Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015    Tam Metin (PDF)

Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar

Melis Sucuoğlu Doğan

Sanatın temel ilham kaynağı olan doğa, insanlık tarihinde sanatçıların üretim odağında yer almaktadır. 20. yüzyılın ilk yarısında sanatçılar, galeri mekânlarını ve sanat piyasasını sorgulamaya başlamışlar ancak 1960’lı ve 1970’li yıllarda bu sorgulama daha geniş bir ölçekte ve belirgin bir şekilde kendini göstererek sanatçıların doğayı sanatsal üretimlerine ortak etmesiyle sonuçlanmış ve doğa sadece yüzey üzerine aktarılan bir tema olmaktan çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma kapsamında 1970’li yıllarda ekolojik sanatın doğayı iyileştirici yaklaşımına yön veren temel etmenlerle birlikte sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın bu alandaki eserlerine yer verilmiştir. Sanatçının doğaya duyduğu hassasiyetin sanatsal üretim sürecinde nasıl yol gösterici olduğu analiz edilmiş, eserlerin malzeme dili üzerinden sanatçı merkezli yaklaşım yöntemi ile betimsel bir analiz yapılmıştır. Bulgular sonucunda sanatçının materyalist dünyaya karşıt bir duruş sergileyerek eserlerinde ekolojik düşünceyi kucaklayan, sürdürülebilir malzemelerle çalışarak fiziksel alanda az yer kaplayan, el yapımı kâğıt gibi doğal malzemelerin yol gösterici olduğu bir sanat anlayışını benimsediği tespit edilmiştir. 1970’li yıllarda ekolojik sanatın yalnızca büyük arazi projelerini destekleyen sanatçıları değil, aynı zamanda daha küçük ölçekli çalışmalarıyla sistemin dışında kalmayı tercih edip doğal olanı destekleyen sanatçıları da kapsadığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015    Tam Metin (PDF)

Ecology-Oriented Narratives in the Works Of Artist Bilge Friedlaender

Melis Sucuoğlu Doğan

Nature, the main source of inspiration for art, has been the focus of artists’s production throughout human history. In the first half of the 20th century, artists began to question gallery spaces and the art market, but in the 1960s and 1970s, this questioning manifested itself on a wider scale and in a more prominent way, resulting in artists incorporating nature into their artistic production, and nature ceased to be a theme transferred only on the surface. In the first half of the 20th century, artists began to question gallery spaces and the art market, but in the 1960s and 1970s, this questioning manifested itself on a wider scale and in a more prominent way, resulting in artists incorporating nature into their artistic production, and nature ceased to be a theme transferred only on the surface. Within the scope of this study, the factors that shaped the nature-healing approach of ecological art in the 1970s and the works of artist Bilge Friedlaender based on ecological art are included. It was analyzed how the artist’s sensitivity to nature guided the artistic production process, and a descriptive analysis was made with the artistcentered approach method through the material language of the works. As a result of the findings, it was seen that the artist adopted an understanding of art that embraces ecological thought in his works by taking a stance against the materialist world, working with sustainable materials, taking up little space in the physical space, and guided by natural materials such as handmade paper. In the 1970s, it became clear that ecological art encompassed not only artists who supported large-scale land projects but also those, who preferred to stay outside the system with their smaller-scale works but supported the natural.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


As humans began to understand their place in the world, their relationship with nature also started to take shape. At the beginning of human history, nature was viewed as a source of fear, filled with uncertainties. Natural events could devastate living spaces, wild animals could pose threats to life, and unexplored territories and unknowns could endanger their existence. However, with the cognitive revolution, humans began to see nature not just as a being to be feared, but as an area to be explored, understood, and ultimately mastered. This change marked a significant turning point that enabled humanity to manipulate its environment and develop strategies for survival. 

As knowledge and technology advanced, humans gradually shifted from a mindset of fear to curiosity and innovation. They learned to cultivate the land, harness natural resources, and create tools that transformed their surroundings. This evolving relationship laid the foundation for civilizations, as people increasingly sought to coexist with nature rather than simply conquer it. Ultimately, this journey from fear to understanding paved the way for a more complex and nuanced interaction with the natural world, influencing cultures and economies throughout history.

