BÖLÜM


DOI :10.26650/B/SS10.2024.013.023   IUP :10.26650/B/SS10.2024.013.023    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Political Economy of the Conservation of Biodiversity and Biodiversity-Based Trade: The Case of Türki̇ye

Ferda Karagöz Özenç

This study examines the situation of Türkiye regarding the conservation of biodiversity from a historical standpoint. It critically assesses the progress made by the public authority in terms of biodiversity awareness and the regulations implemented in this regard by reviewing the official reports such as development plans and by evaluating the components of the Environmental Performance Index, developed by Wolf et al. (2022). Given that the decline of biodiversity within a single country has repercussions not only for that country but also for the global ecosystem, international organizations have been addressing this issue since the 1970s. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which serve as the primary framework for this book, emphasize the need to minimize biodiversity loss and promote the sustainable utilization of biodiversity. These objectives are particularly relevant for SDG 15 and, to a lesser extent, for SDG 14 and SDG 12. To provide insights into Türkiye’s progress over time, the study provides a historical depiction of the biodiversity-based global production and trade networks associated with the sustainable use of biodiversity. It figures out that international trade is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss since colonialism. Additionally, the study conducts a critical analysis of international regulations aimed at promoting its sustainable use, while the regulations of Türkiye align mainly with these international developments. Lastly, by using the UNCTAD and CITES databases on biotrade, the study analyzes the biotrade flows of Türkiye, its sectoral linkages, and the significance of biotrade flows of Türkiye in comparison to the other regions as well as evaluating the national trade regulations. Overall, the study shows that biodiversity-based production and trade contribute significantly to the Turkish economy. Although some progress has been made in the sustainable utilization of biodiversity, Türkiye lags far behind in comparison to its peers. In that sense, Türkiye exhibits a realist/economic nationalist approach to the conservation of biodiversity. It tries to ensure not to undermine its economic development in not just agriculture as the most biodiversity-sensitive sector, but also in others such as tourism, energy, and industry while taking measures to safeguard biodiversity. Besides, there have been relatively few endeavors aimed at reducing the decline in biodiversity, even though the country’s environmental performance indicators fall below the global average.



Referanslar

  • Ağca, B. (2002). Dünya Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Zirvesi (Johannesburg, 26Ağustos - 4 Eylül 2002), Uluslararası Ekonomik Sorunlar Dergisi, VII, T.C. Dışişleri Bakanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Ak, İ. (2002). Ekolojik tarım ve hayvancılık, Gıda ve Yem Bilimi-Teknolojisi, 2, 31-39. google scholar
  • Atmış, E., Artar, M. Türkiye’de korumadan kullanılmaya yönelen doğa koruma politikalarının değerlendirilmesi, 2023’e Doğru 2. Doğa ve Ormancılık Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı. 31 Ekim-3 Kasım 2013/Antalya. Orman Mühendisleri Odası Yayını. S: 403-422. google scholar
  • Ambarlı et al. (2016). An overview of biodiversity and conservation status of steppes of the Anatolian Biogeog-raphical Region, Diodivers Conserv, 25, 2491-2519. google scholar
  • Andrew, D. (2017). Trade and Sustainable Development Goal 15: Promoting “Life on Land” through Mandatory and Voluntary Approaches, ADBI Working Paper No: 700, Asian Development Bank Institute. google scholar
  • Balaam, D. (2005). Agricultural Trade Policy. Trade Politics: International, Domestic and Regional Perspectives içinde, Ed. by. B. Hocking & S. McGuire, Taylor & Francis, New York. google scholar
  • Barcelona Convention (1976). Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution, ret-rieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/35759/76conf1_final_act_ann1bc_eng. pdf, (accessed 24/05/2023). google scholar
  • Bellora, C. et al., (2020). Trade & Biodiversity, European Parliament Policy Department for External Relations, doi: 10.2861/44961. google scholar
