Making the Planet More Habitable: Business Perspectives for Social Economy

EnglishTürkçe

BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/SS05.2023.003.05   IUP :10.26650/B/SS05.2023.003.05    Tam Metin (PDF)

Social Enterprise: A New Form of the New Corporate Social Responsibility

Özgür Atılgan

Although enterprises have been trying to find solutions to social problems with corporate social responsibility projects in recent years, these projects, which are often implemented, have not been sufficient to increase social welfare. In line with these developments, it is observed that attempts to fulfill the social duties ignored by the states and by profit-seeking enterprises evolved into social enterprises. Social enterprises are defined as “private enterprises that seek to realize a social purpose, generate commercial profits (both from the equity of their founders and from public and private enterprises), as well as traditional sources of income. In this context, the main objective of this book section is to describe the gradual transformation from corporate social responsibility to social enterprises. In the first part, the concept of corporate social responsibility is detailed in detail with the different definitions given. Secondly, the dimensions of corporate social responsibility are explained. The third section covers international standards in the field of corporate social responsibility. In the fourth chapter, the evolution of corporate social responsibility towards social enterprises is determined. Finally, the conclusion of the section is given.


Anahtar Kelimeler: Social Economy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Enterprise

Referanslar

  • Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12(1), 1-124. google scholar
  • Amba-Rao, S. C. (1993). Multinational corporate social responsibility, ethics, interactions and third world governments: An agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(7), 553-572. google scholar
  • Aslan, G., Araza, A., & Bulut, Ç. (2012). Sosyal girişimciliğin kavramsal çerçevesi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 7(2), 69-88. google scholar
  • Baden, D. (2016). A reconstruction of Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility for the 21st century. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1-15. google scholar
  • BARDAŞ, P., Rotaru, S., GHTJÀ, M., & Cocosila, M. (2013). The Caux Round Table Principles: A Solution For The International Economic And Social Crisis?. Review of General Management, 17(1). google scholar
  • Berger-Walliser, G., & Scott, I. (2018). Redefining corporate social responsibility in an era of globalization and regulatory hardening. American Business Law Journal, 55(1), 167-218. google scholar
  • Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2014). The United Nations global compact: An institutionalist perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 217-223. google scholar
  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2017). Profit with purpose? A theory of social enterprise. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 19-58. google scholar
  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row google scholar
  • Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press. google scholar
  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132. google scholar
  • Buhmann, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and business responsibilities for human rights. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 25(4), 331-352. google scholar
  • Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59-74. google scholar
  • Carlson, P., & Blodgett, M. S. (1997). International ethics standards for business: NAFTA, CAUX principles and corporate codes of ethics. Review of Business, 18(3), 20-24. google scholar
  • Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility—an inside perspective. International journal of production economics, 113(1), 74-87. google scholar
  • Coffee Jr, J. C. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford review of economic policy, 21(2), 198-211. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (1994). Social issues in management research: experts’ views, analysis, and commentary. Business & Society, 33(1), 5-29. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), 85-105. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Organizational dynamics, 44(2), 87-96. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Corporate social responsibility. google scholar
  • Chatterjee, B., & Ray, R. (2016). Impact of trade vs. non-trade policies on the incidence of child labour: A two-sector general equilibrium framework. Foreign Trade Review, 51(4), 287-297. google scholar
  • Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business horizons, 50(6), 449-454. google scholar
  • Conway, M., Ellingrud, K., Nowski, T., & Wittemyer, R. (2018). Closing the tech gender gap through philanthropy and corporate social responsibility. McKinsey & Company. google scholar
  • Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 355-370. google scholar
  • Denizalp, H. (2009). Toplumsal dönüşüm için sosyal girişimcilik rehberi (2. Baskı). Ankara: Sivil Toplum Geliştirme Merkezi Yayını, Odak Ofset Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., & Haugh, H. (2009). The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate— social enterprise collaboration. Organization studies, 30(8), 887-907. google scholar
  • Diener, K. W. (2013). The charitable responsibilities model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 7, 1. google scholar
  • Dignam, A., & Galanis, M. (1999). Governing the world: The development of the OECD’s corporate governance principles. Eur. Bus. L. Rev., 10, 396. google scholar
  • Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review (pre-1986), 26(000002), 53. google scholar
  • Dymond, W. (2001). Core labour standards and the world trade organization: Labour’s love lost. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 8(3), 99-114. google scholar
  • Fischer, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business ethics, 52(4), 381-390. google scholar
  • Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-economic review, 10(1), 163-192. google scholar
  • Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61. google scholar
  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of business ethics, 53(1), 51-71. google scholar
  • Gardberg, N. A., Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Symeou, P. C., & Schepers, D. H. (2019). The impact of corporate philanthropy on reputation for corporate social performance. Business & society, 58(6), 1177-1208. google scholar
  • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of business ethics, 72(3), 243-262. google scholar
  • Janowski, A. (2021). Philanthropy and the Contribution of Andrew Carnegie to Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 13(1), 155. google scholar
  • Jastram, S. M., & Klingenberg, J. (2018). Assessing the outcome effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives in the field of corporate social responsibility-The example of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 775-784. google scholar
  • Jesover, F., & Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non-OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 127-136. google scholar
