İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102    Tam Metin (PDF)

İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler

Mehmet Hanefi Topal, Kübra Şimşek, Adem Başpınar

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sosyal bilişsel teori (SBT) çerçevesinde deprem risk algısını içeren genişletilmiş bir model kullanarak İstanbul’da yerleşikler arasında bireysel düzeyde depreme hazırlığı etkileyen sosyal ve bilişsel faktörleri belirlemektir. 411 katılımcıyla bir anket yapılmış ve veri analizi, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, SBT’nin iddialarını güçlü bir şekilde destekleyerek, sosyal (sosyal güven ve öznel normlar gibi) ve bilişsel (sonuç beklentileri ve öz yeterlilik dâhil) çevrenin deprem risk algısının temel belirleyicileri olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte, depreme hazırlık davranışının bilişsel faktörlerle, özellikle de öz yeterlilik ve risk algısıyla daha yakından ilişkili olduğu, öznel normların ise hazırlık davranışını etkileyen tek sosyal faktör olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar, politika yapıcıların ve uygulayıcıların bireysel hazırlığı teşvik etmek ve afet riskini azaltmak için afet eğitimi, farkındalık çalışmaları ve katılımcı programlara odaklanmaları gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Sosyal-Bilişsel Teori, Hazırlık Davranışı, Deprem Risk Algısı, İstanbul
DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102    Tam Metin (PDF)

Individual Earthquake Preparedness of Residents in Istanbul: Social and Cognitive Determinants

Mehmet Hanefi Topal, Kübra Şimşek, Adem Başpınar

This study aims to identify the social and cognitive factors that influence individual-level earthquake preparedness among Istanbul residents by using an extended model that incorporates earthquake risk perception within the framework of social cognitive theory (SCT). A survey of 411 participants was conducted, and data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings strongly support the SCT assertions, revealing that social factors (such as social trust and subjective norms) and cognitive factors (including outcome expectations and self-efficacy) are key predictors of earthquake risk perception. However, earthquake preparedness behavior was found to be more closely associated with cognitive factors, particularly self-efficacy and risk perception, with subjective norms being the only social factor influencing preparedness behavior. These results that policymakers and practitioners should focus on disaster education, awareness, and participation to promote individual preparedness and mitigate disaster risk.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Social-Cognitive Theory, Preparedness Behaviour, Earthquake Risk Perception, Istanbul

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Aim: This study aims to assess the effects of social trust, subjective norms, selfefficacy, outcome expectations, and earthquake risk perception on individual earthquake preparedness behaviors among Istanbul residents using social cognitive theory (SCT).

Background: Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), developed by Bandura, emphasizes the significant role of the social environment in shaping behavior and cognition. It suggests that people learn by observing others and the consequences of their actions, thus integrating personal, behavioral, and social/environmental factors. The key components of SCT include self-efficacy, outcome expectations, risk perception, and social trust and subjective norms. These elements influence how individuals perceive and react to their environments, shaping their behaviors and decision-making processes. SCT has wide applications, particularly in health communication, career development, and disaster preparedness, where it helps explain and improve behaviors through observation, reinforcement, and modeling. The theory underscores individuals’ proactive role in adapting to their circumstances, and its constructs are crucial for promoting preparedness behaviors in various contexts, including natural disasters and health emergencies.

Research Model and Hypotheses: The research model of this study in the context of SCT suggests that social-cognitive factors are interconnected and influence earthquake risk perception and preparedness behavior. The key components of the research model are as follows:

1. Personal-Cognitive Factors: Self-Efficacy: Belief in one’s ability to perform a behavior. Higher self-efficacy enhances intentions and actions in disaster preparedness. Social trust and subjective norms positively influence selfefficacy (H1, H2). Outcome Expectations: Beliefs about the consequences of actions. Positive expectations increase preparedness intentions and behaviors, while negative ones decrease them. Social trust and subjective norms enhance positive outcome expectations (H3, H4).

2. Earthquake Risk Perception (EPR): The possible effects and the probability of their occurrence define the perception of earthquake risk. Subjective norms also shape risk perception, as people follow social cues about disaster preparedness (H6). Self-efficacy and positive outcome expectations further increase risk perception, encouraging realistic evaluation and proactive behaviors (H7, H8).

3. Preparedness Behavior (PB): PB involves material, behavioral, and informational actions to ensure effective disaster response. Social trust fosters coordination and cooperation, thus enhancing preparedness (H9). Subjective norms, through social influence and pressure, also promote preparedness behaviors (H10). Self-efficacy is crucial because individuals with higher self-efficacy are more likely to engage in preparedness activities (H11). Positive outcome expectations motivate preventive measures and preparedness (H12). High risk perception although sometimes causing fear, generally leads to increased preparedness actions to mitigate negative emotions (H13).

