Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/TUDED2018-0004   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2018-0004    Tam Metin (PDF)

Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi

Gökçe Yükselen Peler

Günümüzde Oğuz Türkçesi değişkelerinin konuşulduğu Yunanistan’da geçmişte Türkçenin farklı lehçe gruplarına ait değişkelerin konuşulduğu bilinmektedir. Bugünkü manzaranın ortaya çıkması büyük oranda Osmanlı dönemi ile ilgilidir. Ancak Osmanlı dönemi öncesinde Hunlar, Avarlar, Ogurlar, Bulgarlar, Peçenekler, Kumanlar, Uzlar gibi Türk halkları Yunanistan’a gelip yerleşmişlerdir. Bu halklardan Hunlar, Avarlar, Ogurlar ve Bulgarlar, geriye kalan Türk halklarından farklı olarak Bulgar Türkçesi konuşmakta idi ve çeşitli dönemlerde Yunanistan’ı istila edip oraya yerleşmişlerdir. Bu halkların Yunanistan’a geliş tarzlarına göre dillerinin toplumluk etkileri de çeşitlilik göstermiştir. Bu dönemde Türkçe Yunanistan’da kimi zaman bir göçmen veya yerleşimci dili olurken kimi zaman ordu dili olmuştur. Kimi zaman sadece cemiyet dili olarak kalırken kimi zaman da yönetim dili hâline gelmiş, hatta Latince ve Yunanca gibi köklü dillere rağmen uluslararası iletişim ve diplomasi dili hâline gelmiştir. Elbette toplumluk etkinliği konuşurlarının toplum içerisindeki etkinliği ile doğrudan ilişkili idi. Bundan dolayı Türkçe; Hun, Avar, Ogur ve Bulgar dönemlerinde Yunanistan’da birbirinden çok farklı ama kimi zaman da birbiri ile ilişkili bir şekilde toplumluk yer edinmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, elde var olan kısıtlı tarihî kayıtlardan hareketle Bulgar Türkçesi konuşan bu dört kavmin Yunanistan’ı istilaları esnasında ülkede Türkçenin edindiği toplumluk etki ve etkinliğini tespit etmektir.

DOI :10.26650/TUDED2018-0004   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2018-0004    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Turkic Language in Greece Throughout History: The HunicAvaric-Bulghar Period

Gökçe Yükselen Peler

Contemporary Greece is an environment where varieties of Oghuz Turkic are spoken. However, it is known that different Turkic varieties, other than contemporary ones, were spoken in the country in the past. The emergence of the present scenery is a substantial outcome of the Ottoman period. Nevertheless, Turkic groups like the Huns, Avars, Oghurs, Bulghars, Pechenegs, Cumans, and the Oghuz had arrived in Greece and settled there. The former four spoke Bulghar Turkic (Proto-Bulgarian), as distinct from the rest, and had invaded and settled in Greece at different periods. The social influence of their languages varied in accordance with the manner they arrived in Greece. In this period, Turkic sometimes had served as an immigrant or a settler language, whereas sometimes it was used as the language of soldiery. Occasionally, it was solely used as a community language, whereas sometimes it was used as the language of the administration. As a matter of fact, it even had been used as a lingua franca, despite deep-seated languages like Latin and Greek. Naturally, the social strength of the language was directly related to the social status of its speakers. Therefore, Turkic had gained various social statuses in Greece during the Hunnic, Avaric, Oghur, and Bulghar periods. However, these statuses were sometimes influenced by each other. This work aims to establish the social influence and strength of Turkic in Greece during the invasion of these four Bulghar Turkic-speaking groups with reference to limited historical records on hand.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