  • Benda, J., Trade and Biodiversity Statistics: Methodological approach, BioTrade Initiative, 20/12/2022. ret-rieved from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/document.aspx?ReportId=253340 (accessed 12/05/2023). google scholar
  • Bodansky, D. M. (1995). International Law and the Protection of Biological Diversity, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 28(4), 623-634. google scholar
  • CBD (1992) The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/ legal/cbd-en.pdf google scholar
  • CITES Secretariat and UNEP-WCMC, (2022). A guide to using the CITES Trade Database. Version 9. Geneva, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. google scholar
  • CITES, https://cites.org/eng/resources/quotas/export_quotas, (accessed 02.07.2023). google scholar
  • CITES, Wildlife in Turkey, retrieved from: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/sc/71/E-SC71-11-A13. pdf, (accessed 01.06.2023). google scholar
  • CITES Wildlife Tradeview, retrieved from: https://tradeview.cites.org/en/overview (accessed 18/05/2023). google scholar
  • Clay, J. (2016). Codex Planetarius: Reducing Key Environmental Impacts of Producing Globally Traded Food, WWF Markets Institute. google scholar
  • Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat, (1971). Ramsar, Iran, 02.02.1971. retrieved from: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_conven-tion_text_e.pdf (accessed 13/05/2023). google scholar
  • Crosby, A. W. (2004). Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900, 2nd Ed., Camb-ridge University Press: New York. google scholar
  • Demir, A. (2009). Kardelende Ekonomik Değer Analizi, Sosyoekonomik Gelişme ve Biyoteknoloji Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Biyoteknoloji Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Demirayak, F. (2002). Biyolojik Çeşitlilik-Doğa Kuruma ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, TÜBİTAK VİZYON 2023, Biyolojik Çeşitliliğin Korunması ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma panelinde sunulan bildiri. Retrieved from: https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/vizyon2023/csk/EK-14.pdf (accessed 26/06/2023). google scholar
  • Dicken, P., (2015). Global Shift: mapping the changing contours of the world economy, 7th Ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. google scholar
  • Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı [The Ninth Development Plan] (2007-2013), Official Gazette No: 26215, 01.07.2006. retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Dokuzuncu_Kalkinma_ Plani-2007-2013.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • Dommguez, L. & Luoma, C. (2020). Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense of the Environment, Land, 9(65), 1-22, doi:10.3390/land9030065. google scholar
  • Downes, D. R. (1994). The Convention on Biological Diversity: Seeds of Green Trade?, Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 8(1), 163-180. google scholar
  • Downes, D. R. (1999) Integrating Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Rules of the World Trade Organization, IUCN- The World Conservation Union. google scholar
  • DPT (1993) Sanayi ve Çevre, VI. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı ÖİK Raporu, Yayın No: DPT 2324/ÖİK 420. google scholar
  • DPT (1994) Çevre, Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Yayın No: DPT 2360/ ÖİK 428. google scholar
  • DPT (2007) Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013) Çevre Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Yayın No: DPT 2737/ÖİK 688. google scholar
  • DPT, 2. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [The Second Five-Year Development Plan] 1968-1972, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ Ikinci_Bes_Kalkinma_Plani-1968-1972.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • DPT, 4. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [The Fourth Five-Year Development Plan] 1979-1983, DPT Yayın No: 1664, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2022/08/Dorduncu-Bes-Yillik-Kalkinma-Plani_1979_1983.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • DPT, 5. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [The Fifth Five-Year Development Plan] 1985-1989, DPT Yayın No: 1974, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2022/08/Besinci-Bes-Yillik-Kalkinma-Plani-1985-1989.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • DPT, 6. