Referanslar

• Akyüz, S. S.; Kazaz, M. & Gülnar, B. (2021). İletişim fakültesi öğrencilerinin sahte/yalan haberlerle ilgili görüşlerine yönelik betimleyici bir çalışma. Selçuk İletişim, 14(1), 216-239. google scholar
• Barabasi, A.-L. & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. google scholar
• Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?, Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205. google scholar
• Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. google scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder S. & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE. google scholar
• Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalisation. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(3), 209-227, s. 213. google scholar
• Bruns, A. (2017). Echo chamber? What echo chamber? Reviewing the evidence. in 6th Biennial Future of Journalism Conference, September (FOJ17). 2017-09-15. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/113937/ google scholar
• Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi W. & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(9), e2023301118. google scholar
• Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi W. & Starnini, M. (2021). The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), 1-8. Retrieved from https:// www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2023301118 google scholar
• Coviello, L., Sohn, Y., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Franceschetti, M., Christakis NA. & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PloS one, 9(3), e90315. google scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. google scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1(1), 269271. google scholar
• Dubois, E. & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, communication & society, 21(5), 729-745. google scholar
• Dutton, W. H., Reisdorf, B. C., Dubois, E. & Blank, G. (2017). Search and politics: The use and impact of searches in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United States. Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/catalog/uuid:2cec8e9b-cce1-4339-991684715a62066c/download_file?file_format=application%2Fpdf&safe_filename=Blank%2Bet%2Bal%2C%2BSearch%2Band%2Bpolitics.pdf google scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel S. & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320. google scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 google scholar
• Fruchterman, T. M. & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practise and experience, 21(11), 1129-1164. google scholar
• Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. (2002). Community structures in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12), 7821-7826. google scholar
• Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero A. & Moreno, Y (2011). Dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific reports, 1(1), 1-7. google scholar
• Guess, A.; Nyhan, B.; Lyons, B. & Reifler, J. (2018). Avoiding the Echo Chamber About Echo Chambers. google scholar
• Knight Foundation. Retrieved from https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/ files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdf google scholar
• Hansen, D. L., & Shneiderman, B. & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analysing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann. google scholar
• Jorgensen, R. F. & Zuleta, L. (2020). Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights standards, NORDICOM Review: Nordic Research on Media and Communication, 41(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0003 google scholar
• Kramer, A. D., & Guillory, J. E. & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings ofthe National academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788-8789, 2008. google scholar
• Liu, X. & Fahmy, S. (2011). Exploring the Spiral of Silence in the Virtual World: Individual Willingness to Express Personal Opinions Online versus Offline Settings, Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 3(2), 45-57. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS.9000031 google scholar
• B. D. Loader & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics. Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 757-769. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.108 0/1369118X.2011.592648. google scholar
• Maccatrozzo, V. (2012). Burst Filter Bubble: Using a Semantic Web to Enable Serendipity, P. Cudre-Mauroux, J. Heflin, E. Sirin, T. Tudorache, J. Euzenat, M. Hauswirth, J. X. Parreira, J. Hendler, G. Schreiber, A. google scholar
• Bernstein, and E. Blomqvist (Eds.) The Semantic Web-ISWC 2012 (pp. 391-398). Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 35173-0_28 google scholar
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. google scholar
• Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review, 45(2), 167-256. google scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. google scholar
• NodeXL (2024). Retrieved from https://www.smrfoundation.org/nodexl/ google scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You (London: The Penguin Press. google scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. google scholar
• Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Inside the echo chamber. Scientific American, 316(4), 60-63. google scholar
• Scott, M. (25.01.2022). Fringe social media networks sidestep online content rules. Retrieved from https:// www.politico.eu/article/fringe-social-media-telegram-extremism-far-right/ google scholar
• Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Rodrigues, E., Barash, V. et al., (2009). Analysing (social media) networks with NodeXL. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. google scholar
• Suler, J. (2005). The Online Disinhibition Effect, International Journal ofApplied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184-188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295. google scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0.” Princeton University Press, 2007. google scholar
• Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Wolfowicz, M., Weisburd D. & Hasisi, B. (2023). Examining the interactive effects of the filter bubble and the echo chamber on radicalisation. Journal ofExperimental Criminology, 19(1), 119-141. google scholar
• Yücel, E. & Çizel, B. (2018). Bilişsel Uyumsuzluk Teorisi Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme: Satın Alma Perspektifi. Journal of Yasar University, 2018, 13/50, 150-16 google scholar

Atıflar