Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018    Tam Metin (PDF)

Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi

Harun AslanTarık Tuncay

Gönüllülük davranışlarına çeşitli toplumlarda ekonomik, sosyal ya da kültürel nedenlerden dolayı birçok anlam yüklenmiştir. Gönüllülük bazen yalnızca bir hayırseverlik davranışı olarak algılanabilirken bazen de ekonomik kalkınmaya katkı veren davranışlar olarak düşünülmüştür. Gönüllülüğe yönelik toplumsal anlamların keşfinde gönüllülerin ve bu alanda çalışan yöneticilerin görüşleri önemli katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de çocuk refahı alanında gönüllü faaliyetlere katılan gönüllülerin ve yöneticilerin gönüllülük alanındaki deneyimleri temelinde gönüllülük algılarını incelemektir. Çocuk refahı alanı Türkiye özelinde gönüllülük çalışmaları açısından yoğun katılımın olduğu bir kaynak olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma çocuk refahı alanından 60 gönüllü ile derinlemesine görüşme yoluyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında nitel araştırma yöntemi tercih edilmiş olup fenomonolojik araştırma deseni tercih edilmiştir. Anlatılar tematik olarak analiz edilmiş; kişisel düzeyde, aile ve sosyal çevre düzeyinde ve toplumsal düzeyde bakış açısı olmak üzere üç tema belirlenerek ayrıntılı olarak tartışılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında, bireylerin gönüllülüğe yönelik algılarında sahip olduğu kendi kişisel deneyimlerinin yanı sıra aile, arkadaş çevresinin ve yaşadıkları toplumun bakış açısının onların gönüllülük algılarını etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Konuyla ilgili gelecek araştırmalarda gönüllülük faaliyetlerinin sıkça yer aldığı yaşlı refahı, kadına yönelik şiddet ve kadın hakları, afet durumları ve doğal çevrenin korunması gibi alanlar üzerinden yapılacak çalışmalar gönüllülük çabalarının farklı sosyal hizmetler alanlarında nasıl algılandığının ortaya konulmasına yönelik daha bütüncül bir perspektif oluşmasına imkân tanıyabilir.

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018    Tam Metin (PDF)

Examining the Volunteering Perspectives of Individuals Participating in Child Welfare Volunteer Activities

Harun AslanTarık Tuncay

Acts of volunteerism can be observed in schools, hospitals, and religious institutions, as well as and even more so in nearby streets and apartments. Volunteering behaviors mean different things in different societies based on economic, social, and cultural reasons. While volunteering may sometimes be perceived only as a philanthropic behavior, other times it is considered as the behaviors that contribute to economic development. The opinions of volunteers and administrators working in this field play a significant role in uncovering these meanings. In this context, the study aims to investigate the perceptions that volunteers and managers who participate in Türkiye’s child welfare volunteer activities have toward volunteering based on their experiences volunteering in this field. The field of child welfare is considered a source of intense participation in terms of volunteer work in Türkiye. Therefore, this study has conducted in-depth interviews with 60 volunteers in the field of child welfare. The research has preferred the qualitative research method and phenomenological research design within its scope. The participants’ narratives have been analyzed thematically, with three themes being identified and discussed in detail regarding their perspectives: the personal level, the family and social environment level, and the societal level. These themes reveal the importance of understanding how volunteering is perceived in Türkiye. The research has concluded that individuals’ personal experiences and the perspectives of family, friends, and the society in which one lives are able to affect one’s perceptions about volunteering. Conducting future research on the subject as well as studies on areas where volunteering activities are frequently involved, such as elderly welfare, violence against women and women’s rights, disaster situations, and how to protect the natural environment, may enable a more holistic perspective to be formed in order to reveal how volunteering efforts are perceived in different social services fields.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Volunteering is a universal phenomenon and a way in which people try to do something good for society. People all over the world participate in volunteer activities for a great variety of reasons, such as to help eliminate poverty, to improve primary health and education, to provide a safe water supply and adequate sanitation, to tackle environmental issues and climate change, to reduce the risk of disasters, and to combat social exclusion and violent conflict. Various studies in the volunteering literature have occurred in various geographies, disciplines, and research groups on how volunteers perceive volunteering. However, volunteering studies carried out in Türkiye and, more specifically, studies on the reasons for volunteering and perceptions on volunteering are limited. Internationally announced reports have also clearly stated that the phenomenon of volunteering plays a limited role in Türkiye. According to the World Values Survey (WVS) in 1999 and 2007, only 4.5% and 5.3% of the population in Türkiye were members of social and/or political non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Additionally, Türkiye’s ranking is relatively low in the announced international reports in terms of participation in volunteering. For instance, the results from the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF, 2018) World Giving Index 2018 Report show Türkiye to rank 131 out of 146 countries. While volunteering occurred at a rate of 2.5% in social organizations, this number was 4.2% for political organizations (İçduygu et al., 2011). For this reason, studies on the field of volunteerism in Türkiye should be considered to have acquired scientific data and to be one of the factors that will unlock both individual and social development and integration. This study uses the inspiration provided by these sources to guide our research with the aim of revealing the perceptions toward volunteering that the volunteers and administrators who participate in volunteer activities in the field of child welfare in Türkiye have through their experiences in the field of volunteering.

