Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696    Tam Metin (PDF)

Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek

Hakan Karaman

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, evsizlikle mücadele alanında eski evsizliğin bir kaynak olarak nasıl ele alınabileceğini değerlendirmektir. Nitel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanan bu araştırmada fenomenolojik desen tercih edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda evsizlik alanında gönüllü veya profesyonel çalışma tecrübesine sahip 11 katılımcı ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz aracılığı ile yorumlanarak dört tema altında okuyucuya sunulmuştur. Ulaşılan verilerde eski evsizlerin, ihtiyaçlar ve ilişkiler yönünden sokak yaşamını iyi tanıdığı ve sokak çalışmalarında kullanılabilecek güçlü iletişim becerilerine sahip olduğu aktarılmıştır. Bu beceriler neticesinde eski evsizlerin sokaktaki evsizlere rehberlik etme, motivasyon oluşturma, etkili iletişim ve güven sağlama gibi rolleri yerine getirebileceği vurgulanmıştır. Diğer yandan bu sürecin eski evsizler açısından travmatize olma, yardım etme isteğini kontrol edememe, hizmetlerde kendini öne çıkarma, evsizi ve evsizliği istismar etme gibi riskleri de barındırabileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu risklere karşı eski evsizliğin yalnızca barınmaya geçmiş olmakla değil psikososyal iyileşme ile ilişkili olarak değerlendirilmesi önerilmektedir. Yine eski evsizlerin sahaya çıkmadan önce psikolojik sağlamlık, iletişim becerileri, kriz yönetimi gibi konularda hazırlanması önerilirken süreç içinde eski evsize yönelik sürekli bir desteğin sunulması gerekli görülmüştür. Eski evsizlerin doğrudan sokakta bulunmanın yanı sıra bu alanda çalışanlara danışman statüsünde katkı verebileceği ve topluma yönelik farkındalık çalışmalarında etkili roller alabileceği belirtilmiştir. Sonuç itibariyle eski evsizliğin sağladığı doğal tecrübeden ilgili öneriler çerçevesinde faydalanılmasının, evsizlikle mücadeleye özgün bir katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Power of Experience: Utilizing Former Homelessness as a Resource to Combat Homelessness

Hakan Karaman

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate how the experience of former homelessness can be considered a resource in the field of combating homelessness. The research was conducted according to a qualitative research design. In-depth interviews were conducted with 11 participants who work voluntarily or professionally in the field of homelessness within the scope of the research. The data obtained were interpreted thematically. The obtained data indicated that former homeless people are well acquainted with street life in terms of needs and relationships and have strong communication skills that can be used in street work. It was emphasized that as a result of these skills, former homeless people can fulfill roles such as guiding, creating motivation, effective communication and providing trust for homeless people. On the other hand, it was determined that this process may also contain risks such as traumatization, inability to control the desire to help, putting oneself forward in services and abusing the homeless and homelessness. Against these risks, it is recommended that former homelessness be evaluated not only in relation to moving to shelter but also in relation to psychosocial recovery. In addition, it is recommended that former homeless people be prepared in terms of psychological resilience, communication skills and crisis management before going out into the field, and it was deemed necessary to provide continuous support to the former homeless during the process. Also it has been determined that former homeless people can contribute to those working in this field as consultants and take effective roles in awareness activities aimed at society, in addition to being directly on the streets. As a result, it is thought that utilizing the natural experience provided by former homelessness within the framework of relevant suggestions will make a unique contribution to the fight against homelessness.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Background

Homelessness represents a complex, multifaceted issue confronting modern societies, affecting a wide range of individuals due to inadequate housing, lack of social support, and various socio-economic factors. Beyond the obvious lack of stable housing, homelessness involves diverse challenges such as mental health issues, substance abuse, and social exclusion (Crane et al., 2006). Therefore, the strategies to address homelessness must be equally comprehensive, incorporating multidimensional approaches that aim to provide long-term solutions. These strategies must also address the socio-economic, psychological, and interpersonal dimensions of homelessness to achieve sustainable outcomes for affected individuals.

