Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753    Tam Metin (PDF)

Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi

Mehmet KutluLeila Kutlu

Erken Devir Türk Madencilik Tarihi açısından en önemli yerlerin başında Altaylar gelmektedir. Altaylarda demir üretiminin başlangıcı ve bu faaliyetlerin yürütüldüğü üretim merkezlerinin tespiti meselesi bölge tarihinin en önemli sorunlardan biridir. Söz konusu demircilik ve madencilik faaliyetlerinin bilimsel olarak araştırmasına yönelik Altayların güney batı eteklerinde Akbauır’da Prof. Dr. Zainolla Samashev başkanlığındaki bir arkeoloji ekibince 2019 yılından itibaren kazı çalışmaları yürütülmektedir. Akbauır, Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti’nin Doğu Kazakistan Vilayeti Ulan ilçesi sınırları içindeki Sagyr ve Besterek köyleri arasında ve Korcınbay Dağı’nın batı eteklerinde konumlanmaktadır. Kazı çalışmaları sonucunda Akbauır’ın sadece maden çıkarma ve işleme atölyelerine sahip bir üretim merkezi olmasının ötesinde hayvancılık ve tarımsal üretim yapılan, seramik fırınları ile üretim atölyelerini içinde barındıran 8 farklı lokasyonda mesken grupları veya mahalleler şeklinde örgütlenen oldukça büyük bir yerleşim merkezi olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Özellikle taş aletler içinde tarımsal faaliyetlerde kullanılan çapalar, madencilik faaliyetlerinde kullanılan kazma, çapa, kürekler; maden işleme, döküm faaliyetlerine yönelik potalar, döküm kalıpları dikkat çekici buluntulardandır. Akbauır’da şimdiye kadar ele geçen seramik buluntuların %1’inin Geç Tunç Çağına büyük çoğunluğunu ise erken Demir Çağına ait formlardan oluşmasından hareketle yerleşim Erken Demir Çağına (MÖ 10.-8. yy) tarihlendirilmektedir. Akbauır’da ele geçen maden cüruflarına yönelik arkeometalurjik yöntemlerle, Eşleşmiş Plazma Kütle Spektrometresi (ICPMS) ile yaptığımız analiz sonuçlarına göre Akbauır’ın Altaylarda Erken Demir Çağına tarihlenen ve tespit edilen en eski demir madencilik ve üretim merkezi olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma 2019-2023 yılları arasında yürütülen kazı araştırmalarında ulaşılan öncül sonuçlara odaklanmakta ve arkeometalurjik analizleri yapılan maden cüruflarının sonuçlarının Erken Devir Türk veya Ön-Türk Madencilik Tarihi açısından önemini değerlendirmekte ve yorumlamaktadır.

DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Settlement of Akbauyr: Iron Age Metallurgic Center in Southwestern Altai

Mehmet KutluLeila Kutlu

The Altai region is a significant territory in the history of Early or Proto-Turkic metallurgy. Understanding the origins of iron production in the Altai and identifying production centers are key challenges in reconstructing the region’s metallurgical history. Since 2019, the East Kazakhstan Archaeological Expedition, ed by Prof. Dr. Zainolla Samashev, has been excavating the Akbauyr archaeological complex, located in the western foothills of the Altai Mountains. This site lies between the villages of Sagyr and Besterek in the Ulan district of East Kazakhstan Province, on the western slopes of the Korzhynbay Mountains. The excavation aims to explore early metallurgical practices and mining activities in the region. Fieldwork has revealed that Akbauyr functioned as both a production center, with workshops for mineral extraction and processing, and a large settlement divided into eight distinct neighborhoods. These areas supported animal husbandry, agriculture, and craft production, including ceramic kilns and metallurgical workshops. Notable finds include stone tools such as agricultural hoes, mining pickaxes, and shovels, as well as crucibles and molds for mineral processing and casting. Approximately 99% of the ceramic finds at Akbauyr date to the early Iron Age, with about 1% from the late Bronze Age. Based on these findings, the settlement is dated to the early Iron Age, around the 10th–8th centuries BC. Elemental analysis of slag samples, conducted using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), has confirmed Akbauyr as the oldest identified iron production center in the Altai region. This article presents the preliminary results of excavations conducted between 2019 and 2023 and highlights their significance for understanding the Early or Proto-Turkic history of metallurgy.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


