Tarih Dergisi

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004   IUP :10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004    Tam Metin (PDF)

TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI

Gökhan Kağnıcı

Bu çalışmada M.Ö. I. binyılın ikinci yarısında derlenen Yeni Babil Kronikleri’ndeki (ABC 1-7 ve MC 16-17, 21-26) hastalıklar ve sakatlıklarla ilgili kayıtlar ele alınacaktır. Bu kayıtlardaki bilgilerin söz konusu binyılın tıp tarihi açısından tarihsel değeri değerlendirilmeye çalışılacaktır. Özellikle metinlerin derlendiği zamandan önce hüküm sürmüş Mezopotamya ve Elam krallarının kimi zaman ölümcül sonuçları olan hastalıklarıyla ilgili detaylara odaklanılacaktır. Kâtipler tarafından daha ziyade siyasi ve askeri olayların kayıt altına alındığı kroniklerde bu tıbbi konulara neden yer verilmiş olabileceği üzerinde düşünmek, kralların hastalıklarıyla ilgili kayıt geleneğinin tarih yazımının siyasal, dinsel ve geleneksel yönleriyle olan ilişkilerine dair bazı değerlendirmelerde bulunabilmek açısından önemlidir. Böylece kralların tıbbi rahatsızlıklarıyla ilgili kayıtların kroniklerin gerçekçi ve yansız bir bakış açısıyla derlenen metinler olduğu yönündeki modern kabulün sorgulanmasındaki rolü tartışılacaktır. Çalışma M.Ö. 3. binyılın ortalarından M.Ö. 6. yüzyılın sonlarına kadarki dönemi içerecektir. Dolayısıyla bu dönemlerle ilgili kayıtlar içeren Weidner ve Eski Krallar Kronikleri gibi diğer kroniklere de yeri geldiğince değinilecektir. Cite this article as: Kağnıcı, Gökhan, “Tıbbi Bilginin İdeolojik Kullanımı Üzerine Okumalar: Yeni Babil Kroniklerinde Hastalıklar ve Babil Tarih Yazıcılığı”, Turk J Hist sayı 69 (2019), s.1-36.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Yeni Babil Kronikleri, Krallar, Hastalıklar, Tarih yazıcılığı
DOI :10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004   IUP :10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004    Tam Metin (PDF)

IDEOLOGICAL READINGS THROUGH THE MEDICAL RECORDS: ILLNESSES IN THE NEO-BABYLONIAN CHRONICLES AND BABYLONIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY

Gökhan Kağnıcı

In this study, we will focus on the illnesses and disabilities mentioned in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles Series (ABC 1-7 and MC 16-17, 21-26) which were compiled in the second half of the first millennium BC. The information in these records will be evaluated with regards to medical history in the first millennium BC. Particular attention will be given to the details concerning illnesses with fatal consequences for Mesopotamian and Elamite kings who had ruled before the time that the texts were compiled. It is very important to think about why the medical problems in question are included in some of the chronicles since the chronicles speak of accounts of noteworthy political and military events in general. Including information about the medical disorders concerning kings, the chronicles contents can contribute to evaluations of the relationship between the political, religious and traditional aspects of Babylonian historiography. The modern assumption, that Neo-Babylonian and certain other chronicles are “models of historical probity” and impartial texts sharing a historical critique on the records of the kings’ illnesses, will be discussed. This study is related to the historical period between the middle of the third millenium and the end of the sixth century BC. In addition, other chronicles such as the Weidner Chronicle and the Chronicle of Early Kings concerning this period will be referenced considerably as well. Cite this article as: Kağnıcı, Gökhan, “Tıbbi Bilginin İdeolojik Kullanımı Üzerine Okumalar: Yeni Babil Kroniklerinde Hastalıklar ve Babil Tarih Yazıcılığı”, Turk J Hist sayı 69 (2019), s.1-36.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Neo-Babylonian Chronicles, Kings, Illnesses, Historiography

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Known as the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles, the cuneiform texts were compiled (copied) by Babylonian scribes and mostly concern the historical events of both the recent and distant past. Recorded concisely and chronologically, they detail events starting from the Babylonian king Nabunassar era in 747-734 BC and continue to the period just after the capture of Babylonia by the Persians in 539 BC.