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [The Sixth Five-Year Development Plan] 1990-1994, DPT Yayın No: 2174, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2022/07/Altinci_Bes_Yillik_Kalkinma_Plani-1990-1994.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • DPT, Uzun Vadeli Strateji ve 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [Long Term Strategy and Eight Five-Year Develop-ment Plan] 2001-2005, TBMM Karar No: 697, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Uzun_Vadeli_Strateji_ve_Sekizinci_ Bes_Yillik_Kalkinma_Plani-2001-2005.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • DPT, Yeni Strateji ve Kalkınma Planı Üçüncü Beş Yıl [The Third Five-Year Development Plan] 1973-1977, DPT Yayın No: 1272, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, retrieved from: https://www. sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Yeni-Strateji-ve-Kalkinma-Plani_Ucuncu-Bes-Yil_1973_1977.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • EARTHDATA, Socioeconomic data and application center, https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/epi-envi-ronmental-performance-index-2022/data-download (accessed 29.05.2023). google scholar
  • Ecevit, M. Z. (2023). Sustainability promises of Turkish origin apparel brands in the context of greenwashing, Galatasaray University Managerial and Social Science Letters, 1(1), 30-43. google scholar
  • Ekim, T. (2006). Türkiye’nin Flora ve Faunası. in Türkiye’nin Önemli Doğa Alanları, Ed. by Eken, G. Bozdoğan, M., İsfendiyaroğlu, S., Kılıç, D. T., Lise, Y., Doğa Derneği, Ankara, 47-48. google scholar
  • FAO. (2018). Biodiversity of Turkey: Contribution of Genetic Resources to Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems. Ankara. google scholar
  • Foppes, J. (2019). Biodiversity Based Products (BBP) as an economic source for the improvement of livelihoods and biodiversity Protection, Workshop Report, ASEAN. google scholar
  • Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain, Journal of International Economics, (48), 37-70. google scholar
  • Güner, A. et al. (2012). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi Damarlı bitkiler, Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmalı Derneği Yayını, flora dizisi 1, İstanbul. google scholar
  • Gökalp Alıca, S. S. (2012) Tabiatı ve Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma Kanunu Tasarısı’nın Doğa Koruma Mevzuatı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 3, 185-216. google scholar
  • Görg, C. & Brand, U. (2000) Global Environmental Politics and Competition between Nation-States: On the Regulation of Biological Diversity, Review of International Political Economy, 7(3), 371-398. google scholar
  • Guruswamy, L. D. (1999). The Convention on Biological Diversity: exposing the flawed foundations, Environ-mental Conservation, 26(2), 79-82. google scholar
  • Henne, G. & Fakir, S. (1999). The Regime Building of The Convention on Biological Diversity on the Road to Nairobi, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 3, 315-361. google scholar
  • Hermann, M. (2014), Biotrade Training Manual, Ed. by Judith Blank, Doris Günther, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH, Bonn. google scholar
  • Hoffmann, H. & Wagner, J. (2006) Ecosystem Approach, Ecology Centre Kiel - Master’s Programme Environ-mental Management, retrieved from: https://www.uni-kiel.de/ecology/users/fmueller/salzau2006/student-pages/Malawi_Principles/master2.html (accessed 13.06.2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0824-3. google scholar
  • Humphrey, J. (2005). Shaping Value Chains for Development: Global Value Chains in Agribusiness, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH. google scholar
  • IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development), (2003). The TRIPS Agreement and Biological Di-versity, IISD Trade & Development Brief, No:8, 1-4. google scholar
  • IPBES (2019). Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Brond^zio, E. S., Settele, J., D^az, S., Ngo, H. T. (eds). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. google scholar
  • IPCC (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Ed. by. H. O. Pörtner, et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. google scholar
  • IUCN (2023). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. retrieved from: https://www.iucnred-list.org (accessed 26.06.2023). google scholar