The Altai Mountains are a region of profound significance in the history of Early or ProtoTurkic metallurgy. The southwestern Altai hosts some of the world's richest ore belts, which have provided essential raw materials for the advancement of metallurgical practices. These resources include the Kalba-Naryn gold belts, extensive polymetallic ore belts (containing tin, lead, zinc, copper, platinoids, and rare elements) in the northeastern and southeastern areas, and iron ore belts located in the southern Bukhtyrma River region.

Until recently, research on the early Iron Age in Eastern Kazakhstan primarily focused on archaeological data from burial grounds associated with the Mayemer Culture. This culture, exemplified by sites such as Mayemer, Solnechniy Belok, Kurtu, Izmailovka, and others, is distinguished by the emergence of horseback riding, the Scythian animal style in art, and absence of iron tools.

Today, Akbauyr stands as the only known settlement complex in East Kazakhstan containing the Late Bronze Age monuments, with the setllement neighborhoods dating to the Early Iron Age. The complex encompasses settlement clusters, petroglyphs, mines, workshops, and burial grounds, offering a unique and comprehensive view of the period.

Excavations at Akbauyr, directed by Prof. Dr. Zainolla Samashev since 2019, aim to uncover the characteristics of early mining and iron smelting practices in the region. Findings indicate that Akbauyr was not merely a production center but also a sizable settlement, systematically organized into eight distinct residential groups. These areas supported a range of activities, including animal husbandry, agriculture, and craft production, and featured facilities such as ceramic kilns and metallurgical workshops.

The Akbauyr I settlement, situated in the northern part of the site, has been the focus of the most extensive excavations. This area contains the primary settlement structures and production facilities, making it a key zone for understanding the site's organization and functionality. A prominent structure in Akbauyr I, believed to be a dwelling, covers approximately 60 m² and is oriented along a northeast-southwest axis. The building's walls exhibit varying lengths, and its architecture suggests a wooden pyramidal lantern roof—an element commonly associated with the vernacular building traditions of the Altai and Siberia. This roof design would have allowed ventilation and light, particularly important in harsh climatic conditions.

Beyond Akbauyr I, other residential groups, including Akbauyr II, III, VI, and VII, also exhibit architectural diversity. These groups feature rectangular or oval buildings with rounded corners, often accompanied by adjacent spaces interpreted as outbuildings. These structures likely served multifunctional purposes, combining residential, storage, and workshop activities.

Archaeological finds from these areas include hearths, furnaces, and a variety of artifacts such as bronze tools, stone implements, bone objects, and ceramic fragments. These discoveries provide critical insights into the material culture and daily lives of the settlement's inhabitants, as well as their technological capabilities in mining and metallurgy.

The site contains a diverse array of furnaces and hearths, varying in size, design, and construction materials, reflecting advanced metallurgical and domestic practices. At Akbauyr I, an oval hearth constructed from stone materials was uncovered at the center of the main dwelling, possibly serving as a focal point for domestic or communal activities. Additionally, a stone furnace with a circular base lined with clay was identified near the main dwelling, indicating its central role in metallurgical production.

Across Settlement I, approximately ten circular or oval stone hearths have been uncovered, distributed throughout the area. At Akbauyr III, a domed clay-lined hearth was discovered, adding to the variety of furnace types of present. These hearths likely served multifunctional purposes, ranging from heating and cooking to ore processing, demonstrating the complex integration of domestic and industrial activities within the settlement.

