BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/SS05.2023.003.08   IUP :10.26650/B/SS05.2023.003.08    Tam Metin (PDF)

Social Marketing Activities: Measuring Non-financial Disclosures

Recep Pekdemir

Undoubtedly, COVID-19 taught that all organizations worldwide should reconsider sustainability once more due to the many people that either died or became sick during the pandemic. The result was that everyone tried to make a world where people stayed safe and well during the unprecedented period. In addition, protecting the environment and contributing to communities have also gained significance. Thus, the most critical question that could be raised in this environment involves who is doing what to influence behavior-changing societal and financial gain. The question is customizable for industries and sectors, as well as specific companies and corporations. This chapter is inspired by the environment and has a threefold purpose: (1) to identify social marketing activities in general, (2) to develop a framework for measuring the financial and non-financial information about social marketing activities that might involve for-profit purpose entities, and (3) to examine the social marketing activities of a forprofit purpose entity (i.e., a private banking corporation in Turkey) as a pilot study using its annual reports or separate CSR reports. To achieve the above objectives, this chapter will (a) revisit the evolution and background of social marketing, (b) identify the social marketing activities that might involve for-profit purpose entities, (c) develop a framework for measuring information about reporting social marketing activities to use as a social marketing index, and (d) examine the social marketing activities of a private banking corporation in Turkey in order to test the proposed social marketing index. The pilot study’s application of the proposed index enabled the conclusion that a superficial level of social marketing activities exists. The proposed index has been tested over a year of data, is easy for researchers and professionals to use, and provides for understandable decision-making. As a suggestion for future studies, the proposed index can be applied to other industries.