  • IUCN Red List, 2017-2020 Report, retrieved from: https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/resources/files/1630480997-I-UCN_RED_LIST_QUADRENNIAL_REPORT_2017-2020.pdf (accessed 19.04.2023). google scholar
  • Jaramillo Castro, L. (2012). Trade and Biodiversity: The BioTrade Experiences in Latin America, UNCTAD, Geneva. google scholar
  • Jaramillo, L. & Onguglo, B. (2016). BioTrade-harmonizing trade, biodiversity and livelihoods, in 20 years of BioT-rade: Connecting people, the planet and markets, Ed. by. Lorena Jaramillo Castro, UNCTAD, Chapter: 1.1., 1-4. google scholar
  • Klein, M., Jaramillo Castro, L., and Vorhies, F. (2014). The Business of Biotrade: Using Biological Resources Sustainably and Responsibly, UNCTAD: Geneva. google scholar
  • Kunt, M. et al. (2016). Türkiye Çevre Durum Raporu, T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Sar Matbaa Yayıncılık: Ankara. google scholar
  • Kunt, M et al. (2020). 6th State of Environment Report for Republic of Turkey, Publication No: 48/2, T.R. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara, retrieved from: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/ icerikler/tc-dr_2020_-ng-l-zce-20210430143751.pdf, (accessed 25.06.2023). google scholar
  • Kuvan, Y. (2014). Korunan Alan Kavramı ve “Tabiatı ve Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma Kanunu Tasarısı”. İstanbul Ormanlarının Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri, Ed. by. Ü. Akkemik, Türkiye Ormancılar Derneği Marmara Şubesi Yayınları, No:3, 283-296. google scholar
  • Lenzner, B. et al. (2022). Naturalized alien floras still carry the legacy of European colonialism, Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 6, 1723-1732. google scholar
  • Marques, A. et al. (2019), “Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth”, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(4), 628-637. google scholar
  • Matthews, A. & Karousakis, K. (2022). Identifying and assessing subsidies and other incentives harmful to biodiversity: A comparative review of existing national-level assessments and insights for good practice, OECD Environment Working Papers No. 206. google scholar
  • McNeely, J. A., Rojas, M., Martinet, C. (1995), The Convention on Biological Diversity: Promise and Frustra-tion, The Journal of Environment & Development, 4(2), 33-53. google scholar
  • Merson, J. (2000). Bio-Prospecting or Bio-Piracy: Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity in a Colonial and Postcolonial Context, Osiris, 15, 282-296. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 24623, dated 27.12.2001. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 25996, dated 17.11.2005. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 27676, dated 18.08.2010. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 28489, dated 06.12.2012. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 30570, dated 19.10.2018. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 30837, dated 20.07.2019. google scholar
  • Official Gazette, No: 32050, dated 21.12.2022. google scholar
  • O’Brien, R. & Williams, M. (2010). Global Political Economy: Evolution and Dynamics, 3rd. Ed., Palgrave Macmillan: London. google scholar
  • OECD (2019), Biodiversity: Finance and the Economic and Business Case for Action, report prepared for the G7 Environment Ministers’ Meeting, 5-6 May 2019. google scholar
  • Özgen, A. & Soldamlı, I. (2013) Tabiatı ve Biyoçeşitliliği Koruma Kanunu, Kontrast Dergi, Sayı: 35, retrieved from: https://kontrastdergi.com/arzu-ozgen-irmak-soldamli-tabiati-ve-biyolojik-cesitliligi-koruma-kanu-nu-35-sayi/ (accessed 27.06.2023). google scholar
  • Prihadi, N. (2013). CITES and its implementation: case study an experiences of Indonesia, Presentation at the Workshop on Trade & Environment for Asia and Pacific Economies, Bogor, 18 September 2013. google scholar
  • Saygılı et al. (2019). An analysis of the sustainability disclosures of textile and apparel companies in Turkey, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 29(3), 189-196. DOI: 10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.471049. google scholar
  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2020) Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal. google scholar
  • Serter, G. (2020). 2002 Sonrası Milli Parklar Kanunu Kapsamında İlan Edilen Doğa Koruma Alanlarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış, Planlama, 30(2), 242-256. google scholar