One of the key strategies employed to combat homelessness is street work, which involves direct engagement with individuals living on the streets. Street work is crucial because it enables service providers to identify the immediate needs of homeless individuals, offer support, and create tailored interventions that address both their urgent and long-term requirements (Bodelan, 2016). This approach is particularly valuable because it allows service providers to meet homeless individuals where they are, literally and metaphorically, and develop relationships based on trust and understanding. However, recent research highlights that former homeless individuals may serve as a unique and underutilized resource in street work. Their lived experiences equip them with a profound understanding of street life, enabling them to empathize deeply with those currently experiencing homelessness and communicate more effectively (Watson & Cuervo, 2017). Former homeless individuals can leverage their experiences to serve as guides, role models, and motivational figures for those still on the streets, facilitating their transition to stable housing. However, while the potential for former homeless individuals to contribute positively to homelessness interventions is significant, their involvement in such efforts also presents challenges and risks. This study aims to explore the specific roles that former homeless individuals can play in combating homelessness, the characteristics that make them suitable for these roles, and the risks associated with their participation in street work.

Method

This qualitative study seeks to answer the central research question: “How can former homelessness be utilized as a resource in combating homelessness?” The research focuses on understanding the characteristics of former homeless individuals, the specific roles they can play in street work, the potential risks they face, and the most effective ways to harness their contributions. Given the exploratory nature of this research, a qualitative methodology was deemed most appropriate, as it allows for an in-depth exploration of participants’ lived experiences and perspectives (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2018).

The study involved conducting in-depth interviews with 11 participants who had professional or voluntary experience working in homelessness services. These participants were selected based on two criteria: their prior experience of homelessness and their current or past involvement in homelessness interventions, either as volunteers or professionals. The data were collected using a semi-structured interview format, allowing for flexibility in exploring participants’ experiences while ensuring that key topics were covered. The interviews were analyzed thematically, identifying key themes related to the roles, challenges, and contributions of former homeless individuals in street work.

Results

The thematic analysis revealed several key findings regarding the roles of former homeless individuals in street work and the potential risks they face. First, the study found that former homeless individuals possess a deep and nuanced understanding of the dynamics of street life, which enables them to empathize with current homeless individuals in ways that service providers without such experiences may struggle to do. This insight allows them to anticipate the needs of those still living on the streets and engage in communication that is both effective and sensitive to the challenges these individuals face. Additionally, former homeless individuals were found to be well-equipped to serve as role models and guides for current homeless individuals. Their successful transitions from homelessness to stable housing provide them with credibility and relatability, enabling them to offer both practical guidance and motivational support. Their lived experiences allow them to demonstrate to others that overcoming homelessness is possible, instilling hope and motivation in those still struggling.

However, the study also identified several risks associated with involving former homeless individuals in street work. The most significant risk is re-traumatization, as returning to the streets—an environment that once caused them great distress—may trigger past emotional and psychological pain. The experience of homelessness is inherently traumatic, involving exposure to violence, neglect, and instability (Goodman et al., 1991). Thus, even after securing housing, former homeless individuals may carry deep psychological scars. Engaging in street work, particularly when working directly with current homeless individuals, may exacerbate these scars, leading to emotional setbacks.

Another potential risk is that former homeless individuals may struggle to manage their desire to help, leading them to overstep boundaries in their relationships with current homeless individuals. The strong empathy they feel for those still on the streets may cause them to blur the lines between professional support and personal involvement, which could compromise the effectiveness of their interventions and lead to emotional burnout (Breyer, 2020). Moreover, there is a risk that former homeless individuals may project their own experiences onto others, assuming that the path they followed out of homelessness is the only valid approach. This can result in a lack of flexibility and sensitivity to the diverse needs and experiences of current homeless individuals.

Finally, there is the potential for abusing, where former homeless individuals might misuse their position to prioritize personal gain over the well-being of those they aim to help. In some cases, individuals may exploit their past experiences of homelessness to gain social or financial advantages, undermining the integrity of the support they provide. This risk is particularly pronounced in situations where former homeless individuals are not adequately supported or monitored, as the power dynamics between them and the homeless individuals they work with can be easily manipulated (Potter, 2006).