In summary, SCT integrates self-efficacy, outcome expectations, social trust, and subjective norms to explain how these factors collectively influence earthquake risk perception and preparedness behavior. Increasing self-efficacy and positive outcome expectations, supported by social trust and norms, are vital for improving earthquake preparedness.

Methodology: This research employs a quantitative, correlational, and predictive design with data collected via an online survey. The target population includes residents over 18 years old in Istanbul, representing 75% of the 15.908 million population. Convenience sampling was used, aiming for a minimum sample of 384, with 411 participants (206 females, 205 males) eventually completing the survey. Data were gathered from December 21, 2023, to March 11, 2024, through Google Forms, with participant recruitment enhanced via social media. The questionnaire collected consent information and measured social trust, subjective norms, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, earthquake risk perceptions, and preparedness behaviors using Likert scales and binary responses. Six scales were used, adapted into Turkish, and validated by Topal et al. (2024): (1). Social Trust (3 items, α = 80.9%), (2). Subjective Norms (3 items, α = 84.3%), (3). Self-Efficacy (6 items, α = 89.1%), (4). Outcome Expectations** (6 items, α = 87.9%), (5). Earthquake Risk Perception (13 items, α = 92.5%) and (6). Preparedness Behavior (16 items, α = 90.9%). The analysis followed a four-stage process using the JAMOVI software. 1. Descriptive Analysis: Frequency, percentage; mean, mode; median, standard deviation; skewness; and kurtosis. 2. Validity and Reliability: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test construct, convergent, and discriminant validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), and McDonald’s Omega (ω). 3. Group Comparisons: Independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVAs were performed to compare group means using Levene’s test for variance homogeneity. 4. Hypothesis Testing: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM-Path) was used to test the hypotheses and evaluate the model fit and significance of the regression coefficients.

