Referanslar

• AFAD (2018). Turkey Earthquake Hazard Map, https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/TDTH/main.xhtml. Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Akinci, H., Ozalp, A.Y., Kılıçer, S.T. (2015). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Planned Areas Using Geographical Information Systems and AHP Method: The Case of Artvin. Journal of Natural Hazards and Environment, 1(1-2):40-53. google scholar
• Alkan, H., Buyuksarac, A., Bektas, O., Isik, E. (2021). Coulomb stress change before and after 24.01.2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake (Mw=6.8) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(23):1-12. google scholar
• Budayan, C. (2019). Evaluation of delay causes for BOT projects based on perceptions of different stakeholders in Turkey. J Manag Eng 35:04018057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000668 google scholar
• Can, G. (2019). Using geographical information systems and analytical hierarchy method for site selection for wind turbine plants: The case of Çanakkale province, Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey. google scholar
• Chakraborty, S., Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India. Natural Hazards 99: 247274, doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03737-7 google scholar
• Cil, I., Arman, H. (2001). An Application of Analytical Hierarchy Method in Determining the New Settlement of Adapazarı (in Turkish). Journal of SAU Institute of Science and Technology, 5(1): 13-20. google scholar
• Copernicus (2021). Data of land use from Copernicus land Monitoring Service. https://land.copernicus.eu/, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Dagdeviren, M., Akay, D., Kurt, M. (2004). Analytical Hierarchy Process for Job Evaluation and Application. J Fac Eng Arch Gazi Univ, 19(2): 131138. google scholar
• Dandapat, K., Panda, G.K. (2017). Flood vulnerability analysis and risk assessment using analytical hierarchy process. Model Earth Syst Environ 3: 1627-1646. google scholar
• Darko, A., Chan, A.P.C., Ameyaw, E.E., Owusu, E.K., Parn, E., Edwards, D.J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management 19: 436-452.doi.org/10.1080 /15623599.2018.1452098 google scholar
• Demirkiran, D.G. (2019). Effect analysis of Gediz graben and environment earthquake according to geographic information systems and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (in Turkish). Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey. google scholar
• Ekmekcioglu, O., Koc, K., Ozger, M. (2021). District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 35: 617-637. google scholar
• Erden, T., Karaman, H. (2012). Analysis of earthquake parameters to generate hazard maps by integrating AHP and GIS for Kucukcekmece region. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12: 475-483. google scholar
• Geofabrik (2021). Maps and Data, https:// www.geofabrik.de/data/. Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Geologic Hazards Science Center (2011). https:// geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2002 /documentation/ parm.php, Accessed 07 May 2021. google scholar
• Ghosh, A., Kar, S.K. (2018). Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: a case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Natural Hazards 94: 349-368. google scholar
• Gurgun, A.P., Koc, K. (2020). Contractor prequalification for green buildings — evidence from Turkey. Eng Constr Archit Manag 27: 13771400. doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2019-0543 google scholar
• Hajkowicz, S., Collins, K. (2007). A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553-1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5 google scholar
• HGM (2021). Republic of Turkiye Ministry of National Defence General Directorate of Mapping. Turkish administrative borders data.https://www.harita.gov.tr/, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Isik, E., Aydin, M.C., Bakis, A., Ozluk, M.H. (2012). The Faults near Bitlis and Seismicity of the Region (in Turkish). BEU Journal of Science 1(2): 153-169. google scholar
• Isik, E. (2010). Bitlis City Earthquake Performance Analysis, PhD. Thesis, Sakarya University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Turkiye. google scholar
• Isik, E., Aydin, M.C., Buyuksarac, A. (2020). 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) earthquake damages and determination of earthquake parameters in the region. Earthquakes and Structures 19(2): 145-156. google scholar
• Jankowski, P. (1995). Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(3): 251-273. google scholar
• Malczewski, J. (2004). GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning 62: 3-65. google scholar