  • Stahl, J., De Meulenaer, T., Okusu, H. (2016). The BioTrade Initiative and CITES, in 20 years of BioTrade: Connecting people, the planet and markets, Ed. by. Lorena Jaramillo Castro, UNCTAD, Chapter: 5.2., 59-60. google scholar
  • Sun, Z., et al. (2022). Shared and environmentally just responsibility for global biodiversity loss, Ecological Economics, 194, 1-10. google scholar
  • Sundseth, K. (2015) The EU Birds and Habitats Directives for Nature and People in Europe. European Com-mision. google scholar
  • Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. et al. (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis, Biological Conservation, 144, 2752-2769. google scholar
  • T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, (2008). Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı, 1. baskı, Tasarım Ofset: Ankara. google scholar
  • T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı (2010). Rio Sözleşmeleri Kapsamında Türkiye’nin Ulusal Kapasitesinin Değerlendirilmesi Projesi Ulusal Tematik Rapor ve Kesişen Konular Sinerji Raporu, T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Yayınları, No:408, Ankara. google scholar
  • T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevre Etiketine Sahip Firmalar, retrieved from: https://cevreetiketi.csb.gov. tr/cevre-etiketine-sahip-firmalar-i-99342 (accessed 07.07.2023). google scholar
  • T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2018) On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023) Tarım ve Gıdada Rekabetçi Üretim Özel İhtisas komisyonu Raporu, Yayın No: KB: 2990 - ÖİK: 772, Ankara. google scholar
  • T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma Karnesi (2002-2012), retrieved from: https://www.tarimor-man.gov.tr/DKMP/Belgeler/Tabiat%20Koruma%20Durum%20Raporu/Tabiat%C4%B1%20Koruma%20 Durum%20Raporu%202002-2012.pdf (accessed 02.07.2023). google scholar
  • T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (2021). 2020 Türkiye Orman Varlığı, OGM Ofset: Ankara. google scholar
  • T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (2023). Sulak Alanlar, retrieved from: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/DKMP/ Menu/31/Sulak-Alanlar, (accessed 25.06.2023). google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry (2019a) Sixth National Report for UN Convention on Biological Diver-sity, retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/nr/nr-06/tr-nr-06-en.pdf (accessed 26.06.2023). google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry (2019b) National Biodiversity Action Plan 2018-2028, General Dicre-torate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, NBSABP Addendum Action Plan, Ankara. google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry (2023) Organic Crop Production, 2002-2022, retrieved from: https:// www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Organik-Tarim/Istatistikler (accessed 06.07.2023). google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, (2018). Seventh National Communication of Turkey Under The UNFCCC, retrieved from: https://www.undp.org/turkiye/publications/seventh-national-communication-tur-key-under-unfccc, (accessed 05.06.2023). google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol, retrieved from: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/united-nations-framework-convention-on-cli-mate-change-_unfccc_-and-the-kyoto-protocol.en.mfa, (accessed 31.05.2023). google scholar
  • T.R. Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, General Directorate of Combatting Desertification and Erosion, Combating Desertification, retrieved from: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/cem/icerikler/combat-ngdesert-f-cat-on-20211108120736.pdf, (accessed 31.05.2023). google scholar
  • Tabari, J., (2005). TRIPs & Biodiversity, CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics & Environment (CUTS-CITEE), Viewpoint No: 3, CUTS International. google scholar
  • TBMM (2012). Tabiatı ve Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma Kanunu Tasarısı ile Çevre Komisyonu Raporu, Yasama Dönemi: 24, Yasama Yılı: 2, Sıra Sayısı: 297, Esas No: 1/627. google scholar
  • Tekeli, İ. et al. (2006). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları Sayı: 13, 1. Basım, Şenol Matbaacılık: Ankara. google scholar