  • Herzog, L. (2017). No company is an island. Sector-related responsibilities as elements of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 135-148. google scholar
  • Hogan, K., Olson, G. T., & Sharma, R. (2014). The role of corporate philanthropy on ratings of corporate social responsibility and shareholder return. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11(3), 108. google scholar
  • Hori, S., Nogata, D., Hayabuchi, Y., & Kondo, K. (2021). Factors promoting business strategies, activities, and long-term commitment for climate change mitigation: a survey of Japanese enterprises. Climate Policy, 1-17. google scholar
  • Katz, R. A., & Page, A. (2010). The role of social enterprise. Vt. L. Rev., 35, 59. google scholar
  • Kadyan, J. S. (2016). United Nations Global Compact and Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(10). google scholar
  • Keidanren Policy &Action (2017) https://www.keidanren.or.jp/ en/policy/csr/charter2017.pdf. , (02.01.2021). google scholar
  • Kim, M. S., & Thapa, B. (2018). Relationship of ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility and organizational performance. Sustainability, 10(2), 447. google scholar
  • Kraft, K. L., & Hage, J. (1990). Strategy, social responsibility and implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 11-19. google scholar
  • Koç, O. (2010).Toplumsal Sorunlarla Mücadelede Bir Kaldıraç Olarak Sosyal İnovasyon ve Sosyal Girişimcilik Açısından Önemi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2), 205-212. google scholar
  • Koçak, O., & Ersin, K. A. V. İ. (2014). Sosyal politika aktörü olarak sosyal girişimci belediyecilik. Hak İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(6), 26-49. google scholar
  • Kokubu, K., Kitada, H., & Haider, M. B. (2014). Corporate sustainability barometer in Japan. In Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison (pp. 121-140). Springer, Cham. google scholar
  • Kuschnereit, J. (2001). Handelspolitik gegen Kinderarbeit? Die begrenzte Wirksamkeit von Sozialklauseln. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, (3), 287-302. google scholar
  • Latif, K. F., & Sajjad, A. (2018). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A critical review of survey instruments. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1174-1197. google scholar
  • Lau, L. C., Tan, K. T., Lee, K. T., & Mohamed, A. R. (2009). A comparative study on the energy policies in Japan and Malaysia in fulfilling their nations’ obligations towards the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4771-4778. google scholar
  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of business ethics, 30(1), 57-72. google scholar
  • Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society. google scholar
  • Nga, V. T. B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility: Concept and Dimensions. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies, 37(2). google scholar
  • Page, A., & Katz, R. A. (2010). Is social enterprise the new corporate social responsibility. Seattle UL Rev., 34, 1351. google scholar
  • Palakshappa, N., & Grant, S. (2017). Social enterprise and corporate social responsibility: Toward a deeper understanding of the links and overlaps. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 606-625. google scholar
  • Phillip, A. (2014). Interpretation of the Caux Round Table principles for business-a guidance for social responsible businesses. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 1(2), 4-7. google scholar
  • Poetz, K., Haas, R., & Balzarova, M. (2012). Emerging strategic corporate social responsibility partnership initiatives in agribusiness: the case of the sustainable agriculture initiative. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 12(2), 151-165. google scholar
  • Rasheed, S. A. (2020). Quality Standards of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAI) and Its Role in Supporting Transparency Requirements. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(1), 311-333. google scholar
  • Ratnam, C. V. (2000). India and International Labour Standards. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 461-485. google scholar
  • Ray, R., & Chatterjee, B. (2012). Trade and Child Labour: A Review of Theoretical Literature. Journal of International Economics (0976-0792), 3(1). google scholar
  • Rendtorff, J. D. (2019). The concept of business legitimacy: Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship, corporate governance as essential elements of ethical business legitimacy. In Responsibility and Governance (pp. 45-60). Springer, Singapore. google scholar
  • “SA8000 Standard” http://www.sa-intl.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&pageId=1689 (14.01.2022) google scholar
  • Sasse, C. M., & Trahan, R. T. (2007). Rethinking the new corporate philanthropy. Business Horizons, 50(1), 29-38. google scholar
  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business ethics quarterly, 13(4), 503-530. google scholar
  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California management review, 17(3), 58-64. google scholar
  • Shamir, R. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669-689. google scholar
  • Singh, S. (2010). Philanthropy to corporate social responsibility: An Indian perspective. Revista de Management Comparat International, 11 (5), 990-1000. google scholar
  • Swepston, L. (2018). International Labour Organization (ILO) Standards and Human Rights. In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Fifty Years and Beyond (pp. 37-44). Routledge. google scholar
  • Thompson, B. S. (2019). Payments for ecosystem services and corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on sustainable production, stakeholder relations, and philanthropy in Thailand. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 497-511. google scholar
  • Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of business ethics, 85(4), 411-427. google scholar
  • United Nations Global Compact, https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles , (11.02.2022). google scholar
  • Young, S. B. (2006). Principle-based leadership: lessons from the Caux Round Table. In Responsible leadership (pp. 205-221). Routledge. google scholar
  • van den Heuvel, G., Soeters, J., & Gossling, T. (2014). Global business, global responsibilities: Corporate social responsibility orientations within a multinational bank. Business & Society, 53(3), 378-413. google scholar
  • Wakabayashi, M., & Sugiyama, T. (2010). Japan’s Keidanren voluntary action plan on the environment. In Reality Check (pp. 57-77). Routledge. google scholar
  • Welford, R., Chan, C., & Man, M. (2008). Priorities for corporate social responsibility: a survey of businesses and their stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 52-62. google scholar
  • Williams, O. F. (2014). The United Nations global compact: What did it promise?. Journal of business ethics, 122(2), 241-251. google scholar
  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of management studies, 43(1), 93-114. google scholar
  • Zeng, T., Audrain-Pontevia, A. F., & Durif, F. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility affect consumer boycotts? A cost-benefit approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28 (2), 796-807. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.