European Oral Research

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Orijinal Araştırma


DOI :10.17096/jiufd.33921   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.33921    Tam Metin (PDF)

YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Neslihan Tekçe, Mustafa Demirci, Sultan Aslıhan Göktürk, Safa Tuncer, Emre Özel, Kanşad Pala, Canan Baydemir

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı iki farklı all-in-one selfetch adezif ile yüzey örtücü uygulamasının arka bölge sınıf I restorasyonlarda oluşan postoperatif hassasiyet üzerine etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Arka bölge azı dişlerinde sınıfI restorasyon endikasyonu bulunan 11 hastada 44 restorasyon bu çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Her bir hastaya 4 restorasyon yapılmıştır. Restorasyonların tamamlanmasında bonding olarak G-Aenial Bond(GC, Japan) ve Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray, Japan), kompozit materyali olarak Clearfil Majesty Posterior (Kuraray, Japan) kullanılmıştır. Restorasyonların tamamlanmasının arkasından her bir bağlayıcının uygulandığı iki dişten rastgele seçilen bir tanesine yüzey örtücü (Fortify Plus, Bisco, USA) uygulanmıştır. Hassasiyet değerlendirmesi soğuk hava uygulaması, buz ve basınç uygulaması ile 24 saat, 7, 15 ve 30 gün sonunda VAS skalası kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Hassasiyet değerlerinin karşılaştırmasında Friedmen Tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır (p<0.05). Bulgular: 30 gün sonunda 44 restorasyon incelenmiştir. Çalışmada incelenen adezif ve ya yüzey örtücü, restorasyonların hassasiyet skorlarında anlamlı bir değişikliğe sebep olmamıştır. Clearfil S3Bond ve G-Aenial bond hemen hemen aynı hassasiyet skorları sergilemişlerdir. En yüksek hassasiyet, yüzey örtücü uygulanmış dişlerden elde edilmiştir. Sonuç: Self etch adezif sistemler restorasyonlar da hassasiyete sebep olmuşlardır. Restorasyonlardaki hassasiyet 30 gün sonunda hafif düzeyde azalmıştır. Yüzey örtücü uygulaması hassasiyet skorlarında azalmaya sebep olmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: All-in-one adezifler, yüzey örtücü, postoperatif hassasiyet
DOI :10.17096/jiufd.33921   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.33921    Tam Metin (PDF)

THE EFFECT OF BONDING AND SURFACE SEALANT APPLICATION ON POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FROM POSTERIOR COMPOSITES

Neslihan Tekçe, Mustafa Demirci, Sultan Aslıhan Göktürk, Safa Tuncer, Emre Özel, Kanşad Pala, Canan Baydemir

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluatethe postoperative sensitivity of posterior Class Icomposite restoration at short-term, restoratedwith two different all-in-one self-etch adhesiveswith or without surface sealant application.Materials and Methods: 44 restorations wereinserted in 11 patients who required Class Irestorations in their molars. Each patient received4 restorations, thus four groups were formed; (1)G-Aenial Bond (GC, Japan); (2) Clearfil S3 Bond(Kuraray, Japan); (3) G-Aenial Bond+Fortify Plus(Bisco, USA), (4) Clearfil S3 Bond+Fortify Plus.Sensitivity was evaluated at 24h, 7, 15, and 30days using cold air, ice, and pressure stimuli usinga visual analog scale. Comparisons of continuous variables between the sensitivity evaluations wereperformed using the Friedman’s One-Way Analysisof Variance with repeated measures test (p<0.05).Results: The type of adhesive used and theapplication of a surface sealant had no significanteffects in postoperative sensitivity (p>0.05). Theuse of Clearfil S3 Bond resulted in almost the samelevel of postoperative sensitivity as did the useof G-Aenial Bond. The highest sensitivity scoreswere observed for the surface sealant appliedteeth without any statistical significance (p>0.05).Conclusions: Self etch adhesives displayedpostoperative sensitivity. The sensitivity scores slightly decreased at the end of 30 days (p>0.05). Surfacesealant application did not result in a decreasein sensitivity scores for either dentin adhesives.

Anahtar Kelimeler: All-in-one adhesives, surface sealant, postoperative sensitivity

PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Akpata ES, Behbehani J. Effect of bonding systems on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites. Am J Dent 2006;19(3):151-154 google scholar
  • Akpata ES, Sadiq W. Postoperative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):34- 38. google scholar
  • Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002;4(4):255- 269. google scholar
  • Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 2001;29(1):7-13. google scholar
  • van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent 2012;40(12):1060-1067. google scholar
  • Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7(2):107-113. google scholar
  • Irie M, Tanaka J, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G. Vertical and horizontal polymerization shrinkage in composite restorations. Dent Mater 2014;30(7):e189-198. google scholar
  • Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in lightcured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2001;17(3):253-259. google scholar
  • Ferracane JL. Buonocore lecture. Placing dental composites--a stressful experience. Oper Dent 2008;33(3):247-257. google scholar
  • Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class i occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo postoperative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent 1998;11(5):229-234. google scholar
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69(11):726-731. google scholar
  • Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26(9):1035-1042. google scholar
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30(7- 8):371-382. google scholar
  • Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part i. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5(1):27-40. google scholar
  • Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity. Am J Dent 2004;17(3):191-195. google scholar
  • Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of hema in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2008;24(10):1412-1419. google scholar
  • Casselli DS, Martins LR. Postoperative sensitivity in class i composite resin restorations in vivo. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(1):53-58. google scholar
  • Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121(2):251-255. google scholar
  • Delfino CS, Duarte S, Jr. Effect of the composite surface sealant application moment on marginal sealing of compactable composite resin restoration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18(12):2257-2261. google scholar
  • Erhardt MC, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class v aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27(4):396-402. google scholar
  • Lima AF, Soares GP, Vasconcellos PH, Ambrosano GM, Marchi GM, Lovadino JR, Aguiar FH. Effect of surface sealants on microleakage of class ii restorations after thermocycling and long-term water storage. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(3):249-254. google scholar
  • Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21(5):203-208. google scholar
  • Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of class v resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31(4):481-488. google scholar
  • Al-Omari WM, Al-Omari QD, Omar R. Effect of cavity disinfection on postoperative sensitivity associated with amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):165-170. google scholar
  • Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science committee project 2/98--fdi world dental federation study design (part i) and criteria for evaluation (part ii) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 2007;9 Suppl 1(121-147). google scholar
  • Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a hema-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. J Dent 2008;36(10):847-855. google scholar
  • Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2007;3(11):610-618 google scholar
  • Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite--a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2009;34(6):648-655. google scholar
  • Perdigao J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo AR, Hodges JS, Cordeiro HJ, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Amore R. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. Quintessence Int 2004;35(10):777- 784. google scholar
  • Weiner RS, Weiner LK, Kugel G. Teaching the use of bases and liners: A survey of north american dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127(11):1640-1645. google scholar
  • Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002;30(2-3):83-90. google scholar
  • Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, King NM, Goracci C, Ferrari M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials 2005;26(34):6863-6872. google scholar
  • Gwinnett AJ, Kanca JA, 3rd. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5(2):73-77. google scholar
  • Puckett AD, Fitchie JG, Kirk PC, Gamblin J. Direct composite restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):659-675. google scholar
  • Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21(12):1150-1157. google scholar
  • Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(6):658-664. google scholar
  • Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(3):175-190. google scholar
  • Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(3):207-225. google scholar
  • Uno S, Abo T, Tanaka T, Sano H. In vitro sealing performance of two one-step adhesive systems in cervical cavities. J Adhes Dent 2004;6(3):211- 219. google scholar
  • Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17 Suppl 1(S10-17); discussion S26-18. google scholar
  • Gordan VV, Mjor IA. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and selfetching primer. Oper Dent 2002;27(6):543-548. google scholar
  • Pashley DH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, Tay FR. The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46(2):211- 245. google scholar
  • Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21(1):9-20. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Tekçe, N., Demirci, M., Göktürk, S.A., Tuncer, S., Özel, E., Pala, K., & Baydemir, C. (2015). YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ. European Oral Research, 49(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


AMA

Tekçe N, Demirci M, Göktürk S A, Tuncer S, Özel E, Pala K, Baydemir C. YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ. European Oral Research. 2015;49(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


ABNT

Tekçe, N.; Demirci, M.; Göktürk, S.A.; Tuncer, S.; Özel, E.; Pala, K.; Baydemir, C. YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 49, n. 3, p. 1-10, 2015.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tekçe, Neslihan, and Mustafa Demirci and Sultan Aslıhan Göktürk and Safa Tuncer and Emre Özel and Kanşad Pala and Canan Baydemir. 2015. “YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ.” European Oral Research 49, no. 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tekçe, Neslihan, and Mustafa Demirci and Sultan Aslıhan Göktürk and Safa Tuncer and Emre Özel and Kanşad Pala and Canan Baydemir. “YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ.” European Oral Research 49, no. 3 (May. 2024): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


Harvard: Australian Style

Tekçe, N & Demirci, M & Göktürk, SA & Tuncer, S & Özel, E & Pala, K & Baydemir, C 2015, 'YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ', European Oral Research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1-10, viewed 19 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tekçe, N. and Demirci, M. and Göktürk, S.A. and Tuncer, S. and Özel, E. and Pala, K. and Baydemir, C. (2015) ‘YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ’, European Oral Research, 49(3), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921 (19 May. 2024).


MLA

Tekçe, Neslihan, and Mustafa Demirci and Sultan Aslıhan Göktürk and Safa Tuncer and Emre Özel and Kanşad Pala and Canan Baydemir. “YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ.” European Oral Research, vol. 49, no. 3, 2015, pp. 1-10. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921


Vancouver

Tekçe N, Demirci M, Göktürk SA, Tuncer S, Özel E, Pala K, Baydemir C. YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ. European Oral Research [Internet]. 19 May. 2024 [cited 19 May. 2024];49(3):1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921 doi: 10.17096/jiufd.33921


ISNAD

Tekçe, Neslihan - Demirci, Mustafa - Göktürk, SultanAslıhan - Tuncer, Safa - Özel, Emre - Pala, Kanşad - Baydemir, Canan. “YÜZEY ÖRTÜCÜ UYGULAMASI VE BONDİNG’İN ARKA BÖLGE RESTORASYONLARDA OLUŞAN POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYET ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ”. European Oral Research 49/3 (May. 2024): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.33921



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim19.02.2015
Kabul15.06.2015
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma19.02.2015

PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.