Blockchain: Concepts, Issues, and Applications

EnglishTürkçe

BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.003   IUP :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.003    Tam Metin (PDF)

Consumer Insights on Cryptocurrencies: Determining the Main Motivations, Advantages and Risk Factors of Using Cryptocurrency

Merve Kır, Süphan Nasır

Consumer insights related with cryptocurrencies will help to contribute expansion of cryptocurrency market. Thus, within the scope of this study, factors that facilitate the adoption of cryptocurrencies, main motivations of buying cryptocurrencies, perceived advantages and risks associated with cryptocurrencies, trust towards cryptocurrencies, perceived ease of use and usefulness of cryptocurrencies, and also intention to use cryptocurrencies were examined. An online survey was conducted with 831 participants and 322 of them are non-users and 499 of the participants are users. The results indicates differences in knowledge level and expectations related with cryptocurrencies between users and non-users. However, findings of the study shows that users and non-users strongly agree that making legal regulations, providing education about purchase, storage, and use of cryptocurrencies, establishment of price stability, and procurement of cryptocurrencies through banks facilitate widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies. As the result of the factor analysis, reasons of purchasing cryptocurrencies grouped under two main motivations that are “investing and transactioning tool” and “making money in a short time”. Users purchase cryptocurrencies much more as an “investing and transactioning tool” and they do not want to miss opportunities related to cryptocurrencies; so with this motivation they are purchasing cryptocurrencies to gain experience. Easy to use and access, high encryption, fast and low cost transactions and limited supply are among advantages that users consider important. Moreover, perceived risks of cryptocurrencies are explained by two factors; “financial and technical risks’” and “decentralized/ unregularized structure risks”. Since users have experience in purchasing and using cryptocurrencies, they do not perceive cryptocurrencies as so much risky. On the other hand, users’ confidence level towards the honesty of cryptocurrencies’ systems and their related services is moderate.


Anahtar Kelimeler: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, Digital Currency, Perceived Trust, Perceived Risk

