Blockchain: Concepts, Issues, and Applications

EnglishTürkçe

BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.005   IUP :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.005    Tam Metin (PDF)

Cryptocurrency Economics and Its Monetary Policy

Gökçin Vural

Cryptocurrency economics, a fusion of blockchain technology and innovative economic models, is revolutionizing global financial landscapes. This exploration traverses fundamental blockchain principles, consensus mechanisms, smart contracts, token economics, fundraising avenues, regulatory challenges, and future prospects. The journey commences with an examination of the evolution of money, setting the stage for the emergence of cryptocurrencies. Blockchain’s pillars—decentralization, immutability, and consensus mechanisms—are pivotal in redefining trust in transactions. Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and inventive Proof of Storage mechanisms elucidate their roles in securing networks.

Smart contracts emerge as pivotal tools automating processes across industries, while the nuances of token economics unveil factors shaping token value and supply dynamics. Fundraising methods such as ICOs, IEOs, IDOs, and STOs are juxtaposed with regulatory intricacies, showcasing both opportunities and challenges. Amidst the global regulatory landscape, the transformative potential of cryptocurrencies comes to light. Promising financial inclusion, streamlined cross-border transactions, and the advent of novel financial ecosystems, cryptocurrencies stand poised to reshape global finance.

In summation, this chapter underscores the transformative force of cryptocurrency economics and its enduring impact. Striking a balance between innovation and regulation, coupled with technological advancement and collaborative endeavors, is paramount to harnessing its full potential. As we embark on an uncharted trajectory, cryptocurrency economics illuminates the path to a reimagined financial future.


Anahtar Kelimeler: Blockchain Technology, Smart Contracts, Consensus Algorithms, Cryptocurrencies, Monetary Policy, Token Economics