Animal remains recovered at the site provide significant insights into the subsistence strategies of Akbauyr's inhabitants. Domesticated animal bones—including cattle, sheep, goats, horses, camels, and dogs—indicate extensive animal husbandry. Meanwhile, the presence of bones from wild species such as wolves, foxes, boars, and deer suggest that hunting also played an important role in their economy, supplementing domesticated livestock resources.

Preliminary analysis of artifacts reveals the multifunctional nature of stone tools at Akbauyr. Approximately 60% of the tools are associated with mining and metallurgy, 25% with agricultural activities, and 12% with ceramic production. This distribution underscores the settlement’s primary focus on metal production while supporting a diverse range of supplementary activities.

Ceramic analysis indicates that the majority of ceramic artifacts date to the early Iron Age (10th–8th century BC), with only about 1% attributed to the late Bronze Age. These findings further establish Akbauyr as a key early Iron Age settlement and production center in the region.

Elemental analysis of four metallurgical slag samples from Settlements I and VI, conducted using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), revealed diverse metallurgical practices at Akbauyr. One sample was identified as copper slag, another as silicate slag with no significant metallic content, and the remaining two as iron slags. The high iron concentrations in the iron slag samples, combined with the absence of copper traces, confirm Akbauyr's role as a significant iron production center at the Altai during the early Iron Age.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adrianov, Alexander. “K Arheologii Zapadnogo Altaya. İz poezdki v Semipalatinskuyu oblast v 1911 g.”, Izvestiya İmperatorskoy Arheologicheskoy Komissii 62. Petrograd: Tipografiya Glavnogo Upravleniya Udelov, 1916. google scholar
  • Alehin, Yuri ve Petr Shulga. “Kurgan Kondratyevka-XXI - novyy pamyatnik ranneskifskogo vremeni na Rudnom Altaye”, Drevnosti Altaya: Izvestiya Laboratorii Arkheologii 10 (2003): 62-70. google scholar
  • Arslanova, Firaya. “Kurgany s ‘usami’ Vostochnogo Kazahstana”, Drevnosti Kazahstana içinde, 116-129. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1975. google scholar
  • Arslanova, Firaya. “Pogrebalnyi kompleks VIII-VII vekov do nashey eri iz Vostochnogo Kazahstana”, V Glub Vekov içinde, 46-60. Alma-Ata: Akademiya Nauk KazSSR, 1974. google scholar
  • Bokovenko, Nikolay. “Problemy genezisa pogrebalnogo obryada rannekochevnicheskoy znati Tsentralnoy Azii”, Elitnyye kurgany stepey Evrazii v skifo-sarmatskuyu epokhu 18 (1994): 41-48. google scholar
  • Chernikov, Sergey. “Drevnyaya metallurgiya i gornoye delo Zapadnogo Altaya”, KSIIMK XXIII (1948): 96-100. google scholar
  • Chernikov, Sergey. Vostochnyy Kazahstan v epokhu bronzy. Materialı i issledovaniya po arheologii SSSR 88. Moskva-Leningrad: İzd-vo Akademii Nauk, 1960. google scholar
  • Chotbayev, Aidos ve Albina Yerzhanova. “The Settlement of Akbauyr-III, Engaged in Land Farming”, Cultural Heritage 1/100 (2023): 147-152. https://doi.org/10.47500/2023.v13.i1.13. google scholar
  • Ermolayeva, Antonina. “Izmaylovskiy pogrebalno-pominalnyy kompleks nachhala epokhi rannih kochevnikov iz Vostochnogo Kazahstana”, Izvestiya NAN Respubliki Kazakhstan, seriya obshestvennyh nauk 254 (2008): 83-100. google scholar
  • Gryaznov, Mihail. “Pamyatniki maemirskogo etapa epokhi rannih kochevnikov na Altaye”, KSIIMK XVIII (1947): 9-17. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Leila. Doğu Kazakistan’ın Demir Çağı Bağlamında Berel Kurganları. Doktora tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi, 2023. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Leila. “Doğu Kazakistan’ın Tunç Çağı Truşnikovo Yerleşimi”, International Conference On Scientific and Innovation Research-III içinde, Editör Kağan Kökten ve Seyithan Seydoşoğlu, 857-869. Sivas, 2024. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Mehmet. “Orta Asya’da Tütekli (Kırlangıç) Örtünün Kökeni ve Tarihi Gelişim Aşamaları Üzerine bir Değerlendirme”, History Studies 12/5 (2020): 2455-2486. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Mehmet ve Leila Kutlu. “Pazırık Kültüründe Ölü Gömme Gelenekleri ve Kurgan Mimarisine Yansımaları.” Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 31/1 (2022): 321-53. https://doi.org/10.29135/std.984979. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Mehmet ve Leila Kutlu. “Berel’deki 11. Kurgan ve Pazırık Kültürü.” Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 29/1 (2020): 173-207. https://doi.org/10.29135/std.653826. google scholar
  • Kutlu, Mehmet ve Leila Kutlu. “Ölü Gömme Gelenekleri Bağlamında Berel Kurganları.” Folklor/Edebiyat 27/107 (2021): 771-798. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.1602 google scholar