There is no doubt that Turkic groups like the Huns, Avars, Oghurs, and Bulghars, who surged into the Balkans between the 4th and 10th centuries initially carrying out raids but then settling into the Balkans in general and Greece in particular, had brought their language with them. The languages of all four groups were varieties belonging to Turkic languages, which are universally called (Old) Bulghar Turkic, Hun-Bulghar Turkic, or Old Western Turkic. Therefore, they either provided a basis for or consolidated with each other. In this period, Turkic entered Greece in various forms. It was sometimes used as the language of the invader, sometimes as the language of refugees or settlers, and sometimes it merely remained as a community language, whereas sometimes it had become the language of the administration. In parallel with the military and political powers of the Hunnic state, Turkic became the language of international communication and diplomacy, surpassing Latin and Greek during the Hunnic period. Historical records provide evidence that the Turkic language survived in Greece as a language of refugees and soldiery after the collapse and disintegration of the Hunnic state. Despite the small amount of data on hand when compared to the Hunnic period, it could be assumed that the Turkic language had a firmer status during the Avaric period, as the Avar dominance in Greece had lasted longer and was more entrenched than that of the Huns. The Peloponnese, in particular, had remained in the hands of the Avars for a very long period. Historical records provide information that the institutions of the Byzantine civilization and culture were erased from the surface of the peninsula, and “barbarism” ruled for more than two centuries. The Avaric names of places among the Greek and Balkanic toponymy could be considered as evidence that a more influential Turkic element existed during the Avar period than that of the Hunnic period. Clearly, a more influential population meant a more influential language. Most probably, the Avars had encountered Hunnic residues in Greece, who had spoken a language similar to theirs, and absorbed them, strengthening their linguistic basis. Additionally, some Oghur groups arrived and settled in Greece shortly before the Avars and after the collapse of the Hunnic state. On the other hand a number of Oghur and Bulghar groups entered and settled in Greece together with the Avars. All of these factors must had consolidated Turkic as a community language, which was already serving as the language of the administration during the Avar period. It is a widespread view that the Avars were absorbed by the Slavonic groups. However, there is evidence that this did not happen, at least in some regions. There is a great possibility that in some regions of Greece, the Avars were incorporated into the Bulghar state, which domineered the whole of the Balkans after them, without losing their language. Layers of Turkic peoples, who had poured into the Balkans in general and Greece in particular, entrenched and enrooted the Turkic language in the region. However, the Bulghars inherited the mission of dominating and ruling all of the Slavonic peoples from the Avars, and this mission eventually paved the way to the disappearance of a Turkic community, which evolved over five to six centuries. The Turkic language disappeared together, perhaps before the people, as they were outnumbered by the Slavs and absorbed by them. The Turkic groups of the Hunnic–Avaric–Bulghar period in Greece were initially Slavicized and later Grecified to a great extent after Byzantine rule was reestablished in Greece.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Ahmetbeyoğlu, A. (1995). Grek seyyahı Priskos (V. asır)’a göre Avrupa Hunları. İstanbul: Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı. google scholar
  • Ahmetbeyoğlu, A. (2013a). Avrupa Hunları. İstanbul: Yeditepe. google scholar
  • Ahmetbeyoğlu, A. (2013b). Avrupa Hunları. O. Karatay & S. Acar (Ed.), Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi içinde (s. 107–187). İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Anzerlioğlu, Y. (2002). Bizans İmparatorluğu’nda Türk varlığı. H. C. Güzel, K. Çiçek & S. Koca (Ed.), Türkler içinde (C. 6, s. 218–232). Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları. google scholar
  • Baker, D. (Ed.). (1977). Renaissance and renewal in Christian history: Papers read at the fifteenth summer meeting and the sixteenth winter meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Charanis, P. (1950). The Chronicle of Monemvasia and the question of the Slavic settlements in Greece. Dumbarton Oak Papers 5, 141–166. google scholar
  • Charanis, P. (1952). On the capture of Corinth by the Onogurs and its recapture by the Byzantines. Speculum 3, 343–350. google scholar