Results and Discussion: The study’s hypothesis testing results strongly support the claims of Social-Cognitive Theory (SCT), indicating that social factors (such as social trust and subjective norms) and cognitive factors (including outcome expectations and self-efficacy) are primary determinants of earthquake risk perception. However, earthquake preparedness behavior is more closely tied to cognitive factors, particularly self-efficacy and risk perception, with subjective norms being the sole social factor influencing preparedness behavior. Policymakers and practitioners should emphasize disaster education, awareness, and participation to enhance individual preparedness and mitigate disaster risk.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163. google scholar
  • Adams, R. M., Eisenman, D. P., & Glik, D. (2019). Community advantage and individual self-efficacy promote disaster preparedness: a multilevel model among persons with disabilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2779. google scholar
  • Adams, R. M., Karlin, B., Eisenman, D. P., Blakley, J., & Glik, D. (2017). Who participates in the great shakeout? Why audience segmentation is the future of disaster preparedness campaigns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111407 google scholar
  • Adhikari, M., Paton, D., Johnston, D., Prasanna, R., & McColl, S. T. (2018). Modelling predictors of earthquake hazard preparedness in Nepal. Procedia Engineering, 212, 910-917. google scholar
  • Adjaye-Gbewonyo, K., Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Avendano, M. (2018). High social trust associated with increased depressive symptoms in a longitudinal South African sample. Social Science & Medicine, 197, 127-135. google scholar
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. google scholar
  • Aksa, F. I., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2020). The role of knowledge and fatalism in college students related to the earthquake-risk perception. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 12(1), 1-6. google scholar
  • Aletras, V. H., Kostarelis, A., Tsitouridou, M., Niakas, D., & Nicolaou, A. (2010). Development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with home care in Greece: an exploratory factor analysis of polychoric correlations. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 1-14. google scholar
  • Alexander, A. C., & Ward, K. D. (2018). Understanding postdisaster substance use and psychological distress using concepts from the self-medication hypothesis and social cognitive theory. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 50(2), 177-186. google scholar
  • Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated social cognitive theory with learning input factors: The effects of problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills on learning performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978. google scholar
  • Amini, R., Biglari, F., Khodaveisi, M., & Tapak, L. (2021). Effect of education based on the health belief model on earthquake preparedness in women. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52, 101954. google scholar
  • Ao, Y., Tan, L., Tan, L., Zhong, J., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, T. (2022). Households’ earthquake disaster preparedness behavior: the role of trust in and help from stakeholders. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 926432. google scholar
  • Appling, B., Tuttle, M., Harrell, L., Ellerman, H., & Mabeus, D. (2022). Utilizing social cognitive career theory to enhance the self-efficacy and outcome expectations of students with disabilities through career development. Professional School Counseling, 26(1), 2156759X221098937. google scholar
  • Armaş, I. (2006). Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Analysis, 26(5), 1223-1234. google scholar
  • Armaş, I., Cretu, R. Z., & Ionescu, R. (2017). Self-efficacy, stress, and locus of control: The psychology of earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 71-76. google scholar
  • Asgarizadeh Lamjiry, Z., & Gifford, R. (2022). Earthquake threat! Understanding the intention to prepare for the Big One. RiskAnalysis, 42(3), 487-505. google scholar
  • Azali, N. A., & Ludin, S. M. (2020). Disaster preparedness awareness among critical care nurses at a tertiary hospital in Pahang, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research, 4(3), 26-34. google scholar
  • Azim, M. T., & Islam, M. M. (2016). Earthquake preparedness of households in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a perceptual study. Environmental Hazards, 15(3), 189-208. google scholar
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34. google scholar
  • Ballantyne, M., Paton, D., Johnston, D., Kzouch, M. Ve Daly, M. (2000). Information on volcanic and earthquake hazards: the impact on awareness and preparation (Report No. 2000/2). Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences. google scholar
  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25 google scholar
  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press. google scholar
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. google scholar
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. google scholar
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00024 google scholar
  • Bao, Z., & Han, Z. (2019). What drives users’ participation in online social Q&A communities? An empirical study based on social cognitive theory. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(5), 637-656. google scholar
  • Basolo, V., Steinberg, L. J., Burby, R. J., Levine, J., Cruz, A. M., & Huang, C. (2009). The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environment and Behavior, 41(3), 338-364. google scholar
  • Baytiyeh, H., & Naja, M. (2016). The effects of fatalism and denial on earthquake preparedness levels. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(2), 154-167. google scholar
  • Benazzi, F. (2008). A tetrachoric factor analysis validation of mixed depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 32(1), 186-192. google scholar
  • Benight, C. C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1129-1148. google scholar
  • Bixler, R. P., Paul, S., Jones, J., Preisser, M., & Passalacqua, P. (2021). Unpacking adaptive capacity to flooding in urban environments: Social capital, social vulnerability, and risk perception. Frontiers in Water, 3, 728730. google scholar
  • Bodas, M., Giuliani, F., Ripoll-Gallardo, A., Caviglia, M., Dell’Aringa, M. F., Linty, M., ... & Ragazzoni, L. (2019). Threat perception and public preparedness for earthquakes in Italy. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 34(2), 114-124. google scholar
  • Boğaziçi Ünivesitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü Deprem Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı (2020). İstanbul İli Olası Deprem Kayıp Tahminlerinin Güncellenmesi Projesi. https://depremzemin.mncdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DEZiM_KANDiLLi_DEPREM-HASAR-TAHMiN_RAPORU.pdf google scholar
  • Brown, G. D., Largey, A., & McMullan, C. (2021). The impact of gender on risk perception: Implications for EU member states’ national risk assessment processes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102452. google scholar
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21 (2), 230-258. google scholar
  • Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(9), 14811495. google scholar
