Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu

Mustafa Balcı

Oğuzların Selçuklu hâkimiyeti ile birlikte geniş bir coğrafyaya yayılmaları ve kitleler hâlinde yeni bir dini kabul etmeleri birbirine yakın zamanlarda olmuştur. Bölgede yaygın olarak kullanılan Farsça devlet dili olarak kullanılmaya devam etse de geniş Oğuz kitleleri için ihtiyaç duyulan din bilgisine cevap verecek kılavuz veya kaynak kitapların Türkçe ile yazılmasını gerektirmiştir.

İlk dönem metinlerinde dinî muhtevanın ağır basması da bu ihtiyacın bir göstergesidir. Medreselerde okuyan genç Oğuzların toplumlarına geri döndüklerinde çevreye dinlerini anlatma istekleri, konuştukları dil ile metin üretme arzusunu da beraberinde getirmiştir. İslam dininin temel kaynak kitabı olan Kur’an-ı Kerim’in de Türkçe ile ifade edilme çabası da böyle bir arzu neticesinde ortaya çıkmıştır. Kur’an’ın en doğru şekilde anlaşılması ciddi bir sorumluluk getirmektedir. Bu itibarla Oğuzcanın yazı dili olmaması, Kur’an-ı Kerim’in de sıradan bir metin olmaması hassasiyetini yükseltmiştir.

Kur’an’da çok sık kullanılan ve Allah’a ait sıfatların da yapısını teşkil eden bazı kelime türlerinin Türkçede ifadesi özellikle Kur’an tercümelerinde özel bir çabayı gerektirdiği anlaşılmaktadır. Arapçanın kendine has unsurlarından olan ism-i fail, sıfat-ı müşebbehe ve mübalağalı ism-i fail yapıları, Türkçenin büyük oranda yabancısı durumundadır. Bu makalede, söz konusu Arapça yapıların Türkçede yaygın bir kullanım alanı olmayan (-IcI) ekiyle oluşturulan yeni unsurlarla karşılanma çabası işlenmektedir. 

DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Place of Suffix -IcI in The Formation of Turkish as a Written Language

Mustafa Balcı

The expansion of Oghuz Turks into larger lands under the Seljuk dominion, and their adoption of a new religion as large masses, took place in periods that are quite close to each other. Although the Persian language continued its influnce in the state apparatus as the official language, the writing of the religious sources to provide large masses of Oghuzs with the proper guidelines for religious practice in Turkish was also an expanding need. The predomination of religious content in the early period writings has been an indicator of this need. The enthusiasm of medrese students who wanted to inform other people about religion whenever they came back to their own communities, stimulated their desire to produce written texts in their spoken language. The endeavours to express the main source of Islam, the Quran, in Turkish also originated from such needs. The comprehension of the Quran in the most correct way brings such a serious responsibility. Therefore, the absence of a written Oghuz language resulted in greater worries about the Quran, for it was never an ordinary text.

It seems to be the case that the Turkish expression of certain types of words that were often used in Quran, and were formative of divine attributions, necessitated a special effort, particularly in those Quranic translations. Certain peculiar elements in the Arabic language, such as ism- fail (present participle), sıfat-ı müşebbehe and the exaggerative present participle forms are all alien to Turkish. In this article, we will be examining the endeavours to produce the correspondent Turkish elements with the suffix (-IcI), for these Arabic forms that were not in common use in Turkish. 


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Translation, though concerning quite many scientific disciplines such as medicine, pharmacy, mathematics, physics, philosophy, history, linguistics etc., and many other areas concerning practical lives like politics, trade, literature; for the most part, deals with interlinguistic connections. 

The interactions between Arabic and Turkish started to flourish after the Turks’ adoption of Islam. The translations from Arabic to Turkish stemmed mainly from the need to learn about the religion of Islam. Oghuz Turkish, in its formation process as a written language, was also fulfilling such a demand. Hence, the texts with religious content seriously predominated the ones that were produced in the early periods. 

The expansion of Oghuz Turks into larger lands under the Seljuk dominion, and their adoption of a new religion as large masses, took place in periods that are quite close to each other. Whereas the need for written correspondence in the state hierarchy was being fulfilled via Persian, it is obvious that Arabic or Persian would fall short of such a proper function in the case of spreading religious knowledge. For this reason, a small number of literate Turks went into the effort of producing texts in Turkish, which was the common spoken language among Oghuzs and other clans. One may argue that the endeavour to write in Turkish gradually spread towards the west, beginning in the Horasan region. The adoption of Islam by the Oghuzs, and the formation of a large state organization in a simultaneous way, both came into play in the flourishment of the Oghuz language in the written form. Though the need for an official language was met by correspondences that were being written in Persian, it was not sufficient for the learning of the new religion, and in corresponding the demand for knowledge, which came forward in various strata of society in differing proportions. The fact that Arabic was the language of the main religious source, and the official language being Persian was leading to a shortage of communication for the larges masses of Oghuzs, with both the state and religion. Though the official language, being Persian, did not constitute a serious problem for the people who did not have grave concerns about the state mechanism, their disconnection with religion was quite of an inconvenience.