Referanslar

  • Abadi, J., & Brunnermeier, M. (2018). Blockchain Economics. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 25407. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w25407 google scholar
  • Anson, M. (2021). Initial exchange offerings: The next evolution in cryptocurrencies. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 23(4), 110-121. google scholar
  • Atıcı, G. (2023). Dijital Ekonomi Blokzinciri ve Finansal Sistem (2nd Edition) (pp. 35-40). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Barreiro-Gomez, J., & Tembine, H. (2019). Blockchain Token Economics: A Mean-Field-Type Game Perspec-tive. IEEE Access, 7, 64603-64613. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917517. google scholar
  • Benedetti, H., Caceres, C., & Abarzua, L. Â. (2023). Utility Tokens. In The Emerald Handbook on Cryptoassets: Investment Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 79-92). Emerald Publishing Limited. google scholar
  • Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2018). Initial Coin Offerings and the Value of Crypto Tokens. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 24418. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w24418 google scholar
  • Chitsaz, E., & Bigdeli, M. (2021). Identifying the Success Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Finance using Initial Dex Offering. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(2), 221-240. google scholar
  • Cong, L., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754-1797. google scholar
  • de Caria, R. (2020). Blockchain and smart contracts: Legal issues and regulatory responses between public and private economic law. Italian Law Journal, 6, 363. google scholar
  • De Filippi, P., Wray, C., & Sileno, G. (2021). Smart contracts. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). doi: 10.14763/2021.2.1549 google scholar
  • Eichengreen, B. (2019). From Commodity to Fiat and Now to Crypto: What Does History Tell Us? NBER Wor-king Paper Series, Working Paper 25426. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w25426 google scholar
  • Ferreira, A. (2020). Emerging regulatory approaches to blockchain based token economy. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association, ISSN Online: 2516-3957, ISSN Print: 2516-3949. https://doi.org/10.31585/ jbba-3-1-(6)2020 google scholar
  • Freni, P., Ferro, E., & Moncada, R. (2020, July). Tokenization and Blockchain Tokens Classification: A morpho-logical framework. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
  • Gervais, A., Karame, G. O., Wüst, K., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., & Capkun, S. (2016). On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on com-puter and communications security (pp. 3-16). google scholar
  • Halaburda, H., Haeringer, G., Gans, J. S., & Gandal, N. (2020). The Microeconomics of Cryptocurrencies. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 27477. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w27477 google scholar
  • Horesh, N. (2012). From Chengdu to Stockholm: A Comparative Study of the Emergence of Paper Money in East and West. Provincial China, 4(1), 68. google scholar
  • Howell, S. T., Niessner, M., & Yermack, D. (2018). Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocur-rency Token Sales. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 24774. Retrieved from http://www.nber. org/papers/w24774 google scholar
  • Joshi, S. (2021). Feasibility of proof of authority as a consensus protocol model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.02480. google scholar
  • Kahn, C. M., Rivadeneyra, F., & Wong, T. (2019). Should the Central Bank Issue E-Money? FRB St. Louis Wor-king Paper No. 2019-3. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3318871 or http://dx.doi.org/10.20955/ wp.2019.003 google scholar
  • Lambert, T., Liebau, D., & Roosenboom, P. (2022). Security token offerings. Small Business Economics, 59, 299-325. doi:10.1007/s11187-021-00539-9. google scholar
  • Lashkari, B., & Musilek, P. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms. IEEE Access, 9, 43620-43652. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065880. google scholar
  • Lesche, P., Sandner, P., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). Implications of the Token Economy: A Taxonomy and Research Agenda. In M.C. Lacity & H. Treiblmaier (Eds.), Blockchains and the Token Economy: Technology, Work and Globalization. (pp 1-30). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95108-5_1 google scholar
  • Makarov, I., & Schoar, A. (2022). Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance (DeFi). NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 30006. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w30006 google scholar
  • Manolache, M. A., Manolache, S., & Tapus, N. (2022). Decision making using the blockchain proof of authority consensus. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 580-588. google scholar
  • Monroe, C. M. (2005). Money and Trade. In Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy (pp. 155-168). doi:10.1002/9780470997086.ch11 google scholar
  • Nguyen, C. T., Hoang, D. T., Nguyen, D. N., Niyato, D., Nguyen, H. T., & Dutkiewicz, E. (2019). Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanisms for Future Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 7, 85727-85745. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925010. google scholar
  • Ritter, J. A. (1994). The Transition from Barter to Fiat Money. Working Paper 1994-004A. Federal Reserve google scholar
  • Bank of St. Louis, Research Division. Retrieved from http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/1994/94-004.pdfc google scholar
  • Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Auditing with Smart Contracts. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18. pp. 1-27 ISSN: 2340-5058 google scholar
  • Saleh, F. (2021). Blockchain without Waste: Proof-of-Stake. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1156-1190. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa075. google scholar
  • Selgin, G. (2003). Adaptive Learning and the Transition to Fiat Money. The Economic Journal, 113(484), 147165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00094 google scholar
  • Sockin, M., & Xiong, W. (2022). Decentralization Through Tokenization. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 29720. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w29720 google scholar
  • Sundararajan, V. (1991). Chapter 16 Financial Sector Reform and Central Banking in Centrally Planned Eco-nomies. In The Evolving Role of Central Banks (pp. 249-268). International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Suratkar, S., Shirole, M., & Bhirud, S. (2020, September). Cryptocurrency wallet: A review. In 2020 4th In-ternational Conference on Computer, Communication and Signal Processing (ICCCSP) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. google scholar
  • Tapscott, A., & Tapscott, D. (2017, March 01). Financial Markets: How Blockchain Is Changing Finan-ce. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://capital.report/Resources/Whitepapers/40fc8a-6a-cdbd-47e6-83f6-74e2a9d36ccc_finance_topic2_source2.pdf google scholar
  • Teichmann, F., & Falker, M. C. (2020). Blockchain: Implications of the impending token economy. In Scien-tific and Technical Revolution: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (pp. 1551-1565). Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  • Xu, Y., Chong, H. Y., & Chi, M. (2021). A review of smart contracts applications in various industries: A pro-curement perspective. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5530755 google scholar
  • Zhang, R., & Chan, W. K. V. (2020). Evaluation of energy consumption in block-chains with proof of work and proof of stake. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1584(1), 012023. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1584/1/012023 google scholar
  • Zou, W., Lo, D., Kochhar, P. S., Le, X. B. D., Xia, X., Feng, Y., ... & Xu, B. (2019). Smart contract development: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 47(10), 2084-2106. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.