Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 IUP :10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 Tam Metin (PDF)

“İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar

Bu çalışma, bir performans modeli olarak jam session’ı tarihsel ve teorik boyutlarıyla incelemektedir. Çalışmada jam session, bir ev sahibi grubun konuk müzisyenlerin katılımına izin vererek informel uzlaşımlarla şekillenen, caz kökenli doğaçlama odaklı bir grup müzik pratiği olarak tanımlanır. Ayrıca jam session’larda müzisyenler arası statü farklılıklarının önemli olduğu ve müzisyenlerin “öğrenme”, “itibar”, “tanıtım” gibi ödüllere ulaşabilmek niyetiyle bir tür çekişme içinde yer alabildiği vurgulanır. Bu doğrultuda caza odaklanan tarihsel bölümde jam session’ların cutting session’lara uzanan geçmişi; Kansas City, Missouri, New York gibi gelişim merkezleri ve konser-kayıt ortamlarına taşınma girişimleri üzerinde durulur. Teorik bölümde ise jam session’ın bağlamsal parametreler, habitus, katılımcısunumsal performans, ritüel gibi birçok yaklaşım üzerinden nasıl yorumlanabileceği ele alınır. Bu çalışmanın ilk amacı, caz tarihi anlatılarında yeteri denli vurgulanmayan jam session’ın hususi önemini göstermektir. İkinci amacı ise müzikolojinin daha çok tamamlanmış eserlere yönelme eğiliminden dolayı gözden kaçırdığı doğaçlama pratiklerinde etnografik metodolojinin imkânlarına değinmektir. Son olarak Türkçe literatürde son derece sınırlı bir yere sahip jam session konusuna katkı sunulması hedeflenmektedir. Çalışmanın, jam session’ın dışında doğaçlama içeren veya içermeyen müzik türlerinde müzisyenler arası etkileşimi çözümlemede etkili yaklaşımlar sunabileceği de değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Jam session, doğaçlama, caz

DOI :10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 IUP :10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 Tam Metin (PDF)

“The Jazz Gathering Where Improvised Performance is Practiced”: Historical and Theoretical Approaches to the Jam Session

Selim Tan

This paper examines the jam session as a performance model through historical and theoretical perspectives. The paper defines a jam session as a group music practice rooted in jazz and centered on improvisation, shaped by informal conventions, in which the house band allows guest musicians to participate. It also emphasizes that status differences among musicians are essential in jam sessions and that musicians may engage in a form of competition to attain rewards such as “learning,” “reputation,” and “promotion.” Accordingly, the historical section, which focuses on jazz, addresses the origins of jam sessions extending to cutting sessions, key development centers such as Kansas City, Missouri, and New York, and attempts to adapt jam sessions to concert and recording contexts. The theoretical section explores jam sessions through various lenses, including contextual parameters, habitus, participatory-presentational performance, and ritual. The first objective of this paper is to highlight the unique significance of jam sessions, often understated in jazz history narratives. Its second objective is to demonstrate the potential of ethnographic methodology in analyzing improvisation practices, frequently neglected by musicology due to its tendency to prioritize completed musical works. Finally, this paper aims to contribute to studying jam sessions, which have a limited place in Turkish literature. It also offers practical approaches to understanding musician interactions in other music genres, whether or not they involve improvisation, beyond the context of jam sessions.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Jam session, improvisation, jazz

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET

A jam session is a performance model based on group improvisation rooted in jazz. However, despite their significant role in jazz, jam sessions occupy a relatively limited space within jazz studies. Throughout jazz’s historical journey —from Storyville to concert halls, from party music to an art form, and from informality to university curricula—jam sessions have consistently remained at the core of innovation and creativity (Herzig & Baker, 2014). The first objective of this paper is to examine jam sessions from historical and theoretical perspectives and highlight their significance within jazz. In this context, the paper relies on literature from jazz studies, sociology, and (ethno)musicology. The second objective is to emphasize the importance of ethnography, the foundational methodology of ethnomusicology, in studying jam sessions. This focus arises from the dominance of the Adlerian/positivist/formalist approach in musicology (Kerman, 1985), which primarily centered on completed musical works, neglecting improvisational music. However, as Rice (2014) points out, ethnomusicology approaches music as a process aiming to understand human interactions and behaviors through ethnographic methodology. The final objective is to contribute to the limited Turkish-language literature on jam sessions. Additionally, this paper suggests that beyond jam sessions, the findings can provide valuable insights for analyzing musician interactions across various musical genres, whether or not they involve improvisation.

