Referanslar

• Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics, 2(4), 433-459. google scholar
• Adaman, F., & Keyder, Ç. (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in the slum areas of large cities in Türkiye. Report for the European Commission, employment, social affairs and equal opportunities. google scholar
• Akder, H. (1999). Dimensions of Rural Poverty in Turkey. World Bank. google scholar
• Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public econo-mics, 95(7-8), 476-487. google scholar
• Anand, R., Mishra, S., & Peiris, S. J. (2013). Inclusive Growth Revisited: Measurement and Determinants. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/842461468335940798/pdf/794450BRI0Incl-0Boc0377373B00PUBLIC0.pdf./(1..04.2023). google scholar
• Aşık, G., Karakoç, U., & Pamuk, Ş. (2023). Regional inequalities and the West-East divide in Türkiye since 1913. The Economic History Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13245. google scholar
• Aygün, A.H. (2022). Impact of Green Card on labor market: Regression-adjusted difference-indifferences analy-sis. Trends in Business and Economics, 36(4), 336-345. google scholar
• Bayazıt, S., Önsal, A. (2017). Türkiye İçin 2030 Kalkınma Gündemi; Binyıl Kalkınma Hedefleri Değerlendirilmesiyle Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Gündemi İçin Yol Haritası Önerisi. Ankara: Kalkınma Bakanlığı Yayın No: 2965. google scholar
• Başlevent, C. (2014). Social Transfers and Income Inequality in Turkey: How Informative is the Survey of Income and Living Conditions?. Ekonomi-tek, 3(3), 23-42. google scholar
• Boratav, K. (1991). Türkiye’de sosyal sınıflar ve bölüşüm. İstanbul: Gerçek Yayınevi. google scholar
• Boratav, K., Orhangazi, Ö. (2022). “Neoliberal Framework and External Dependency Versus Political Priorities 2009-2020”, in Emre Özçelik and Yonca Özdemir (eds.) 2009-2020. Political Economy of Development in Turkey: 1838-Present.Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 287-314. google scholar
• Buğra A. (2017). “Sosyal Politika Düşüncesi İçinde Eşitsizliğin Yeri ve Günümüz Türkiye’sinde Eşitsizlikler”, in Hasan Cömert, Emre Özçelik, Ebru Voyvoda (eds.) Kalkınma İktisadının Penceresinden Türkiye’ye Bakmak, İstanbul: İletişim,pp.7-49. google scholar
• Buğra A., Keyder Çaydar.(2006). “The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 3,211-228. google scholar
• Bağımsız Sosyal Bilimciler, BSB. (2015). AKP’li Yıllarda Emeğin Durumu. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Bartholomew D.J..(2010).Principal Components Analysis, in Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, Barry McGaw (eds), International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), Elsevier,2010,pp. 374-377. google scholar
• Cammack, P. (2004). What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy, 9(2), 189-211. google scholar
• Celasun, M. (1986). Income Distribution and Domestic Terms of Trade in Türkiye, 1978-1983: Estimated Me-asures of Inequality and Poverty. google scholar
• Cichos, K., & Salvia, A. L. (2018). Sustainable Development Goal 1. In SDG1-No-poverty (pp. 51-61). Emerald Publishing Limited. google scholar
• Cling, J. P., & Delecourt, C. (2022). Interlinkages Between the Sustainable Development Goals. World Deve-lopment Perspectives, 25, 100398. google scholar
• Cosar, S., & Yegenoglu, M. (2009). The neoliberal restructuring of Turkey’s social security system. Monthly Review, 60(11), 36. google scholar
• Çavdar, T. (2015). Türkiye>nin açlık, fukaralık ve yoksunluk tarihi. İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
• Çavlin, A. (2019). 2018 Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması Suriyeli Göçmen Örneklemi. http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-con-tent/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf/(10.05.2023). google scholar
• Dervis, K., & Robinson, S. (1980). “The structure of income inequality in Türkiye (1950-1973)”.in Derviş, K., Robinson, S., Özbudun, E., & Ulusan, A. (eds)The Political Economy of Income Distribution in Türkiye. New York: Holmes and Meier, pp.83-122. google scholar
• Doğan, E., (2014). Türkiye’de Yoksulluğun Ölçülmesi. Uzmanlık Tezi. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Bölgesel Gelişme ve Yapısal Uyum Genel Müdürlüğü. google scholar
• DPT (2001). Gelir dağılımının iyileştirilmesi ve yoksullukla mücadele özel ihtisas komisyonu raporu. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. google scholar
• Easterly, W. (2009). How the millennium development goals are unfair to Africa. World development, 37(1), 26-35. google scholar
• Easterly, W. (2015a). The SDGs should stand for senseless, dreamy, garbled. Foreign Policy, 28, 1-5. google scholar
• Easterly, W. (2015b). The trouble with the sustainable development goals. Current History, 114(775), 322. google scholar
• Feng, T. T., Kang, Q., Pan, B. B., & Yang, Y. S. (2019). Synergies of sustainable development goals between China and countries along the Belt and Road initiative. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 167-186. google scholar
• Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International envi-ronmental agreements: Politics, law and economics, 16, 433-448. google scholar
• Gupta, J., Baud, I., Bekkers, R., Bernstein, S., Boas, I., Cornelissen, V., et al. (2014). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development, Post 2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief. http://sdg.earthsystemgovernance.org/ sdg/publications/sustainable-development-goals-and-inclusive-development/ (10.05.2023). google scholar
• Güngen, A. R. (2022). Borçlandırma Siyaseti: Türkiye’de Finansal İçerilme/Ankara Dayanışma Akademisi Kitaplığı (Vol. 491). İletişim Yayınları:İstanbul. google scholar
• Gürsel, S., Uysal, G., & Toru Delibaşı, T. (2020). Turkish Labor Market: Complex Dynamics and Challenges. in Dal Emel P.(ed.) Turkey’s Political Economy in the 21st Century. Palgrave, pp.85-114. google scholar
• Göçmen, I. (2014). Religion, politics, and social assistance in Turkey: The rise of religiously motivated associ-ations. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(1), 92-103. google scholar
• Hegre, H., Petrova, K., & Von Uexkull, N. (2020). Synergies and trade-offs in reaching the sustainable develop-ment goals. Sustainability, 12(20), 8729. google scholar
• Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. google scholar
• Megyesiova, Silvia, and Vanda Lieskovska. “Analysis of the sustainable development indicators in the OECD countries.” Sustainability 10.12 (2018): 4554. google scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. google scholar
• Kakwani, N. (2001). Pro-poor growth and policies. In Asian Development Bank Annual Meeting Seminars in Honolulu, Hawaii. google scholar
• Kakwani, N., Son, H. H., Qureshi, S. K., & Arif, G. M. (2003). Pro-poor growth: Concepts and measurement with country case studies [with comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 417-444. google scholar
• Klasen, S., & Fleurbaey, M. (2019). Leaving no one behind: Some conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Globalization and Development, 9(2), 20180045. google scholar
• Kroll, C., Warchold, A., & Pradhan, P. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). google scholar
• Köse, A. H., & Bahçe, S. (2009). “Hayırsever’Devletin Yükselişi: AKP Yönetiminde Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk”, in Uzgel, İ., Duru, B. (eds.)AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu. Ankara, Phoenix Yayınevi, pp. 492-509. google scholar
• Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Moreno, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., & Kroll, C. (2018). SDG index and dashboards detailed methodological paper. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 1-56. google scholar
• Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Bermont-Diaz, L., Kloke-Lesch, A., Koundouri, P., Riccaboni, A. (2022). Achieving the SDGs: Europe’s Compass in a Multipolar World. Europe Sustainable Development Report 2022. SDSN and SDSN Europe. France: Paris. google scholar
• Lamichhane, S., Eğilmez, G., Gedik, R., Bhutta, M. K. S., & Erenay, B. (2021). Benchmarking OECD countries’ sustainable development performance: a goal-specific principal component analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125040. google scholar
• LNOB. (2023). Leave-No-One-Behind Rankings The leave-no-one-behind (LNOB) performance of European countries, https://eu-dashboards.sdgindex.org/rankings/leave-no-one-behind/20.03.2023. google scholar
• Lumivero (2023). XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution. https://www.xlstat.com/en. google scholar
• Mackie, J., & Allwood, G. (2022). The implementation of the 2030 Agenda’s principles of ‘leaving-no-one-be-hind’and ‘addressing the needs of those furthest behind first’in the EU’s development policy. google scholar
• Menon, R., Mollahaliloglu, S., & Postolovska, I. (2013). Toward universal coverage: Turkey’s green card program for the poor.https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/565451468319153981/pdf/750120NWP-0Box300for0the0Poor0TURKEY.pdf/(29.08.2023). google scholar
• Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent social sciences, 5(1), 1653531. google scholar
• Mensah, J., Mensah, A., & Mensah, A. N. (2022). Understanding and Promoting the ‘Leaving No One Behind’ Ambition Regarding the Sustainable Development Agenda: A Review. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. google scholar
• Moallemi, E. A., Hosseini, S. H., Eker, S., Gao, L., Bertone, E., Szetey, K., & Bryan, B. A. (2022a). Eight Archetypes of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Synergies and Trade-Offs. Earth’s Future, 10(9), e2022EF002873. google scholar
• Moallemi, E., Gao, L., Eker, S., & Bryan, B. (2022b). Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways. Global Sustainability, 5, E7. doi:10.1017/sus.2022.7 google scholar