In this study, the records concerning the illnesses and disabilities of the Mesopotamian and Elamite kings in these chronicles will be discussed. We will attempt to determine the historical importance of these medical problems of the kings with regards to the medical history of Mesopotamia. Some assessments will be made concerning the relations between these records and the political, religious, and traditional aspects of Babylonian historiography. Additionally, other pieces of information in other chronicles such as Esarhaddon, Weidner, and Chronicle of Early Kings will be referred to when needed.

Although numerous Babylonian and Assyrian kings are mentioned concerning political events in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles, the only king whose illness is mentioned is the Neo-Assyrian king Esarhaddon (681- 669 BC). The king fell ill during one of his campaigns and subsequently died. There is not much detailed information about the king’s illness in the relevant chronicles. Similarly, the chronicles do not mention the illnesses of the Babylonian kings in much detail. While the Neo-Babylonian king Nabunassar (747-734 BC) died after becoming sick in his palace, another Babylonian king Nabonidus (555-539 BC) was also ill but recovered. In brief, it is observed that the medical backgrounds of some of the numerous Babylonian and Assyrian kings are mentioned in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles and that these references are only superficial. However, it is very clear that the illnesses and disabilities of the Neo-Elamite kings, who reigned during the 1st millennium BC, are mentioned in more detail by the chronicle scribes. What is the reason behind the fact that no detailed information is given about the illnesses of the Assyrian and Babylonian kings, while the health situations and deaths of their contemporary Neo-Elamite kings include more details? There might be more than one answer to this question. One answer might be that the scribes could not find sufficient information in the ancient sources about these issues while compiling the chronicles. In addition, statements indicating that the demise of the kings did not result from an illness and particularly that some of them “died in the palaces” are either proof of the fact that there is not sufficient information about the cause of death of these kings or it is possible that these individuals were accepted as “well-remembered figures” in Babylonian history. However, another answer (and one which is the main focus of the study) should be sought in the relation between the medical knowledge and tradition of Babylonian historiography, in which political and religious ideologies are dominant. It is possible to find pieces of information about the health problems of kings such as Esarhaddon and Nabonidus in other cuneiform sources such as the royal inscriptions and correspondence. However, only in the chronicles is it possible to encounter details about the illnesses of the Elamite kings. The records of the death of two Neo-Elamite kings following a stroke and/or paralysis can be considered as an example of the reflection of a pro-Babylonian attitude towards historiography. It is certain that the scribe or scribes, who mentioned these pieces of information, are eager to leave no stone unturned about information and the details concerning the disabilities or deaths of the Elamite kings. It should be considered that a conscious preference in deciding which pieces of information to be recorded might be related to the world views of the scribes, the relevance of the kings, the form of the illnesses to be mentioned, divine background, and the political/ideological aspects of historiographical tradition. Similarly, this relation is conspicuous in the health problems of the Sargon of Akkad and Isin king Erra-imitti written in the records of the Chronicles of the Early Kings and Weidner as well.

It is possible that some of the details concerning the illnesses of the kings might contain fabrications, exaggerations, or personal comments. However, even if these details are supported by information from other cuneiform sources or even if it is medically possible, it doesn’t change the possible views asserted in the study about the intentions behind adding them to the chronicles. Sometimes concise and sometimes relatively longer, the information provided by the chronicle writers about the illnesses of the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Elamite kings, and even about the Isin king Erra-imitti contribute to our knowledge about the medical history of ancient Mesopotamia. Independent from the individuals, since these medical cases (such as stroke, paralysis, fever, insomnia, and respiratory problems) are common in royal correspondence and literary texts and particularly in medical texts, they have no particular privilege. However, these medical details in the chronicles are important with regards to Babylonian historiography. It is observed in the chronicles that only the health problems of the kings are detailed with interest. However, some kings like the Neo-Babylonian King Nabonidus (who recovered after the illness), or kings who died without getting sick, are also discussed. Particularly in the latter case, it was also relevant that some of the scribes did not have knowledge about the causes of deaths of the kings. Additionally, it was recorded that some of the kings (like the Babylonian king Nabunassar) died in the palaces, even without getting sick. The Babylonian scribes were probably informed about the details of the illness of the Neo-Assyrian king Esarhaddon; however, they did not mention it. In fact, Esarhaddon was a Neo-Assyrian king, who was trying to revive the city of Babylonia and return it to its old magnificent days after his father, Sennacherib, wrathfully devastated the city. It can be considered that these kings were not remembered with ill feelings by later generations. However, this interpretation can involve problems, since it is a result of an overall general view about the whole life of the individual. It is also possible that they were punished with illnesses resulting in death by the gods due to their misconduct in any period of their kingdom or in any issue that might annoy (!) the gods.

