Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/eor.20251440402 IUP :10.26650/eor.20251440402 Tam Metin (PDF)

Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling

Pedro Ivo Da Graça Fagundes, Ricardo Armini Caldas, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage of the dentin/resin interface when subjected to water storage, chemical aging, or thermocycling in different adhesive luting treatments.

Materials and Methods: Bovine teeth were used to prepare dentin blocks (5 × 4 × 1 mm) with one fully exposed dentin surface (n = 45). The blocks were randomly assigned to three luting protocols: 2BSE+DRC (two-bottle self-etch adhesive + dual-curing resin cement); SAP+PRC (self-adhesive primer + photo-activated dual resin cement); and SAP+SRC+O (self-adhesive primer + self-cured dual resin cement + Oxyguard II). Composite resin blocks of the same dimensions were luted onto the dentin blocks according to each protocol. Each treatment group (n = 15) was subdivided into three subgroups (n = 5) based on the aging challenge: storage in water for 7 days (control), aging in 10% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 hour, or thermocycling for 5,000 cycles. Specimens were then individually immersed in a neutral methylene blue solution for 1 hour, rinsed with water, air-dried, and analyzed for marginal microleakage.

Results: Data analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05) showed that 2BSE+DRC exhibited the lowest microleakage after water storage for 7 days (100 µm) and the highest after thermocycling (220 µm), while sodium hypochlorite aging resulted in an intermediate value (190 µm). SAP+PRC and SAP+SRC+O showed no statistically significant differences in microleakage when stored in water (170 µm and 620 µm, respectively) or after sodium hypochlorite aging (180 µm and 610 µm, respectively). SAP+SRC+O resulted in significantly greater microleakage in water storage (620 µm) and sodium hypochlorite aging (610 µm) compared to 2BSE+DRC (100 µm and 190 µm, respectively) and SAP+PRC (170 µm and 180 µm, respectively). Thermocycling produced significant differences among the three treatments (p < 0.05), with SAP+SRC+O showing the highest microleakage (1,370 µm), 2BSE+DRC the lowest (220 µm), and SAP+PRC an intermediate value (810 µm).

Conclusion: Adhesive luting treatments exhibited different levels of marginal microleakage when subjected to water storage, chemical aging, or thermocycling. Thermocycling resulted in the highest marginal microleakage at the dentin/resin interface for all adhesive protocols tested.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Adhesive luting, Storage in water, Chemical aging, Thermocycling, Microleakage

