BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/SS05ET50.2024.016.09   IUP :10.26650/B/SS05ET50.2024.016.09    Tam Metin (PDF)

Evaluation of Sustainable Practices and Company Profitability of Transportation and Logistics Business

Ebru DemirciCengiz Görkem AkınJan Benus

Sustainability assessments are made by considering financial and non-financial indicators. Various profitability measures (such as EVA, CFROI, ROA, ROE) are used to analyze the financial status of companies and measure their profitability. The aim of the article is to apply the profitability criteria to the corporate data of 6 logistics and transportation companies in Europe and Turkey and to measure the level of significance between the sustainability performance criteria of the companies. This study is based on the information obtained through a comprehensive literature review on sustainability and profitability criteria, and the financial statements and balance sheets of companies. Obtained data were analyzed by correlation and ANOVA. As a result of the research, EVA, which is among the profitability criteria, gave the most similar result to the total sustainability performance score ranking. However, the closest result to the social sustainability performance score ranking was the ROA and ROE profitability criteria ranking, while the closest result to the economic sustainability performance score ranking was the EVA profitability criterion.



Referanslar

  • Baah C, Amponsah KT, Issau K, Ofori D, Acquah IS, Agyeman DO. Examining the interconnections betwe-en sustainable logistics practices, environmental reputation and financial performance: a mediation appro-ach. Vision 2021;25(1):47-64. google scholar
  • Deakin E. Sustainable development and sustainable transportation: strategies for economic prosperity, en-vironmental quality, and equity. 2001. google scholar
  • Ramudhin A, Chaabane A, Paquet M. On the design of sustainable, green supply chains. In:2009 Internati-onal Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering. IEEE 2009;6:979-84. google scholar
  • Gao PX, Curtis AR, Wong B, Keshav S. It’s not easy being green. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communi-cation Review 2012;42(4):211-22. google scholar
  • Maheshwari P, Khaddar R, Kachroo P, Paz A. Dynamic modeling of performance indices for planning of sustainable transportation systems. Networks and Spatial Economics 2016;16(1):371-93. google scholar
  • De Souza LL, Lora EE, Palacio JC, Rocha MH, Reno ML, Venturini OJ. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional vehicles with different fuel options, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles for a sustainable transportation system in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018;203:444-68. google scholar
  • Shi Y, Arthanari T, Liu X, Yang B. Sustainable transportation management: Integrated modeling and support. Journal of cleaner Production 2019;212:1381-95. google scholar
  • Tercan ŞH, Eid B, Heidenreich M, Kogler K, Akyürek Ö. Financial and technical analyses of solar boats as a means of sustainable transportation. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2021;25:404-12. google scholar
  • de Brito M. Managing reverse logistics or reversing logistics management? 2004 Feb 12. google scholar
  • Mollenkopf D, Closs D, Twede D, Lee S, Burgess G. Assessing the viability of reusable packaging: a relative cost approach. Journal of Business Logistics 2005;26(1):169-97. google scholar
  • Abdullah NA, Yaakub S. Reverse logistics: pressure for adoption and the impact on firm’s performance. International Journal of Business and Society 2014;15(1):151. google scholar
  • Govindan K, Soleimani H, Kannan D. Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research 2015;240(3):603-26. google scholar
  • Cannella S, Bruccoleri M, Framinan JM. Closed-loop supply chains: What reverse logistics factors influence performance? International Journal of Production Economics 2016;175:35-49. google scholar
  • Dias KT, Braga Junior SS. The use of reverse logistics for waste management in a Brazilian grocery retailer. Waste Management & Research 2016;34(1):22-9. google scholar
  • Khan SA, Dong QL, Zhang YU, Khan SS. Research on decision-making of green reverse logistics in enterp-rises: A case study on electronic products manufacturers from the perspective of South Africa. In2017 2nd International Conference on Advances in Management Engineering and Information Technology AMEIT 2017;11-18. google scholar
  • Morgan TR, Tokman M, Richey RG, Defee C. Resource commitment and sustainability: a reverse logistics performance process model. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2018 Feb 21. google scholar
  • Nagurney A, Toyasaki F. Reverse supply chain management and electronic waste recycling: a multitiered network equilibrium framework for e-cycling. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2005;41(1):1-28. google scholar
  • Verghese K, Lewis H. Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach. Interna-tional Journal of Production Research 2007;45(18-19):4381-401. google scholar
  • Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management 2013;33(1):220-32. google scholar
  • Bartolacci F, Paolini A, Quaranta AG, Soverchia M. The relationship between good environmental practices and financial performance: Evidence from Italian waste management companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2018;14:129-35. google scholar
  • Bartolacci F, Paolini A, Quaranta AG, Soverchia M. Assessing factors that influence waste management financial sustainability. Waste Management 2018;79:571-9. google scholar
