BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.009   IUP :10.26650/B/T8SSc4.2024.041.009    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Nexus of DeFi and CeFi: A Look at The Future Monetary System

Gonca Atıcı

In this study, we explore the multifaceted blockchain technology in terms of economics and finance. Detecting the literature gap in this field, we analyze the nexus of centralized finance (CeFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). We question the relationship between DeFi and stablecoins and ask whether the next global financial crisis might be triggered by the stablecoins. We search whether DeFi and CeFi be complementaries or substitutes of one another in the following years. We review the progress of CBDCs that evolve at warp speed. Through our research, we take a look at the future monetary system, the position of central banks within this system, and the global cooperation possibilities.

Our study shed light on the literature by covering both theoretical and practical aspects of this complex issue. We believe it will be the first attempt to cover the critical dimensions of the subject with an integrated view. We conduct our study by analyzing the recent articles on the WoS database. We select the studies by applying several inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, we present the results and limitations of the study. 


Anahtar Kelimeler: BlockchainCe-FiDe-FistablecoinsCBDCs

Referanslar

  • Atici, G. (2018). Bitcoin and blockchain: a threat or opportunity for the financial system. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 4(3). google scholar
  • Atıcı, G. (2023). Dijital ekonomi blokzinciri ve finansal sistem (2nd ed). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Atici, G. (2022). The Nexus of Blockchain and Governance: A use Case of Blockchain on Tarde Finance. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 12(2). google scholar
  • Baek, C., & Elbeck, M. (2015). Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look. Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 30-34. google scholar
  • Briola, A., Vidal-Tomas, D., Wang, Y., & Aste, T. (2023). Anatomy of a Stablecoin’s failure: The Terra-Luna case. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103358. google scholar
  • Carstens, A., Frost, J., & Shin, H. S. (2022). A Foundation of Trust. Finance & Development. google scholar
  • Fry, J., & Ibiloye, O. (2023). Towards a taxonomy for crypto assets. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2207266. google scholar
  • Galanti, S., & Özsoy, Ç. Y. (2023). Can Blockchain Help Improve Financial Inclusion? A Comparative Study. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 438-449. google scholar
  • Iwashita, N. (2021). Facebook’s Libra is far from broad acceptance as a world currency. Evolutionary and Ins-titutional Economics Review, 18(1), 335-339. google scholar
  • Keller, A., & Stolzenberg, B. (2021). Decentralized finance: Defining the future of finance (PwC Report). Ret-rieved from https://www.pwc.ch/en/insights/digital/defi-defining-the-future-of-finance.html google scholar
  • Kumhof, M., & Noone, C. (2021). Central bank digital currencies—Design principles for financial stability. Eco-nomic Analysis and Policy, 71, 553-572. google scholar
  • Li, S., & Huang, Y. (2021). The genesis, design, and implications of China’s central bank digital currency. China Economic Journal, 14(1), 67-77. google scholar
  • Mishkin F. S. (2009). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. United Kingdom, UK: Pearson Education Limited. google scholar
  • Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Bitcoin. org. Disponible en https://bitcoin. org/en/bitcoin-paper. google scholar
  • Savona, P. (2022). Prospects for Reforming the Money and Financial System. Open Economies Review, 33(1), 187-195. google scholar
  • Schroeder, S. K. (2023). Greening Monetary Policy: CBDCs and Community Development Banks. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 654-660. google scholar
  • Siu, R. C. (2023). Social, Political, and Economic Dimensions of the Instituted Process of Central Bank Digital Currency: The Case of the Digital Yuan. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 458-465. google scholar
  • Spithoven, A. (2023). Virtual Property and Governance Structures with Blockchain. Journal of Economic Is-sues, 57(2), 466-475. google scholar
  • Temperini, J., & Corsi, M. (2023). Democratizing money? The role of cryptocurrencies. PSL Quarterly Re-view, 76(304). 51-66. google scholar
  • Tong, W., & Jiayou, C. (2021). A study of the economic impact of central bank digital currency under global competition. China Economic Journal, 14(1), 78-101. google scholar
  • Tong, W., Yunsong, X., Jiaqi, L., & Qingyang, D. (2020). Does Digital Currency Have Safe Haven Propert-y-based on the Perspective of Macroeconomic Financial Uncertainity. Journal of Financial Development Research, (7), 1-12. google scholar
  • Trebat, N. M. (2023). Stateless Money? Cryptocurrency and Digital Banking in Brazil. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 450-457. google scholar
  • https://a8f59890210bb2a36cc265c34c80a801c14e01d5.vetisonline.com/wos/woscc/basic-search google scholar
  • Yardeni Research, Inc. (2017). Global Economic Briefing: Central Bank Balance Sheets. USA. google scholar
  • Zhang, R., Chen, X., Li, Z., & Qiu, P. (2023). Innovation under an umbrella: how can blockchain contribute to corporate innovation in the age of globalization. Technological and Economic Development of Eco-nomy, 29(3), 1005-1040. google scholar
  • Quin, K., Zhou, L., Afonin, Y., Lazzaretti, L., & Gervais, A. (2021). CeFi vs. DeFi--Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08157. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.