  • Maksimova, Anna. Epokha bronzy Vostochnogo Kazakhstana, Trudy Instituta Istorii, Arkheologii i Etnografii SSR 7. Alma-Ata: Izd-vo AN Kaz. (1959): 86-161. google scholar
  • Marsadolov, Leonid ve Zainolla Samashev. Izuçeniye arheologiçeskih pamyatnikov Zapadnogo Altaya. Materialı Sayano-Altayskoy arheologiçeskoy ekspeditsii Gos. Ermitaja 3 (2000). Sankt-Peterburg. google scholar
  • Merts, İlya. Kul’tura naseleniya Vostochnogo Kazakhstana v epokhu ranney bronzy. Doktora tezi, Altay Devlet Üniversitesi. 2017. google scholar
  • Peteneva, Galina. “Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya i problemy muzeyefikatsii pamyatnikov na istoriko-arkheologicheskom komplekse Akbauyr v Vostochnom Kazakhstane”, Materialy Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo altaisticheskogo foruma “Tyurko-mongol’skiy mir Bol’shogo Altaya: istoriko-kul’turnoye naslediye i sovremennost”içinde, 76-80. Barnaul - Gorno-Altaysk: Izdatel’stvo AGU, 2021. google scholar
  • Rudenko, Sergey. Kultura naseleniya Tsentralnogo Altaya v skifskoe vremya. Moskva-Leningrad: AN SSSR, 1960. google scholar
  • Samashev Zainolla, Aidos Chotbayev ve Albina Yerzhanova. “Poseleniye Akbauyr III.” Altay—Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 133-139. Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, Yerzhanova, Albina, Chotbayev, Aidos, Samashev, Samat, Medelbek Shuğula ve Botanov, Diyar. “Prodolzheniye issledovaniy na poseleniyakh Akbauyr-F’. Altay — Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, Editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 116-121, Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla. “Proizvodstvennyy tsentr rannikh sakov v Kazakhskom Altaye (poselencheskiy kompleks Akbauyr)”, Arkheologiya Yuzhnoy Sibiri: Sb. nauch. trudov, posv. 75-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. V. Bobrova. haz. Olga Sovetova, 103-118. Kemerovo: Izd-vo Kuzbasskogo region. in-ta povysheniya kvalifikatsii i perepodgotovki rabotnikov obrazovaniya, 28/2020. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, Mehmet Kutlu ve Leila Kutlu. “On the Study of Iron Smelting Production of the Saka of the Kazakh Altai (based on materials of settlement complex Akbauyr)”, Povolzhskaya Arheologiya (2025, in publication) google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, vd. “Poseleniye Akbauyr VI”. Altay — Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, Editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 140-145, Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, vd. “Aqbauyr-VII qonysy”. Altay — Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, Editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 146-157, Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, Antonina Yermolayeva ve Galiya Dzhumabekova. “Kazahskiy Altay v I. tısyaçeletii do. n.e.”, Kazahstan v Sakskuyu Epokhu: Kollektivnaya Monografiya içinde, 101-156. Almatı: İnstitut Arheologii im. A.H. Margulana, 2017. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla, vd. “Poseleniye Akbauyr II”, Altay — Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, Editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 122-132, Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla,vd. “Kompleks poseleniy rannego zheleznogo veka Akbauyr v Vostochnom Kazakhstane” Arkheologicheskiye Vesti 42 içinde, Editör Nataliya Khvoschinskaya, 68-77. Sankt-Peterburg: Institut istorii material’noy kul’tury RAN, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31600/1817-6976-2023-42-68-75. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla. Berel. Almatı: Taimas, 2011. google scholar
  • Samashev, Zainolla. “About One Funeral and Memorial Rite Among the Early Sakas”, Kazakhstan Archeology 3/17 (2022): 9-31. https://doi.org/10.52967/akz2022.3.17.9.31. google scholar
  • Shagirbayev, Mambet. “Pervyye rezul’taty arkheozoologicheskogo izucheniya kostnykh ostankov zhivotnykh iz poselencheskikh kompleksov na Akbauyre”. Altay — Türki aleminin altın besigi içinde, Editör Daniyal Akhmetov, 158-184, Oskemen, 2022. google scholar
  • Sorokin, Sergey. “Pamyatniki rannikh kochevnikov v verhovyakh Buhtarmy.” ASGE 8 (1966): 39-60. google scholar
  • Shulga, Petr. Skotovody Gornogo Altaya v skifskoye vremya (po materialam poseleniy). Novosibirsk: RİTS NGU, 2005. google scholar
  • Tishkin, Alexey. “Etapy razvitiya biykenskoy kultury Altaya”, Teoriya i Praktika Arkheologicheskikh Issledovaniy 3 (2007): 146-158. google scholar
  • Yerzhanova, Albina. “Functional Analysis of Tools from the Akbauyr 1 Settlement (Kazakh Altai)”, Kazakhstan Archeology 21/3 (2023): 187-204. https://doi.org/10.52967/akz2023.3.21.187.204. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Kutlu, M., & Kutlu, L. (2024). Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 34(2), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


