Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583    Tam Metin (PDF)

Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği

Hasan Yüksel

Bu çalışmanın amacı, gerek ‘oyuncu’ gerek ‘yönetmen’ kimliği ile Hint sinemasının (Bollywood) önde gelen isimleri arasında yer alan Aamir Khan ve filmleri özelinde dezavantajlı grupların sinemada temsil edilme biçimlerini tespit etmektir. Popüler kültürün ve modernitenin bu denli yaygınlaştığı günümüz dünyasında Hint sineması toplumda ‘dezavantajlı’ ya da ‘kırılgan’ olarak nitelendirilebilecek kesimlerin beyaz perdeye aktarılmasında büyük ve oldukça önemli bir rol üstlenmektedir. Bu kesimler içerisinde kadınlar, öğrenme güçlüğü çeken çocuklar, engelliler, yoksullar vb. gruplar ön plana çıkmakta ve sinemaseverlerin beğenisine sunulmaktadır. Çalışmada nitel analize veri sağlamak amacıyla Aamir Khan’ın oyuncu olarak yer aldığı filmler seçilmiş olup, ilgili filmler içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmak suretiyle bilimsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bahse konu filmlerin tümünde dezavantajlılığa neden olan faktörler sonuçları ile birlikte analiz edilmiş, dezavantajlı grupların nasıl avantajlı hale geldiği tüm boyutları ile tartışılmıştır. Çalışma geneli itibariyle üç ana bölümden meydana gelmektedir. Bu yönüyle birinci bölümde dezavantajlı grupların tanımı, içeriği ve boyutlarına değinilmiştir. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümünde ise araştırmanın yöntem ve veri toplama biçiminden bahsedilmiştir. Çalışmanın son kısmında araştırmanın sonuçları ve bulgularına yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Dezavantajlı Gruplar, Sosyal Politika, Sinema, Aamir Khan Sineması
DOI :10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583    Tam Metin (PDF)

Representation of Disadvantageous Groups in Cinematography: Evidence from Aamir Khan’s Cinema

Hasan Yüksel

The objective of this study is to ascertain the manner in which disadvantageous groups are represented in cinematography and on the basis of the movies of Aamir Khan, who are leadingIndian cinema (Bollywood), with his role as an actress and director. Nowadays and within an atmosphere where popular culture as well as modernity is so common, Indian cinema plays a crucial and fantastic role in portraying those referred to as disadvantageous or fragile groups in motion picture industry. In these groups, women, children with learning disabilities, disabled people, the poor, and etc., come to fore, and all these catch the attention of cinema fans. In this study, the movies in which Aamir Khan played as an actress were selected to provide data for qualitative analysis, and these movies were scientifically analyzed using content analysis research method. In these movies, the factors paving the way for a disadvantageous environment were analyzed by means of their results as a whole, and the manner in which these groups were converted into advantageous individuals was discussed with all its ins and outs. The paper mainly consists of three sections. From this perspective, and in the first part, the definitions, content, and dimensions of disadvantageous groups were presented. In the second section, the research method and the method of data collection were verified. In the last part, the research findings and results were mentioned. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Disadvantageous Groups, Social Policy, Cinema, Aamir Khan Cinema

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


As a key term frequently used in social policy literature, disadvantageous groups are those who are continually exposed to social exclusion, alienation, and discrimination due to their gender roles, ideology, political choices, physical or psychological handicaps, and so forth. In a way, there is no hesitation in saying that they always experience ‘otherness’ syndrome. These groups include many people from different spheres of life like immigrants, workers, disabled people, women, children, young and old men, and so on. Therefore, the portrayal of disadvantageous groups in cinematography is of great significance to ascertain the causes and effects of their situations. Therefore, the main goal of this article is to analyze selected Aamir Khan movies on the basis of disadvantageous groups and their representations in cinematography. In order to reach that aim, nine Khan movies like Lagaan (2001, Ashutosh Gowariker), Fanaa (2006, Kunal Kohli), Taare Zameen Par (2007, Aamir Khan), 3 Idiot (2009, Rajkumar Hirani), Dhobi Ghat (2010, Kiran Rao), Talaash (2012, Reema Kagti), Dangal (2016, Nitesh Tiwari), Secret Superstar (2017, Advait Chandan), and Laal Singh Chaddha (2022, Advait Chandan) were determined for qualitative analysis via content analysis research method.

