Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/jos.1522758   IUP :10.26650/jos.1522758    Tam Metin (PDF)

Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak

Birsel Küçüksipahioğlu

1095’te resmen başlayan Haçlı Seferleri sırasında Haçlılarla mücadele büyük bir özveri ve gayretle Türkler tarafından gerçekleştirildi. Türkiye Selçuklu Sultanı I. Kılıç Arslan’ın Haçlılara karşı Anadolu’yu geçilmez kılan stratejisi ve başarısı önemliydi. 1108’de Büyük Selçuklu Devleti tarafından Haçlılarla mücadele devlet politikasına dönüştü ve Sultan Muhammed Tapar tarafından bu göreve Musul emîri Mevdûd b. Altuntegin getirildi. Mevdûd ile başlayan, İmâdeddin Zengi ve Nureddin Mahmud Zengi ile devam eden süreç, Belek, Aksungur el-Porsuki, İlgazi ve Dımaşk Atabeği Tuğtegin tarafından desteklendi. Tuğtegin’in, Suriye Selçuklu Meliki Tutuş’un yanında yer aldığı, çalışkanlığı ve başarısı ile meliki etkilediği, bu sebeple Tutuş tarafından oğlu Dukak’a atabeg tayin edildiği bilinmektedir. Tutuş’un 1095 Rey Savaşı’nda hayatını kaybetmesinden sonra Dukak’a olan bağlılığını devam ettiren Tuğtegin bu süreçte Dımaşk’ı Haçlı tehlikesine karşı koruması ve melikliği güçlendirme faaliyetleri ile dikkatleri üzerine çekmiştir. Dukak’ın 1104’te ölümünden sonra ise siyasi oluşumunu başlatarak Dımaşk Atabegliği veya Tuğteginliler Hanedanlığı’nı kurmuştur. Müstakil yönetimi boyunca halkına cömert ve adil davranan Tuğtegin, Haçlılarla mücadele etmiş, dönemin şartları gereği onlarla ittifak yapmaktan da çekinmemiştir. Bu makale Tuğtegin’in Haçlılarla ilişkilerini ele alarak, savaş, ittifak ve anlaşma üzerinden belirlediği politikalarla onlara bakışını değerlendirmeye çalışacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: DımaşkTuğteginHaçlılarTaberiyeKudüs
DOI :10.26650/jos.1522758   IUP :10.26650/jos.1522758    Tam Metin (PDF)

Tughtigin, Ruler of Damascus: Struggle with the Crusaders, War, and Alliance

Birsel Küçüksipahioğlu

During the Crusades, which officially began in 1095, the Turks carried out the fight against the Crusaders with great devotion and zeal. The strategy and success of the Turkish Seljuk Sultan Kilij Arslan I against the Crusaders, who made Anatolia impassable against them Crusaders were important. In 1108, the struggle against the Crusaders was turned into a state policy by the Great Seljuk Empire, and Sultan Muhammad Tapar appointed Mawdūd, amīr of Mosul, to this task. The process that started with Mawdūd and continued with Imād al-Dīn Zangī and Nūr al-Dīn Maḥmūd Zangī was supported by Belek, Aksunkur al-Bursukī, Ilghāzī and Tughtigin, the Atabeg of Damascus. It is known that Tughtigin was a supporter of the Seljuk Malik of Syria Tutush, who impressed the malik with his diligence and success. For, this reason, he was appointed atabeg to his son Dukāk by Tutush. After Dukāk’s death in 1104, he began his political formation and established the Atabegate of Damascus or Tughtiginites. Tughtigin, who treated his people generously and fairly throughout his independent rule, fought against the Crusaders and did not hesitate to ally with them due to the conditions of the period.