To mitigate these risks, the study suggests that the involvement of former homeless individuals in street work should be carefully managed. It is recommended that their role in such work not be based solely on having secured housing but also on their psychosocial recovery. Moreover, former homeless individuals should receive training in psychological resilience, communication skills, and crisis management before engaging in outreach work. Continuous support should be provided to them throughout their involvement in street-level work to ensure they are emotionally and mentally equipped to handle the challenges. The study also suggests that former homeless individuals can contribute in roles beyond direct street outreach. They could serve as consultants to those working in the field, helping professionals better understand the dynamics of street life. Additionally, they could play an active role in raising public awareness about homelessness, leveraging their personal experiences to educate and inform the broader community.

Conclusion

The experiences of former homeless individuals offer a valuable resource in the fight against homelessness. Their empathy, communication skills, and deep understanding of street life can make them highly effective in helping current homeless individuals. However, their involvement in street work must be managed carefully to prevent the risks associated with re-traumatization, boundary violations, and exploitation. By providing appropriate training, ongoing support, and carefully defined roles, former homeless individuals can make a unique and meaningful contribution to homelessness interventions, helping to build trust, motivate change, and offer hope to those still struggling on the streets.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Acar, B., Bozkafa, H., Vural, B., Önal, S., Genç, M. ve Yaman, Ö.M. (2022). Evsizliğin Nedenleri ve Deneyimleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma: Beyoğlu Örneği. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 33 (2), 339-358. google scholar
  • Allen, M., Benjaminsen, L., O’Sullivan, E. & Pleace, N. (2020). Ending homelessness? The contrasting experience of Denmark, Finland and Ireland. Bristol: Policy Press. google scholar
  • Baum, S. & W. Burnes. (1993). A National in Denial The Truth About Homelessness. San Francisco: Westview Pres. google scholar
  • Bodelan, M. (2016) Street social work: essence and specificity. Science and Education, (1), 28-31. google scholar
  • Breyer, T. (2020). Empathy, sympathy and compassion. The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotion içinde. (pp. 429-440). Routledge. google scholar
  • Cloke, P., May, J., & Johnsen, S. (2010). Swept Up Lives?: Re-envisioning The Homeless City. Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  • Coady, N. & Lehmann, P. (Eds.)., 2016, Theoretical Perspectives For Direct Social Work Practice: A Generalist-Eclectic Approach. Springer. google scholar
  • Crane, M., Warnes, A. M. & Fu, R. (2006). Developing homelessness prevention practice: Combining research evidence and professional knowledge. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14 (2), 156-166. google scholar
  • Creswell, J. W., 2021, Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni (6. Baskı), (çev. Demir ve Bütün), Ankara: Siyasal kitabevi. google scholar
  • Culhane, D. P. (2008). The cost of homelessness: A perspective from the United States. European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 97-114. google scholar
  • Dordick, G. A. (2002). Recovering from homelessness: Determining the “quality of sobriety” in a transitional housing program. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 7-32. google scholar
  • Downer, R. T. (2013). Homelessness and its consequences: The impact on children’s psychological well-being. Routledge. google scholar
  • Dowling, M. (2006). Approaches to Reflexivity in Qualitative Eesearch. Nurse Researcher, 13(3), 7-21. google scholar
  • Erickson, J. R., Stevens, S., McKnight, P., & Figueredo, A. J. (1996). Willingness for treatment as a predictor of retention and outcomes. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 14(4), 135-150. google scholar
  • Ersin, İ. ve Baş, H. (2021). İstanbul’da Yaşayan Evsizlerin Sosyoekonomik Durumları, Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri: Fatih İlçesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Maruf İktisat İslam İktisadı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), s.41-67. google scholar
  • Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Explaining homelessness: A critical realist perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 22(1), 1-17. google scholar
  • Flatau, P., Zaretzky, K., Brady, M., Haigh, Y. & Martin, R. (2013). The cost of homelessness and the net benefit of homelessness programs: A national study. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Retrieved From: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/sites/default/files/migration/documents/ AHURI_Final_Report_No218_The-cost-of-homelessness-and-the-net-benefit-of-homelessness-programs-a-national-study.pdf google scholar