In line with the understanding of social realism, cinema can be referenced as a gorgeous instrument for the depiction of social, economic, and even political problems such as unemployment, disability, urbanization, poverty, economic doctrines, gender roles, discrimination, income distribution, industrialization and many others. The more cinema deals with these types of issues, the more attractive and realistic it will be. From this realistic and social perspective, it can be claimed that Aamir Khan movies are perfect laboratories, in particular, their representations of disadvantageous groups.

As a result of the research, it was determined that each Khan movie selected as a case for this qualitative analysis included disadvantageous groups from India and the reasons behind this problem, with outcomes as well as certain solutions. The research puts forward that Lagaan (2001) is the portrayal of poor villagers and disabled people, Fanaa (2006) can be associated with disability, Taare Zameen Par (2007) tells the story of a kid, 3 Idiot (2009) mentions those who are in need of special education, Dhobi Ghat (2010) is about poverty and women, Talaash (2012) is so critical about women and impaired people, Dangal (2016) and Secret Superstar (2017) tackle the ceaseless attempts of women to overcome the glass ceiling and gender roles predefined in Indian cultures and traditions, and finally Laal Singh Chaddha (2022), the modern adaptation of Forrest Gump (1994) focuses upon disability. In general, it was found that traditions, cultural factors, an indoctrinated education system closed to diversity and differences, the glass ceiling effect, prejudices about women, bullying behaviours of peers, social gender, and alienation are the major reasons behind the phenomena of this disadvantageous philosophy in Khan movies. According to Khan’s perspective, ambition, decisiveness, social and family support are the only ways to overcome these barriers in a particular society.

The study contributes to the current literature in various ways. At first, associating disadvantageous groups with cinematography by considering Indian cinema is a novel idea that enables theory-practice overlapping. By means of this study, those who are focusing on disadvantageous groups and their problems in real-life settings may possibly comprehend the dimension of this matter, the vehemence of the case and the causes, as well as the results in an overall way. This philosophy of research also contributes to multidisciplinary studies that will be quite original for scientists conducting scientific research on cinema and disadvantageous groups, or let’s say in social policy as an academic field. 