Therefore, all of these examples have great importance since they reflect the dominant understanding concerning the ancient Mesopotamian historiography: a religious belief that the illness is a divine punishment arising from the faults of an individual. The common trait of almost all of the kings, about whom the chronicles give detailed information concerning their illnesses, is that they were all remembered negatively with regards to the history of Babylonia. It is possible that there was an attempt to create a perception that the patron deity of the city of Babylon Marduk (Bel) punished these kings who were in the wrong. Illnesses and deaths related with these situations were remarkable events since they demonstrated the proof of the relation between the crime and the punishment. Thus, the motives behind the intention to abstain from recording the known or fabricated medical causes of deaths of some kings should not be examined, to a large extent, in the epistemological concerns. These motives should be investigated in the relations between historiography and its political, religious, and traditional aspects. For example, mentioning the insomnia problems of Sargon of Akkad doesn’t have a medical or historical importance in itself. This record reaches significance when there is an attempt to establish relations between the current ideologies and compilation of literary narratives, whose “reality is suspicious”, that are dated to the 1st millennium BC. It might also be mentioned that, sometimes while narrating, the role and influence of these relations are behind the inclusion of the themes and contents, which are thought to arouse curiosity and interest, with a high potential of speculation.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Adalı, S. F. - A.T. Görgü, Bâbil Hemeroloji Serisi: Uğurlu ve Uğursuz Günler Takvimi, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2017. google scholar
  • Adamson, P.B., “The Influence of the King on Medical Practice in Ancient Mesopotamia”, Medicina Nei Secoli, 1, 1989, s. 13-22. google scholar
  • Ambos, C., “Types of Ritual Failure and Mistakes in Ritual in Cuneiform Sources”, When Rituals Go Wrong: Mistakes, Failure, and the Dynamics of Ritual, Ed. Ute Hüsken, Brill, Leiden 2007, s. 25-47. google scholar
  • Beaulieu, P. A., “Nabonidus the Mad King: A Reconsideration of His Steles from Harran and Babylon”, Representations of Political Power, Eds. Marlies Heins - Marian H. Feldman, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake- Indiana 2007, s. 137-166. google scholar
  • Bottéro, J., Mezopotamya: Yazı, Akıl ve Tanrılar, çev. Mehmet Emin Özcan - Ayten Er, Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara 2003. google scholar
  • Brinkman, J. A., “The Babylonian Chronicle Revisited”, Lingering over Words, Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Literature in Honor of William L. Moran, Eds. T. Abusch - John Huehnergard - Piotr Steinkeller, Harvard Semitic Studies 38, Scholars Press, Atlanta 1990, s. 73-104. google scholar
  • __________, A Political History of Post-Kassite Babylonia: 1158-722 B.C., Pontificum Institutum Biblicum, Roma 1968. google scholar
  • De Breucker, G., “Heroes and Sinners: Babylonian Kings in Cuneiform Historiography of the Persian and Hellenistic Periods”, Political Memory in and after the Persian Empire, Eds. J. M. Silverman - C. Waerzeggers, SBL, Atlanta 2015, s. 75-94. google scholar
  • Elayi, J., Sargon II, King of Assyria, SBL Press, Atlanta 2017. google scholar
  • Fincke, J. C., “Spezialisierung und Differenzierung im Bereich der altorientalischen Medizin: Die Dermatologie am Beispiel der Symptome simmu matqutu, kalmatu (matuqtu), kibšu, kiṣṣatu und gurištu”, The Empirical Dimension of Ancient Near Eastern Studies, Ed. Gebhard J. Selz, Lit Verlag, Münster 2011, s. 159-208. google scholar
  • Finkel, I. L., “Adad-apla-iddina, Esagil-kin-apli, and the Series SA. GIG”, A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, Eds. Erle Leichty - Maria Dej Ellis, University Museum, Philadelphia 1988, s. 143-159. google scholar
  • __________, “Bilingual Chronicle Fragments”, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 32/2, 1980, s. 65-80. google scholar
  • Frahm, E., “Sanherib”, Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie, 12, Berlin - New York 2009, s. 12-22. google scholar
  • Frame, G., Babylonia 689-627 B.C.: A Political History, Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, Leiden 1992. google scholar
  • __________, Rulers of Babylonia: From the Second Dynasty of Isin to the End of Assyrian Domination (1157-612 BC), The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Babylonian Periods [RIMB] 2, University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1995. google scholar
  • Frayne, D. R., Old Babylonian Period (2003-1595 BC), The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Early Periods [RIME] 4, University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1990. google scholar
  • Gadd, C. J. “The Harran Inscriptions of Nabonidus”, Anatolian Studies, 8, 1958, s. 35-92. google scholar
  • Gallagher, W. R., Sennacherib’s Campaign to Judah: New Studies, Brill, Leiden 1999. google scholar
  • Geller, M. J. - S. L. Cohen, “Kidney and Urinary Tract Disease in Ancient Babylonia, with Translations of the Cuneiform Sources”, Kidney International, 47, 1995, s. 1811-1815. google scholar
