Referanslar

• Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01568.x google scholar
• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Aysoy, M. (2004). Avrupa Birliği sürecinde özürlüler politikası. Açı Kitaplar. google scholar
• Bagenstos, S.R. (2009). Law and the contradictions of the disability rights movement. Yale University Press. google scholar
• Barnes, C. (2012). Understanding the social model of disability past, present and future. N. Watson, A. Roulstone ve C. Thomas (Ed.), Routledge handbook of disability studies, içinde (s. 12-29). Routledge. google scholar
• Barnes, C. ve Mercer, G. (2006). Independent futures: Creating user-led disability services in a disabling society. The Policy Press. google scholar
• Beaulaurier, R.L. ve Taylor, S.H. (2007). Social work practice with people with disabilities in the era of disability rights. A.O. Dell ve P.W. Power (Eds.), Psychological and social impact of illness and disability, içinde (s. 53-75). Springer Publishing. google scholar
• Blaug, R., Horner, L. ve Lekhi, R. (2006). Public value, politics and public management. The Work Foundation. google scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest. Georgetown University Press. google scholar
• Brisenden, S. (1986). Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 1(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674648666780171 google scholar
• Brown, P.R. (2021). Public value measurement vs. public value creating imagination - the constraining influence of old and new public management paradigms. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 808817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1903498 google scholar
• Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C. ve Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. https://doi. org/10.1111/puar.12238 google scholar
• Buntinx, W.H. ve Schalock, R.L. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and ındividualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00278.x google scholar
• Burcu, E. (2007). Türkiye’de özürlü birey olma: Temel sosyolojik özellikleri ve sorunları üzerine bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
• Charlton, J.I. (2000). “Nothing about us without us” disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press. google scholar
• Cole, M. ve Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking public value: a new model for achieving high performance in public service. Wiley. google scholar
• Cooper, J. (2000). Improving the civil rights of people with disabilities through international law. J. Cooper (Ed.), Law, rights and disability, içinde (s. 59-81). Jessica Kingsley. google scholar
• Cordella, A., Paletti, A. ve Shaikh, M. (2018). Renegotiating public value with co-production. C.L. Tucci, A. Afuah ve G. Viscusi (Eds.), Creating and capturing value through crowdsourcing, içinde (s. 181-197). Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/ convention_eng.pdf adresinden 13 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• Çağlar, S. (2009). Uluslararası hukuk ve Türk hukuk sisteminde engellilerin eğitim hakkı ve devlet yükümlülükleri. Beta Yayınları. google scholar
• Çukurçayır, M.A. (2003). Çok boyutlu bir kavram olarak yönetişim. H. Özgür ve M. Acar (Eds.), Çağdaş kamu yönetimi I, içinde (s. 259-275). Nobel Kitabevi. google scholar
• Davis, L.J. (2006). Introduction. L.J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader, içinde (s. vx-xviii). Routledge. google scholar
• De Vries, M.S. ve Kim, P.S. (2011). Introduction to value and virtue in public administration. M.S. De Vries ve P.S. Kim (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective, içinde (s. 1-17). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Denek, S. (2019). Yeni kamu hizmeti düşüncesi: değişen kamu hizmeti anlayışı. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1). 418-439. google scholar
• Denhardt, J.V. ve Denhardt, R.B. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering. M.E. Sharpe. google scholar
• Denhardt, R.B. ve Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117 google scholar
• Denhardt, R.B. ve Denhardt, J.V. (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013 google scholar
• Drake, R.F. (1999). Understanding disability policies. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Erbil-Erdugan, F. (2010). Türkiye’de özürlü yoksulluğu ve mücadele politikalarının değerlendirilmesi: Ankara-Keçiören örneği. Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
• Eroğul, C. (2014). Siyasal Katılma. G. Atılgan ve E. Aytekin (Eds.), Siyaset bilimi: Kavramlar, ideolojiler, disiplinlerarası ilişkiler, içinde (s. 227-237). Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Erten, Ş. (2019). 2030 Sürdürülebilir kalkınma gündemi ve engelliler: Güçlendirme kavramı çerçevesinde bir değerlendirme. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 22(2), 890-902. https:// doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.622299 google scholar
• Erten, Ş. (2021). Kamu değeri: tanımı ve ölçülmesi üzerine bir inceleme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1). 104-125. google scholar