• Masood, M., Takeuchi, K. (2012). Assessment of flood hazard, vulnerability and risk of mid-eastern Dhaka using DEM and 1D hydrodynamic model. Nat Hazards 61: 757-770, doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0060-x google scholar
• Moradi, M., Delavar, M.R., Moshiri, B. (2015). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for seismic vulnerability assessment using quantifier-guided OWA operator: a case study of Tehran, Iran, Annals of GIS, 21(3):209-222, doi: 10.1080/19475683.2014.966858. google scholar
• MTA (2021). Data of geological structure from GeoScience Mab Viewer and Drawing Editor, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Türkiye, http://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Myers, J.H., Alpert, M.I. (1968). Determinant buying attitudes: Meaning and Measurement. Journal of Marketing, 32(4): 13-20. google scholar
• Ozsahin, E. (2014). Earthquake damage risk analysis in Tekirdag Province using geographic information systems (GIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Human Sciences 11(1): 861-879. google scholar
• Peng, Y. (2015). Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods. Ann Oper Res 234: 95-110. DOI 10.1007/s10479-012-1253-8 google scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3): 234-281. google scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 20-25. google scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1):9-26. google scholar
• Salifu, E., Agyei Agyare, W., Abdul-Ganiyu, S. (2022). Evaluation of Land Suitability for Crop Production in Northern Ghana Using GIS and AHP Based Techniques. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(4), 46-56.doi.org/ 10.30897/ijegeo.1022275 google scholar
• Savun-Hekimoğlu, B., Erbay, B., Burak, Z. S., Gazioğlu, C. (2021). A Comparative MCDM Analysis of Potential Short-Term Measures for Dealing with Mucilage Problem in the Sea of Marmara. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 8(4), 572-580. doi.org/ 10.30897/ijegeo.1026107 google scholar
• Sevgi Birincioglu, E. (2021). Disaster risk analysis of Bitlis province using geographical information systems and analytical hierarchy method. Master Thesis, Bitlis Eren University Graduate Education Institute, Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, Turkey. google scholar
• Subramanian, N., Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. Int. J Production Economics 138: 215-241. google scholar
• TAD (2021). Agricultural Land Evaluation Portal (TAD Portal), Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry General Directorate of Agricultural Reform. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Taherdoost, Hamed, Mitra Madanchian. (2023). "Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts" Encyclopedia 3, no. 1: 77-87.https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006 google scholar
• Timor, M. (2011). Analytical Hierarchy Process (in Turkish). First edition, Turkmen Publications, Istanbul, Turkey. 29-51. google scholar
• TUIK (2021). Population data from Data Portal for Statistical, Turkish Statistical Institute,https://data.tuik.gov.tr/, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• USGS (2021). EarthData and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Bitlis province, United States Geological Survey (USGS). https://www.usgs.gov/, Accessed 16 December 2021. google scholar
• Wang, Y., Liu, J., Elhag, T. (2008). An Integrated AHP-DEA Methodology for Bridge Risk Assessment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 54(3):513-525. google scholar
• Whole Building Design Guide (2010)http://www.wbdg.org/resources/seismic_design.php, Accessed 02 February 2021. google scholar
• Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. (2004). At risk, natural hazard, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 49-52. google scholar
• Yalcin, A. (2007). The Use of Analytical Hierarchy Method and GIS in the Production of Landslide Susceptibility Maps (in Turkish). Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Selcuk University, 22(3): 1 - 14. google scholar
• Yalcin, C., Sabah L. (2018). Creation of Earthquake Hazard Analysis of Adiyaman Province via GIS-Based Fuzzy Logic and AHP Methods (in Turkish). Adıyaman University, Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8: 101-113. google scholar
• Yang, X.L., Ding, J.H., Hou, H. (2013). Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis. Nat Hazards 68(2): 657-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0642-x google scholar
• Yavasoglu, F., Ozden Ç.V. (2017). Earthquake damage risk analysis using geographical information systems based analytical hierarchy process: Kadıköy example (in Turkish). TUBAV Science 10(3):28-38. google scholar

Atıflar