The section “‘Roots and Development’: Historical Dimension” first discusses the cutting session, a performance model that differs from the jam session by placing competition at its core. Dating back to the early 1900s in New Orleans, cutting sessions occurred at inter-group and individual levels, characterized by marching bands and solo pianists. The elements of competition and rewards (“learning,” “financial gain,” and “self-promotion”) found in cutting sessions have also endured within jam sessions. While jam sessions in the 1920s were often seen as after-hours gatherings for jazz musicians in major United States cities, those that had a lasting impact on jazz history emerged during the bebop era of the 1940s, particularly in Kansas City, Missouri, and New York. In this highly competitive period, leading musicians implemented measures and strategies to prevent inexperienced performers from disrupting the overall quality of performances. Although jam sessions originated in jazz clubs, efforts were made to adapt them into concert and recording contexts. However, the commercialization of jam sessions raised concerns about authenticity, as some argued that adapting them for concerts and recordings compromised their original essence. Despite their decline in significance after 1950, a survey conducted by Herzig and Baker (2014) among jazz musicians in the United States indicates that jam sessions have retained their importance, even if not exclusively within jazz clubs (e.g., in rehearsal spaces and private homes).

The section “‘Sociomusical Construction’: Theoretical Dimension” explores how jam sessions, as a process, are socially and musically constructed through various conceptual frameworks. An early study on jam sessions by Cameron (1954) suggests that jam sessions function as structured oral traditions rather than entirely unarranged and sponta neous. Gooley (2011) describes the coordination of individual and collective expression, the relaxation of dogmatic constraints, the need to listen to others, and the impulse to respond within jam sessions as resembling the ideal communicative economy of a democratic society. Adopting a symbolic interactionist perspective, Dempsey (2008) examines how musicians’ performances and backgrounds shape contextual parameters (e.g., age/education, status, stylistic preferences) that influence jam sessions. Tan (2021), using Bourdieu’s concepts of capital, habitus, and field, investigates power dynamics among musicians in jam sessions. Pedro (2014), based on Turino (2008), describes jam sessions as a blend of participatory and presentational performances, framing them within a music scene as a space for sharing musical experiences and enabling social interaction. Similarly, Pinheiro (2013) and Lebert (2019) analyze jam sessions as rituals, focusing on structured activities involving gestures, words, and objects.

In conclusion, this paper synthesizes the historical and theoretical discussions to provide a comprehensive, liter ature-based definition of the jam session. The jam session is a group, improvisation-centered performance model rooted in jazz, in which a house band allows guest musicians to participate in a musical practice within a specific time and space. This practice unfolds through informal musical and non-musical conventions, which guest musicians are expected to follow. Thus, musicians engage in the form of competition to attain rewards such as “learning,” “reputation,” and “self-promotion.” Following this definition, the paper highlights the central role of ethnographic methodology—such as observation, participant observation, and interviews—in grasping the structure and dynamics of jam sessions.