Method

In line with the research purposes, the study has selected the phenomenological research design for revealing the experiences, perceptions, and meanings individuals attribute to a phenomenon. The qualitative study uses the in-depth interview technique with semi-structured interview forms. Data were collected from 60 participants in volunteer fields who had been accessed using the purposeful sampling method. The participants involve volunteers from 10 different NGOs and administrators from 10 different NGOs, four different ministries, four different municipalities, one international organization, and three different universities that have a wide range of participants in child welfare in Türkiye.

Findings and Discussion

The results of the research are presented under three main themes: (a) perspectives on volunteering at a personal level, (b) family and social environment’s perspectives on volunteering, and (c) society’s perspectives on volunteering. The study also analyzes within its scope the participants’ first associations about volunteering.

The perceptions on volunteering at the personal level reflect how individuals generally think about volunteering. Personal-level perceptions on volunteering have been categorized into: volunteers’ perceptions, experts’ perceptions, and decisionmakers’ perceptions.

The results show volunteering to have been identified and perceived with concepts such as social welfare, active citizenship, responsibility, solidarity and helping, winwin, taking time, sincerity, gratuitousness, and contribution to change. Accordingly, the expressions that refer the perspective of volunteering and all eight subthemes that were created afterward involve positive attitudes toward volunteering. The main reason for this result can be considered as individuals who are involved in voluntary activities being able to realize and experience the benefits of volunteering. In particular, the emphasis on responsibility, solidarity, helping people, contributing to change, and being an active citizen indicate a sense of achievement at the personal level, while emphases such as contributing to social welfare, contributing to change, and win-win describe the macro-level contribution of volunteering from a personal point of view.

At the family and social environment level, volunteering has been found to be identified and perceived through such concepts as appreciation, insecurity and fear, waste of time, and not considering working in the field of volunteering as a serious job. The inferences about the family and social environment’s perspectives on volunteering point to a structure that inherently has both positive and negative meanings. Individuals who bring their volunteering lifestyle to their family and social environment allow the benefit they’ve created to be discovered by their environment. Thus, an interaction can emerge that positively affects the volunteer, such as being appreciated by one’s environment, improving one’s commitment to the field of volunteering, and changing both one’s own perspective towards volunteering, as well as of those in one’s own environment. Regarding the negative points of view involving family and social environment, historically speaking, the fear and insecurity created by the political climate in the field of civil society, the loss of time, and the inability to see volunteer activities as a serious business result in one’s family and social environment being unable to fully understand the individual’s environment.

In line with the point of view toward volunteering at the society level, volunteering is also found to be identified and perceived with such prejudices and concepts as: being a free workforce, having no economic return, and being an area that creates fear and distrust. In the context of society’s perspective on volunteering, the inability of society to understand and know the volunteer activities, as well as the insecurity and fears in the field of civil society from past to present, can cause the social perspective of volunteering to be formed at a negative level. As a result, making the right policies and promoting efforts to change negative perceptions and prejudices in both the family, social environment, and society will contribute to correcting perceptions of volunteerism and to reconstructing its image.