  • TEMA Vakfı (2013). Tabiatı ve Biyoçeşitliliği Koruma Kanun Tasarısı TBMM Gündemin’nden Geri Çekilsin, Press Bulletin, 20.02.2013, retrieved from: https://www.tema.org.tr/basin-odasi/basin-bultenleri/tabia-ti-ve-biyolojik-cesitliligi-koruma-kanun-tasarisi, (accessed 16.06.2023). google scholar
  • Textile Exchange (2022). Organic Cotton Market Report, retrieved from: https://textileexchange.org/app/uplo-ads/2022/10/Textile-Exchange_OCMR_2022.pdf (accessed 05.07.2023). google scholar
  • The Law on Environment, Official Gazette No. 2872, dated 09.08.1983. google scholar
  • TMMOB (2011) Tabiatı ve Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma Kanunu Tasarısı ile ilgili TMMOB Görüşü, retrieved from: https://www.tmmob.org.tr/sites/default/files/tmmob_gorus-tabiati_ve_biyolojik_cesitliligi_koruma_ kanunu_tasarisi_11_ocak_2011.pdf, (accessed 16.06.2023). google scholar
  • TREND Database, German Development Institute, retrieved from: https://klimalog.idos-research.de/trend/index. html, (accessed 04.09.2023). google scholar
  • TÜBA Çevre Çalışma Grubu et al. (2006) Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Biyolojik Çeşitliliği Koruma, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi, Şenol Matbaacılık, Ankara. google scholar
  • TÜİK (2023) Yıllık Sanayi ve Hizmet İstatistikleri, Çalışanlar Sayısı, retrieved from: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=72&locale=tr (accessed 05.07.2023). google scholar
  • UEBT (2016) ABS in Turkey, Fact Sheet, Amsterdam, Netherlands. google scholar
  • UEBT (2021) Biodiversity Action Plans: Guidelines to set up and implement a BAP for farming activities, Version 2.0, April 2021. google scholar
  • Ülker, E. (2002). International Regulation for genetic resources and developing countries, İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 55-70. google scholar
  • UN, Agenda 21, Section 1 Chapter 4, retrieved from https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_04. shtml. (accessed 22/05/2023). google scholar
  • UNCTAD (2021). Trade and Environment Review 2021: Trade-climate readiness for developing countries, United Nations, Geneva. google scholar
  • UNCTAD, Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, https://unctad.org/topic/trade-and-environment/biotrade/ Post-2020-framework, erişim tarihi: 31.03.2023. google scholar
  • UNCTADSTAT, retrieved from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?Repor-tId=227725, accessed 30/05/2023 google scholar
  • UNEP (2021), Biodiversity and international trade policy primer: How does nature fit in the sustainable trade agenda? UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) Trade, Development and the Environment Hub, UN Environment Programme (UNEP), and the Forum on Trade, Environment & the SDGs (TESS). google scholar
  • Uzunyayla, F. (2017). Yeşil Kalkınma: Kalkınma Yazınında Süreklilik mi Farklılaşma mı? Biyoçeşitlilik Piyasası Örneği. Mülkiye Dergisi, 41(3), 3-48. google scholar
  • WDI, (2022). retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (accessed 12.12.2022). google scholar
  • Willer, H. et al. (2023). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2023. Research Ins-titute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM - Organics International, Bonn. google scholar
  • Wolf, M. J, Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A., et al. (2022). 2022 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. epi.yale.edu. google scholar
  • WTO, (2008). TRIPS: Reviews, Article 27.3(b) and Related Issues: Background and the current situation, No-vember 2008. Retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.htm (accessed 13/05/2023). google scholar
  • WWF (2022). Living Planet Report 2022 - Building a naturepositive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. google scholar
  • WWF (2016). Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era. WWF International, Gland, Swit-zerland. google scholar
  • WWF (2021). Korumazsak Kaybederiz: Sürdürülebilir Bir Türkiye İçin Korunan Alanlar Hedef: 2030’a Kadar %30, PrintWorld Matbaa San. Tic. A.Ş. google scholar
  • Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [The Seventh Five-Year Development Plan] (1996-2000), TBMM Karar No: 374, retrieved from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Yedinci_Bes_Yillik_Kalkin-ma_Plani-1996-2000.pdf, (accessed 23/05/2023). google scholar
  • Yeniyurt, C., Hemmami, M. (2011). Türkiye’nin Ramsar Alanları. Doğa Derneği, Ankara, Türkiye. google scholar


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.