Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JEPR599442   IUP :10.26650/JEPR599442    Tam Metin (PDF)

Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Harun Çetinkaya

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’deki bankacılık sektörünün takipteki kredi oranlarında etkili olan faktörleri tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla çalışmada Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren bankaların üç aylık finansal verileri kullanılmıştır. Analiz kapsamına 2014-2017 yılları arasında faaliyet gösteren en büyük hacme sahip ilk üç banka dâhil edilmiştir. Analiz panel veri regresyon yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, bankaya özgü değişkenler arasında yer alan aktif karlılığı, banka büyüklüğü, net faiz marjı, finansman açığı ve özsermaye karlılığı değişkenlerinin %99 güven düzeyinde ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Makroekonomik değişkenler arasında yer alan gayri safi yurtiçi hâsıla oranı değişkeni ve sermaye yeterlilik oranı değişkeni ile kredi riski arasında %90 güven düzeyinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki çıkmıştır. Bu sonuçlar bankacılık sektöründe takipteki kredileri dolayısıyla kredi riskini yönetmede hangi değişkenlerin ön plana alınması gerektiğini göstermesi bakımından önemli ve özgündür.


JEL Classification : E43 , G21 , G11
DOI :10.26650/JEPR599442   IUP :10.26650/JEPR599442    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Empirical Study on the Key Determinants of Credit Risk in the Banking Sector

Harun Çetinkaya

The purpose of this study, the banking sector in Turkey is to identify the factors that influence their lending rates followed. The purpose of this study is to detect the factors that influence the rate of NPLs in the banking sector in Turkey. Quarterly financial data of banks operating in Turkey was used for this purpose. Quarterly financial data of banks operating in Turkey was used for this purpose. The first three banks with the largest volume operating between 2014-2017 were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed by method of panel data regression. The analysis was performed by method of panel data regression. The results of the study show that the variables such as asset profitability, bank size, net interest margin, finance deficit and return on equity among bank specific variables were statistically significant to a 99% confidence level. The results of the study show that the variables such as asset profitability, bank size, net interest margin, finance deficit and return on equity among bank specific variables were statistically significant to a 99% confidence level. There was a statistically significant relationship between the gross domestic product ratio which is macroeconomic variable and capital adequacy ratio variable and the credit risk at the 90% confidence level. These results are important and specific in terms of showing which variables should be taken into the foreground in managing non-performing loans in the banking sector, namely credit risk.


JEL Classification : E43 , G21 , G11

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


The volume of loans or funds plays an important role in the growth and expansion of the impact areas of countries. The economic growth of a country is influenced by the institutions and organizations operating in the country. Banks fulfill the funding needs of firms and individual customers by providing loans. Banks may have problems in the collection of loans due to a number of negativity. These negativities that occur in the form of not paying the loans on time and in full cause the risk in the collection of the receivables. The failure of the borrower or counterparty to fully fulfill its obligations is defined as the credit risk faced by banks. The financial crises have shown that the increase in the non-performing loan ratios of the banks has indicated some problems in the real economy. For all these reasons, it is generally accepted that non-performing loans are a leading indicator that should be monitored and managed very carefully

While non-performing loans shed light on the current situation of the banking sector, it also holds an important projection to understand the course of the general economy. The share of non-performing loans in total loans depicts the asset quality of banks, while the debt solvency of the household and the real sector is shown. In this respect, non-performing loans are a leading indicator in determining the banking performance as a micro indicator and as a macro indicator in the performance of the general economy. It is important to make accurate forecasts in order for economic policy recommendations to be made accurately and for banks to continue their operations healthily . It is important to make accurate forecasts in order for economic policy recommendations to be made accurately and for banks to continue their operations healthily. Therefore, in our study, non-performing loans were used as dependent variables in order to represent credit risk. Factors affecting NPLs in the banking sector in Turkey is aimed to identify what is going on. Thus, this study has investigated what happened the factors affecting the NPLs in the banking sector in Turkey. From this point of view, it is aimed to contribute to the literature. Working in conventional banks operating in the banking sector in Turkey using quarterly data in credit risk between the years 2014-2017 aimed to identify factors that are effective. For this purpose, the first three largest banks were included in the sample. Thus, the study was estimated by panel data regression method. The econometric model for the banking sector was found to be significant at 99% confidence level. The results of the study revealed that the selected variables were 67% effective in explaining the credit risk in the banking sector. While all the bank-specific variables selected in the research model were significant, only gross domestic product was significant among the macroeconomic variables.

The results show that a unit increase in the return on assets of the first three banks operating in the banking sector will result in an increase of 5.84 in credit risk. This result reveals that the increase in asset profitability will adversely affect credit risk. In addition, the results of the study show that a one-unit increase in the size of the bank will increase the non-performing loans, namely the credit risk by 1.30%. The net interest margin variable in the model was positive and statistically significant at 99% confidence level. This result shows that a one-unit increase in the net interest margin will increase the credit risk by 0.03. A one-unit increase in the share of liquid assets in total assets reduces the credit risk by 0.09. A one-unit increase in the return on equity reduces the credit risk by 0.57. This result supports the idea that the increase in shareholders’ equity will decrease the credit risk. This result supports the idea that the increase in banks shareholders’ equity reduces credit risk. The findings suggest that a one-unit increase in banks’ capital adequacy ratios will reduce credit risk by 0.06 percent. Thus, the higher the capital adequacy ratio of the banks, the lower the exposure to credit risk. The results of the research show that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between the gross domestic product variable and credit risk at 90% confidence level. In addition, the results showed that the inflation rate variable was meaningless in explaining the credit risk in banking.