The concept of nature, one of humanity’s most fundamental relationships, has gradually become one of the critical elements of art. Throughout history, artists have drawn inspiration from nature, reflecting its beauty, complexity, and chaos. In examining art history, we can observe a significant transformation toward the 20th century, following periods when nature was often treated superficially and depicted through a romantic lens. During this time, artists began to study nature not just as an object but as a complex system. Themes questioning the relationship between humans and nature began to emerge alongside the esthetic values of nature in artworks. In this context, nature shifted from being merely a backdrop or source of inspiration to occupying the center of artistic expression, prompting artists to develop new techniques and methods to explore the often-overlooked aspects of nature. 

The Industrial Revolution, as one of the significant turning points in human history, played a vital role in this artistic transformation. This led to a substantial increase in consumer culture and urban living. The technological advancements of this era changed the dynamics of human life, contributing to the growth of cities and the rise of industry. However, this rapid development came at a high cost, resulting in issues such as international economic crises and the irreversible destruction of natural habitats. Air pollution, the contamination of water resources, and various factors disrupting the natural balance forced people to confront environmental problems. 

By the mid-20th century, these factors led to a new awareness of ecological issues, fostering a tendency among people to advocate for and support ecological movements. Artists began to play a significant role in this transformation, creating works aimed at questioning the relationship between nature and humanity and raising awareness. Art evolved from merely reflecting society to becoming a form of activism, stimulating discussions about environmental degradation and the consequences of unchecked industrialization.

In this context, the late 1960’s marked a period when many artists began to reclaim nature. A desire to address environmental issues and a critique of the art market and gallery spaces drove this transformation. Artists, adopting a perspective that criticized the destruction of nature and the gallery environment, started creating their works in natural settings. One of the first significant examples of this new approach emerged with the artist Robert Smithson, who created works using natural materials found in the environment.

Following in Smithson’s footsteps, artists like Michael Heizer, Helen Mayer Harrison, Robert Morris, and Agnes Denes contributed to this movement through their installations featuring geometric forms in natural settings. However, the initial excitement surrounding the movement known as Land Art eventually became the focus of criticism. These critiques influenced some artist’s production processes, prompting them to shift from merely directing nature to aiming to heal it. They took steps to transform social awareness through large-scale environmental projects, leading to what began to be called Ecological Art. 

Sonfist’s “Time Landscape” project is one of the most significant examples of the ecological art movement. This project restores Manhattan, which was once covered by forests, by collaborating with local residents to return the area to its natural state. The project not only seeks to achieve an ecological transformation but also aims to revive collective memory and enhance environmental awareness. Today, this project has become a symbol of the efforts of both artists and communities to reconnect with nature. Artists’' ecological projects focus not only on the protection and restoration of nature but also on raising social awareness. For instance, Agnes Denes’s work “Wheatfield – A Confrontation” questions the importance of agriculture and nature during urban life, offering viewers a chance to reflect on environmental issues. Joseph Beuys used his art as a tool for social change, focusing on the preservation of nature and strengthening human relationships. Lynne Hull has developed respectful and sustainable projects, reexamining the relationship between art and ecosystems.

These artists have highlighted the potential of art for ecological awareness and social change by focusing on sustainable art projects. Each has developed different approaches to nature conservation and human-nature interaction, successfully increasing viewer’s sensitivity to environmental issues.

In addition to artists involved in large-scale ecological projects, there are also those who address ecological concerns through smaller works, relying on nature and using recycled materials. This research highlights Bilge Friedlaender, an exemplary artist who settled in the United States in the 1950s. Preferring materials derived from nature and handmade papers, she produces ecology-focused works that reflect her sensitivity to the environment. Friedlaender questions the surface of painting by using natural materials in her installation and printmaking practices, leading to artistic productions that reference her own life experiences.

The artist, who conducts research on space, has focused on the concept of placelessness following a personal experience, producing works that explore themes such as horizon and gravity. Generally described as having a minimalist approach, she tends to use geometric forms in her art. Issues related to the production process on canvas have led her to create works on paper, where the texture, line, and tear of the paper -essentially every state of the paper- constitute the foundation of her pieces. Additionally, she is interested in mythological themes, with one of her significant series being the Epic of Gilgamesh. Through her Gilgamesh exhibition, she created her first installation work, adding depth to the relationship between nature and humanity in the context of the themes she addresses.

The artist returned to Turkey in 1998 and began producing works in her homeland for a period. During this time, she held exhibitions under the guidance of Galeri Nev. The period when the Gilgamesh exhibition was created coincides with this phase of her work. She has also produced a print series using a technique called Chine Colle. By employing traditional printing techniques in innovative ways, she draws from handmade paper in her printmaking processes. This material, integrated into her art with ecological concerns, holds a significant place in her artistic practice. 