On the other hand, the current work has several limitations due to its qualitative origin in nature. Initially, it can be stated that Aamir Khan’s movies selected as cases so as to be analyzed from a qualitative perspective are fairly limited on a quantitative basis. That’s why, the number of those movies belonging Aamir Khan is to be enhanced in upcoming studies. In addition, computer programmes were not benefited so that the data could be confirmed and validated. For this reason, those who will grapple with the same issue from a different perspective are advised to use statistical programmes like Nvivo, Maxqda, and Atlas. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Abeysekera, S. (1989). Women in Sri Lankan Cinema. Framework: The Journal ofCinema and Media, 37, 49-58. google scholar
  • Agajanian, R. (1998). ‘Just for Kids?’: Saturday morning cinema and Britain’s children’s film foundation in the 1960s. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 18(3), 395-409. google scholar
  • Ahmad, A. (2019). A Critical Analysis of Bollywood Actor Aamir Khan’s Selected Movies. International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communications, 5(2), 7-13. google scholar
  • Aldridge, J. (2014). Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 112-130. google scholar
  • Altuntaş, B. (2014). Dezavantajlı Gruplar ve Sosyal Politika. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Anggraini, R. (2020). An Analysis of Intrinsic Elements in Taare Zameen Par’s Film by Aamir Khan Production. In International Conference on the Teaching English and Literature, 1(1), 210-217. google scholar
  • Ayisi, F, & C. Brylla. (2013). “The Politics of Representation and Audience Reception: Alternative Visions of Africa.” Research in African Literatures 44 (2): 125-141. google scholar
  • Bal, M. D. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğine genel bakiş. Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 1(1), 15-28. google scholar
  • Bautista-Hernandez, D. A. (2020). Commuting inequality, role of urban structure, and identification of disadvantaged groups in the Mexico City metropolitan area. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 159-183. google scholar
  • Ben-Ghiat, R. (2001). The Italian Cinema and the Italian Working Class. International Labor and Working-Class History, 59, 36-51. google scholar
  • Bir Zamanlar Hindistan’da (Lagaan, 2001, Ashutosh Gowariker). google scholar
  • Botha, S., & Harvey, C. (2024). Disabling discourses: contemporary cinematic representations of acquired physical disability. Disability & Society, 1-23. google scholar
  • Castellino, J. (2009). The MDGs and international human rights law: a view from the perspective of minorities and vulnerable groups. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(1), 10-28. google scholar
  • Castillo, G. (1997). Soviet Orientalism: Socialist Realism and Built Tradition, Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 8(2), 33-47. google scholar
  • Chapman, A. R., & Carbonetti, B. (2011). Human Rights Protections for Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Groups: The Contributions of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 33(3), 682-732. google scholar
  • Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about Us Without Us, California: University of California Press. google scholar
  • Chivers, S. & N. Markotic. (2010). The Problem Body. Ohio: Ohio State University Press. google scholar
  • Church, D. (2011). Freakery, cult films, and the problem of ambivalence. Journal of Film and Video, 63(1), 03-17. google scholar
  • Dangal (2016, Nitesh Tiwari). google scholar
  • Datta, S. (2000). Globalisation and Representations of Women in Indian Cinema. Social Scientist, 28(3/4), 71-82. google scholar
  • Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2010). “Let them eat harmony” prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 76-80. google scholar
  • Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of social issues, 72(2), 315-334. google scholar
  • Ekin, N. (1989). Endüstri İlişkiler, 5. Baskı, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi Yayın No 208. google scholar
  • Ellerson, B. (2015). Afrıcan Women In Cınema: An Overvıew. In J. Mistry & A. Schuhmann (Eds.), Gaze Regimes: Film and feminisms in Africa. Wits University Press,1-9. google scholar
  • Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal ofadvanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115. google scholar
  • Esen, E., Soylu, Y., Siyez, D. M., & Demirgürz, G. (2017). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısının Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolü ve Cinsiyet Değişkenlerine Göre İncelenmesi. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 46-63. google scholar
  • Fernandez, R. M., & Rubineau, B. (2019). Network Recruitment and the Glass Ceiling: Evidence from Two Firms. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(3), 88-102. google scholar
  • Frieden, S. (1990). Women’s Cinema in West Germany. Monatshefte, 82(3), 276-285. google scholar
  • Gauci, V., & Callus, A. M. (2015). Enabling everything: scale, disability and the film The Theory of Everything. Disability & Society, 30(8), 1282-1286. google scholar
  • Goethals, T., Mortelmans, D., Van den Bulck, H., Van den Heurck, W., & Van Hove, G. (2022). I am not your metaphor: frames and counter-frames in the representation of disability. Disability & Society, 37(5), 746-764. google scholar
  • Gül, G., & Eren, B. (2018). The Effect of Chorus Education in Disadvantageous Groups on the Process of General Education-Cultural Awareness and Socializing: The Sample of Gypsy Children. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 125-133. google scholar
  • Gümüşoğlu, F. (2008). Ders kitaplarında toplumsal cinsiyet. Toplum ve Demokrasi Dergisi, 2(4), 39-50. google scholar
  • Haberfeld, Y., & Izraeli, D. N. (2002). Gender Inequality in Majority and Minority Groups in Israel. Race, Gender & Class, 9(2), 156-175. google scholar