  • Burns, K. E., Brown, P., Calnan, M., Ward, P. R., Little, J., Betini, G. S., ... & Meyer, S. B. (2023). Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM). BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2023. google scholar
  • Cai, J., Hu, S., Que, T., Li, H., Xing, H., & Li, H. (2023). Influences of social environment and psychological cognition on individuals’ behavioral intentions to reduce disaster risk in geological hazard-prone areas: An application of social cognitive theory. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 86, 103546. google scholar
  • Celsi, R., Wolfinbarger, M., & Wald, D. (2005). The effects of earthquake measurement concepts and magnitude anchoring on individuals’ perceptions of earthquake risk. Earthquake Spectra, 21(4), 987-1008. google scholar
  • Chang, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Lee, Y. J. (2015). Factors influencing knowledge-sharing behavior in virtual communities: a longitudinal investigation. Information Systems Management, 32(4), 331-340. google scholar
  • Cho, H., & Lee, J. S. (2015). The influence of self-efficacy, subjective norms, and risk perception on behavioral intentions related to the H1N1 flu pandemic: A comparison between Korea and the US. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 311-324. google scholar
  • Chou, J. S., Hsu, S. C., Lin, C. W., Lee, C. J., & Wei, J. L. (2017). Structural analysis of the relationships between implementing tasks and ex-post effectiveness for disaster mitigation practice in Taipei City. Sustainable Cities and Society, 34, 1-11. google scholar
  • Cuconato, G., Aggarwal, I., Ates, N. Y., & Meslec, N. (2022). Creative self-efficacy in teams: a socio-cognitive approach to team performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 16398. google scholar
  • Daimon, H., Miyamae, R., & Wang, W. (2023). A critical review of cognitive and environmental factors of disaster preparedness: research issues and implications from the usage of “awareness (ishiki)” in Japan. Natural Hazards, 117(2), 1213-1243. google scholar
  • Damayanti, V., Agustina, I. H., Rahminawati, N., Ekasari, A. M., & Aji, R. R. (2023). Assistance in the preparation of the Cikole Village Disaster Risk Reduction Handbook. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14369 google scholar
  • Davarani, E. R., Nekoei-Moghadam, M., Khanjani, N., Iranpour, A., Chashmyazdan, M., & Farahmandnia, H. (2023). Factors related to earthquake preparedness of households based on social-cognitive theory constructs: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.987418 google scholar
  • Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of normality tests in terms of sample sizes under different skewness and Kurtosis coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397-409. google scholar
  • Durukal, E., Erdik, M., & Uçkan, E. (2007). Earthquake risk to industry in Istanbul and its management. Natural Hazards, 44(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9119-0 google scholar
  • Ekşi, F., Okan, N., Yılmaztürk, M., & Ekşi, H. (2021). Sosyal Etki Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik yönden incelenmesi. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 41 (1), 153-173. google scholar
  • Emaliyawati, E., Satiadi, D., Sutini, T., Jamaludin, H. N. N., Khofifah, I. N., Manika, L. R., Fauziyah, S. M., & Siagian, E. T. (2022). The effect of disaster education of increasing earthquake disaster preparedness: A narrative review. Jurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif: Comprehensive Nursing Journal, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.33755/jkk.v8i4.407 google scholar
  • Epler, R. T., & Leach, M. P. (2021). An examination of salesperson bricolage during a critical sales disruption: Selling during the Covid-19 pandemic. Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 114-127. google scholar
  • Erdik, M. (2007). Discussion of “Istanbul at the threshold: An evaluation of the seismic risk in Istanbul.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 727-729. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2754261 google scholar
  • Erdik, M., Demircioglu, M., Sesetyan, K., Durukal, E., & Siyahi, B. (2004). Earthquake hazard in Marmara Region, Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(8), 605-631. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.04.003 google scholar
  • Ersoy, Ş., & Koçak, A. (2015). Disasters and earthquake preparedness of children and schools in Istanbul, Turkey. Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk, 7(4), 1307-1336. https://doi.org/10.1080 /19475705.2015.1060637 google scholar
  • Fatehpanah, A., Maraghi, E., Coetzer-Liversage, A., Karimy, M., Pakpour, A. H., Maripour, M., Fard, N. J. H., & Araban, M. (2023). Modeling factors related to earthquake preparedness: a structural equation modeling approach. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2986891/v1 google scholar
  • Fields, N. L., Dabelko-Schoeny, H., Murphy, I. E., Highfill, C., Cao, Q., White, K., ... & Kunz-Lomelin, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory, driving cessation, and alternative transportation in later life. Journal ofApplied Gerontology, 42(11), 2252-2260. google scholar
  • First, J. M., Yu, M., & Houston, J. B. (2021). The Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale: Development and validation of an individual-level protection measure. Disasters, 45(4), 939-967. google scholar
  • Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89-110. google scholar
  • Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447. google scholar
  • Fumey, R. A. (2022). Understanding public emergency preparedness before and during the coronavirus outbreak: Implications for effective public health and risk communication. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3832. google scholar
  • Gan, C., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Understanding social media discontinuance behavior in China: a perspective of social cognitive theory. Information Technology & People, 37(3), 1185-1207. google scholar
  • Gershon, R. R., Portacolone, E., Nwankwo, E., Qi, Z., Qureshi, K., & Raveis, V. H. (2016). Psychosocial influences on disaster preparedness in San Francisco recipients of home care. Journal of Urban Health, 94(5), 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0104-3 google scholar
  • Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B., Forzano, L. A. B., & Witnauer, J. E. (2021). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning. google scholar
  • Greer, A., Wu, H. C., & Murphy, H. (2020). Household adjustment to seismicity in Oklahoma. Earthquake Spectra, 36(4), 2019-2032. google scholar
  • Gunasekera, R., Ishizawa Escudero, O. A., Daniell, J. E., Pomonis, A., Macabuag, J. L. D. C., Brand, J., Schaefer, A., Romero Hernandez, R. A., Esper, S., Otalora, S. G., Khazai, B., Cox, K. D. (2023). Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) Report: February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes - Türkiye Report (English). World Bank Group. http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/099022723021250141/P1788430aeb62f08009b2302bd4074030fb google scholar
  • Gustafsod, P. E. (1998). Gender Differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805-811. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. google scholar
  • Han, Z., Lu, X., Hörhager, E. I., & Yan, J. (2017). The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China. Natural Hazards, 86, 437-452. google scholar