Anahtar Kelimeler: DamascusTughtiginCrusadersTiberiasJerusalem

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


It is not known where and when Tughtigin, who took part in the struggle against the Crusaders, was born, but it is thought that he impressed the Seljuk Malik of Syria Tutush with his diligence and success while he was in the service of Tutush, and probably for this reason Tutush appointed him atabeg to his son Dukāk. Tughtigin, who took part in the Battle of Ray in 1095 on the side of Tutush, was captured in the battle and Tutush lost his life. However, through the prisoner exchange agreement with Barkyaruq, he was freed and returned from Isfahān to Damascus. He was welcomed with respect by the dignitaries, especially Dukāk, and regained his former reputation. After this, Tughtigin sided with Dukāk and tried to make him strong in Syria. When the Crusades started and the Crusaders headed toward Antioch, Tughtigin, who went with Dukāk to request the help of the ruler of the city, Yaghi Siyan, took part in the army of Kerboga, who came to expel the Crusaders from Antioch after the battle with the Crusaders in Albara (el-Bâre) in December 1097. After Antioch, Tughtigin did not intervene with Dukāk in the advance of the armies of the First Crusade toward Jerusalem. In 1101, 1102 and 1103, the atabeg was instrumental in the capture of Jableh, Rahbeh and Hims. With the death of Dukāk in 1104 and his successor Tutush soon after, he began his political formation and established the Atabegate of Damascus or the Tughtiginites.

After a severe illness, Tugtegin, who took over the government independently, captured Baalbek and Raphanea in April 1105. He then participated in the Fatimid campaign to expel the Crusaders from the region and regain possession of Palestine. On 27 August, 1105, the battle with the Crusaders under the command of King Baldwin I of Jerusalem in Ramla ended in defeat, despite all the efforts of the Muslims. After this, he prioritized the fight against the Crusaders.This struggle, which was sometimes a war alliance, was extremely important considering the political situation of the region. Because from the moment the Crusaders arrived in the region, they had determined policies to be permanent, continuous, and successful, and they had endeavored to expand. It is noteworthy that the Crusaders, who were intensely active in Anatolia, Syria, and Palestine, insisted on Mosul, Aleppo, and Damascus, which had a strategic position. For this reason, Tughtigin tried to ensure the security of Damascus against the Crusaders, and as a result, he captured and destroyed the Al’âl Castle built by the Crusaders to be used as a base for attacks against Muslims and to follow the activities of Damascus. To demonstrate this sensitivity toward Muslim cities exposed to the Crusader danger, Tughtigin supported the Amīr of Tripoli, Fakhr al-Mulk ibn Ammār, during the Crusader siege of Tripoli.

The atabeg, who organized expeditions to strategically important Tiberias in 1106 and 1108, signed a 10-year agreement with King Baldwin I of Jerusalem in 1108. With the comfort of this agreement, he participated in the expedition of Mosul Governor Mawdūd b. Altuntegin, who was assigned to fight the Crusaders by the Seljuk Sultan Muhammad Tapar, to Urfa (Edessa) in 1110. On 28 June 1113, he again acted with Mawdūd against the Crusaders in the Battle of Tiberias. However, he was accused of being personally responsible for Mawdūd’s assassination in Damascus on October 10 1113. Sultan Muhammad Tapar was also of the same opinion. Due to this and the influence of Ilghāzī, the ruler of Aleppo, Ilghāzī, collaborated with the Crusaders against the sultan, but later regretted it and continued his struggle against the Crusaders. His being forgiven by the sultan in 1116 strengthened his activities against the Crusaders, and he supported Aksunkur al-Bursukī, the ruler of Mosul, who endeavored to expel them from the region. Then he tried to prevent the Crusaders jointly with Ilghāzī.

When the city of Tyre, which had been under Fatimid rule for 10 years, was besieged by the Crusaders on 15 February 1124 with Venetian support, Tughtigin could not remain indifferent to the help requested from him and tried to protect the city. Tyre, which had been previously subjected to Crusader attacks and sieges before, could hardly withstand this siege. Tughtigin realized the impossibility of defending the city under difficult conditions and sent envoys to the Crusaders, informing them that Tyre would be surrendered on the condition that those who wanted to stay in the city would be allowed to leave and go to other places. Upon the acceptance of this offer by the Crusaders, the city gates were opened on July 7, 1124, the people were allowed to leave. In this way, Tyre was out of the hands of the Muslims.