  • Her Çocuk Özeldir/Yerdeki Yıldızlar (Taare Zameen Par, 2007, Aamir Khan). google scholar
  • Hershfield, J. (2010). Women’s Cinema and Contemporary Allegories of Violence in Mexico. Discourse, 32(2), 170-185. google scholar
  • Hussain, S., & Ahmad, N. (2016). The impact of the Indian movie, Three Idiots (2009) on attitudes to education. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 21(2), 242-246. google scholar
  • Icelandic Human Rights Centre, The Human Rights Protection of Vulnerable Croups (2009), available at http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights-project/humanrightscasesandmaterials/humanrightsconceptsideasandfora/Undirflokkur (Erişim Tarihi: 22 Şubat 2024). google scholar
  • Ieta, R. (2010). The New Romanian Cinema: A Realism of Impressions. Film Criticism, 34(2/3), 22-36. google scholar
  • Imrie, R. (2014). “Space, Place and Policy Regimes: The Changing Contours of Disability and Citizenship”. In Disability, Spaces and Places of Policy Exclusion, edited by K. Soldatic, H. Morgan, and A. Roulstone, 13-30. London: Routledge, 13-30. google scholar
  • Kaur, R. (2013). The nuclear imaginary and Indian popular cinema. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(4), 539-553. google scholar
  • Kayboluş (Fanaa, 2006, Kunal Kohli). google scholar
  • Kılıçkıran, C. A. (1997). Women in Turkish Cinema. Insight Turkey, 11, 89-111. google scholar
  • Kivlighan III, D. M., Drinane, J. M., Tao, K. W., Owen, J., & Liu, W. M. (2019). The detrimental effect of fragile groups: Examining the role of cultural comfort for group therapy members of color. Journal of counseling psychology, 66(6), 763-770. google scholar
  • Koven, M. J. (1999). Feminist Folkloristics and Women’s Cinema: Towards a Methodology. Literature/Film Quarterly, 27(4), 293-300. google scholar
  • Kunze, P. C. (2017). “We Don’t Die, We Multiply”: Bebe’s Kids, Hip-Hop Aesthetics, and Black Feature Animation. Black Camera, 8(2), 226-242. google scholar
  • Laal Singh Chaddha (2022, Advait Chandan). google scholar
  • Layton, M. L., & Smith, A. E. (2017). Is It Race, Class, or Gender? The Sources of Perceived Discrimination in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(1), 52-73. google scholar
  • Leong, A. (1984). Socialist Realism: Cinema and the Arts. Studies in Comparative Communism, 17(3/4), 157-161. google scholar
  • Long, G. T. (2012). Delivering Social Protection to the Poor and Vulnerable Groups in Vietnam: Challenges and the Role of the Government. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 29(3), 245-258. google scholar
  • Longmore, P. (2003). Why I burned my book. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 131-146. google scholar
  • Lori Uscher-Pines, Patrick S. Duggan, Joshua P. Garron, Karron, R. A., & Faden, R. R. (2007). Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups. The Hastings Center Report, 37(4), 32-39. google scholar
  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628-657. google scholar
  • Markotic, N. (2012). Play the Facts and the Truth: Disability in Documentary Film. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 1(2), 1-18. google scholar
  • Maule, R. (2010). Women Filmmakers and Postfeminism in the Age of Multimedia Reproduction: A Virtual Archive for Women’s Cinema. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, 51(2), 350-353. google scholar
  • McBride, S. (1989). The Female Gaze? Looking at Women in Popular Cinema. Circa, 44, 19-21. google scholar
  • Mechanic, D., & Tanner, J. (2007). Vulnerable people, groups, and populations: societal view. Health Affairs, 26(5), 1220-1230. google scholar
  • Milner, L.. (2014). Labour Culture on Screen and Online: Union Films as Mobilisation Strategies. Labour History, (107), 181-196. google scholar
  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2001). The uneasy home of disability in literature and film. Gary L. Albrecht, Katherine D., Seelman, and Michael Bury (Eds.): Handbook of Disability Studies. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 195-218. google scholar
  • Moitra, S. (2009). “Reality Is There, but It’s Manipulated”: West German Trade Unions and Film after 1945. In V. Hediger & P. Vonderau (Eds.), Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media . Amsterdam University Press, 329-346. google scholar
  • Nelson, J. A. (1994). Broken images: Portrayals of those with disabilities in American media. İn Nelson, J.. (Ed.) People with Disabilities, the Media, and the Information Age, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1-17. google scholar
  • Norden, M. F. (1994). The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. google scholar
  • Mumbai Günlükleri (Dhobi Ghat, 2010, Kiran Rao). google scholar
  • O’Dell, E. J. (2015). From Leprosy to the Willow Tree: Decoding disability and Islamic spirituality in Iranian film. Disability & Society, 30(7), 1123-1126. google scholar
  • Ötgün, C. (2008). Sanat Yapıtına Yaklaşım Biçimleri, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 2, 159-178. google scholar
  • Paranjape, M. S. (2007). Uneven Distribution of Education in Maharashtra: Rural-Urban, Gender and Caste Inequalities. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(3), 213-216. google scholar
  • Peroni, L., & Timmer, A. (2013). Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(4), 1056-108. google scholar
  • Qadri, M., & Mufti, S. (2016). Films and religion: An analysis of Aamir Khan’s PK. Journal of Religion & Film, 20(1), 1-29. google scholar
  • Parks-Yancy, R., DiTomaso, N., & Post, C. (2005). Social Capital Resources and Social Programs: Advancement Mechanisms For Disadvantaged Groups. Michigan Sociological Review, 19, 115-137. google scholar
  • Radke, H. R., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S. C., & Becker, J. C. (2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291-315. google scholar
