Referanslar

• 1. Fuks AB et al. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: longterm follow-up. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:327-30. google scholar
• 2. Cuadros-Fernandez C el al. Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2016;20:1639-45. google scholar
• 3. Juneja P, Kulkarni S. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2017;18:271-8. google scholar
• 4. Guven Y et al. Success Rates of Pulpotomies in Primary Molars Using Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Randomized Control Trial. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:4059703. google scholar
• 5. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010;24:8-18 google scholar
• 6. El Meligy OA, Allazzam S, Alamoudi NM. Comparison between biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2016;47:571-80. google scholar
• 7. Yıldız E, Tosun G. Evaluation of formocresol, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulfate, and MTA primary molar pulpotomies. Eur J Dent 2014;8:234-40. google scholar
• 8. Erdem AP et al. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatr Dent 2011;33:165-70. google scholar
• 9. Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbas T. A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod 2008;34:950-5. google scholar
• 10. Cuadros-Fernandez C et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23:400-7. google scholar
• 11. Smail-Faugeron V et al. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014;6:CDOO322O. google scholar
• 12. Fuks AB. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. J Endod 2008;34:S18-S24. google scholar
• 13. Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB. Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015;16:303-12. google scholar
• 14. Moretti AB et al. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J 2008;41:547-55. google scholar
• 15. Yildirim C et al. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year FollowUp. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40:14-20. google scholar
• 16. Farsi N et al. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;29:307-11. google scholar
• 17. Noorollahian H. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Br Dent J 2008;204: E20. google scholar
• 18. Sushynski JM et al. Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6- to 24-month observation. Pediatr Dent 2012;34:120-8. google scholar
• 19. Bani M et al. The Clinical and Radiographic Success of Primary Molar Pulpotomy Using Biodentine™ and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent 2017;39:284-8. google scholar
• 20. Kusum B, Rakesh K, Richa K. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Restor Dent Endod 2015;40:276-85. google scholar
• 21. Niranjani K et al. Clinical evaluation of success of primary teeth pulpotomy using mineral trioxide aggregate, laser and biodentin an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC35-ZC37. google scholar
• 22. Hugar SM et al. In vivo comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars: A 60-month follow-up study. Contemp Clin Dent 2017;8:122-7. google scholar
• 23. Olatosi OO, Sote EO, Orenuga OO. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: A clinical and radiographic study. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:292-6. google scholar
• 24. Çarıkçıoğlu B, Derelioğlu SŞ, Yılmaz Y. Clinical Assessment of Pulp Therapy for Primary Molars Performed Under General Anesthesia, Using Two Pulpotomy Agents-A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Dent Sci and Res 2017;5:110-5. google scholar
• 25. Rajasekharan S et al. Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomized control trial. Int Endod J 2017;50:215-28. google scholar

Atıflar