  • Gaetz, S., Gulliver, T., & Richter, T. (2014). The State of Homelessness in Canada 2014. Canadian Homelessness Research Network. Retrieved From: https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/ bitstream/10315/29368/1/SOHC2014.pdf google scholar
  • Gerzi, S. (2005). Trauma, narcissism and the two attractors in trauma. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(4), 1033-1050. google scholar
  • Gilbert, R. (2001). Doing More for Those Made Homeless by Natural Disasters, World Bank, Disaster Management Facility, Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Goodman, L. A., Saxe, L., & Harvey, M. (1991). Homelessness as psychological trauma: Broadening perspectives. American Psychologist, 46(11), 1219. google scholar
  • Gürel, M. (2024). Mekânsızlar: Evsizlik, Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Hâkansson, J. (2003). Exploring the phenomenon of empathy (Doctoral Dissertion, Stockholm University, Department of Psychology). Retrieved From: https://www.atu.dk/sites/default/files/ aktiviteter/empathy_dissertation.pdf google scholar
  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. google scholar
  • Hope, M. & J. Young (1986). The Faces of Homelessness. Lexington: Lexington Books. google scholar
  • International Network of Social Street Workers, (2008). International Guide on the Methodology of Street Work Throughout the World. Bruxelles: Dynamo international. google scholar
  • Johnson, G., & Chamberlain, C. (2011). Are the homeless mentally ill? Australian Journal of Social Issues. 46(1), 29-48. google scholar
  • Karaman, H. (2024). Sokağa Ulaşmanın Metodolojisi: Sosyal Hizmet Teorisinden Sokak Çalışması. Sosyal Sağlık Dergisi. 4(2). google scholar
  • Klop, H. T., Evenblij, K., Gootjes, J. R., de Veer, A. J., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2018). Care avoidance among homeless people and access to care: an interview study among spiritual caregivers, street pastors, homeless outreach workers and formerly homeless people. BMC Public Health, 18, 1-12. google scholar
  • Kuo G. (2019). Yet another emerging global crisis - Homelessness. The Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere. Retrieved From: https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/yet-another-emerging-global-crisis-homelessness/ google scholar
  • Kümbetoğlu, B. (2015). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları. google scholar
  • Lavella, L. A. (2004). Time perspective and hope among the current homeless and former homeless. (Doctoral Thesis, Adler University). google scholar
  • Levicka, K., Zakova, M., & Stryckova, D. (2015). Identity of Street Workers Working with Drug Users and Sexworkers in Slovakia. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional 7(2). google scholar
  • Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. google scholar
  • McNaughton, C. (2008). Transition Through Homelessness:Lives on the Edge. UK: Palgrav Macmillan. google scholar
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide To Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Merriam, S.B. (2018). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber, (çev. Selahattin Turan). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
  • Morrell-Bellai, T., Goering, P., & Katherine, B. (2000). Becoming and remaining homeless: A qualitative investigation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 21(6), 581-604. google scholar
  • Morris, D., & Gordon, J. (2006). The Role of the Emergency Department in the Care of Homeless and Disadvantaged Populations. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 24: 839-848. google scholar
  • Moxley, D. P., Washington, O. G., & McElhaney, J. (2012). “I don’t have a home:” Helping Homeless People Through Faith, Spirituality, and Compassionate Service. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 431-449. google scholar
  • Nies, M A. & McEwen, M. (2001). Community Health Nursing:Promoting The Health of Populations (3rd ed.) USA: W B. Saunders Company google scholar
  • O’Connel., J., J. (2004). Dying in the Shadows: the Challenge of Providing Health Care of Homeless People. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 170(8). 1251-1252. google scholar
  • Palaganas, E. C., Sanchez, M. C., Molintas, M. V. P., & Caricativo, R. D. (2017). Reflexivity in Qualitative Research: A Journey of Learning. The Qualitative Report. 22(2). 426-438. google scholar
  • Piechowicz, M., Piotrowski, A., & Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B. (2014). The social rehabilitation of homeless women with children. Acta Neuropsychologica, 12(4). google scholar
  • Pleace, N. (2011). The ambiguities, limits and risks of Housing First from a European perspective. European Journal of Homelessness, 5(2). google scholar
  • Plumb, J. D. (2000). Homelessness: Reducing health disparities. Canadian Medical Association Journal,163 (2), 172- 173. google scholar
  • Potter, N., N. (2006). What is manipulative behavior, anyway? Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(2), 139-156. google scholar
