Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003    Tam Metin (PDF)

Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi

Süleyman Dikmen, Hüseyin Güçlü Çiçek

Son yıllarda kamu mali yönetiminde yaşanan dönüşüm yasama organının bütçe gözetimini ve mali saydamlığı daha önemli hale getirmiştir. Çalışmanın temel amacı, yasama organının etkin bütçe gözetimi gerçekleştirmesi durumunda mali saydamlığın artıp artmadığını belirlemektir. Yasama organının bütçe gözetimi ile mali saydamlık arasındaki ilişki İki Aşamalı En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi (2SLS) ile ampirik olarak test edilmiştir. Uluslararası Bütçe Ortaklığının 2017 yılında yayınlanan Açık Bütçe Anketi verilerinin kullanıldığı analizde 115 ülkeye yer verilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda yasama organının bütçeyi etkin gözetlemesi durumunda mali saydamlığın artacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada yasama organının bütçe gözetimini ve mali saydamlığı etkileyen faktörler de belirlenmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bütçe gözetimi, Mali saydamlık, Yasama organı, İki Aşamalı En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi (2SLS)
DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Econometric Analysis of the Relationship between the Budget Oversight Function of the Legislature and Fiscal Transparency

Süleyman Dikmen, Hüseyin Güçlü Çiçek

The transformation in the public fiscal management in recent years has made legislative budget oversight and fiscal transparency more important. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether the actualization of efficient budget oversight by the legislature would increase fiscal transparency or not. The relationship between the budget oversight of legislature and the fiscal transparency is tested empirically with the 2-Stage Least Squares Method (2SLS). In the analysis of International Budget Partnership dated 2017 and in which the Open Budget Survey data is used, 115 countries are given place. According to the results of the analysis it is determined that in case of an efficient budget oversight by the legislature, fiscal transparency would increase. Furthermore the factors that affect legislative budget oversight and fiscal transparency are determined in the study. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Budget oversight, Fiscal transparency, Legislature, Two-Stage Least Squares Method (2SLS)

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


In the last quarter of the twentieth century, states faced serious budget deficits and the lack of fiscal transparency caused by the financial crises in East Asia and Mexico. In order for the lack of fiscal transparency to be eliminated, various national and international reformist actions have been taken. Through cutting public expenditures at the national level, extensive reforms have been developed in favour of fiscal transparency, policies have been applied for the preservation of fiscal discipline, the efficiency of the budget oversight of the legislature has been increased, and certain precautions that strengthen accountability have been taken. At the international level, the standards of fiscal transparency have started to be applied. “Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency” was prepared in 1998 by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and fiscal transparency evaluations have been made. Similarly, based on member country experiences, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) published its “Best Practices for Budget Transparency” guide in 2001. Besides, the attention of international institutions on fiscal transparency has increased day by day and, in order for fiscal transparency to be attained, they started to publish new guidelines and reports. As fiscal transparency and budget oversight could not be embedded in the fiscal system of the states in its fullest sense, despite the reformist actions, the subject remains on the agenda. 

The main purpose of the study on the relationship between the budget oversight of the legislature and fiscal transparency is to measure how the efficient budget oversight of the legislature affects fiscal transparency. The study also aims to analyse the factors that affect the budget oversight of the legislature and fiscal transparency. Budget is the legal basis of how much tax is collected from the citizens and where these taxes are spent. In representative democracies, the budget that is prepared by the executive organ, is audited and overseen by the legislature in order to preclude corruption and wastage, to inform the citizens and to control the executive organ. The study tries to determine whether the efficient use of this function by the legislature directs the government to be financially more transparent or not. 

In order to ensure fiscal transparency, the legislature gets actively involved in the budget processes. Besides ensuring fiscal transparency, the budget should be audited and overseen by an extrinsic institution as it is a policy tool of the government, as it reflects future goals, as it is the picture of the services to be rendered to the citizens, and as it reveals how much tax is to be collected from the citizens. The legislature oversees the efficient, effective and productive use of public income and expenses of the government. The legislature gets involved in the budget process by using the oversight instruments. The citizens call the deputies to account for the proper use of the authority they delegated. The oversight instruments contribute to the forestalment of corruption by increasing the efficiency of the oversight of the legislature. The assurance of fiscal transparency and accountability increases the legitimacy of the policies of the government. 

The literature (Ríos, Bastida, & Benito, 2016; Santiso, 2005) reveals that the efficient oversight of the budget by the legislature ensures accountability by increasing the fiscal transparency. On the other hand, there is a reverse causality between fiscal transparency and the budget oversight of the legislature. Increases in fiscal transparency and accountability also increase the budget oversight of the legislature. Furthermore, international institutions (Global Initiative on Fiscal Transparency [GIFT], 2017; International Monetary Fund [IMF], 2017; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2002, 2015) admit that the realisation of an efficient oversight of the budget by the legislature supports the enabling of accountability and fiscal transparency.