  • Glassner, J. J., “Le devin historien en Mésopotamie”, Proceedings of the XLVe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale: Historiography in the Cuneiform World, Part I, Ed. Tzvi Abusch ve diğerleri, CDL Press, Bethesda-Maryland 2001, s. 181-193. google scholar
  • __________, Chroniques mésopotamiennes, Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1993. google scholar
  • __________, Mesopotamian Chronicles, SBLWAW 19, Ed. Benjamin Foster, Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta 2004. google scholar
  • Goddeeris, A., Tablets from Kisurra in the Collections of British Museum, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden 2009. google scholar
  • Grayson A. K., “Königslisten und Chroniken. B. Akkadisch.”, Reallexikon der Assyrologie und vorderasiatischen Archaologie, 6, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin - New York 1980-1983, s. 86-135. google scholar
  • __________, Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles, TCS 5 (tekrar basım), Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake- Indiana 2000. google scholar
  • __________, Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles, TCS 5, Locust Valley, J. J. Augustin, N.Y. 1975. google scholar
  • __________ - J. Novotny, The Royal Inscriptions of Sennacherib King of Assyria (704-681 BC), Part I, The Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period [RINAP] 3/1, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake-Indiana 2012. google scholar
  • Gurney, O. R., “The Sultantepe Tablets (Continued). IV. The Cuthaean Legend of Naram-Sin”, Anatolian Studies, 5, 1955, s. 93-113. google scholar
  • Hallo, W. W., “The Death of Kings: Traditional Historiography in Contextual Perspective”, Ah, Assyria: Studies in Assyrian History and Ancient Near Eastern Historiography Presented to Hayim Tadmor, Eds. Mordechai Cogan - Israel Eph’al, The Magnes Press, Jerusalem 1991, s. 148-166. google scholar
  • __________, “The Limits of Skepticism”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 110/2, 1990, s. 187-199. google scholar
  • Heeßel, N. P., “Diagnosis, Divination and Disease: Towards an Understanding of the Rationale Behind the Babylonian Diagnostic Handbook”, Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine, Eds. H. F. J. Horstmanshoff - Marten Stol, Brill, Leiden- Boston 2004, s. 97-116. google scholar
  • __________, “The Hands of the Gods: Disease Names, and Divine Anger”, Disease in Babylonia, Eds. I.L.Finkel - M.J.Geller, Brill, Leiden 2007, s. 120-130. google scholar
  • __________, Babylonisch-assyrische Diagnostik, Alter Orient und Altes Testament 43, Ugarit- Verlag, Münster 2000. google scholar
  • Huber, I., “Ersatzkönige in griechischem Gewand: Die Umformung der šar pūhi-Rituale bei Herodot, Berossos, Agathias und den Alexander-Historikern“, Von Sumer bis Homer, Festschrift für Manfred Schretter zur Vollendung des 60. Lebensjahres, Ed. R. Rollinger, Ugarit-Verlag, Münster 2005, s. 339-397. google scholar
  • Hunger, H, Babylonische und assyrische Kolophone, Neukirchener, Neukirchen-Vluyn 1968. google scholar
  • Kağnıcı, G., “Eski Mezopotamya’da Sıtma Hastalığı”, Tarihsel Süreçte Anadolu’da Sıtma, Ed. Şükran Köse ve diğerleri, Gece Kitaplığı, Ankara 2017, s. 99-116. google scholar
  • Kinsbourne, M., “The Right Hemisphere and Recovery From Aphasia”, Handbook of Neurolinguistics, Eds. Brigitte Stemmer - Harry A. Whitaker, Academic Press, San Diego-California 1998, s. 385-392. google scholar
  • Labat, R., “La Mort Du Roi D’Elam Ḫumban-Ḫaltaš I, Dans La Chronique Babylonienne”, Archiv Orientální [ArOr], 17, 1949, s. 1-6. google scholar
  • Lambert, W. G., “Nabonidus in Arabia”, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, Vol. 2, Archaeopress Publishing, 1972, s. 53-64. google scholar
  • Liverani, M., “Later Mesopotamia”, The Oxford History of Historical Writing Volume I: The Beginnings to AD 600, Eds. Andrew Feldherr - Grant Hardy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011, s. 29-52. google scholar
  • Livingstone, A., Hemerologies of Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars, CDL Press, Bethesda, Maryland 2013. google scholar
  • Luckenbill, D. D., Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, Volume 2, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois 1927. google scholar
  • Mattila, R., “The Political Status of Elam after 653 BC According to ABL 839”, State Archives of Assyria Bulletin, I, 1987, s. 27-30. google scholar
  • Milik, J. T., “Prière de Nabonide et autres ècrits d’un cycle de Daniel: Fragments aramèens de Qumrân 4”, Revue Biblique, 63/3, 1956, s. 407-415. google scholar
  • Mitsuma, Y., “From Preliminary Diaries to Short Diaries: The First and Second Steps in the Compilation Process of the Late Babylonian Astronomical Diaries”, Sources and Commentaries in Exact Sciences [SCIAMVS], 16, 2015, s. 53-73. google scholar
  • __________, “The Offering for Well-Being in Seleucid and Arsacid Babylon”, Archiv für Orientforschung, 53, 2015, s. 117-127. google scholar
  • Oshima, T., Babylonian Poems of Pious Sufferers: Ludlul Bel Nemeqi and the Babylonian Theodicy, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen 2014. google scholar
  • Parpola, S., “Assyrian Library Records”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 42/1, 1983, s. 1-29. google scholar