Referanslar

1. Medic V, Obradovic-Djuricic K, Dodic S, Petrovic R. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of various types of dental cements. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2010;138:143-9. google scholar
2. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full-cast crowns. Dent Mater 2005;21:445-53. google scholar
3. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol Med 1982;11:439-50. google scholar
4. About I, Murray PE, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair. J Dent 2001;29:109-17. google scholar
5. Gu X-H, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: Influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:109-16. google scholar
6. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16. google scholar
7. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier W, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel D, Erickson R, Latta M, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2015;40:379-95. google scholar
8. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munch J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28. google scholar
9. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-30. google scholar
10. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-35. google scholar
11. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-40. google scholar
12. Deng D, Yang H, Guo J, Chen X, Zhang W, Huang C. Effects of different artificial ageing methods on the degradation of adhesive-dentine interfaces. J Dent 2014;42:1577-85. google scholar
13. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994;25:781-5. google scholar
14. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GAP, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23:1276-82. google scholar
15. Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:127-32. google scholar
16. Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002;27:475-9. google scholar
17. Giorgi MCC, Hernandes NM a P, Sugii MM, Ambrosano GMB, Marchi GM, Lima D a NL, et al. Influence of an intermediary base on the microleakage of simulated class II composite resin ^restorations. Oper Dent 2014;39:301-7. google scholar
18. Özel-Bektas Ö, Eren D, Herguner-Siso S, Akin GE. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:723-8. google scholar
19. Amaral FLB, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SAM. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: A critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:340-53. google scholar
20. Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, Wang ZY, He HM. Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: The effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent 2010;35:547-55. google scholar
21. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann K, Chen H. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002;18:269-75. google scholar
22. Bajabaa S, Balbaid S, Taleb M, İslam L, Elharazeen S, Alagha S. Microleakage evaluation in class V cavities restored with five different resin composites: İn vitro dye leakage study. Clin Cosmet İnvestig Dent 2021;27: 504-11. google scholar
23. De Munck J, Ermis RB, Koshiro K, İnoue S, İkeda T, Sano H, et al. NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques. J Dent 2007;35:74-83. google scholar
24. Yamauti M, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Ohno H, Carvalho RM, Kaga M, et al. Degradation of resin-dentin bonds using NaOCl storage. Dent Mater 2003;19:399-405. google scholar
25. Fathpour K, Bazazzade A, Mirmohammadi H. A comparative study of cervical composite restorations microleakage using dental universal bonding and two-step self-etch adhesive. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22:1035-40. google scholar
26. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LVJ, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:357-63. google scholar
27. Shafiei F, Dehghani Z, Jowkar Z. The influence of the operator's experience on the microleakage of two universal adhesives. Clin Exp Dent Res 2021;7:951-6. google scholar
28. Gielzak F, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Bociong K. Effect of storage temperature on selected strength parameters of dual-cured composite cements. J Funct Biomater 2023;14:487. google scholar
29. Shirang F, Birang R, Ahmadpour E, Heidari Z, Memar RO, Zarei Z, Fekrazad R. Evaluation of microleakage in resin composites bonded to an er:yag laser and bur-prepared root and coronal dentin using different bonding agentes. J Lasers Med Sci 2021;12:e74. google scholar
30. Singh S, Bhadauria US, Sharma A, Mathur RV. Comparative evaluation of microleakage with total-etch, universal (Self-etch mode), and nano adhesive systems in class V composite restorations: An in-vitro study. Cureus 2023;15:e46766. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın

DIŞA AKTAR

APA

Fagundes, P.I., Caldas, R.A., & Consani, R.L. (2019). Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling. European Oral Research, 0(0), -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

AMA

Fagundes P I, Caldas R A, Consani R L. Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling. European Oral Research. 2019;0(0):-. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

ABNT

Fagundes, P.I.; Caldas, R.A.; Consani, R.L. Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 0, p. -, 2019.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Fagundes, Pedro Ivo Da Graça, and Ricardo Armini Caldas and Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani. 2019. “Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling.” European Oral Research 0, no. 0: -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

Chicago: Humanities Style

Fagundes, Pedro Ivo Da Graça, and Ricardo Armini Caldas and Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani. “Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling.” European Oral Research 0, no. 0 (Aug. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

Harvard: Australian Style

Fagundes, PI & Caldas, RA & Consani, RL 2019, 'Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling', European Oral Research, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. -, viewed 14 Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Fagundes, P.I. and Caldas, R.A. and Consani, R.L. (2019) ‘Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling’, European Oral Research, 0(0), pp. -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402 (14 Aug. 2025).

MLA

Fagundes, Pedro Ivo Da Graça, and Ricardo Armini Caldas and Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani. “Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling.” European Oral Research, vol. 0, no. 0, 2019, pp. -. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

Vancouver

Fagundes PI, Caldas RA, Consani RL. Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling. European Oral Research [Internet]. 14 Aug. 2025 [cited 14 Aug. 2025];0(0):-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402 doi: 10.26650/eor.20251440402

ISNAD

Fagundes, PedroIvo Da Graça - Caldas, RicardoArmini - Consani, RafaelLeonardo Xediek. “Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling”. European Oral Research 0/0 (Aug. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251440402

ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ

Gönderim	20.02.2024
Kabul	28.10.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma	04.07.2025

LİSANS

Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

European Oral Research