Firstly expanding to the Horasan region, and up to the inlands of Anatolia afterwards, Oghuz settlements necessitated their meeting with the new religion, and re-organizing their lives in accordance with the two motives, along with adapting to a new geography. Except for the migrant settler masses, religious knowledge had become a necessity for the Oghuzs, who adopted a sedentary life in their daily practices. The fact that it was religious motives behind the transmission of knowledge from Arabic to Turkish aggravated the responsibility of the translators who shouldered it. Any mistake that was to be made in the translation of a literary text would at worst vitiate the aesthetic flavour of the text. However, the translation of a religious text obviously requires much more sensitivity. Hence, one should admit that it requires a very special effort in the translation of such issues as the faith and the attributions of Allah, which also shape one’s conception of God. The Quranic translations that were produced with such a sensitivity as much served for the formation of the written Turkish as for the comprehension and teaching of the religion. 

The young Turkish scholars, who did not know any other written sources other the Arabic ones, must have used Arabic as a guide during their translations. We should admit that the translation of Arabic expressions to a language that had been used in written form before, must have been very difficult. Especially, the translation of some peculiar Arabic phrases to Turkish correctly, required the utmost prudence, so as to understand the source of religion in the most correct way.

The underline translation method which was commonly used in the early periods, despite being a poor method for the phrases, was successful in producing comprehensible Turkish written texts. In the course of these translations, there were some peculiar elements in Arabic, such as ism-i fail (present participle), sıfat-ı müşebbehe and the exaggerative present participle, which were alien to Turkish to a great extent. Building the conception of God in accordance with the understanding of oneness (and unity), the Quran presents the idea of God as almighty andbenevolent, by often making use of the aforementioned peculiar expressions. It also uses those word structures in order to explain the condition of men in the face of orders and prohibitions to which it appeals in regulating human life. The suffix -IcI in Oghuz Turkish virtually seems to have taken on a very special task, so as to meet the peculiar expressions of Arabic in question. The suffix IcI, which did not usually come forward in the early years in Old Turkish and the Anatolian region, is now one of the most common elements, and it is one of the indicators of verb performers.

We know that the suffixes -GlI and -GAn were being used for certain verb performers of Arabic in the Karakhanid and Khorezmian regions. Such a differentiation indicates the rising sensitivity in the Anatolian geography with regard to the translations of these aforementioned structures. It also shows that the written language in Anatolia developed quite separately from the Turkistan region. Although the Quranic translations that were written in Karakhanid and Khorezmian Turkish contain some occasional instances of the suffix -IcI (=ĠUçI), it seems to have been used far less in proportion to the Anatolian region.