• Erten, Ş. (2022). Vatandaşların ortak yapımcı rolü: Yeni kamu hizmeti yaklaşımı ve kamu değer teorisi çerçevesinde bir değerlendirme. J.V. Andrei ve M.E. Kalgi (Eds.). 5th International Aegean Conferences on Social Sciences & Humanities Full Texts Book, içinde (s. 144-156), ISPEC Publications. google scholar
• European Comission. (2019). Access city award 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main. jsp?langId=envecatId=88veeventsId=1375vefurtherEvents=yes#navItem-1 adresinden 25 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Access city award 2021: Examples of best practices in making EU cities more accessible. EU Publications. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24020velangId=en adresinden 25 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Access cities awards 2022- rules of competition. EU Pablications. https:// ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24076velangId=en adresinden 25 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• Faulkner, N. ve Kaufman, S. (2018). Avoiding theoretical stagnation: A systematic review and framework for measuring public value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 69-86. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-8500.12251 google scholar
• Ghosh, N. (2012). Disabled definitions, impaired policies: Reflections on limits of dominant concepts of disability. Occasional Paper 34. Institute of Development Studies Kolkata. google scholar
• Gözler, K. (20117). İnsan hakları hukukuna giriş. Ekin Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Güler, B.A. (2005a). Yeni sağ ve devletin değişimi. İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
• Güler, B.A. (2005b). Devlette reform yazıları. Paraf Yayınları. google scholar
• Hammarberg, T. (2012). Avrupa’da insan hakları. (A. Ekmekçi, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
• Hansen, C. ve Sait, W. (2011). “We too are disabled”: Disability grants and poverty politics in rural South Africa. A.H. Eide ve B. Ingstad (Eds.), Disability and poverty: A global challenge, içinde (s. 93-119). Policy Press. google scholar
• Hefetz, A. ve Warner, M.E. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289-317. https:// doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur006 google scholar
• Hills, D. ve Sullivan, F. (2006). Measuring public value II: Practical approaches. The Work Foundation. google scholar
• Hiranandani, V.S. (2005). Rethinking disability in social work: Interdisciplinary perspectives. G.E. May ve M.B. Raske (Eds.), Endling disability discrimination: Strategies for social workers, içinde (s. 71-82). Pearson Education. google scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x google scholar
• Jaeger, P.T. ve Bowman, C.A. (2005). Understanding disability. Greenwood Publishing. google scholar
• Kearney, R.C. ve Hays, S.W. (1998). Reinventing government, the new public management and civil service systems in international perspective: The danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9801800404 google scholar
• Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00334 google scholar
• Koray, M. (2007). Sosyal politikanın anlamı ve işlevini tartışmak. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, (4), 19-56. google scholar
• Lang, R. (2007). The development and critique of the social model of disability, Working paper. Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/iehc/research/epidemiology-public-health/research/leonard-cheshire-research adresinden 06 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• Lee, T.M. (2005). Multicultural citizenship: The case of the disabled. D. Pothier ve R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy and law, içinde (s. 87-106). UBC Press. google scholar
• Linton, S. (2006). Reassigning meaning. L.J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader, içinde (s. 161-173). Routledge. google scholar
• Lord, J.E., Guernsey, K.N., Balfe, J.M. ve Karr, V.L. (2007). İnsan hakları. Evet! Engelli haklarına dair eylem ve savunuculuk. N. Flowers (Ed.), (Ç. Gülabioğlu ve E. Çopuroğlu, Çev.). Minnesota Üniversitesi İnsan Hakları Merkezi. google scholar
• Lutz, B.J. ve Bowers, B.J. (2007). Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. A.E. Orto ve P.W. Power (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of illness and disability, içinde (s. 11-22). Springer Publishing Company. google scholar
• Mackelprang, R.W. ve Salsgiver, R.O. (2009). Disability: A diversity model approach in human service practice. Lyceum Books. google scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632 google scholar
• Meynhardt, T. ve Bartholomes, S. (2011). (De)Composing public value: In search of basic dimensions and common ground. International Public Management Journal, 14(3), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/109 67494.2011.618389 google scholar
• Mitra, S. ve Yap, J. (2021). The disability data report 2021. Fordham Research Consortium on Disability. google scholar
• Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harward University Press. google scholar