• Moyer, J.D.; Bohl, D.K. (2019). Alternative pathways to human development: Assessing trade-offs and synergies in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Futures, 105, 199-210. google scholar
• Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., ... & Stafford-Smith, M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability science, 13, 1489-1503. google scholar
• Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature, 534, 320- 322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a google scholar
• OECD. (2022). OECD Social Expenditures Database. https://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm/(6.05.2023). google scholar
• Joint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: metho-dology and user guide. OECD publishing. google scholar
• Orhangazi, Ö. (2020). Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yapısı. Sorunlar Kırılganlıklar ve Kriz Dinamikleri. İmge Kitabevi. Ankara: Türkiye. google scholar
• Önder, H., & Şenses, F. (2006). Türkiye’de yoksulluk ve yoksulluk düşüncesi. İktisat, Siyaset, Devlet Üzerine Yazılar, 199, 221. google scholar
• Önder, İ. (2019). Âşarın Kaldırılması. Mülkiye Dergisi,43(2),491-510. google scholar
• Özbudun, E. (1980). Income distribution as an issue in Turkish politics. Political Economy of Income Distri-bution in Turkey, in,Derviş, K., Robinson, S., Özbudun, E., & Ulusan, A. (eds.), The Political Economy of Income Distribution in Türkiye. New York: Holmes and Meier, pp.55-82. google scholar
• Özcan M. K.. (2003). “Poverty in Turkey”. World Bank. 2003. Turkey: Poverty and Coping after Crises, Volume 2. Background Papers, pp.28-pp.42.https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/501431468779361900/ pdf/241850TRvol2.pdf/(4.05.2023) google scholar
• Pamuk, Ş. (2005). 20. Yüzyıl Türkiyesi için büyüme ve bölüşüm endeksleri. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 20(235), 5-15. google scholar
• Pamuk, Ş. (2012). Türkiye’nin 200 Yillik İktisadi Tarihi. İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. Istanbul: Türkiye. google scholar
• Pamuk, Ş. (2019). Uneven centuries: Türkiye’s experience with economic development since 1820. The Econo-mic History Review, 72(4), 1129-1151. google scholar
• Pradhan, Prajal, et al. (2017). A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future, 5.11 (2017): 1169-1179. google scholar
• Ravallion Martin, (2022). “ On the origins of the idea of ending poverty” in Gutmann, M., & Gorman, D. (eds.). Before the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Historical Companion. Oxford University Press, pp.1-54. google scholar
• Ravallion, M. (2004). Pro-poor growth: a primer. Available at SSRN 610283. google scholar
• Ravallion, M. (2008). Poverty lines. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2. google scholar
• Ravallion, M. (2015). The economics of poverty: History, measurement, and policy. Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Reinert, K. A. (2020). From sustainable development goals to basic development goals. Ethics & International Affairs, 34(2), 125-137. google scholar
• Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: A John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Ringner, M. (2008). What is principal component analysis?. Nat Biotechnol 26, 303-304. google scholar
• Saad-Filho,A.(2010). Growth, poverty and inequality: From Washington consensus to inclusive growth. https:// www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/08/1597341752.0397.pdf/(10.05.2020). google scholar
• Sachs, J., Lafortune, G., Kroll, C., Fuller, G., Woelm, F., (2022). From Crisis to Sustainable Development: the SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond. Sustainable Development Report 2022. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Sachs, J.D.(2012).From millennium development goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet, 379, 22062211. google scholar
• SBB, Turkey, Presidency of Strategy and Budget.(2023). Turkey’s National Development Plans. http://www. sbb.gov.tr. google scholar
• Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F., & Gao, L. (2019). The evolution of sustainable development theory: Types, goals, and research prospects. Sustainability, 11(24), 7158. google scholar
• Stuart, E., & Samman, E. (2017). Defining ‘leave no one behind’. ODI Briefing Note. London: Overseas De-velopment Institute. google scholar
• SYGM (2010). Turkey’s Integrated Social Assistance.https://www.aile.gov.tr/SYGM/PDF/Turkeys_integra-ted_social_assistance_system.pdf/(13.05.2023). google scholar
• Şeker S.D. (2008). Türkiye’de Sosyal Transferlerin Yoksulluk Üzerindeki Etkileri, DPT Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 2008. google scholar
• Şeker, S. D., & Dayıoğlu, M. (2015). Poverty Dynamics in Turkey. Review of Income and wealth, 61(3), 477493. google scholar
• Şener, M. Y. (2015). How the World Bank manages social risks: implementation of the Social Risk Mitigation Project in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 36(4), 758-775. google scholar