  • Hasegawa, M., Murakami, M., Takebayashi, Y., Suzuki, S., & Ohto, H. (2018). Social capital enhanced disaster preparedness and health consultations after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and nuclear power station accident. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030516 google scholar
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. google scholar
  • Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth google scholar
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. google scholar
  • Hubert-Ferrari, A., Barka, A., Jacques, E., Nalbant, S. S., Meyer, B., Armijo, R., Tapponnier, P., & King, G. C. P. (2000). Seismic hazard in the Marmara Sea region following the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake. Nature, 404(6775), 269-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/35005054 google scholar
  • Ilmiani, A. M., Wahdah, N., & Mubarak, M. R. (2021). The application of Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory: A Process in Learning Speaking Skill. Ta’lim al-’Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban, 5(2), 181-192. google scholar
  • Iskandar, T. M., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2011). Assessing the effects of self-efficacy and task complexity on internal control audit judgment. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 7(1), 29-52. google scholar
  • Jam, M. B., Aminizadeh, M., Akbari-Shahrestanaki, Y., & Khankeh, H. R. (2024). Evaluating the disaster preparedness of emergency medical services (EMS) facilities: a cross-sectional investigation in Iran. BMC Emergency Medicine, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-00932-z google scholar
  • Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (1993). A test of the social support deterioration model in the context of natural disaster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 395. google scholar
  • Kelly, B., & Ronan, K. R. (2018). Preparedness for natural hazards: testing an expanded education-and engagement-enhanced social cognitive model. Natural Hazards, 91, 19-35. google scholar
  • Kinanthi, R., Wikan, P., & Anasfisia, V. (2023). Enhancing students’ earthquake disaster preparedness through self experience, knowledge, and self-efficacy. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Science, Humanity and Public Health, ICoSHIP 2022, Banyuwangi, East Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-11-2022.2326512 google scholar
  • Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications. google scholar
  • Krakowczyk, J. B., Beckord, J., Planert, J., Kohl, P., Schweda, A., Teufel, M., & Bauerle, A. (2023). Development and psychometric evaluation of the man-made disaster-related distress scale (MMDS). Psychiatry Research, 324, 115193. google scholar
  • Kung, Y. W., & Chen, S. H. (2012). Perception of earthquake risk in Taiwan: Effects of gender and past earthquake experience. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(9), 1535-1546. google scholar
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936-949. google scholar
  • Li, Y., Guo, Y., & Ito, N. (2014). Modeling of public risk perception and risk communication research: In a social-cognitive direction. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 1(3), 217-231. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. (2013). North American cities at risk: Household responses to environmental hazards. In Cities at risk: Living with perils in the 21st century (pp. 109-130). Springer Netherlands. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2000). Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 461-501. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(4), 616-632. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2000). Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 13-25. google scholar
  • Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., Wu, H. C., Huang, S. K., Johnston, D. M., Becker, J. S., & Shiroshita, H. (2016). Immediate behavioural responses to earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, and Hitachi, Japan. Disasters, 40(1), 85-111. google scholar
  • Lo, A. Y. (2013). The role of social norms in climate adaptation: Mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1249-1257. google scholar
  • Lo, A. Y., & Cheung, L. T. (2016). Geographies of social capital: Catastrophe experience, risk perception, and the transformation of social space in postearthquake resettlements in Sichuan, China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(4), 874-890. google scholar
  • Luo, X., Lu, J., & Apuke, O. D. (2024). Understanding the impact of computer-based technology storytelling for help seeking and help receiving among victims’ of flood disaster. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108101. google scholar
  • MacPherson-Krutsky, C., Lindell, M. K., & D. Brand, B. (2023). Residents’ information seeking behavior and protective action for earthquake hazards in the Portland Oregon Metropolitan Area. Risk Analysis, 43(2), 372-390. google scholar
  • Maheshwari, G., & Kha, K. L. (2022). Investigating the relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intention in Vietnam: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100553. google scholar
  • Manjarres-Posada, N., Onofre-Rodriguez, D. J., & Benavides-Torres, R. A. (2020). Social cognitive theory and health care: Analysis and evaluation. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 8, 132. google scholar
  • McIvor, D., Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2009). Modelling community preparation for natural hazards: understanding hazard cognitions. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 3(2), 39-46. google scholar
  • Mu, C. (2020). A social-cognitive framework. Understanding Chinese multilingual scholars’ experiences of writing and publishing in English. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-33938-8 google scholar
  • Muda, R. S., Hussain, M. R. M., Tukiman, Z., & Abdullah, F. S. (2021). Community preparedness towards dam disaster: disaster risk reduction (DRR) program in Cameron Highlands. International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Development/International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 12(9), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijesd.2021.12.9.1350 google scholar
  • Mulilis, J., & Lippa, R. (1990). Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(8), 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00429.x google scholar
  • Muttarak, R., & Pothisiri, W. (2013). The role of education on disaster preparedness: case study of 2012 Indian ocean earthquakes on Thailand’s Andaman coast. Ecology and Society, 18(4). https:// doi.org/10.5751/es-06101-180451 google scholar
  • Myrick, J. G., & Yang, Y. (2023). Social cognitive theory. In E. Y. Ho, C. L. Bylund, J. C. M. van Weert, I. Basnyat, N. Bol, & M. Dean (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of health communication. google scholar
  • Nandi, N., & Havwina, T. (2018). The preparedness level of school community in handling the earthquake and tsunami threats in Banda Aceh city. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 145, 012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012097 google scholar
  • Neves, P. C., Andrade, C., Paixâo, R., & da Silva, J. T. (2023). Portuguese version of Bern Illegitimates Task Scale: adaptation and evidence of validity. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 27. google scholar