After Tyre fell to the Crusaders, Tughtigin joined Aksunkur al-Bursukī’s army in 1125 and played a role in the capture of Kafartab in May 1125. However, he was heavily criticized for giving Banyas to the Batiniyya and was accused of giving them a foothold in Syria. The atabeg reacted to the fact that King Baldwin II of Jerusalem, who had been captured by the amīr of Belek, had been freed. After his arrival in Jerusalem, he began attacking around Damascus in January 1126. Crusader rulers usually took action against the Turkish-Islamic world to avenge their captivity and attacked important cities, especially Damascus and Aleppo. Tughtigin, who died in February 1128 in Damascus, was known as a wise, just, benevolent and generous amīr, and his merciful approach to his people and fair administration were praised. For this reason, his people were very saddened by his death, wept, and mourned for days. Tughtigin, who made great efforts to protect Damascus against the Crusaders, sometimes allied with the Crusaders, but he did so because he was afraid of losing Damascus or the Seljuks taking it from him. The alliance with the Crusaders was a situation that emerged according to the conditions of that period, and it is known that some other beys and amīrs also made such alliances. In addition, his sensitivity toward the possession and defense of Damascus was not only against.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Albertus Aquensis, Liber Christianae Expeditionis pro Ereptione, Emundatione et Restitutione Sanctae Hierosolymitanae Ecclesiae, RHC. occ., IV, s. 265-713, trc. Susan B. Edgington, Albert of Aachen, Historia Ierosolimitana. History of the Journey to Jerusalem, Oxford: 2007. google scholar
  • Alptekin, Coşkun, Dımaşk Atabegliği (Tog-Teginliler), Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yayın, 1985. google scholar
  • ________________, “Aksungur el-Porsukî”, DİA., II, s. 297. google scholar
  • Azîmî, Târîhu’l-Azîmî, trc. Ali Sevim, Azîmî Tarihi Selçuklularla İlgili Bölümler (h. 430-538= 1038/39-1143/1144, Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1988. google scholar
  • Cahen, C, La Syrie du Nord a L’epoque des Croisades et la Principaute Franque d’Antioche, Paris: 1940. google scholar
  • Demirkent, Işın, Urfa Haçlı Kontluğu Tarihi (1098-1118), Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1990. google scholar
  • _____________, Urfa Haçlı Kontluğu Tarihi (1118-1146), Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1987. google scholar
  • Fulcherius Carnotensis, Gesta Francorum Iherusalem peregrinantium, RHC occ., III, s. 311-485, trc. R. Ryan, Fulcher of Chartres. A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem 1095-1127, Knoxville: 1969. google scholar
  • Fink, Harold S., “The Role Of Damascus in the History of the Crusades”, The Müslim World, 1959(XLIX), s. 41-53. google scholar
  • Galterius Cancellarius, De Bello Antiochene, RHC. occ., V, s. 75-132. google scholar
  • Gesta Francorum et aliorum Hierosolimitanorum, RHC occ., III, s.119-163 terc. R. Hill, The Deeds of the Franks and the other Pilgrims to Jerusalem, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 1979. google scholar
  • Ibn Kesîr, el-Bidâye ve’n-nihâye, Büyük İslâm Tarihi, trc. Mehmet Keskin, Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1994, XII. google scholar
  • Ibnü’l-Adim, Buğyetü’t-taleb fi târîhi Haleb, trc. Ali Sevim, Biyografilerle Selçuklular Tarihi, Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1982. google scholar
  • Ibnü’l-Esîr, el-Kâmil fi’t-Tarih, trc. Istanbul: Bahar Yayınları, 1987, X-XI. google scholar
  • Ibnü’l-Kalânisî, Zeylü Târihi Dımaşk, trc. H.A.R. Gibb, The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades, London: 1932. google scholar
  • Karaca, Sevtap Gölgesiz, Kudüs Haçlı Krallığı Siyasi Tarihi (1099-1187), Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 2020. google scholar
  • Küçüksipahioğlu, Birsel, Trablus Haçlı Kontluğu Tarihi (1109-1187), Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • _____________________, Haçlılar ve İstanbul (1096-1261), Istanbul: Pozitif Yayınları, 2021. google scholar
  • _____________________,“Mevdûd b. Altuntekin: Haçlılarla Mücadele Eden Bir Selçuklu Komutanı”, TYB Akademi Dil Edebiyat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(Eylül 2014), s. 37-49. google scholar
  • _____________________, “Musul ve Halep Valisi Imâdeddin Zengi’nin Haçlılarla Mücadelesi”, Şarkiyat Mecmuası, 36(2020), s. 103-126. google scholar
  • ______________________, Artuklu Döneminde Orta Doğu’da Haçlılar ve Politikaları”, Bir Medeniyet Merkezi google scholar
  • Olarak Orta Doğu Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri 3-4 Kasım 2016 Mardin, Mardin 2017, s. 95-101. google scholar
  • ________________________, “Haçlılarla Mücadelede Türklerin Rolü”, Savaş Tarihi, ed. Dr. Erdal Korkmaz-Dr. Sadık Emre Karakuş, Çanakkale: Paradigma Akademi Yayınları, 2023, s. 21-47. google scholar
  • Özergin, Muammer Kemal, Dımaşk Melikliği ve Dımaşk Atabegi Zahir al-Din Toğ-Tegin, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi) Istanbul: IÜ. Edebiyat Fakültesi, 1965. google scholar
  • Raimundus Aguilers, Historia Francorum qui Ceperunt Iherusalem, RHC occ., III, s. 231-309; Ingilizce terc. J.H. Hill ve L.L.Hill, Raymond d’Aguilers, Philadelphia: 1968. google scholar
  • Runciman, Steven, Haçlı Seferleri Tarihi, trc. Fikret Işıltan, Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1992, II. google scholar
  • ________________, “The First Crusade: “Antioch to Ascalon”, A History of the Crusades, ed. Kenneth M. Setton, Marshall W. Baldwin, Madison, Milwaukee, London:1969. google scholar
  • Sevim, Ali, Suriye ve Filistin Selçukluları Tarihi, Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1989. google scholar
  • __________, Artukoğlu Ilgazi”, Belleten, XXVI (1962), s.649-691. google scholar
  • __________., “Tuğtegin”, İA, 12/2, s. 44-46. google scholar
  • Taef El-Azhari, “Tughtigin”, The Crusades an Encyclopedia, ed. Alan V. Murray, 2006, s. 1204-1205. google scholar
  • Sıbt Ibnü’l-Cevzî, Mir’âtü’z-zamân, RHC. Or., III. google scholar
  • Urfalı Mateos, Vekayinâme, trc. Hrant Andreasyan, Urfalı Mateos Vekayinâmesi (952-1136) ve Papaz Grigor’un Zeyli (1136-1162), Ankara: TTK Yayınları, 1987. google scholar
  • Willermus Tyrensis, Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum, RHC. occ., I, trc. E. A. Babcock - A. C. Krey, A History of Deeds Done Beyond the Sea. By William Archbishop of Tyre, New York: 1943, II. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Küçüksipahioğlu, B. (2024). Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak. Şarkiyat Mecmuası, 0(45), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