Referanslar

  • Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731-757. google scholar
  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review, International Journal of Management Review, 18(2), 180-205. google scholar
  • Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. European Accounting Review, 29(3), 555-580. google scholar
  • Al-Tuwaijria, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes II, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447-471. google scholar
  • AMA. American Marketing Association. What is marketing? Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://www. ama.org/the-definition-of-marketing-what-is-marketing/ google scholar
  • Andreasen, A. R. (1994). Social marketing: Its definition and domain, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(I), 108-114. google scholar
  • Andreasen, A. R. (1995). Marketing social change changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment, Jossey-Bass Publishers. google scholar
  • Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 3-13. google scholar
  • Andreasen, A. R. (2006). Social marketing in the 21st century. Sage Publications, Inc. google scholar
  • Ballou, B., Heitger, D. L., Landes, C. E., & Adams, M. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting a rapidly growing assurance opportunity. Journal of Accountancy, 202(6), 65-74. google scholar
  • Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes, Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236. google scholar
  • Bebbington, J., Larinaga, C., & Moneva, J.M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337-361. google scholar
  • Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Liederke, L. V., Moor, L. D., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35, 187-204. google scholar
  • Bozzolan, Favotto, F., & Ricceri, F. (2003). Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 543-558. google scholar
  • Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232-248. google scholar
  • Buranatrakul, T. & Swierczek, F. W. (2018). Climate change strategic actions in the international banking industry, Global Business Review, 19(1), 32-47. google scholar
  • Ceres.org (2022). Retrieved October 5, 2022, from https://ceres.org/about-us google scholar
  • Chew, B. C., Tan, L. H., & Hamid, S. R. (2016). Ethical banking in practice: a closer look at the Co-operative Bank UK PLC, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(1), 70-91. google scholar
  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D. & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (4-5), 303-327. google scholar
  • Cooke, T. E. (1991). An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations. The International Journal of Accounting, 26(3), 174-189. google scholar
  • Cobb, C., Schuster, D., Beloff, B., & Tanzil, D. (2009). The AIChE sustainability index the factors in detail. Chemical Engineering Progress, 105(1), 60-63. google scholar
  • Commission on Sustainability Development. Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd.htm google scholar
  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3-39. google scholar
  • Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122. google scholar
  • Craig, R., & Diga, J. (1998). Corporate accounting disclosure in ASEAN. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 9(3), 246-274. google scholar
  • Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187-199. google scholar
  • De Villiers, C. & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(6), 504-525. google scholar
  • De Villiers, C. & Alexander, D. (2014). The institutionalisation of corporate responsibility reporting, The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 198-212. google scholar
  • Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Statunton, M. (2011). Equity premia around the world. Retrieved September 25, 2022, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1940165 google scholar
  • Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (DJSI). Dow Jones sustainability world index guide. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/regional-exposure/global/?utm_medium=next_gen&utm_ source=google&utm_campaign=paid_campaign&utm_term=sustainable&indices&utm_content=Intl_ ESG&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItqCj4tuc-gIV4m5vBB3k6QLTEAAYAiAAEgJT4vD_BwE#overview google scholar
  • Dumaya, J., Bernardi, C., Guthriea, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40, 166-185. google scholar
  • ECOINVENT. Data quality guidelines for the ecoinvent database. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from http:// www.ecoinvent.org google scholar
  • Elliott, Barrie J. (1991). A re-examination of the social marketing concept. Sydney, Australia: Elliott & Shanahan Research, Quoted from Andreasen (2002). google scholar
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford, UK. google scholar
  • Ernst & Ernst. (1978). Social responsibility disclosure surveys. Ernst & Ernst, Cleveland, OH. google scholar
  • ETHOS (2022). Indicadores ETHOS para Negocies Sustantaveis a Responsaveis. Quoted from Salvado et al., 2015. google scholar
  • European Commission (2014). Non-financial reporting. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from https://www. worker-participation.eu/Company-Law-and-CG/Non-financial-Reporting google scholar
  • Ferreira, M. & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: the role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 499-533. google scholar
  • Gao, S. S., Heravi, S., & Xiao, J. Z. (2005). Determinants of corporate social and environmental reporting in Hong Kong: a research note. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 233-242. google scholar
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from http://www.globalreportinginitiative.org google scholar
  • Gleeson-White, J. (2014). Six capitals: The revolution has to have — Or can accountants save the planet? Sydney: Allen & Unwin. google scholar
  • Globalreporting.org (2022). Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://globalreporting.org/standards/download-the-standards/ google scholar
  • Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation. Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793-819. google scholar
  • Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability, and how we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47-62. google scholar
  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78-101. google scholar
  • Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(3/4), 327355. google scholar
  • Guthrie, J. & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is new? Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10(2), 114-126. google scholar
  • Guthrie, J. E. & Parker, L. D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3, 159-176. google scholar
  • Hackston, D. & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108. google scholar
  • Hawn, O., Chatterji, A.K., & Mitchell, W. (2018). Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management Journal, 39, 949-976. google scholar
  • Hedberg, C.J., & von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 153-164. google scholar