The effect of budget oversight of the legislature on fiscal transparency is estimated with Two-Stage Least Squares (2-SLS) method for 115 countries. The budget oversight of the legislature and fiscal transparency datum are compiled from the Open Budget Survey 2017 of International Budget Partnership. As the survey was made in 2016, other data also belong to the year 2016. All the analyses are made through the Stata 13 packaged software. While generating data sets, as each institution’s method of calculation is different from others, and this, in turn, would hinder to attain sound and consistent results; data sets are compiled from the data of credible and internationally accepted institutions.

There is an endogeneity problem between fiscal transparency and the budget oversight of the legislature. In order to solve this problem, the 2-SLS method that takes the reciprocal relationship between the variables into account is used. 2-SLS is a statistical method that unbiasedly estimates the endogenous variables among simultaneous variables. The method is the estimation of the equation by Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method twice. In this context, the factors that affect the budget oversight of the legislature are analysed for all the stages of the budget process (ex-ante oversight, current oversight, ex-post oversight and legislative budget oversight). Then, the factors that affect fiscal transparency are analysed. However, in this regression, the factors that affect the budget oversight of the legislature are accepted as instrumental variables and the 2-SLS method is used. 

In order to estimate ex-ante oversight, current oversight and legislative budget oversight, the OLS method is used. But, as the ex-post oversight variable consists only of a single survey question (as a dependent variable is qualitative), it is necessary to use ordered logit or ordered probit estimation methods. In the study, the ordered logit estimation method is preferred. 