AMA

Kutlu M, Kutlu L. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi. Türkiyat Mecmuası. 2024;34(2):659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


ABNT

Kutlu, M.; Kutlu, L. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi. Türkiyat Mecmuası, [Publisher Location], v. 34, n. 2, p. 659-684, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kutlu, Mehmet, and Leila Kutlu. 2024. “Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi.” Türkiyat Mecmuası 34, no. 2: 659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kutlu, Mehmet, and Leila Kutlu. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi.” Türkiyat Mecmuası 34, no. 2 (Mar. 2025): 659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


Harvard: Australian Style

Kutlu, M & Kutlu, L 2024, 'Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi', Türkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 659-684, viewed 15 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kutlu, M. and Kutlu, L. (2024) ‘Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi’, Türkiyat Mecmuası, 34(2), pp. 659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753 (15 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Kutlu, Mehmet, and Leila Kutlu. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi.” Türkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 34, no. 2, 2024, pp. 659-684. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


Vancouver

Kutlu M, Kutlu L. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi. Türkiyat Mecmuası [Internet]. 15 Mar. 2025 [cited 15 Mar. 2025];34(2):659-684. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753 doi: 10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753


ISNAD

Kutlu, Mehmet - Kutlu, Leila. Güneybatı Altaylarda Demir Çağı Madencilik Merkezi Akbauır Yerleşimi”. Türkiyat Mecmuası 34/2 (Mar. 2025): 659-684. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1520753



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim23.07.2024
Kabul01.12.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma25.12.2024

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.