Conclusion

The research concludes that individuals’ personal experiences and the perspectives of family, friends, and the society in which one lives can affect one’s perceptions on volunteering. This general result reveals the need to conduct new studies from a multidimensional perspective and a range of micro- and macro-variables in order to change individuals’ perceptions toward and increase their motivation to participate in volunteer activities. Moreover, areas such as elderly welfare, violence against women and women’s rights, disaster situations, and the protection of the natural environment are areas in which volunteer activities are frequently involved, and studies on these areas may allow a more holistic perspective to be created to alter awareness about volunteerism.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Akboğa, S. (2017). The current state of volunteering in Turkey. In N. Butcher, J. & Einolf, C. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on Volunteering: Voices from the South. (pp. 245-261). Springer, Cham. google scholar
  • Akintola, O. (2011). What motivates people to volunteer? The case of volunteer AIDS caregivers in faith-based organizations in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Health Policy and Planning, 26(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq019 google scholar
  • Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Service Participation, 39(3), 251-263. google scholar
  • Balaban, A. Y., & İnce, İ. Ç. (2015). Gençlerin sivil toplum kuruluşlarındaki gönüllülük faaliyetleri ve gönüllülük algısı: Türkiye Eğitim Gönüllüleri Vakfı (TEGV) Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 149-169. google scholar
  • Bartsch, G. (2012). Emotional learning: managerial development by corporate volunteering. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211208880 google scholar
  • Bass, S.A., & Caro, F.G. (1995). Increasing volunteering among older people. In S. Bass (Eds.), Older and active: How Americans over 55 are contributing to society (pp. 71-96). Yale University Press. google scholar
  • Batuhan, E. R., & Gürbüz, P. G. (2021). Uluslararası spor organizasyonlarında gönüllü motivasyonu ile serbest zaman doyum düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 152-172. google scholar
  • Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Alta Mira Press. google scholar
  • Beyazova, A. & Durmuş, G. (2020). “Abla Bir Daha Gelecek misin?” Türkiye’de Çocuklarla Gönüllülük Deneyimleri. E. Erdoğan, P. Uyan Semerci, N. Yentürk & L. Yurttagüler (Eds.), Türkiye’de gönüllülük (ss. 133-164) içinde. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Blome, W. W., & Steib, S. (2008). An examination of oversight and review in the child welfare system: The many watch the few serve the many. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(3), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J479v01n03_02 google scholar
  • Bryan, V., Jones, B., & Lawson, E. (2010). Key features of effective citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Findings from a national study of citizen review panels. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.12.006 google scholar
  • Bryan, V., Collins-Camargo, C., & Jones, B. (2011). Reflections on citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Listening to citizen review panel volunteers and agency liaisons. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(5), 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.11.003 google scholar
  • CAF. (2018). Caf World Giving Index 2018. https://www.cafonline.org/about-us/publications/2018-publications/caf-world-giving-index-2018 google scholar
  • Celdran Castro, M., & Buscemi, V (2011). Benefits, costs and barriers to be a volunteer: Perception in oncology volunteers. Apuntes de Psicologla, 29, 59-70. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2019.01.031 google scholar
  • Cheung, C. K., Lo, T. W., & Liu, S. C. (2012). Measuring volunteering empowerment and competence in Shanghai. Administration in Social Work, 36(2), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107. 2011.564722 google scholar
  • Cheung, C. K., Lo, T. W., & Liu, E. S. C. (2016). Sustaining social trust and volunteer role identity reciprocally over time in pre-adult, adult, and older volunteers. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2015.1078267 google scholar
  • Chum, A., Mook, L., Handy, F., Schugurensky, D., & Quarter, J. (2013). Degree and direction of paid employee/volunteer interchange in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21072 google scholar
  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516 google scholar
  • Cnaan, R. A., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 25(3), 364-383. https://doi. org/10.1177/0899764096253006 google scholar
  • Cordingley, S., & Bates, K. (2004). Supporting volunteering in Australia. Volunteering Australia Inc. google scholar
  • Creswell, J. W. (2020). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çeviri). Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Çevik, A., & Gürsel, F. (2015). Gönüllü Motivasyon Envanteri: Türk Popülasyonuna Uyarlanması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 83-92. google scholar
  • Dageid, W., Akintola, O., & Saeberg, T. (2016). Sustaining motivation among community health workers in aids care in Kwazulu-natal, South Africa: challenges and prospects. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(5), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21787 google scholar
  • DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family medicine and community health, 7(2), 1-8. google scholar
  • Demir, N. Ö., Baran, A. G., & Ulusoy, D. (2005). Relations of Adolescents with Their Peer Groups-Friends in Ankara and Deviated Behaviors. Bilig, (32), 83-108. google scholar
  • Ellis, S. J., & Noyes, K. H. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers (Rev. ed.). Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Farooq, Q., Liu, X., Fu, P., & Hao, Y. (2020). Volunteering sustainability: An advancement in corporate social responsibility conceptualization. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2450-2464. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1893 google scholar