As a result of the analysis, a positive relationship is determined between fiscal transparency and the budget oversight of the legislature. The result is in line with the literature (Ríos et all., 2016; Santiso, 2005). The results also affirm the views of international institutions (GIFT, 2017; IMF, 2007; OECD, 2002, 2015) carrying on studies claiming that efficient oversight of the budget by the legislature supports fiscal transparency and increases accountability. Furthermore, it is determined that ex-ante oversight, current oversight and ex-post oversight of the legislature are positively and disjointly correlated with fiscal transparency. The budget oversight of the legislature is evaluated in four stages, namely, ex-ante oversight, current oversight, ex-post oversight and legislative budget oversight. It is seen that having an Anglo-Saxon type of judicial system and the political competition have negative effects; and the level of democratization has positive effects on the ex-ante oversight of the legislature. It is determined that public participation into the budget process and per capita GDP have positive effects on current oversight while the oversight of the Supreme Audit Institution and the Anglo-Saxon type of judicial system adopted by the country have positive effects on ex-post oversight. It is also seen that the oversight of the Supreme Audit Institution has positive; having an Anglo-Saxon type of judicial system and political competition have negative effects on legislative budget oversight. It is identified that public participation, the level of democratization, the existence of budget deficits and per capita GDP have positive effects on fiscal transparency.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 401–407. google scholar
  • Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50, 1403–1439. google scholar
  • Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D., & Rose, S. (2005). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. states. İçinde Sixth Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Atiyas, İ., & Sayın, Ş. (2000). Devletin mali ve performans saydamlığı. İçinde İ. Atiyas & Ş. Sayın (Ed.), Kamu maliyesinde saydamlık (ss. 27–44). İstanbul: Acar Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667–716. google scholar
  • Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2009). Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: An international approach. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 403–417. google scholar
  • Bilginoğlu, M. A., & Maraş, G. (2011). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de mali saydamlığın panel veri yöntemi ile analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(1), 59–73. google scholar
  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1271–1295. google scholar
  • Cansız, H. (2000). Kamu mali yönetiminde saydamlık. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 267–281. google scholar
  • Cimpoeru, V. M. (2015). The Influence of citizens’ engagement in the budget process on the national budget transparency. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(8(1)), 122–132. google scholar
  • Feyzioğlu, B. N. (1983). Modern anayasalarda bütçe hakkı. İçinde Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi. google scholar
  • Global Initiative on Fiscal Transparency [GIFT]. (2017). High-level principles on fiscal transparency, participation, and accountability. Erişim tarihi: 23 Aralık 2017, http://www.fiscaltransparency.net/ft_ principles/ Grigorescu, A. (2003). International organizations and government transparency: Linking the international and domestic realms. International Studies Quarterly, 47, 643–667. google scholar
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Temel ekonometri. (Ü. Şenesen & G. Günlük Şenesen, Çev.) (6. Basım). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. Hameed, F. (2005). Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes (No. WP/05/225). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 513–525. google scholar
  • International Budget Partnership [IBP]. (2016). Guide to the open budget questionnaire: An explanation of the questions and the response options. Washington, DC. Erişim adresi: https://www.internationalbudget.org/ wp-content/uploads/open-budget-survey-2017-guide-and-questionnaire-english.pdf google scholar
  • International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2007). Code of good practices on fiscal transparency. Erişim adresi: https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/051507c.pdf google scholar
  • International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2017). Fiscal transparency code. Erişim tarihi: 23 Aralık 2017, http:// www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/ google scholar
  • Kopits, G., & Craig, J. (1998). Transparency in government operations. google scholar
  • Krafchik, W., & Wehner, J. (2004). Legislatures and budget oversight: Best practices. Içinde the Kazakhstan Revenue Watch Open Forum. Almaty, Kazakhstan. google scholar
  • Lienert, I. (2005). Who controls the budget: The legislature or the executive? IMF Working Paper, 05(115). google scholar
  • Lienert, I., & Jung, M.-K. (2004). The legal framework for budget systems an international comparison. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(3). google scholar
  • Marcel, M., & Tokman, M. (2002). Building a consensus for fiscal reform: The Chilean case. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2(3), 35–56. google scholar
  • Marchessault, L. (2015). Public participation and the budget cycle: Lessons from country examples. Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Mert, M. (2016). SPSS, STATA yatay kesit veri analizi bilgisayar uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2002). OECD best practices for budget transparency. Paris. Erişim adresi: http://www.oecd.org/governance/budgeting/Best Practices Budget Transparency - complete with cover page.pdf google scholar
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2015). Recommendation of the council on budgetary governance. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/Recommendation-of-theCouncil-on-Budgetary-Governance.pdf google scholar
  • Pelizzo, R., & Stapenhurst, R. (2004). Tools for legislative oversight: An empirical investigation (No. Policy Research Working Paper, No:3388). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Reviglio, F. (2001). Budgetary transparency for public expenditure control. (No. Working Paper 01/8). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Ríos, A.-M., Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2016). Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: An international approach. American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 546–568. Ríos, A.-M., google scholar
  • Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2017). Factors explaining public participation in the central government budget process. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 48–64. google scholar
  • Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2006). Democracy and data dissemination: The effect of political regime on transparency. New York University & Yale University. google scholar
  • Santiso, C. (2005). Budget institutions and fiscal responsibility: Parliaments and the political economy of the budget process in Latin America. google scholar
  • Santiso, C. (2006). Improving fiscal governance and curbing corruption: How relevant are autonomous audit agencies? International Public Management Review, 7(2), 97–108. google scholar
  • Sayogo, D. S., & Harrison, T. M. (2012). Effects of the internet and sociocultural factors on budget transparency and accountability. İçinde Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (ss. 11–20). New York. google scholar
  • Sayogo, D. S., & Harrison, T. M. (2013). Exploring the socio-political determinants of open budget: A crossNational perspective. İçinde J. R. Gil-Garcia (Ed.), E-government success factors and measures: Theories, concepts, and methodologies (ss. 142–170). Hershey, United States: IGI Global. google scholar
  • Stapenhurst, R., & Titsworth, J. (2001). Features and functions of supreme audit institutions (No. PREM Notes; No. 59). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Stein, E., Talvi, E., & Grisanti, A. (1998). Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: The Latin American experience (No. Working Paper 367). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Tanaka, S. (2007). Engaging the public in national budgeting: A non-governmental perspective. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 139–177. google scholar
  • Tarı, R. (2012). Ekonometri (8. Baskı). Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları. google scholar
  • Traunmuller, R. (2001). Relevance of portals in e-government. İçinde 14th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference (ss. 35–45). Slovenia. google scholar
  • von Hagen, J., & Harden, I. J. (1995). Budget processes and commitment to fiscal discipline. European Economic Review, 39(3–4), 771–779. google scholar
  • Wehner, J. (2005). Legislative arrangements for financial scrutiny: Explaining cross-national variation. İçinde R. Pelizzo, R. Stapenhurst, & D. Olson (Ed.), The role of parliaments in the budget process. google scholar
  • Wehner, J. (2007). Effective financial scrutiny : The role of parliament in public finance. World Bank Parliamentary Staff Training Program. google scholar
  • Wehner, J., & de Renzio, P. (2013). Citizens, legislators, and executive disclosure: The political determinants of fiscal transparency. World Development, 41(1), 96–108. google scholar
  • Whaley, J. (2000). Strengthening legislative capacity in legislative-executive relations (No. Legislative Research Series, Paper#6). Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Yamamoto, H. (2007). Tools for parliamentary oversight: A comparative study of 88 national parliaments. Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-Parliamentary Union. google scholar
  • Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(2), 289–317. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Dikmen, S., & Çiçek, H.G. (2019). Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(2), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


AMA

Dikmen S, Çiçek H G. Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2019;28(2):181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


ABNT

Dikmen, S.; Çiçek, H.G. Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 28, n. 2, p. 181-205, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Dikmen, Süleyman, and Hüseyin Güçlü Çiçek. 2019. “Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 2: 181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


Chicago: Humanities Style

Dikmen, Süleyman, and Hüseyin Güçlü Çiçek. “Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 2 (Mar. 2025): 181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


Harvard: Australian Style

Dikmen, S & Çiçek, HG 2019, 'Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 181-205, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Dikmen, S. and Çiçek, H.G. (2019) ‘Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(2), pp. 181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Dikmen, Süleyman, and Hüseyin Güçlü Çiçek. “Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, 2019, pp. 181-205. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


Vancouver

Dikmen S, Çiçek HG. Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];28(2):181-205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003


ISNAD

Dikmen, Süleyman - Çiçek, HüseyinGüçlü. “Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28/2 (Mar. 2025): 181-205. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.2.0003



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim04.01.2019
Kabul26.10.2019
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma31.10.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.