  • __________, Letters from Assyrian Scholars to the Kings Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal, Part II: Commentary and Appendices, Alter Orient und Altes Testament 5/2, Butzon & Bercker, Neukirchen-Vluyn 1983. google scholar
  • __________, - K. Watanabe, Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (State Archives of Assyria 2-SAA 2), Helsinki University Press, Helsinki 1988. google scholar
  • Potts, D. T., “The Elamites”, The Oxford Handbook of Iranian History, Ed. Touraj Daryaee, Oxford University Press, New York 2012, s. 37-56. google scholar
  • Radner, K., “The Trials of Esarhaddon: The Conspiracy of 670 BC”, Isimu, VI, 2003, s. 165-183. google scholar
  • Salin, S., “When Disease “Touches”, “Hits”, or “Seizes” in Assyro-Babylonian Medicine”, Kaskal, 12, 2015, s. 319-336. google scholar
  • __________, “Words for Loss of Sensation and Paralysis in Assyro-Babylonian Medical Texts: Some Considerations”, Le Journal Des Médecınes Cunéiformes [JMC], 31, 2018, s. 26-37. google scholar
  • Sallaberger, W., “Von Politischem Handeln zu Rituellem Königtum”, Ritual and Politics in Ancient Mesopotamia, Ed. Barbara Nevling Porter, American Oriental Society, New Haven 2005, s. 63-93. google scholar
  • Schaudig, H., Die Inschriften Nabonidus von Babylon und Kyros’ der Großen, Alter Orient und Altes Testament 256, Ugarit-Verlag, Münster 2001. google scholar
  • Scurlock, J. - B. R. Andersen, Diagnoses in Assyrian and Babylonian Medicine: Ancient Sources, Translations, and Modern Medical Analyses, University of Illinois Press, Urbana- Chicago 2005. google scholar
  • __________, Sourcebook for Ancient Mesopotamian Medicine, SBL Press, Atlanta-Georgia 2014. google scholar
  • Slanski, K., Babylonian Entitlement Narûs (Kudurrus): A Study in Form and Function, American Schools of Oriental Research, Boston 2003. google scholar
  • Starr, I., Queris to the Sungod: Divination and Politics in Sargonid Assyria, State Archives of Assyria 4 [SAA 4], Helsinki University Press, Helsinki 1990. google scholar
  • Stol, M., Epilepsy in Baylonia, Styx Publication, Groningen 1993. google scholar
  • Tadmor, H., “Propaganda, Literature, Historiography: Cracking the Code of the Assyrian Royal Inscriptions”, Assyria 1995, Eds. Simo Parpola - R.Whiting, The Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki 1997, s. 325-338. google scholar
  • __________ - S. Yamada, The Royal Inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser III (744-727 BC) and Shalmaneser V (726-722 BC), Kings of Assyria. RINAP 1, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake 2011. google scholar
  • Ungnad, A., “Woran starb König Era-imitti von Isin?”, Orientalia, 12, 1943, s. 194-195. google scholar
  • Van, B. W. - F. Wiggermann, “Magic in History: A Theoretical Perspective, and Its Application to Ancient Mesopotamia”, Mesopotamian Magic: Textual, Historical, and Interpretative Perspectives, Eds. Tzvi Abusch - Karel van der Toorn, Styx Publications, Groningen 1999, s. 3-34. google scholar
  • Van, D. M. M., Cuneiform Texts and the Writing of History, Routledge, New York 1999. google scholar
  • Van, Seters. J., In Search of History: Historiography in the Ancient World and Origins of Biblical History, Yale University Press, New Haven 1997. google scholar
  • Waerzeggers, C., “Manuscript and Archive: Who Wrote and Read Babylonian Chronicles?”, Conceptualizing Past, Present and Future: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium of the Melammu Project , Helsinki / Tartu, 18-24 Mayıs 2015 , Eds. S. Fink - R. Rollinger, Ugarit-Verlag, Münster 2018, s. 335-346. google scholar
  • __________, “The Babylonian Chronicles: Classification and Provenance”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 71/2, 2012, s. 285-298. google scholar
  • __________, “The Prayer of Nabonidus in the Light of Hellenistic Babylonian Literature”, Jewish Cultural Encounters in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World, Eds. M. Popović- M. Schoonover- M. Vandenberghe, Brill, Leiden 2017, s. 64-75. google scholar
  • Walls, Neal H., “Sakat Bedenin Kökenleri: Eski Mezopotamya’da Sakatlık”, çev. G. Kağnıcı G., Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37/64, 2018, s. 369-394. google scholar
  • Watanabe, K., “Die literarische Überlieferung eines babylonisch-assyrischen Fluchthemas mit Anrufung des Mondgottes Sin”, Acta Sumerologica, 6, 1984, s. 99-119. google scholar
  • Waters, M. W., A Survey of Neo-Elamite History, State Archives of Assyria Studies [SAAS], 2000. google scholar
  • Weissbach, F., “Aššuraḫiddin”, Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 1, Eds. Erich Ebeling - Bruno Meissner, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin - Leipzig 1932, s. 198-203. google scholar
  • Wilson, J. V. K. - E.H. Reynolds, “On Stroke and Facial Palys in Babylonian Texts”, Disease in Babylonia, Eds. I.L.Finkel - M. J. Geller, Brill, Leiden 2007, s. 67-99. google scholar
  • Zur, Ofer, “Savaşın Psiko-Tarihi: Kültür, Ruh ve Düşmanın Birlikte Evrimi”, çev. G. Kağnıcı, Tarih Okulu Dergisi, VI, 2010, s. 125-143. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Kağnıcı, G. (0001). TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI. Tarih Dergisi, 0(69), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