  • Pujara Y, Pathak P, Sharma A, Govani J. Review on Indian Municipal Solid Waste Management practices for reduction of environmental impacts to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Environmental Management 201915;248:109238. google scholar
  • Gull AA, Atif M, Ahsan T, Derouiche I. Does waste management affect firm performance? International evidence. Economic Modelling. 2022;114:105932. google scholar
  • Lewis H. Defining product stewardship and sustainability in the Australian packaging industry. Environmen-tal Science & Policy 2005;8(1):45-55. google scholar
  • Sonneveld K, James K, Fitzpatrick L, Lewis H. Sustainable packaging: how do we define and measure it. In 22nd IAPRI Symposium 2005 May (pp. 1-9). google scholar
  • Bucci DZ, Forcellini FA. Sustainable packaging design model. InComplex Systems Concurrent Engineering: Collaboration, Technology Innovation and Sustainability 2007 (pp. 363-370). Springer London. google scholar
  • Zailani S, Jeyaraman K, Vengadasan G, Premkumar R. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics 2012;140(1):330-40. google scholar
  • Chhabra D, Garg SK, Singh RK. Analyzing alternatives for green logistics in an Indian automotive organi-zation: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017;167:962-9. google scholar
  • Atmaca M, Çalgüner AL. Effect of packaging design and designer on sustainable development. Gazi Univer-sity Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 2018;6(4):179-85. google scholar
  • Meherishi L, Narayana SA, Ranjani KS. Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019;237:117582. google scholar
  • Afif K, Rebolledo C, Roy J. Drivers, barriers and performance outcomes of sustainable packaging: a syste- matic literature review. British Food Journal 2022;124(3):915-35. google scholar
  • Carter CR, Jennings MM. Logistics social responsibility: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Logistics 2002;23(1):145-80. google scholar
  • Olhager J, Selldin E. Supply chain management survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics 2004;89(3):353-61. google scholar
  • Eesley C, Lenox MJ. Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal 2006;27(8):765-81. google scholar
  • Colicchia C, Marchet G, Melacini M, Perotti S. Building environmental sustainability: empirical evidence from Logistics Service Providers. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013;59:197-209. google scholar
  • Santis P, Albuquerque A, Lizarelli F. Do sustainable companies have a better financial performance? A study on Brazilian public companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016;133:735-45. google scholar
  • Fernando RA. Strategic corporate sustainability-key approaches for creating strategies for environmental sustainability. Vision 2017;21(2):vii-ix. google scholar
  • Gupta A, Singh RK, Suri PK. Prioritizing critical success factors for sustainable service quality management by logistics service providers. Vision 2018;22(3):295-305. google scholar
  • Gustavo Jr JU, Pereira GM, Bond AJ, Viegas CV, Borchardt M. Drivers, opportunities and barriers for a re-tailer in the pursuit of more sustainable packaging redesign. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018;187:18-28. google scholar
  • Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Afum E, Ahenkorah E. Exploring financial performance and green logistics mana-gement practices: Examining the mediating influences of market, environmental and social performances. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020;1-13. google scholar
  • Bansal P, Roth K. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 2000;43(4):717-36. google scholar
  • Carter CR, Dresner M. Purchasing’s role in environmental management: cross-fUnctional development of grounded theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2001;37(2):12-27. google scholar
  • Zsidisin GA, Siferd SP. Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 2001;7(1):61-73. google scholar
  • Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain ma-nagement. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008;16(15):1699-710. google scholar
  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J. The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research 2007;45(18-19):4333-55. google scholar
  • Carter CR, Rogers DS. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management. 2008 Jun 13. google scholar
  • Teuteberg F, Wittstruck D. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010. 2010:203. google scholar
  • Kim ST, Lee SY. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental logistics practices: is eco-oriented culture a missing link? The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2012 Aug 10. google scholar
  • Li D, Cao C, Zhang L, Chen X, Ren S, Zhao Y. Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017;166:1323-34. google scholar
  • Huang Y, Wang Z. Information sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. International Journal of Production Economics 2017;191:113-27. google scholar
  • Hassan AY, Nasereddin HH. Information sharing characteristics in supply chain management. EPH-Interna-tional Journal of Business & Management Science 2018;4(1):1-6. google scholar
  • Baah C, Jin Z. Sustainable supply chain management and organizational performance: the intermediary role of competitive advantage. J. Mgmt. & Sustainability 2019;9:119. google scholar
  • Christmann P. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 2000;43(4):663-80. google scholar
  • Carter CR, Kale R, Grimm CM. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2000;36(3):219-28. google scholar
  • Sarkis J. A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production 2003;11(4):397-409. google scholar