  • Fischer, L. R., & Schaffer, K. B. (1993). Older volunteers: A guide to research and practice. Sage Publications, Inc. google scholar
  • Germain, C. B., & Bloom, M. (1999). Human behavior in the social environment: An ecological view. Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Gibelman, M., & Sweifach, J. (2008). Acting on our values: Do social workers volunteer?. Social Work, 53(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.53 google scholar
  • Halman, L. (2003). Volunteering, democracy, and democratic attitudes? In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: cross-culturalperspectives (pp. 179-198). Kluwer. google scholar
  • Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(3), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00405.x google scholar
  • Haugh, H., & Kitson, M. (2007). The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour’s economic policy and the social economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(6), 973-994. https://doi.org/10.1093/ cje/bem027 google scholar
  • Herzig, C. (2006). Corporate volunteering in Germany: Survey and empirical evidence. International Journal ofBusiness Environment, 1(1), 51-69. google scholar
  • Hiatt, S. W., Michalek, P., Younge, P., Miyoshi, T., & Fryer, E. (2000). Characteristics of volunteers and families in a neonatal home visitation project: The Kempe Community Caring Program. Child abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00114-3 google scholar
  • Howard, B. W. (1999). Managing volunteers. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 14(3), 37-38. google scholar
  • İçduygu, A., Meydanoğlu, Z., & Sert, D. (2011). Civil society in Turkey: A turning point. Civil society index project analytical country report for Turkey II. TUSEV Publications. google scholar
  • Jones, B. L. (2004). Citizen participation in public child welfare: A multi-state study of citizens review panel members’perceptions of effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky). google scholar
  • Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2002). State and civil society in Turkey: Democracy, development, and protest. In A. B. Sajoo (Eds.), Civilsociety in theMuslim world: Contemporaryperspectives (pp. 247- 272). I.B. Tauris. google scholar
  • Kallio, H., Pietila, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. google scholar
  • Keyman, F., ve Öniş, Z. (2007). Turkish politics in a changing world: Global dynamics and domestic transformations. Istanbul Bilgi University Press. google scholar
  • Kifle Mekonen, Y., & Adarkwah, M. A. (2022). Volunteers in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Intrinsic, extrinsic, or altruistic motivation? Postgraduate international students in China. Journal of Social Service Research, 48(2), 147-162. google scholar
  • Kobulsky, J. M., Cage, J., & Celeste, G. (2018). The perceived effects of volunteer use by public child welfare agencies. Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2018.04.015 google scholar
  • Koşar, N. G. (1992). Sosyal Hizmetlerde Aile ve Çocuk Refahı Alanı (2 b.). MN Ofset. google scholar
  • Kulik, L. (2007). Explaining responses to volunteering: An ecological model. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295994 google scholar
  • Kümbetoğlu, B. (2012). Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma. Bağlam Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Law, B. M., & Shek, D. T. (2009). Family influence on volunteering intention and behavior among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 44(175), 665. google scholar
  • Leigh, R., Smith, H. D., Giesing, C., Leon, M. J., Haski-Leventhal, D., Lough, B. J., Mati, M. J., & Strassburg, S. (2011). Dünyada Gönüllülüğün Durumu Raporu. P. Hockenos (Ed.), Biliz, Z. (Çev.). Art Press. google scholar
  • Low, N., Butt, S., Ellis, P., & Davis Smith, J. (2007). Helping out: A national survey of volunteering and charitable giving. Cabinet Office google scholar
  • Maes, K. (2012). Volunteerism or labor exploitation? Harnessing the volunteer spirit to sustain AIDS treatment programs in urban Ethiopia. Human organization, 71(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.17730/ humo.71.1.axm39467485m22w4 google scholar
  • Martinez, J. M. (2003). Liability and volunteer organizations: A survey of the law. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 151-169. google scholar
  • Martinez, T. A., & McMullin, S. L. (2004). Factors affecting decisions to volunteer in non-governmental organizations. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/ nml.27 google scholar
  • McAllum, K. (2017). Volunteers/volunteering. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 2-14. google scholar
  • McKeever, B. (2015). The nonprofit sector in brief 2015: Public charities, giving, and volunteering. Retrieved January 05, 2020 from https://nccs.urban.org/project/nonprofit-sector-brief google scholar
  • Miller, A., Simpson, B., Lieben, J., & Simpson, B. J. (2011). Understanding The Role of Volunteerism In Creating Social Inclusion. South West Communities Resource Centre. google scholar
  • Milligan, C., & Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Preserving space for volunteers: Exploring the links between voluntary welfare organizations, volunteering and citizenship. Urban Studies, 42(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500034884 google scholar
  • Mitchell, K. (2001). Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state. Economy and Society, 30(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042262 google scholar
  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social Science & Medicine, 56(2), 259-269. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00025-4 google scholar
  • National Community Service. (2018). Newsroom 2018. Retrieved December 30, 2019 from https:// www.nationalservice.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/volunteering-us-hits-record-high-worth-167-billion google scholar