• Şenses, F. (2005). Approaches to Poverty and Poverty Alleviation: A Turkish Perspective. New Perspectives on Türkiye, 32, 199-215. google scholar
• Şenses, F. (2008). Missing Links in Poverty Analysis in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization: Some Lessons from Türkiye. New Perspectives on Türkiye, 38, 61-81. google scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Edu-cation. google scholar
• Tahsin, E. (2013). The Gini Illusion of Turkey: An Approach to Inequalities on the Basis of the Palma Ratio. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 24(89), 73-109. google scholar
• Tahsin, E. (2019). An investigation of the Palma Ratio for Turkey both on national and regional level. Sosyoe-konomi, 27(41), 151-182. google scholar
• Tekgüç, H. (2018). Declining poverty and inequality in Turkey: The effect of social assistance and home owner-ship. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 547-570. google scholar
• Tosun, J., & Leininger, J. (2017). Governing the Interlinkages between the Sustainable Development Go-als: Approaches to Attain Policy Integration. Global Challenges, 1(9), 1700036. https://doi.org/10.1002/ gch2.201700036 google scholar
• Turkey SRMP. (2018). Turkey - Social Risk Mitigation Project (SRMP) (English). Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/617991468120293073/Turkey-Social-Risk-Mitigation-Proje-ct-SRMP/(05.05.2023). google scholar
• Turkey’s 2nd VNR, (2019). Sustainable Development Goals, “Strong Ground towards Common goals,” https:// sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/23862Turkey_VNR_110719.pdf /(5.05.2023). google scholar
• Turkish Republic Ministry of Family and Social Services. (2022). T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, 2022 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu, https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/129482/ashb_2022-idare-faaliyet-raporu.pdf/ (19.06.2023). google scholar
• TurkStat.(2023). Turkish Statistical Institute Ankara, www.tuik.gov.tr. google scholar
• TurkStat. (2022) .Social Protection Statistics, 2021, Turkish Statistical Institute Ankara, www.tuik.gov.tr. google scholar
• UN. (1995).World Summit for the Social Development 1995. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wor-ld-summit-for-social-development-1995.html/(30.08.2023). google scholar
• UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations: New York, NY, USA. google scholar
• UNDP. (2018). What does it mean to leave no one behind? A UNDP discussion paper and framework for imple-mentation. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Discussion_Paper_LNOB_EN_ lres.pdf/(20.05.2023). google scholar
• UNSDG. (2023) “Universal Values,Principle Two: Leave No One Behind”. https://unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/ universal-values/leave-no-one-behind/(20.05.2023). google scholar
• UNSDG. (2019).”Leaving no one behind - A UNSDG operational guide for UN country teams. Interim draft. google scholar
• UNSDG”.https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/Interim-Draft-Operational-Guide-on-LNOB-for-UNCTs. pdf/(15.05.2023). google scholar
• Vidal, N. P., Manful, C. F., Pham, T. H., Stewart, P., Keough, D., & Thomas, R. (2020). The use of XLSTAT in conducting principal component analysis (PCA) when evaluating the relationships between sensory and quality attributes in grilled foods. MethodsX, 7, 100835. google scholar
• World Bank. (1990). World development report 1990: Poverty. The World Bank. google scholar
• World Bank. (2000). World development report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. The World Bank. google scholar
• World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/200 : Attacking Poverty. NewYork:Oxford University Press. google scholar
• World Bank. (2003). “Turkey: Poverty and Coping After Crises, Volume 1. Main Report,” World Bank Publica-tions - Reports 14624, The World Bank Group. google scholar
• World Bank. (2009). What is Inclusive Growth? Available from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEBT-DEPT/ Resources/468980-1218567884549/WhatIsInclusiveGrowth20081230.pdf. google scholar
• World Bank. (2014). A measured approach to ending poverty and boosting shared prosperity: Concepts, data, and the twin goals. The World Bank google scholar
• Yapar Y. (2019). Turkey: Integration Of The Sdgs Into A Natıonal Settıng For Leavıng No One Behind.https:// nec.undp.org/publications/turkey-integration-sdgs-national-setting-leaving-no-one-behind/(20.04.2022). google scholar
• Yentürk, N. (2018). Sosyal yardımlardan güvenliğe Türkiye’nin kamu harcamaları (2006-2017). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
• Yilmaz, H., Ozyer, M., & Ozyer, S. (2019). Redistribution Effects of Taxes on Expenditure: The Case of Turkey (2002-2013). Hacienda Publica Espanola-Review of Public Economics, 230(230). google scholar
• Zabcı, F. C. (2003). Sosyal Riski Azaltma Projesi: Yoksulluğu Azaltmak mı, Zengini Yoksuldan Korumak mı?. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 58(01). google scholar