  • Ng, S. L. (2022). Effects of risk perception on disaster preparedness toward typhoons: an application of the extended theory ofplanned behavior. International Journal ofDisaster Risk Science, 13 (1), 100-113. google scholar
  • Ngo, V. M., Pham, H. C., & Nguyen, H. H. (2023). Drivers of digital supply chain transformation in SMEs and large enterprises-a case of COVID-19 disruption risk. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(6), 1355-1377. google scholar
  • Nguyen, L. H., Shen, H., Ershoff, D., Afifi, A. A., & Bourque, L. B. (2006). Exploring the causal relationship between exposure to the 1994 Northridge earthquake and pre-and post-earthquake preparedness activities. Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 569-587. google scholar
  • Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981—2001. Psychiatry, 65(3), 207-239. google scholar
  • Nurjanah, N., & Rezza, A. M. (2021). Disaster preparedness and risk perception: A study in Bandung. Tourism and Sustainable Development Review, 2(1), 32-38. google scholar
  • Oktari, R. S., Latuamury, B., Idroes, R., Sofyan, H., & Munadi, K. (2022). Validating knowledge creation factors for community resilience to disaster using structural equation modelling. International Journal ofDisaster Risk Reduction, 81, 103290. google scholar
  • Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Lagura, F. C., Ramos, R. N., Sigua, K. M., Villas, J. A., ... & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2021). Factors affecting intention to prepare for mitigation of “the big one” earthquake in the Philippines: Integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal ofDisaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102467. google scholar
  • Önkal, D., Goodwin, P., Thomson, M., Gönül, S., & Pollock, A. (2009). The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(4), 390-409. google scholar
  • Oral, M., Yenel, A., Oral, E., Aydin, N., & Tuncay, T. (2015). Earthquake experience and preparedness in Turkey. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(1), 21-37. google scholar
  • Ozbilgin, M., Erbil, C., Demirbağ, K. Ş., Demirbağ, O., & Tanriverdi, V. (2023). Afet yönetiminde sorumluluğun yeniden inşası: deprem, sosyal dramalar, sosyal politikalar. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(1), 71-112. google scholar
  • Ozyilmaz, A., Erdogan, B., & Karaeminogullari, A. (2018). Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory-based examination. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(1), 181-204. google scholar
  • Paton, D. (2003). Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 12(3), 210-216. google scholar
  • Paton, D. (2020). Social-psychological perspectives on preparedness theory and practice: facilitating resilience. In M. Yokomatsu & S. Hochrainer-Stigler (Eds.), Disaster risk reduction and resilience (pp. 139-167). GADRI Book Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4320-3_8 google scholar
  • Paton, D., Bajek, R., Okada, N., & McIvor, D. (2010). Predicting community earthquake preparedness: a cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 54, 765-781. google scholar
  • Paton, D., Johnston, D., Bebbington, M. S., Lai, C. D., & Houghton, B. F. (2001a). Direct and vicarious experience of volcanic hazards: implications for risk perception and adjustment adoption. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 15(4), 58-63. google scholar
  • Paton, D., Millar, M., & Johnston, D. (2001b). Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences. Natural Hazards, 24, 157-169. google scholar
  • Paton, D., Smith, L., & Johnston, D. (2000). Volcanic hazards: risk perception and preparedness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 86-91. google scholar
  • Paton, D., Smith, L., & Johnston, D. (2005). When good intentions turn bad: Promoting natural hazard preparedness. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 20(1), 25-30. google scholar
  • Peng, L., Tan, J., Deng, W., & Liu, Y. (2020). Farmers’ participation in community-based disaster management: The role of trust, place attachment and self-efficacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101895. google scholar
  • Prasetyo, Y. T., Senoro, D. B., German, J. D., Robielos, R. A. C., & Ney, F. P. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis of vulnerability to natural hazards: A household Vulnerability Assessment in Marinduque Island, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101831. google scholar
  • Priyanti, R. P., Nurul, H., Rosmaharani, S., Nahariani, P., Asri, Mukarromah, N., & Mundakir, M. (2019). Community preparedness in flood disaster: A qualitative study. The International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 40(1), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684x19853169 google scholar
  • Qureshi, M. I., Khan, S. U., Rana, I. A., Ali, B., & ur Rahman, A. (2021). Determinants of people’s seismic risk perception: A case study of Malakand, Pakistan. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 55, 102078. google scholar
  • Rahman, M. L. (2019). Risk perception and awareness of earthquake: the case of Dhaka. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(1), 65-82. google scholar
  • Ranjbar, M., Soleimani, A. A., Sedghpour, B. S., Shahboulaghi, F. M., Paton, D., & Noroozi, M. (2018). The predictors of earthquake preparedness in Tehran households. Electronic Physician, 10(3), 6478. google scholar
  • Reininger, B. M., Rahbar, M. H., Lee, M., Chen, Z., Alam, S., Pope, J., & Adams, B. (2013). Social capital and disaster preparedness among low income Mexican Americans in a disaster prone area. Social Science & Medicine, 83, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.037 google scholar
  • Rezabeigi Davarani, E., Nekoei-Moghadam, M., Khanjani, N., Iranpour, A., Chashmyazdan, M., & Farahmandnia, H. (2023). Factors related to earthquake preparedness of households based on social-cognitive theory constructs: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 987418. google scholar
  • Rizal, R. (2021). The influence of disaster knowledge and community attitudes towards preparedness for landslide disasters in Cemparam Pakat Jeroh Village Mesidah District Bener Meriah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan Indonesia: Indonesian Nursing Scientific Journal (E-journal), 11(04), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.33221/jiiki.v11i04.1525 google scholar
  • Rostami-Moez, M., Rabiee-Yeganeh, M., Shokouhi, M., Dosti-Irani, A., & Rezapur-Shahkolai, F. (2020). Earthquake preparedness of households and its predictors based on health belief model. BMC Public Health, 20, 1-8. google scholar
  • Sahadev, S., Malhotra, N., Kannangara, L. N., & Ritchie, B. W. (2023). Disaster planning intentions of tourism accommodation managers: Understanding the influence of past disaster experience and disaster management training. Journal of Travel Research, 63(1), 175-194. https://doi. org/10.1177/00472875221145129 google scholar
  • Sandanam, A., Diedrich, A., Gurney, G. G., & Richardson, T. D. (2018). Perceptions of cyclone preparedness: Assessing the role of individual adaptive capacity and social capital in the Wet Tropics, Australia. Sustainability, 10(4), 1165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041165 google scholar
  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2023). Learning from a social cognitive theory perspective. In T. Zanardi, S. La Rosa (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (4th ed., pp. 22-35). google scholar