  • Omoto, A. M., & Malsch, A. (2005). Psychological sense of community: Conceptual issues and connections to volunteerism-related activism. In A. M. Omoto (Eds.), Processes of community change and social action (pp. 83-102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
  • Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (2002). Considerations of community: The context and process of volunteerism. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 846-867. https://doi. org/10.1177/0002764202045005007 google scholar
  • Opdenakker, R. J. G. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. art-11). Institut fur Klinische Sychologie and Gemeindesychologie. google scholar
  • Ortega Carpio, M. L., Martinez-Cousinou, G., & Morales-Femandez, E. J. (2018). Transformative Volunteerism: An Inventory of NGDO Volunteers’ Motivations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017 .1363103 google scholar
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y google scholar
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çeviri). Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  • Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540/-4560.00270 google scholar
  • Penner, L. A. (2004). Volunteerism and social problems: Making things better or worse?. Journal of Social issues, 60(3), 645-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00377.x google scholar
  • Perlmutter, F. D., & Cnaan, R. A. (1994). Challenging human service organizations to redefine volunteer roles. Administration in Social Work, 17(4), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J147v17n04_06 google scholar
  • Plowden, W. (2003). The compact: attempts to regulate relationships between government and the voluntary sector in England. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 415-432. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0899764003254909 google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and Revival of American Community. Touchstone. google scholar
  • Rochester, C., Paine A. E., Howlett S., ve Zimmeck M. (2012). Volunteering and Society in The 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: From philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.306 google scholar
  • Smith, J. D. (1998). The 1997 national survey of volunteering. National Centre for Volunteering. google scholar
  • Snyder, M. Snyder, M., Clary, EG, & Stukas, AA (2000). The functional approach to volunteerism. In GR Maio & JM Olson (Eds.), Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (pp. 365-393). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
  • Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2008). Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy implications. Social issues and policy review, 2(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00009.x google scholar
  • Söğütlü, A. (2015). Çocuk Refahı Alanında Çalışan Personelin Sevgi Evleri Modeline Yönelik Değerlendirmeleri. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi). google scholar
  • Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press. google scholar
  • Sundeen, R. A., Raskoff, S. A., & Garcia, M. C. (2007). Differences in perceived barriers to volunteering to formal organizations: Lack of time versus lack of interest. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.150 google scholar
  • Swartz, A., & Colvin, C. J. (2015). ‘It’s in our veins’: Caring natures and material motivations of community health workers in contexts of economic marginalization. Critical Public Health, 25(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.941281 google scholar
  • Şentürk, M., Adıgüzel, Y., & Turan Tüylüoğlu, B. (2016). Üniversitede Gönüllü Olmak Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Gönüllülük Algıları Eğilimleri ve Deneyimleri Araştırması İstanbul Üniversitesi Örneği. Limit Ofset. google scholar
  • Tawil, S. (2013). Education for ‘global citizenship’: A framework for discussion (ERF working papers series, no. 7). Paris, France: UNESCO Education, Research and Foresight. google scholar
  • TGA. (2019). Türkiye’de Gönüllülük Araştırması. Available at: https://stk.bilgi.edu.tr/media/ uploads/2019/12/16/ google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Aslan, H., & Tuncay, T. (2024). Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(1), 283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


AMA

Aslan H, Tuncay T. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2024;44(1):283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


ABNT

Aslan, H.; Tuncay, T. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 44, n. 1, p. 283-311, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aslan, Harun, and Tarık Tuncay. 2024. “Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 1: 283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aslan, Harun, and Tarık Tuncay. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 1 (Nov. 2024): 283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


Harvard: Australian Style

Aslan, H & Tuncay, T 2024, 'Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi', İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 283-311, viewed 22 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aslan, H. and Tuncay, T. (2024) ‘Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(1), pp. 283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018 (22 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Aslan, Harun, and Tarık Tuncay. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 1, 2024, pp. 283-311. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


Vancouver

Aslan H, Tuncay T. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 22 Nov. 2024 [cited 22 Nov. 2024];44(1):283-311. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018


ISNAD

Aslan, Harun - Tuncay, Tarık. Çocuk Refahı Alanında Gönüllü Faaliyetlere Katılım Sağlayan Bireylerin Gönüllülüğe Bakışlarının İncelenmesi”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44/1 (Nov. 2024): 283-311. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.44.1.0018



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim19.03.2022
Kabul18.02.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma10.07.2024

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.