  • Watson K, Klingenberg B, Polito T, Geurts TG. Impact of environmental management system implementation on financial performance: A comparison of two corporate strategies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 2004 Dec 1. google scholar
  • Li S, Ragu-Nathan B, Ragu-Nathan TS, Rao SS. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega 2006;34(2):107-24. google scholar
  • Gonzalez-Benito J, Gonzalez-Benito O. The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research 2006;44(7):1353-73. google scholar
  • Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R. Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment 2008;17(1):30-45. google scholar
  • Lin CY, Ho YH. Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of Bu-siness Ethics 2011;98:67-83. google scholar
  • Lai KH, Wong CW. Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega. 2012 Jun 1;40(3):267-82. google scholar
  • Beske P, Land A, Seuring S. Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics 2014;152:131-43. google scholar
  • Bag S. Identification of green procurement drivers and their interrelationship using total interpretive struc-tural modelling. Vision 2017;21(2):129-42. google scholar
  • de Camargo Fiorini P, Jabbour CJ. Information systems and sustainable supply chain management towards a more sustainable society: Where we are and where we are going. International Journal of Information Management 2017;37(4):241-9. google scholar
  • Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Singh R. The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and finan-cial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics 2019;212:111-24. google scholar
  • Baah C, Opoku-Agyeman D, Acquah IS, Issau K, Abdoulaye FA. Understanding the influence of environ-mental production practices on firm performance: a proactive versus reactive approach. Journal of Manu-facturing Technology Management. 2020 Sep 10. google scholar
  • Ali AH, Gruchmann T, Melkonyan A. Assessing the impact of sustainable logistics service quality on re-lationship quality: Survey-based evidence in Egypt. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain 2022;4:100036. google scholar
  • Vâlceanu G, Robu V, Georgescu N. Economic and financial analysis. Omnia Uni Publishing House, Braşov. 2004. google scholar
  • Dicu C, Bondoc MD, Popescu MB. A quantitative approach to profitability ratios. Scientific Bulletin-Eco-nomic Sciences, University of Pitesti 2019;18(1):57-65. google scholar
  • Gibson CH. Study Guide Financial Statement Analysis: Using Financial Accounting Information. College Division, South-Western Publishing Company; 1992. google scholar
  • Gibson CH. Financial reporting and analysis. Cengage Learning; 2012 May 10. google scholar
  • Alvarez F, Fridson MS. Financial Statement Analysis Workbook: A Practitioner’s Guide. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Jun 3. google scholar
  • Maynard J. Financial accounting, reporting, and analysis. Oxford University Press; 2017. google scholar
  • Petersen CV, Plenborg T. Financial statement analysis: valuation, credit analysis and executive compensation. Pearson Longman; 2012. google scholar
  • Stickney CP. Financial statement analysis: A strategic perspective. (No Title). 1990 Jan. google scholar
  • Stickney CP, Brown PR, Wahlen JM. Financial reporting, financial statement analysis, and valuation: A strategic perspective. Thomson/South-Western; 2007. google scholar
  • Bryson JR, Lombardi R. Balancing product and process sustainability against business profitability: Sus-tainability as a competitive strategy in the property development process. Business Strategy and the Envi-ronment 2009;18(2):97-107. google scholar
  • Osmanagic Bedenik N. Business between profitability and sustainability. EFZG Working Paper Series 2018(03):1-0. google scholar
  • dan Perbankan JK. The impact of firm size, leverage, firm age, media visibility and profitability on sustai-nability report disclosure. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan 2021;25(1):36-47. google scholar
  • Rizki MK, Agriyanto R, Farida DN. The effect of sustainability report and profitability on company value: Evidence from Indonesian Sharia shares. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 2019;10(1):117-40. google scholar
  • Yang Q, Crowther D. The relationship between CSR, profitability and sustainability in China. InBusiness Strategy and Sustainability 2012 May 24 (Vol. 3, pp. 155-175). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. google scholar
  • Morhardt JE, Baird S, Freeman K. Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2002;9(4):215-33. google scholar
  • Karahan G. Firma Piyasa Değerinin Belirlenmesinde EVA ve Geleneksel Performans Ölçüm Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, İşletme Yönetimi, İstanbul. 2011; 31. google scholar
  • Ghassim B, Bogers M. Linking stakeholder engagement to profitability through sustainability-oriented in-novation: A quantitative study of the minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019;224:905-19. google scholar
  • Jankalova M, Kurotova J. Sustainability assessment using economic value added. Sustainability 2019;12(1):318. google scholar
  • Jyoti G, Khanna A. Does sustainability performance impact financial performance? Evidence from Indian service sector firms. Sustainable Development 2021;29(6):1086-95. google scholar
  • Pham DC, Do TN, Doan TN, Nguyen TX, Pham TK. The impact of sustainability practices on financial performance: empirical evidence from Sweden. Cogent Business & Management 2021;8(1):1912526. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.