  • Schwarzer, R., & Fuchs, R. (1996). Self-efficacy and health behaviours. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (pp. 163-196). Open University Press. google scholar
  • Seebauer, S., & Babcicky, P. (2020). The sources of belief in personal capability: antecedents of self-efficacy in private adaptation to flood risk. Risk Analysis, 40(10), 1967-1982. google scholar
  • Shapira, S., Aharonson-Daniel, L., & Bar-Dayan, Y. (2018). Anticipated behavioral response patterns to an earthquake: The role of personal and household characteristics, risk perception, previous experience and preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 1-8. google scholar
  • Shaw, R., Shiwaku Hirohide Kobayashi, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2004). Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 39-49. google scholar
  • Şimşek, P., & Gündüz, A. (2021). A big earthquake awaits İstanbul: mini review. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 4(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.849816 google scholar
  • Smith, K. (1993). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge. google scholar
  • Stewart, A. E. (2021). Psychometric properties of the climate change worry scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 494. google scholar
  • Sugisawa, H., Shimizu, Y., Kumagai, T., Sugisaki, H., Ohira, S., & Shinoda, T. (2017). Earthquake preparedness among Japanese hemodialysis patients in prefectures heavily damaged by the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 21(4), 334-344. https://doi. org/10.1111/1744-9987.12542 google scholar
  • Sun, L., Guo, J., & Qi, W. (2024). Earthquake attribution, risk perception, and self-efficacy: Tibetan Buddhism believers’ preparedness motivation. Environmental Hazards, 1-20. google scholar
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell. LS (2013). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson. google scholar
  • Tang, J., & Feng, J. Y. (2018). Residents’ disaster preparedness after the meinong Taiwan Earthquake: A test of protection motivation theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071434 google scholar
  • Tekeli-Yeşil, S., Dedeoğlu, N., Braun-Fahrlaender, C., & Tanner, M. (2011). Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul. Natural Hazards, 59, 427-446. google scholar
  • Thomas, T. N., Leander-Griffith, M., Harp, V., & Cioffi, J. P. (2015). Influences of preparedness knowledge and beliefs on household disaster preparedness. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(35), 965-971. google scholar
  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Westview Press. google scholar
  • Topal, M. H., Başpinar, A., & Güntürkün, M. (2024). Social-cognitive factors of individual earthquake preparedness behavior: A scale adaptation and correlational survey research. TRC Journal of Humanitarian Action, 4(1), Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.55280/trcjha.2024.4.1.0001 google scholar
  • Ünal, U. (2021). Structural equation modeling as a marketing research tool: A guideline for SEM users about critical issues and problematic practices. İstatistik ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 65-77. google scholar
  • Vinnell, L. J., Milfont, T. L., & McClure, J. (2019). Do social norms affect support for earthquake-strengthening legislation? Comparing the effects of descriptive and injunctive norms. Environment and Behavior, 51(4), 376-400. google scholar
  • Vrselja, I., Pandzic, M., & Glavas, D. (2022). Predicting earthquake preparedness intention among Croatian residents: Application of the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12882 google scholar
  • Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065. google scholar
  • Wagener, T., Goda, K., Erdik, M., Daniell, J., & Wenzel, F. (2016). A spatial correlation model of peak ground acceleration and response spectra based on data of the Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response and Early Warning System. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 85, 166178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.016 google scholar
  • Wang, Y., Shen, C., Bartsch, K., & Zuo, J. (2021). Exploring the trade-off between benefit and risk perception of NIMBY facility: A social cognitive theory model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106555. google scholar
  • Wang, Z., Han, Z., Liu, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Place attachment and household disaster preparedness: Examining the mediation role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5565. google scholar
  • Welton-Mitchell, C., James, L., & Awale, R. (2016). Nepal 2015 Earthquake: A rapid assessment of cultural, psychological and social factors with implications for recovery and disaster preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters/International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 34(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701603400303 google scholar
  • Wu, D., Gu, H., Gu, S., & You, H. (2021). Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory. Health Policy and Technology, 10(3), 100525. google scholar
  • Xu, D., Liu, Y., Deng, X., Qing, C., Zhuang, L., Yong, Z., & Huang, K. (2019). Earthquake disaster risk perception process model for rural households: A pilot study from southwestern China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4512. google scholar
  • Xu, D., Zhuang, L., Deng, X., Qing, C., & Yong, Z. (2020). Media exposure, disaster experience, and risk perception of rural households in earthquake-stricken areas: evidence from rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3246. google scholar
  • Xu, J., & Lu, Y. (2018). Towards an earthquake-resilient world: from post-disaster reconstruction to pre-disaster prevention. Environmental Hazards, 17(4), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477 891.2018.1500878 google scholar
  • Xue, W., Hine, D. W., Loi, N. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Phillips, W. J. (2014). Cultural worldviews and environmental risk perceptions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 249-258. google scholar
  • Yazdanpanah, M., Feyzabad, F. R., Forouzani, M., Mohammadzadeh, S., & Burton, R. J. (2015). Predicting farmers’ water conservation goals and behavior in Iran: A test of social cognitive theory. Land Use Policy, 47, 401-407. google scholar
  • Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Samah, A. A., Roslan, S., Shaffril, H. A. M., D’Silva, J. L., Kamarudin, S., & Ahrari, S. (2021). Household preparedness for future earthquake disaster risk using an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102533. google scholar
  • Zhang, F., Bao, X., Deng, X., Wang, W., Song, J., & Xu, D. (2022). Does trust help to improve residents’ perceptions of the efficacy of disaster preparedness? Evidence from Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes in Sichuan Province, China. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4515. google scholar
  • Zhu, D., Xie, X., & Gan, Y. (2011). Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31 (2), 129-136. google scholar
  • Zobeidi, T., Komendantova, N., Yazdanpanah, M., & Lamm, A. (2024). A multi-dimensional model of anticipating intention to use social media for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104356. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Topal, M.H., Şimşek, K., & Başpınar, A. (2024). İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(1), 77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