This research examines the emergence of ecological art and the works of artist Bilge Friedlaender, who adopted ecology-focused artistic practices. It has been observed that the artist adopts an artistic approach that embraces ecological thinking, taking a stand against the materialist world. Natural materials, such as handmade paper, guide her works, avoiding the occupation of space. Ecological art goes beyond being merely an esthetic form of expression, shedding light on profound social and environmental issues. In Friedlaender’s works, the depth of the relationship with nature provides the viewer with an opportunity to question the complex structure of nature and humanity’s place within it. This aspect highlights the impact of art on both individual and collective consciousness, allowing viewers to rethink their connections to nature through the artistic experience. In this way, the artist creates a societal transformation through her artistic practice. 

Ecological art has a significant potential to combine artistic expression with environmental sensitivity, offering viewers new ways of thinking. This art form encourages audiences to question their relationship with nature while also drawing attention to environmental issues. Artists like Friedlaender have become crucial tools for social transformation in this context. Their works are more than mere esthetic objects; they carry deep meanings and strive to foster social awareness. Their works transcend mere esthetic appeal; they embody profound meanings that resonate on multiple levels. By integrating natural materials and processes into their creations, these artists invite viewers to reflect on the intricate connections between humanity and the environment. Through this reflective process, ecological art aims not only to raise awareness but also to inspire action and advocacy for sustainable practices.