Referanslar

Agawu, K. (1997). Analyzing music under the new musicological regime. The Journal of Musicology, 15(3), 297-307. Bailey, D. (2011). Doğaçlama (A. Bucak, Çev.). Pan Yayıncılık. (Özgün eser 1980 tarihlidir) google scholar
Becker, H. S. (1951). The professional dance musician and his audience. American Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 136-144. google scholar
Bennett, A., & Peterson, R. A. (2004). Introducing music scenes. A. Bennett & R. A. Peterson (Ed.), Music scenes: Local, translocal and virtual içinde (s. 1-15). Vanderbilt University Press. google scholar
Berendt, J. E. (2010). Caz kitabı: Ragtime’dan fusion ve sonrasına (N. Ozan, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları. (Özgün eser 1953 tarihlidir) google scholar
Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Çev). Stanford University Press. (Özgün eser 1980 tarihlidir) google scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Çev.). Harvard University Press. google scholar
Cameron, W. B. (1954). Sociological notes on the jam session. Oxford University Press, 33(2), 177-182. google scholar
Carr, I., Fairweather, D., & Priestley, B. (1987). Jazz: The essential companion. Paladin Grafton Books. Caz (1956). Akis, 6(103), 28-29. google scholar
Chazelle, D. (Yönetmen). (2014). Whiplash [Film]. Bold Films; Blumhouse Productions; Right of Way Films. google scholar
Cohen, S. (1999). Scenes. B. Horner & T. Swiss (Ed.), Key terms in popular music and culture içinde (s. 239-250). Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
Cook, N. (2008). We are all (ethno)musicologists now. H. Stobart (Ed.), The new (ethno)musicologies içinde (s. 48-70). The Scarecrow Press. google scholar
Dempsey, N. P. (2008). Hook^ups and train wrecks: Contextual parameters and the coordination of jazz interactions. Symbolic Interaction, 31(1), 55-75. google scholar
DeVeaux, S. (1997). The birth of bebop: A social and musical history. University of California Press. google scholar
Erenberg, L. A. (1989). Things to come: Swing bands, bebop, and the rise of a postwar jazz scene. L. May (Ed.), Recasting America: Culture and politics in the age of cold war içinde (s. 221-245). The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Erol, A. (2015). Müzik üzerine düşünmek. Bağlam Yayıncılık. google scholar
Erol, A. (2018). İslam, Alevilik ve müzik. Bağlam Yayıncılık. google scholar
Erol, A. (2024). Bellek, tarih ve müzik: Finlandiya Tatarları. Bağlam Yayıncılık. google scholar
Feige, D. M. (2016). Caz felsefesi (N. Aça, Çev.). Dost Kitabevi. (Özgün eser 2014 tarihlidir) google scholar
Fordham, J. (1998). Caz (S. Davran, Çev.). Akbank Kültür ve Sanat Yayınları. (Özgün eser 1993 tarihlidir) google scholar
Fremon, D. K. (2000). The Jim Crow laws and racism in American history. Enslow Publishers. google scholar
Gillespie, D., & Fraser, A. (1979). Dizzy: To be or not to bop, the autobiography of Dizzy Gillespie with Al Fraser. Da Capo Press. google scholar
Goffman, E. (1972). The neglected situation. P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context içinde (s. 61-66), Penguin. google scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Harper and Row. google scholar
Goffman, E. (2021). Günlük yaşamda benliğin sunumu (B. Cezar, Çev.). Metis Yayınları. (Özgün eser 1956 tarihlidir) google scholar
Gooley, D. (2011). The outside of ‘sitting in”: Jazz jam sessions politics of participation. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 16(3), 43-48. google scholar
Hajer, M. A (2009). Authoritative governance: Policy-making in the age of mediatization. Oxford University Press. google scholar
Hajer, M., & Uitermark, J. (2008). Performing authority: Discursive politics after the assassination of Theo van Gogh. Public Administration, 86(1), 5-19. google scholar
Hartley, A. J. (2009). Character, agency and the familiar actor. P. Yachnin & J. Slights (Ed.), Shakespeare and character: Theory, history, performance, and theatrical persons içinde (s. 158-176). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
Herzig, M., & Baker, D. (2014). Beyond jamming: A historical and analytical perspective on the creative process. Journal of the Music & Entertainment Industry Educators Association, 14(1), 183-217. google scholar
İrticalen (t.y.). Kubbealtı sözlük içinde. Erişim adresi: lugatim.com/s/irticâlen google scholar
İrticalî (t.y.). Türk Dil Kurumu güncel Türkçe sözlük içinde. Erişim adresi: https://sozluk.gov.tr/ google scholar
Jackson, T. A. (1998). Performance and musical meaning: Analyzing “Jazz” on the New York scene [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Columbia University. google scholar
Kerman, J. (1985). Contemplating music: Challenges to musicology. Harvard University Press. google scholar
Kınlı, H. D., & Yükselsin, İ. Y. (2016). Eşikler, müzikler ve liminalite: Profesyonel Roman müzisyenler ve Bergama yöresi evlilik ritüellerindeki liminal rolleri. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 375^399. google scholar
Kisliuk, M. (1988). “A special kind of courtesy”: Action at a bluegrass festival jam session. TDR (1988-), 32(3), 141-155. google scholar
Lebert, R. (2019). Jam sessions as rites of passages: An ethnography of jazz jams in Phoenix [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Arizona State University. google scholar
Lewis, G. E. (1996). Improvised music after 1950: Afrological and Eurological perspectives. Black Music Research Journal, 16(1), 91-122. google scholar
McCollum, H., & Hebert, D. G. (Ed.). (2014). Theory and method in historical ethnomusicology. Lexington Books. google scholar
Merriam, A. P. (1964). The anthropology of music. Northwestern University Press. google scholar
Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Monson, I. (2007). Freedom sounds: Civil rights call out to jazz and Africa. Oxford University Press. google scholar
Nelson, L. D. (1995). The social construction of the jam session. Jazz Research Papers, 15, 95-100. google scholar
Nelson, L. D. (2011). The social and musical construction of the jam session in jazz [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. University of Kentucky. google scholar
Nettl, B. (1974). Thoughts on improvisation: A comparative approach. The Musical Quarterly, 60(1), 1-19. google scholar
Nettl, B. (1998). Introduction: An art neglected in scholarship. B. Nettl & M. Russell (Ed.), In the course of performance: Studies in the world of musical improvisation içinde (s. 1-23). The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Norman Granz JATP pilot… (1979). Down Beat, 46(16), 31-32. google scholar
Öztürk, O. M. (Ed.). (2023). Eleştirel boyutlarıyla müzikoloji. Müzik Eğitimi Yayınları. google scholar
Parker, C. (1993). Bird’s eyes: Last unissued, vol. 7 [Derleme]. Philology. google scholar
Pedro, J. (2014). Jam sessions in Madrid’s blues scene: Musical experience in hybrid performance models. Journal of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music, 4(1), 73-86. google scholar
Pinheiro, R. N. F. (2011). The creative process in the context of jazz jam sessions. Journal of Music and Dance. 1(1), 1-5. google scholar
Pinheiro, R. N. F. (2013). Jam sessions in Manhattan as rituals. Jazz Research Journal, 6(2), 129-150. google scholar
Qureshi, R. B. (1995). Music anthropologies and music histories: A preface and an agenda. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 48(3), 331-342. google scholar
Reisner, R. G. (Ed.). (1991). Bird: The legend of Charlie Parker. Da Capo Press. (Özgün eser 1962 tarihlidir) google scholar
Rice, T. (2014). Ethnomusicology: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. google scholar
Russell, R. (1971). Jazz style in Kansas City and the Southwest. University of California Press. google scholar
Russell, R. (1973). Bird Lives! The high life and hard times of Charlie (Yardbird) Parker. Charterhouse, New York. google scholar
Schudel, M. (2006, 18 Ocak). Bob Weinstock: Jazz record producer. Washington Post. google scholar
Schuller, G. (1977). Early jazz: Its roots and musical development. Oxford University Press. (Özgün eser 1968 tarihlidir) google scholar
Shapiro, N., & Hentoff, N. (Ed.). (1966). Hear me talkin’ to ya: The story of jazz as told by the men who made it. Dover Publications. (Özgün eser 1955 tarihlidir) google scholar
Shelemay, K. K. (1980). “Historical ethnomusicology”: Reconstructing Falasha liturgical history. Ethnomusicology, 24(2), 233-258. google scholar
Simmel, G. (2015). Yabancı. Bireysellik ve kültür (T. Birkan, Çev.) içinde (s. 149^154). Metis Yayınları. (Özgün eser 1971 tarihlidir) Smithsonian jazz oral history project with J.J. Johnson (1994, 26-27 Şubat). Interview by David and Lida Baker, Smithsonian Jazz, US. google scholar
Stobart, H. (Ed.). (2008). The new (ethno)musicologies. The Scarecrow Press. google scholar
Stokes, M. (1998). Etnisite, kimlik ve müzik (A. Yılmaz, Çev.). Dans Müzik Kimlik: Folklora Doğru Çeviri / Araştırma Dergisi. 63, 123-149. (Özgün eser 1994 tarihlidir) google scholar
Stone, R. M. (2008). Theory for ethnomusicology. New Jersey: Pearson Education. google scholar
Tan, S. (2021). Performativity in game: The case of “Yüzen Oda” in Ankara jam sessions. Porte Akademik Müzik ve Dans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20, 19-34. google scholar
Tan, S. (2023). Müziksel meşruiyet ve değer: Ankara caz atmosferi [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. google scholar
Taylor, R. (1978). Art, an enemy of the people. The Harvester Press Limited. google scholar
Turino, T. (2008) Music as social life: The politics of participation. The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press. google scholar
Turner, V. W. (1977). Variations on a theme of liminality. S. L. Moore & B. G. Myerhoff (Ed.), Secular ritual içinde (s. 36-53). Van Gorcum. google scholar
Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedon & G. L. Caffee, Çev.). Routledge. (Özgün eser 1909 tarihlidir) google scholar
Walker, K. (2010). Cut, carved, and served: Competitive jamming in the 1930s and 1940s. Jazz Perspectives, 4(2), 183-208. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın

DIŞA AKTAR

APA

Tan, S. (2019). “İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar. Konservatoryum, 0(0), -. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

AMA

Tan S. “İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar. Konservatoryum. 2019;0(0):-. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

ABNT

Tan, S. “İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar. Konservatoryum, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 0, p. -, 2019.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tan, Selim,. 2019. ““İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar.” Konservatoryum 0, no. 0: -. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

Chicago: Humanities Style

Tan, Selim,. ““İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar.” Konservatoryum 0, no. 0 (Apr. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

Harvard: Australian Style

Tan, S 2019, '“İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar', Konservatoryum, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. -, viewed 30 Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tan, S. (2019) ‘“İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar’, Konservatoryum, 0(0), pp. -. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 (30 Apr. 2025).

MLA

Tan, Selim,. ““İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar.” Konservatoryum, vol. 0, no. 0, 2019, pp. -. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

Vancouver

Tan S. “İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar. Konservatoryum [Internet]. 30 Apr. 2025 [cited 30 Apr. 2025];0(0):-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460 doi: 10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

ISNAD

Tan, Selim. ““İrticalî İcranın Tatbik Edildiği Caz Toplantısı”: Jam Session’a Tarihsel ve Teorik Yaklaşımlar”. Konservatoryum 0/0 (Apr. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2025-1635460

ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ

Gönderim	07.02.2025
Kabul	10.04.2025
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma	25.04.2025

LİSANS

Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Konservatoryum