Referanslar

  • Alam, T. (2020). mHealth communication framework using blockchain and IoT technologies. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(6). google scholar
  • Alqaryouti, O., Siyam, N., Alkashri, Z., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Cryptocurrency usage impact on perceived be-nefits and users’ behaviour. In European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems (pp. 123-136). google scholar
  • Ananda, A. D., Mumtaza, A. R., Harsyarie, S. D., & Jingga, F. (2022). Cryptocurrency Exchange Application Acceptance with TAM Model in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engi-neering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, March 7-10, 2022. google scholar
  • Aini, Q., Lutfiani, N., Santoso, N. P. L., Sulistiawati, S., & Astriyani, E. (2021). Blockchain for education purpo-se: essential topology. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 5(2), 112-120. google scholar
  • Auer, R., & Claessens, S. (2018). Regulating cryptocurrencies: assessing market reactions. BIS Quarterly Re-view September. google scholar
  • Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper, 3(37), 2-1. google scholar
  • Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2021). Blockchain in education management: present and future appli-cations. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1-17. google scholar
  • Cheng, S., Daub, M., Domeyer, A., & Lundqvist, M. (2017). Using blockchain to improve data management in the public sector. McKinsey Digital, Feb. 2017. google scholar
  • CoinMarketCap (2023, June 25). Today’s Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Cap. Retrieved from https://coin-marketcap.com/coins/ google scholar
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. google scholar
  • Deepika, E. P. E., & Kaur, E. R. (2017). Cryptocurrency: Trends, perspectives and challenges. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(4), 4-6. google scholar
  • Dumitrescu, G. C. (2017). Bitcoin-a brief analysis of the advantages and disadvantages. Global Economic Observer, 5(2), 63-71. google scholar
  • Farell, R. (2015). An analysis of the cryptocurrency industry. University of Pennsylvania Repository, Philadelphia google scholar
  • Financial Conduct Authority. (2019). Cryptoassets: Ownership and Attitudes in the UK. FCA consumer survey research report. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/cryptoassets-ownership-attitudes-uk-consu-mer-survey-research-report.pdf google scholar
  • Folkinshteyn, D., & Lennon, M. (2016). Braving Bitcoin: A technology acceptance model (TAM) analysis. Jour-nal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 18(4), 220-249. google scholar
  • Gaynor, M., Tuttle-Newhall, J., Parker, J., Patel, A., & Tang, C. (2020). Adoption of blockchain in health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e17423. google scholar
  • Guych, N., Anastasia, S., Simon, Y., & Jennet, A. (2018). Factors influencing the intention to use cryptocurrency payments: An examination of blockchain economy. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2018, 1-11. google scholar
  • Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovati-on, 2, 1-12. google scholar
  • Hashemi Joo, M., Nishikawa, Y., & Dandapani, K. (2020). Cryptocurrency, a successful application of blockc-hain technology. Managerial Finance, 46(6), 715-733. google scholar
  • Jalan, A., Matkovskyy, R., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2023). The role of interpersonal trust in cryptocurrency adoption. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 83, 101715. google scholar
  • Khan, R., & Hakami, T. A. (2022). Cryptocurrency: Usability perspective versus volatility threat. Journal of Money and Business, 2(1), 16-28. google scholar
  • Kim, M. J., Chung, N., & Lee, C. K. (2011). The effect of perceived trust on electronic commerce: Shopping online for tourism products and services in South Korea. Tourism Management, 32(2), 256-265. google scholar
  • Koksalmis, G. H., Arpacı, İ., & Koksalmis, E. (2022). Predicting the Intention to Use Bitcoin: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with Perceived Risk Theory. In Recent Innovations in Artificial Intelligence and Smart Applications (pp. 105-120). google scholar
  • Konashevych, O. (2020). Constraints and benefits of the blockchain use for real estate and property rights. Jour-nal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 12(2), 109-127. google scholar
  • Krupa, K. S., & Akhil, M. S. (2019). Reshaping the real estate industry using blockchain. In Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology: Proceedings of International Conference, ICERECT 2018 (pp. 255-263). google scholar
  • Kumpajaya, A., & Dhewanto, W. (2015). The acceptance of Bitcoin in Indonesia: extending TAM with IDT. Jour-nal of Business and Management, 4(1), 28-38. google scholar
  • Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130-141. google scholar
  • Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(4), 346-360. google scholar
  • Mahomed, N. (2017). Understanding consumer adoption of cryptocurrencies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria). google scholar
  • Miraz, M. H., Hasan, M. T., Rekabder, M. S., & Akhter, R. (2022). Trust, transaction transparency, volati-lity, facilitating condition, performance expectancy towards cryptocurrency adoption through intention to use. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 25, 1-20. google scholar
  • Namahoot, K. S., & Rattanawiboonsom, V. (2022). Integration of TAM Model of Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Cryptocurrency Platform in Thailand: The Mediating Role of Attitude and Perceived Risk. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022. google scholar
  • Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2019). Blockchain for secure ehrs sharing of mobile cloud based e-health systems. IEEE Access, 7, 66792-66806. google scholar
  • Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127. google scholar
  • Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2013). An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. Springer New York, 197-223. google scholar
  • Satoshi, N. (2008) Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. google scholar
  • Selimovic, A., Kozaric, K., Zunic, A., & Dzelihodzic, E. Z. (2021). Cryptocurrency-Advantages, Disadvantages, Determinants: Case of Bitcoin. Sarajevo Business & Economics Review (Zbornik Radova), (39). google scholar
  • Singh, A., Parizi, R. M., Zhang, Q., Choo, K. K. R., & Dehghantanha, A. (2020). Blockchain smart contracts formalization: Approaches and challenges to address vulnerabilities. Computers & Security, 88, 101654. google scholar
  • Skiba, D. J. (2017). The potential of blockchain in education and health care. Nursing Education Perspecti-ves, 38(4), 220-221. google scholar
  • Soomro, B. A., Shah, N., & Abdelwahed, N. A. A. (2022). Intention to adopt cryptocurrency: a robust contribu-tion of trust and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. google scholar
  • Ullah, F., & Al-Turjman, F. (2023). A conceptual framework for blockchain smart contract adoption to manage real estate deals in smart cities. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(7), 5033-5054. google scholar
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: exten-ding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157-178. google scholar
  • Warkentin, M., & Orgeron, C. (2020). Using the security triad to assess blockchain technology in public sector applications. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102090. google scholar
  • Willems, K., Holstein, I., Finzel, L., Fritsch, A., & Michelis, D. (2021, September). Study of Student Acceptance of the Cryptocurrency Diem Based on the TAM. In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneur-ship (pp. 1273-R31). google scholar
  • Won-jun, L. (2018). Understanding counsumer acceptance of Fintech Service: An extension of the TAM Model to understand Bitcoin. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(7), 34-37. google scholar
  • Zile, K., & Strazdina, R. (2018). Blockchain use cases and their feasibility. Applied Computer Systems, 23(1), 12-20. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.