AMA

Topal M H, Şimşek K, Başpınar A. İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2024;44(1):77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


ABNT

Topal, M.H.; Şimşek, K.; Başpınar, A. İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 44, n. 1, p. 77-130, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Topal, Mehmet Hanefi, and Kübra Şimşek and Adem Başpınar. 2024. “İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 1: 77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


Chicago: Humanities Style

Topal, Mehmet Hanefi, and Kübra Şimşek and Adem Başpınar. “İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44, no. 1 (Nov. 2024): 77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


Harvard: Australian Style

Topal, MH & Şimşek, K & Başpınar, A 2024, 'İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler', İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 77-130, viewed 22 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Topal, M.H. and Şimşek, K. and Başpınar, A. (2024) ‘İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 44(1), pp. 77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102 (22 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Topal, Mehmet Hanefi, and Kübra Şimşek and Adem Başpınar. “İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 1, 2024, pp. 77-130. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


Vancouver

Topal MH, Şimşek K, Başpınar A. İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 22 Nov. 2024 [cited 22 Nov. 2024];44(1):77-130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102


ISNAD

Topal, MehmetHanefi - Şimşek, Kübra - Başpınar, Adem. “İstanbul’da Yerleşiklerin Bireysel Deprem Hazırlığı: Sosyal ve Bilişsel Belirleyiciler”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 44/1 (Nov. 2024): 77-130. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0102



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim30.03.2024
Kabul10.06.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma10.07.2024

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.