AMA

Küçüksipahioğlu B. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak. Şarkiyat Mecmuası. 2024;0(45):95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


ABNT

Küçüksipahioğlu, B. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak. Şarkiyat Mecmuası, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 45, p. 95-116, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Küçüksipahioğlu, Birsel,. 2024. “Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0, no. 45: 95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


Chicago: Humanities Style

Küçüksipahioğlu, Birsel,. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0, no. 45 (Nov. 2024): 95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


Harvard: Australian Style

Küçüksipahioğlu, B 2024, 'Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak', Şarkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 0, no. 45, pp. 95-116, viewed 22 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Küçüksipahioğlu, B. (2024) ‘Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak’, Şarkiyat Mecmuası, 0(45), pp. 95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758 (22 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Küçüksipahioğlu, Birsel,. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak.” Şarkiyat Mecmuası, vol. 0, no. 45, 2024, pp. 95-116. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758


Vancouver

Küçüksipahioğlu B. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak. Şarkiyat Mecmuası [Internet]. 22 Nov. 2024 [cited 22 Nov. 2024];0(45):95-116. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758 doi: 10.26650/jos.1522758


ISNAD

Küçüksipahioğlu, Birsel. Dımaşk Hâkimi Tuğtegin: Haçlılarla Mücadele, Savaş ve İttifak”. Şarkiyat Mecmuası 0/45 (Nov. 2024): 95-116. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1522758



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim26.07.2024
Kabul17.09.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma03.10.2024

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.