Besides the historical dialects such as Karakhanid and Khorezmian, there are some examples that it was from time to time corresponded by the suffixes -IcI (küçi and Kuçi) in Afghanistan Uzbek Turkish and Kazan Tatar Turkish.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Akdoğan, Yaşar, Erişim 03.06.2019 http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/Eklenti/10591,ahmedidivaniyasarakdoganpdf. pdf?0 google scholar
  • Arat, R. Rahmeti. Atabetü’l-hakayık. Ankara: TDK Yay., Ankara, 1992. google scholar
  • Ayazlı, Özlem. Altun Yaruk Sudur VI. Kitap. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2011. google scholar
  • Borovkov, A. K. Orta Asya’da Bulunmuş Kur’an Tefsirinin Söz Varlığı (XII.-XIII. Yüzyıllar). Çeviren H. İ. Usta-E. Amanoğlu. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2002. google scholar
  • Bünyâd-ı Ta’lîmü’l Kur’an-ı Afganistan, Tercüme Özbikî, Afganistan, (28.10.1390) google scholar
  • Canpolat, Mustafa. Mecmūʿatü’n-neẓāir. Ankara: TDK Yay., 1982. Cin, Ali. Ali’nin Kıssa-i Yûsuf’u. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2011. google scholar
  • Demir, N.-Aydoğdu, Ö. Oğuzname. İstanbul: Kesit Yay., 2015. google scholar
  • Develi, Hayati, “Ağız Özellikleri Taşıyan Bir Eski Türkiye Türkçesi Metni Fatiha Tefsiri”, İlmî Araştırmalar, (1998): 63-81 İstanbul. google scholar
  • Elmalı, Murat. Eski Uygurca Dilbilgisi Terimleri. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2017. google scholar
  • Ercilasun, Ahmet B.-Akkoyunlu, Z. Dîvânu Lugâti’t Türk. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2015. google scholar
  • Ergin, Muharrem. Orhun Abideleri. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Yay. 2008. google scholar
  • Gabain, Anamarie. Eski Türkçenin Grameri. Çeviren Mehmet Akalın. Ankara: TDK Yay., 1988. google scholar
  • Gökyay, Orhan Ş. Dedem Korkud’un Kitabı. İstanbul: MEB Yay., 1973. google scholar
  • Hamilton, James, R. İyi ve Kötü Prens Öyküsü. Çeviren Vedat Köken. Ankara: TDK Yay., 1998. google scholar
  • Kaçalin, M. S. Dedem Korkut’un Kazan Bey Oğuznamesi. İstanbul: Kitabevi Yay., 2006. google scholar
  • Karabacak, Esra. An Inter-linear Translation of The Qur’an Into Old Anatolian Turkish I-II-III-IV-V-VI-VIIVIII. Harvard Ün. Yakındoğu Dilleri Böl., 1994-95-95-99. google scholar
  • Karamanlıoğlu, A. F. Gülistan Tercümesi. Ankara: TDK Yay., 1989. google scholar
  • Kaya, Ceval. Uygurca Altun Yaruk. Ankara: TDK Yay., 1994. google scholar
  • Korkmaz, Zeynep. Türkiye Türkçesinin Temeli Oğuz Türkçesinin Gelişimi. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2013. google scholar
  • Küçük, Murat. Eski Anadolu Türkçesi Dönemine Ait Satır Arası İlk Kur’an Tercümesi. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2014. google scholar
  • Küçük, Serhat. XVI. Yüzyıla Ait Bir Tezkiretü’l-evliya Tercümesi. İstanbul: Kesit Yay., 2013. google scholar
  • Küçük, Serhat. Ali-İfrit Cenknâmesi. İstanbul: Kesit Yay., 2014. Küçük, Serhat. Kitâb-ı Güzîde,. İstanbul: Kesit Yay., 2014. google scholar
  • Moflyuhunov, Nurulla Nazaram. Nogmani Tefsire. Kazan, 2014. google scholar
  • Ölmez, Mehmet. Altun Yaruk 3. Kitap (=5. Bölüm). Beytepe/Ankara,1991. google scholar
  • Özdoğan, M. Akif. “Abbasîler Dönemi Tercüme Faaliyetlerinin Arap Edebiyatına Etkisi”, Nüsha Şarkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5/16. (2005), Ankara. google scholar
  • Özek, Fatih. Kitābu Feżā’ili’l-mekke ve’l-medīne ve’l-ḳudüs. İstanbul: Kesit Yay., 2016. google scholar
  • Sağol, Gülden, An Inter-linear Translation of The Qur’an Into Khawarizm Turkish I-II-III-IV-V, Harvard Ün. Yakındoğu Dilleri Böl., 1993-95-96. google scholar
  • Tatçı, Mustafa, http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/Eklenti/10662,girispdf.pdf?0, Erişim 19.5.2019. google scholar
  • Tekin, Şinasi. Kuanşi İm Pusar, Ankara: TDK Yay., 1993. google scholar
  • Timurtaş, F. Kadri. Osmanlı Türkçesi Grameri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 1985. google scholar
  • Toker, Mustafa. Anonim Satır Altı Kur’an Tercümesi. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2011. google scholar
  • Topaloğlu, Ahmet. 14. Yüzyılın Ortalarında Yapılmış Satırarası Kur’an Tercümesi 1. İstanbul: Dergâh Yay., 2018. google scholar
  • Türk, Vahit. Bahrü’l-hakâyık. Ankara: TDK Yay., 2009. google scholar
  • Ünlü, Suat. Karahanlı Türkçesi İlk Satır-Arası Kur’an Tercümesi (TİEM 73). Konya: Eğitim Kitabevi, 2018. google scholar
  • Yavuz, Kemal. Garibname. Ankara:TDK Yay., 2000. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Balcı, M. (2019). Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 29(2), 367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


AMA

Balcı M. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu. Türkiyat Mecmuası. 2019;29(2):367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


ABNT

Balcı, M. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu. Türkiyat Mecmuası, [Publisher Location], v. 29, n. 2, p. 367-390, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Balcı, Mustafa,. 2019. “Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu.” Türkiyat Mecmuası 29, no. 2: 367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


Chicago: Humanities Style

Balcı, Mustafa,. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu.” Türkiyat Mecmuası 29, no. 2 (Dec. 2024): 367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


Harvard: Australian Style

Balcı, M 2019, 'Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu', Türkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 367-390, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Balcı, M. (2019) ‘Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu’, Türkiyat Mecmuası, 29(2), pp. 367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Balcı, Mustafa,. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu.” Türkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 29, no. 2, 2019, pp. 367-390. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


Vancouver

Balcı M. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu. Türkiyat Mecmuası [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];29(2):367-390. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900 doi: 10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900


ISNAD

Balcı, Mustafa. Türkiye Türkçesinin Yazı Dili Olarak Kuruluşunda -IcI Ekinin Durumu”. Türkiyat Mecmuası 29/2 (Dec. 2024): 367-390. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.658900



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim05.10.2019
Kabul04.11.2019
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma13.12.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.