The fact that banks have a solid liquidity structure is not only important in terms of the performance of the banks and the stability of the financial system, but also in terms of avoiding crises due to the increase in non-performing loans in the economy. Both the local banking crisis of 2000-2001 and the global financial crisis of 2007-2008 showed that nonperforming loans, ie, not managing credit risk effectively, could result in bankruptcy of banks. The study credits the banks operating in Turkey reveals factors that need attention in order to prevent exposure to risk. In this regard, considering the factors mentioned above, it is thought that banks that follow an appropriate policy will not have credit problems and keep their performance in good condition.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Ahmad, N. H., & Ahmad, S. N. (2004). Key factors influencing credit risk of Islamic bank: A Malaysian case. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 1(1), 65-80. google scholar
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis Of Panel Data. England: John Wiley & Sons . google scholar
  • BDDK. (1.11.2006). Bankalarca Kredilerin ve Diğer Alacakların Niteliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Bunlar İçin Ayrılacak Karşılıklara İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar Hakkında Yönetmelik. İstanbul: Resmi Gazete. google scholar
  • Claessens, S., Klingebiel, D., & Laeven, L. (2001). Financial Restructuring in Banking and Corporate-Sector Crises. The National Bureau of Economic Research, Chapter 9650. google scholar
  • Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). Nonperforming Loans İn The GCC Banking System And Their Macroeconomic Effects And Their Macroeconomic Effects. IMF Working Papers, 1-24. google scholar
  • Ferhi, A., & Chkoundali, R. (2015). Credit Risk and Efficiency: Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Banks during the Current Crises. Journal of Behavioral Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport, 3(1), 47-56. google scholar
  • Ghost, S., & Das, A. (2007). Determinants of credit risk in indian state-owned banks: An empirical investigation. Economic Issues, 12(2). google scholar
  • Göğebakan, C. M., & Arda, M. (2004). Kredi Risk Yönetimi Açısından İçsel Derecelendirme Modeli. Active Bankacılık ve Finans Dergisi(34). google scholar
  • Keklik, G. (2011). Bankalarda Kredi Riski Yönetimi Performans Analizi Ve Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemi İle Uygulama. Kütahya: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. google scholar
  • Klein, N. (2013). Non-Performing Loans İn CESEE: Determinants And Impact On Macroeconomic Performance. IMF Working Paper. google scholar
  • Koyuncu, C., & Saka, B. (2011). Takipteki Kredilerin Özel Sektöre Verilen Krediler ve Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Etkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(31), 113-124. M. Cristea, L. G. (2010). Evaluation of Turkish domestic and foreing banks by using financial ratios. University of Craiova, Faculty of Economy and Business Administration. Nurul, K., Worthington, A., & Gupta, R. (2014). Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank. PacificBasin Finance Journal, 34, 327-353. google scholar
  • Özkan, N., & Işıl, G. (2016). İslami Bankalarda Kredi Riskini Belirleyen Faktörler: Panel Veri Anazi İle Türkiye’de Katılım Bankacılığı Üzerinde Ampririk Bir Uygulama. Maliye Finans Yazıları Dergisi, 105, 153-176. google scholar
  • Sarı, S. (2004). Ticari bankalarda risk yönetimi ve sermaye yeterliliği. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. google scholar
  • Sözer, İ. A. (2010). Bankalarda Takipteki Krediler: Takibine Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Bankacılık ve Sigortacılık Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Suresh, N., Kumar, A., & Gowda, D. M. (2009). Credit risk management in commercial banks. Don Bosco İnstitute of Bio-Sciences and Management Studies, 2(4), 72-78. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Çetinkaya, H. (0001). Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


AMA

Çetinkaya H. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi. 0001;6(2):121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


ABNT

Çetinkaya, H. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 6, n. 2, p. 121-134, 0001.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çetinkaya, Harun,. 0001. “Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma.” İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 6, no. 2: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çetinkaya, Harun,. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma.” İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 6, no. 2 (Nov. 2024): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


Harvard: Australian Style

Çetinkaya, H 0001, 'Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma', İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121-134, viewed 25 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çetinkaya, H. (0001) ‘Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma’, İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442 (25 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Çetinkaya, Harun,. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma.” İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 2, 0001, pp. 121-134. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442


Vancouver

Çetinkaya H. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi [Internet]. 25 Nov. 2024 [cited 25 Nov. 2024];6(2):121-134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442 doi: 10.26650/JEPR599442


ISNAD

Çetinkaya, Harun. Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Riskinin Temel Belirleyicilerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Çalışma”. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 6/2 (Nov. 2024): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR599442



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim12.06.2019
Kabul03.07.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.