  • Ray, R., & Lancaster, G. (2005). On Setting the Poverty Line Based on Estimated Nutrient Prices: Condition of Socially Disadvantaged Groups during the Reform Period. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(1), 46-56. google scholar
  • Richler, D. (2016). Cinema, Realism, And The World Accordıng To Jia Zhangke. Revue Canadienne d’Etudes Cinematographiques / Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 25(2), 6-38. google scholar
  • Riley, C. A. (2005). Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change. London: University Press of New England; Boyd, N. (2016). The warped mirror: the reflection of the ableist stare in David Lynch’s The Elephant Man. Disability & Society, 31(10), 1321-1332. google scholar
  • Ross, S. (2001). American Workers, American Movies: Historiography and Methodology. International Labor and Working-Class History, (59), 81-105. google scholar
  • Safran, S. P. (1998). Disability portrayal in film: Reflecting the past, directing the future. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 227-238. google scholar
  • Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. European review of social psychology, 12(1), ss. 167-199. google scholar
  • Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Qualitative content analysis in practice, USA: Sage Publication. google scholar
  • Serdar A. B., (2018). “Sosyal Politika Kavramı. Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika”, Ed. Aysen Tokol ve Yusuf Alper, Sosyal Politika, 9. Baskı, Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık, 1-78. google scholar
  • Stemler, S. E. (2015). Content analysis. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1-14. google scholar
  • Stigsdotter, I. (2019). Women film exhibition pioneers in Sweden: Agency, invisibility and first wave feminism. In I. Stigsdotter (Ed.), Making the invisible visible: Reclaiming women’s agency in Swedish film history and beyond, Kriterium, 65-96. google scholar
  • Süperstar (Secret Superstar, 2017, Advait Chandan). google scholar
  • Tezcür, G. M., & Gurses, M. (2017). Ethnic Exclusion and Mobilization: The Kurdish Conflict in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 49(2), 213-230. google scholar
  • Üç Ahmak (3 Idiot, 2009, Rajkumar Hirani). google scholar
  • Van Fleit, K. (2022). The “Conscience of Bollywood” in China: Aamir Khan and Transnational Spreadable Media. A Companion to Indian Cinema, 456-472. google scholar
  • Wang, L. (2015). Wang Ping and Women’s Cinema in Socialist China: Institutional Practice, Feminist Cultures, and Embedded Authorship. Signs, 40(3), 589-622. google scholar
  • Whittington-Walsh, F. (2002). From freaks to savants: Disability and hegemony from The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) to Sling Blade (1997). Disability & Society, 17(6), 695-707. google scholar
  • Woods, M. N. (2015). Calcutta and the Modern Woman: Reading the Films Mahanagar and Kahaani. The Global South, 9(2), 85-102. google scholar
  • Yalan Çemberi (Talaash, 2012, Reema Kagti). google scholar
  • Yung, B., & Lee, F. (2014). “Equal right to housing” in Hong Kong housing policy: perspectives from disadvantaged groups. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(4), 563-582. google scholar
  • Yüksel, H. (2020a). Güncel Gelişmeler Işığında Sosyal Politika, 2. Baskı, Bursa: Ekin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Yüksel, H. (2020b). Sendikacılık ve Sinema Teori ve Pratik, Bursa: Ekin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Yüksel, H. (2021). Endüstri İlişkiler Disiplininde Sinemanın Yeri ve Önemi 1965-1980. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2(69), 1005-1048. google scholar
  • Zarowsky, C., Haddad, S., & Nguyen, V. K. (2013). Beyond ‘vulnerable groups’: contexts and dynamics of vulnerability. Global Health Promotion, 20(1_suppl), 3-9. google scholar
  • Zola, I. (1985). Depictions of disability-metaphor message, and medium in the media: a research and political agenda, Social Science Journal, 22(4), 5-17. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Yüksel, H. (2024). Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(86), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


AMA

Yüksel H. Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2024;0(86):86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


ABNT

Yüksel, H. Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 86, p. 86-105, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yüksel, Hasan,. 2024. “Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği.” Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 0, no. 86: 86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yüksel, Hasan,. “Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği.” Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 0, no. 86 (Mar. 2025): 86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


Harvard: Australian Style

Yüksel, H 2024, 'Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği', Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 86, pp. 86-105, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yüksel, H. (2024) ‘Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği’, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(86), pp. 86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Yüksel, Hasan,. “Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği.” Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 86, 2024, pp. 86-105. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


Vancouver

Yüksel H. Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];0(86):86-105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583


ISNAD

Yüksel, Hasan. “Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 0/86 (Mar. 2025): 86-105. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.86.1453583



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim15.03.2024
Kabul27.06.2024
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma11.07.2024

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.