In conclusion, the journey from viewing nature as something to be feared to embracing it as an integral part of our existence underscores the importance of ecological awareness in art. As artists continue to explore this dynamic relationship, they will not only enrich the cultural landscape but also inspire meaningful change toward the environment. The ongoing dialog between art and nature will undoubtedly evolve, offering new insights and opportunities to promote a more sustainable future for our planet.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Agnes Denes Studio. “Agnes Denes.” Erişim 20 Mart 2024. http:www.agnesdenesstudio.com google scholar
  • Antmen, Ahu. “Kum, Taş, Papatya, Su, Sessizlik: Bilge Friedlaender,” Bilge Friedlaender Sözcükler, Sayılar, Çizgiler. İstanbul: Arter Sanatçı Kataloğu, Ofset Yapımevi, 2016, 100-103 google scholar
  • Antmen, Ahu. Sanatçılardan Yazılar ve Açıklamalarla 20. Yüzyıl Batı Sanatında Akımlar. İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık, 2012 google scholar
  • Archzine, “Agnes Denes.” Erişim 20 Mart 2024. https:afasiaarchzine.com/2019/11/agnes-denes-3 google scholar
  • Atakan, Nancy. Sanatta Alternatif Arayışlar. İzmir: Karakalem Kitabevi, 2008 google scholar
  • Brown, Andrew. Güncel Sanat ve Ekoloji. Çev. Emre Gözgü, Yiğit Adam. İstanbul: Akbank Kültür ve Sanat Dizisi, 2014 google scholar
  • Delaney, Kate, “Earth Into Art.” Polish Journal for American Studies 2 (2008): 120-126, erişim 15 Eylül 2023. https:paas.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/nr-2-2008-cover.png google scholar
  • Demir, Metin. “Çevre Olarak Konumlandırılmış Kadını ve Doğayı Birlikte Düşünmek: Ekofeminizm.” Doğu Batı Düşünce Dergisi 63 (2012): 11-44 google scholar
  • Farmer, Jane M. “Panel Discussion Bilge Friedlaender.” Excerpt from Crossing Over Changing Places. Riverdale, Maryland: Pyramid Atlantic, 1992 google scholar
  • Friedlaender, Mira. Önol Işın. “Yerçekimini Reddetmek: Bilge Friedlaender Kendi Yapıtıyla / Kendisiyle Söyleşiyor.” Bilge Friedlaender Sözcükler, Sayılar, Çizgiler. İstanbul: Arter Sanatçı Kataloğu, Ofset Yapımevi, 2016, 9-20 google scholar
  • Guattari, Felix. Üç Ekoloji. Çev. Ali Akay. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık. 2000 google scholar
  • Hyperallergic. “The Origins of Manhattan’s Tiny Plot of Precolonial Terrain.” Erişim 14 Eylül 2023. https:hyperallergic.com/337906/timelandscape-alan-sonfist google scholar
  • Iannelli, Francesca. “Ecological Art.” International Lexicon of Aesthetics. 5. Cilt. (2022): 1. Erişim 03 Ocak 2025, DOI 10.7413/18258630119 google scholar
  • Johnson, Lewis. “Geçiş Halindeki Soyutlama: Bilge Friedlaender’ın Yapıtında Karşı Çıkış ve Yayılma.” Bilge Friedlaender Sözcükler, Sayılar, Çizgiler. İstanbul: Arter Sanatçı Kataloğu, Ofset Yapımevi, 2016, 114-118 google scholar
  • Land and Lens Photographers Envision the Enviroment. “Tree Mountain-A Living Time Capsule.” Erişim 20 Mart 2024. https:sites.middlebury.edu/landandlens/2016/10/06/agnes-denes-tree-mountain-a-living-time-capsule-11000-trees-11000-people-400-years-triptych-1992-1996-1992-2013 google scholar
  • Leavitt, Thomas W. Earth Art 1969 Catalogue. New York. Andrew Dickson White Museum of Art, Cornell Üniversitesi, 1969. Erişim 22 Aralık 2024. https:monoskop.org/File:Earth_Art_1969_catalogue.pd google scholar
  • Madra, Beral. “Bilge Friedlaender.” Resme Bakan Yazılar – I. İstanbul: Galeri Nev, 2009, 251-253 google scholar
  • Madra, Beral. Bilge Friedlaender Gılgamış. İstanbul: Galeri BM – Galeri Nev, 1989 google scholar
  • Matilsky, Barbara C. Fragile Ecologies - Contemporary Artists' Interpretations and Solution. Washington: Rizzoli International, 1992 google scholar
  • Middleman Rachel ve Mira Friedlaender. “Touching Things: Mira Friedlaender Unpacks Her Mother’s Legacy.” Art Journal 76/1 (2017): 110-115. Erişim 14 Ocak 2025. DOI: 10.1080/00043249.2017.1332894 google scholar
  • Moma, "Chine Colle." Erişim 12 Eylül 2023. https:www.moma.org/collection/terms/chine-coll google scholar
  • Public art fund. “Alan Sonfist: Time Landscape,” Erişim 14 Eylül 2023. https:www.publicartfund.org/exhibitions/view/time-landscape google scholar
  • Sakıp Sabancı Müzesi. “Agnes Denes: Hayatı ve Sanatı.” Erişim 10 Eylül 2023. https:www.sakipsabancimuzesi.org/sayfa/agnes-deneshayati-ve-sanat google scholar
  • Spaid, Sue. Ecovention: Current Art to Transform Ecologies. Ohio: Greenmuseum.org ve The Contemporary Arts Center, 2002 google scholar
  • Volk, Gregory. “Olayla Dolu Oluş ve Akış.” Bilge Friedlaender Sözcükler, Sayılar, Çizgiler. İstanbul: Arter Sanatçı Kataloğu, Ofset Yapımevi, 2016, 106-110 google scholar
  • Zeynep Rona Sanat Arşivi. “Bilge Friedlaender Söyleşisi-1998.” Erişim 12 Eylül 2023. https:zeynepronaarsivi.com/ekler/ google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Sucuoğlu Doğan, M. (2025). Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar. Art-Sanat, 0(23), 340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


AMA

Sucuoğlu Doğan M. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar. Art-Sanat. 2025;0(23):340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


ABNT

Sucuoğlu Doğan, M. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 23, p. 340-365, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sucuoğlu Doğan, Melis,. 2025. “Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 23: 340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sucuoğlu Doğan, Melis,. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 23 (Jun. 2025): 340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


Harvard: Australian Style

Sucuoğlu Doğan, M 2025, 'Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 23, pp. 340-365, viewed 26 Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sucuoğlu Doğan, M. (2025) ‘Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar’, Art-Sanat, 0(23), pp. 340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015 (26 Jun. 2025).


MLA

Sucuoğlu Doğan, Melis,. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 23, 2025, pp. 340-365. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


Vancouver

Sucuoğlu Doğan M. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 26 Jun. 2025 [cited 26 Jun. 2025];0(23):340-365. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015


ISNAD

Sucuoğlu Doğan, Melis. Sanatçı Bilge Friedlaender’ın Eserlerinde Ekoloji Odaklı Anlatılar”. Art-Sanat 0/23 (Jun. 2025): 340-365. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2025.23.0015



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim29.09.2023
Kabul24.01.2025
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma31.01.2025

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ



İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.