  • History.com (2022). Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://www.history.com/topics/1980s/exxon-valdez-oil-spill google scholar
  • ISMA. International Social Marketing Association, Retrieved October 12, 2020, from https://www.i-socialmarketing.org/ google scholar
  • ISO 14031: 2013 Environmental Management—Environmental Performance Evaluation -Guidelines, Retrieved September 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/52297.html google scholar
  • Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307-321. google scholar
  • Joseph, C. & Taplin, R. (2011). The measurement of sustainability disclosure: Abundance vs. occurrence, Accounting Forum, 35, 19-31. google scholar
  • Kılıç, M. (2016). Online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the banking industry Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(4), 550-569. google scholar
  • Kılıç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357-374. google scholar
  • Kotler, P. & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10-15. google scholar
  • Kotler, P. & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12. google scholar
  • KPMG. (2011). Corporate Sustainability: A Progress Report. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/corporate-sustainability-v2.pdf google scholar
  • Lee, N.R. & Kotler, P. (2020). Social marketing behavior change for social good, 6th ed., SAGE Publications, Inc. google scholar
  • Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Reprint of advancing the integration of corporate sustainability measurement, management and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 859-862. google scholar
  • Marston, C. L., & Shrives, P. L. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. British Accounting Review, 23(3), 195-210. google scholar
  • Martinez-Ferrero J., Ruiz-Cano, D., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2016). The causal link between sustainable disclosure and information asymmetry: the moderating role of the stakeholder protection context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 319-332. google scholar
  • Manian, F. A. (2009). IDSA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 49(11):1770-1771. https://academic.oup.com/cid/ article/49/11/1770/344574 (retrieved October 10, 2022). google scholar
  • McAlister, L., Srinivasan, R., & Kim, M. (2007). Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm, Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 35-48. google scholar
  • Mizik, N. & Nissim, D. (2011). Accounting for marketing activities: Implications for marketing research and practice. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1768382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.1768382 google scholar
  • Mori, K. & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new city sustainability index (CSI), Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94-106. google scholar
  • O’Dwyer, B. and Gray, R. H. (1998). Corporate social reporting in the Republic of Ireland: a longitudinal study, Irish Accounting Review, 5(2), 1-34. google scholar
  • O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J. & Hession, E. (2005). User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders of Ireland, European Accounting Review, 14(4), 759-787. google scholar
  • Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Environmental Management, 25(4), 489-507. google scholar
  • Robb, S. W. G., Single, L. E., & Zarzeski, (2001). Non-financial disclosures across Anglo-American culture, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 10(1), 71-83. google scholar
  • Robertson, D.C. & Nicholson, N. (1996). Expression of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(10), 1085-1106. google scholar
  • Rangun, V.K. & S. Karim. (1991). Teaching note: Focusing on the concept of social marketing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Quoted from Andreasen, A. R. (1994) Social marketing: Its definition and domain, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(I), 108-114. google scholar
  • Salvado, M. F., Azevedo, S.G., Matias, J. C. O., & Ferreira, L. M. (2015). Proposal of a sustainability index for the automotive industry. Sustainability, 7, 2113-2144. google scholar
  • Scholtens, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 159-175. google scholar
  • Sierra-Garcia, L., Zorio-Grima, A., & Garcia-Beneau, M. A. (2013). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility, and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 286-304. google scholar
  • S & P Global, (2022). Sustainability indices: Do Investors actually care? https://www.spglobal.com/esg/csa/ insights/why-sustainability-indices-matter-to-investors, Retrieved October 14, 2022. google scholar
  • Truong, V. D. (2014). Social marketing: A systematic review of research 1998 - 2012. Social Marketing Quarterly, 1-20. google scholar
  • Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues—Reflections on quantification in corporate reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability, 13(5), 667-681. google scholar
  • UNIDO (2020), United Nations International Development Organization. Retrieved October 6, 2022, from https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr google scholar
  • United Nations (UN) (1995), https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd/csd9_indi_bp3.pdf, Retrieved September 25, 2022. google scholar
  • Vountisjarvi, T. (2006). Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures, Journal of Business Ethics, 69( 4), 331-354. google scholar
  • Yapi Kredi, (2019). 2019 Integrated Report, https://www.yapikrediinvestorrelations.com/en/images/pdf/ sustainability-reports/2019/2019_integrated_report.pdf, Retrieved October 2, 2022. google scholar
  • Yapi Kredi, (2022). https://www.yapikrediinvestorrelations.com/en/about-yapi-kredi/default/ABOUT-YAPI-KREDI/2/0/0 Retrieved September 20, 2022. google scholar
  • Wang, L. (2005). A methodology of sustainability, accountability and management for industrial enterprises (Master’s Thesis). Faculty of Graduate School, the State University of New York at Buffalo. google scholar
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 49, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. google scholar
  • Wiebe, G. D. (1951). Merchandising commodities and citizenship on television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 679-691, and 13(2), 142-143. google scholar
  • Willard, B. (2012). The new sustainability advantage: Seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line, Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwlax/ reader.action?docID=5180721, Retrieved October 14, 2022. google scholar
  • Wilmshurst, T. D. & Frost, G.R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10-26. google scholar
  • Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53-63. google scholar
  • World Bank. (2019). Global infrastructure investor survey. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from https://cdn. gihub.org/umbraco/media/2564/global-infrastructure-investor-survey-report-2019.pdf google scholar
  • Wymer, W. (2011). Developing more effective social marketing strategies. Journal of Social Marketing, 1(1), 17-31. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.