  • Punch, K.F. (2005). Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş. (çev. ed. Zeliha Etöz) Ankara: Siyasal Kitap. google scholar
  • Puusepp, V. (2023). Becoming closer to one another: Shared emotions and social relationships. Philosophical Psychology, 1-27. google scholar
  • Ravenhill, M. (2016). The Culture of Homelessness. Routledge. google scholar
  • Rocha, C., Johnson, A. K., McChesney, K. Y., & Butterfield, W. H (1996) Predictors of Housing for Sheltered Homeless Families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services.17(4) 43-56. google scholar
  • Rossi, P. (1989) Without Shelter: Homelessness in The 1980. New York: Priority Pres. google scholar
  • Shlay, A. B. (1994). Running on empty: Monitoring the lives and circumstances of formerly homeless families with children. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 3(2), 135-162. google scholar
  • Simmel, G. (2009). Bireysellik ve Kültür (çev. Tuncay Birkan), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Somerville, P. (2013). Understanding homelessness. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(4), 384-415. google scholar
  • Speak, S. & Tipple, G. (2007). Housing and Homelessness in Developing Nations. D. Levinson & M. Ross (ed.), Homelessness Handbook içinde, (s. 374-383). USA: Berkshire. google scholar
  • Susser, E., Valencia, E., Conover, S., Felix, A., Tsai, W. Y., & Wyatt, R. J. (1997). Preventing recurrent homelessness among mentally ill men: a” critical time” intervention after discharge from a shelter. American Journal of Public Health, 87(2), 256-262. google scholar
  • Szeintuch, S. (2015). Street work and outreach: A social work method? The British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1923-1934. google scholar
  • Tsemberis, S. (2010). Housing First: Ending Homelessness, Promoting Recovery And Reducing Costs. Ellen, I, G. & O’Flaherty, B. (ed.). How to house the homeless içinde, (s. 37-56). New York: Russel Sage Foundation. google scholar
  • Van Doorn, L. (2010). Perceptions of time and space of (formerly) homeless people. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 20(2), 218-238. google scholar
  • Vasylenko, O., Grach, Y., Gudz, T., Romanovska, L., & Kravchyna, T., (2019) Analysis of the formation of personal and professional qualities of future social workers for street social work. Revista Româneasca pentru Educafie Multidimensionala.11(4), 288-303. google scholar
  • Velasquez, C. S. (2019). Former Homeless Heads of Households’ Experience of Being Homeless (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). Retrieved From: https://www.proquest.com/ docview/2229333053?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20 &%20Theses google scholar
  • Watson, J., & Cuervo, H. (2017). Youth homelessness: A social justice approach. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 461-475. google scholar
  • Yeter, A. (2018). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının evsizlere yönelik hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesi: İstanbul örneği. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(17), 34-60. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 11. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Kitabevi. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Karaman, H. (2025). Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(2), 419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


AMA

Karaman H. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2025;44(2):419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


ABNT

Karaman, H. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 44, n. 2, p. 419-448, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Karaman, Hakan,. 2025. “Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 2: 419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


Chicago: Humanities Style

Karaman, Hakan,. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 2 (Feb. 2025): 419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


Harvard: Australian Style

Karaman, H 2025, 'Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek', İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 419-448, viewed 4 Feb. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Karaman, H. (2025) ‘Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(2), pp. 419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696 (4 Feb. 2025).


MLA

Karaman, Hakan,. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 2, 2025, pp. 419-448. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


Vancouver

Karaman H. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 4 Feb. 2025 [cited 4 Feb. 2025];44(2):419-448. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696


ISNAD

Karaman, Hakan. Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44/2 (Feb. 2025): 419-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim16.09.2024
Kabul03.12.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma03.01.2025

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.