• O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x google scholar
• Okur, N. ve Erbil-Erdugan, F. (2010). Sosyal haklar ve özürlüler: Özürlülük modelleri bağlamında tarihsel bir değerlendirme. Sosyal haklar ulusal sempozyumu II bildiriler kitabı, içinde (s. 245-263). Petrol-İş Yayınları. google scholar
• Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z. ve Nasi, G. (2012). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158. https://doi. org/10.1177/0275074012466935 google scholar
• Öz, E. (1992). Tek parti yönetimi ve siyasal katılım. Gündoğan Yayınları. google scholar
• ÖZİDA. (1999). I. Özürlüler şûrası: Komisyon raporları, genel kurul görüşmeleri. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
• ÖZİDA. (2005). II. Özürlüler şûrası: Komisyon raporları, genel kurul görüşmeleri. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
• ÖZİDA. (2007). III. Özürlüler şûrası: Komisyon raporları, genel kurul görüşmeleri. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
• ÖZİDA. (2009). IV. Özürlüler şûrası: Komisyon raporları ve genel kurul görüşmeleri. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
• Page, N. ve Czuba, C.E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5), 1-5. google scholar
• Perry, J.L. (2007). Democracy and the new public service. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296091 google scholar
• Pfeiffer, D. (2005). The conceptualization of disability. G.E. May ve M.B. Raske (Eds.), Ending disability discrimination: Strategies for social workers, içinde (s. 25-44). Pearson. google scholar
• Picking, C. (2000). Working in partnership with disabled people. J. Cooper (Ed.), Law rights and disability, içinde (s. 11-33). Jessica Kingsley. google scholar
• Quinn, G., Degener, T., Bruce, A., Burke, C., Castellino, J., Kenna, P. ve Quinlivan, S. (2002). Human rights and disability: The current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. United Nations Publications. google scholar
• Rhodes, R.A. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x google scholar
• Rioux, M.H. (2008). Disability, citizenship and rights in a changing world. C. Barnes, M. Oliver ve L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today, içinde (s. 210-228). Blackwell Publishers. google scholar
• Rioux, M.H. ve Valentine, F. (2005). Does theory matter? Exploring the nexus between disability human rights and public policy. D. Pothier ve R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy and law, içinde (s. 47-69). UBC Press. google scholar
• Robinson, M. (2015). From old public administration to the new public service: Implications for public sector reform in developing countries. UNDP. google scholar
• Saran, U. (2004). Kamu yönetiminde yeniden yapılanma kalite odaklı bir yaklaşım. Atlas Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Sarıbay, A. (1992). Siyasal sosyoloji. Gündoğan yayınları. google scholar
• Shekhar, R. (2009). Global perspective on disability. Abhishek Publications. google scholar
• Siebers, T. (2006). Disability in theory: Disability in theory to the new realism of the body. L.J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader, içinde (s. 173-185). Routledge. google scholar
• Stainton, T. (2005). Empowerment and the architecture of rights based social policy. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629505059266 google scholar
• Stein, M.A. (2007). Disability human rights. California Law Review, 95(75), 75-122 google scholar
• Stewart, J. (2021). Creating public value in a Westminster context: The case of the Australian Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet’s Indigenous Regional Network, 2013-2018. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 826-834. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1850779 google scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583 google scholar
• UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). Sustainable development goals and disability. https:// www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/about-us/sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-and-disability.html adresinden 21 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. https:// www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf adresinden 13 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
• UPIAS. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. UPIAS. google scholar
• Wang, X. ve Wang, Z. (2019). Beyond efficiency or justice: the structure and measurement of public servants’ public values preferences. Administration & Society, 52(2), 1-29 https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719843658 google scholar
• Warner, S., Brown, P.R. ve Cherney, L. (2021). Public values in pluralistic and complex settings - Are agonistic ideas the answer? International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 857-866. https://doi.org/10.108 0/01900692.2021.1909620 google scholar
• Wedel, H. (2013). Siyaset ve cinsiyet: İstanbul gecekondularında kadınların siyasal katılımı. (C. Kurultay, Çev.). Metis Yayınları. google scholar
• WHO and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization. google scholar