AMA

Kağnıcı G. TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI. Tarih Dergisi. 0001;0(69):1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


ABNT

Kağnıcı, G. TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI. Tarih Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 69, p. 1-36, 0001.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kağnıcı, Gökhan,. 0001. “TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI.” Tarih Dergisi 0, no. 69: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kağnıcı, Gökhan,. “TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI.” Tarih Dergisi 0, no. 69 (Nov. 2024): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


Harvard: Australian Style

Kağnıcı, G 0001, 'TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI', Tarih Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 69, pp. 1-36, viewed 22 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kağnıcı, G. (0001) ‘TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI’, Tarih Dergisi, 0(69), pp. 1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004 (22 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Kağnıcı, Gökhan,. “TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI.” Tarih Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 69, 0001, pp. 1-36. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


Vancouver

Kağnıcı G. TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI. Tarih Dergisi [Internet]. 22 Nov. 2024 [cited 22 Nov. 2024];0(69):1-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004 doi: 10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004


ISNAD

Kağnıcı, Gökhan. “TIBBİ BİLGİNİN İDEOLOJİK KULLANIMI ÜZERİNE OKUMALAR: YENİ BABİL KRONİKLERİNDE HASTALIKLAR VE BABİL TARİH YAZICILIĞI”. Tarih Dergisi 0/69 (Nov. 2024): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.26650/TurkJHist.2019.18004



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim12.02.2019
Kabul27.06.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.