  • Charanis, P. (1953). A Note on the population and cities of the Byzantine Empire in the thriteenth century. In The Joshua Starr memorial volume: Studies in history and philology (pp. 135–148). New York, NY: Conference on Jewish Relations. google scholar
  • Charanis, P. (1959). Ethnic changes in the Byzantine Empire in the seventh century. Dumbarton Oak Papers 13, 23–44. google scholar
  • Charanis, P. (1961). The transfer of populations as a policy in the Byzantine Empire. Comparative Studies in Society and History 3(2), 140–154. google scholar
  • Curta, F. (2004). The making of the Slavs. History and archaeology of the Lower Danube region c. 500-700. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Davidson, G. R., & Horvath, T. (1937). The Avar invasion of Corinth. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 6(2), 227–240. google scholar
  • Dimitrov, S. (1993). The Bulgarian apocryphal chronicle and Bulgarian ethnic history. Etudes Balkaniques 29(4), 97–109. google scholar
  • Dunn, M. (1977). Evangelisatıon or repentance? The re-Christianisation of the Peloponnese in the ninth and tenth centuries. In D. Baker (Ed.), Renaissance and renewal in Christian history: papers read at the fifteenth summer meeting and the sixteenth winter meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. (pp. 71–86). Oxford, UK: Blackwell google scholar
  • Feher, G. (1984). Bulgar Türkleri tarihi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları. google scholar
  • Foederati. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In Priceton. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Foederati.html google scholar
  • Golden, P. B. (2006). Türk halkları tarihine giriş (O. Karatay, Çev.) Çorum: Karam. google scholar
  • Gökdağ, B. ve Karatay, O. (Ed.). (2013). Balkanlar el kitabı (C. 1): Tarih. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. google scholar
  • Güzel, H. C., Çiçek, K. ve Koca, S. (Ed.). (2002). Türkler (C. 6). Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hodgkin, T. (2001). The barbarian invasions of the Roman Empire (Vols. 1-5). London, UK: The Folio Society. google scholar
  • Illyria. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/place/Illyria google scholar
  • Kafesoğlu, İ. (1985). Bulgarların kökeni. Ankara: Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Karatay, O. (2004). Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihinin ana hatları –Altın Orda öncesi dönem. Karadeniz Araştırmaları 3, 1–70. google scholar
  • Karatay, O. (2013a). Oğurlar. O. Karatay & S. Acar (Ed.), Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi içinde (s. 241–250). İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Karatay, O. (2013b) Tuna Bulgarları. O. Karatay & S. Acar (Ed.), Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi içinde (s. 273–294). İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Karatay, O. ve Acar, S. (Ed.). (2013). Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi. İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Kayapınar, A. (2013) Bulgarların Balkanlara göçü ve Tuna Bulgar Devleti. B. Gökdağ & O. Karatay (Ed.). Balkanlar el kitabı. 1. cilt: Tarih içinde (s. 105–128). Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. google scholar
  • Levtchenko, M. V. (2007). Bizans tarihi (M. Selen, Çev.) İstanbul: Doruk. google scholar
  • Limes. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/technology/limes google scholar
  • Mangaltepe, İ. (2013). Avarlar (558-822). O. Karatay & S. Acar (Ed.), Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi içinde (s. 203–340). İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Mango, C. (Ed.). (2002). The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford, UK: University Press. google scholar
  • Mango, C. (2005). Byzantium the empire of the new Rome. London, UK: Phoenix. google scholar
  • Meanchen-Helfen, O. J. (1973). The world of the Huns. Studies in their history and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. google scholar
  • Moesia. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/place/Moesia google scholar
  • Obolensky, D. (1997). The Byzantine commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500-1453. New York, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminay Press. google scholar
  • Opsikion. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In WikiVisually. Retrieved from https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Opsikion google scholar
  • Pannonia. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/place/Pannonia google scholar
  • Rasonyi, L. (1984). Tuna köprüleri (H. Akın, Çev.) Ankara: Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Rona-Tas, A. (1996). An ‘Avar’ Word: terem. In A. Berta, B. Brendemoen & C. Schönig (Eds.), Symbolae Turcologicae: Studies in honour of Lars Johanson on his sixtieth birthday. (pp. 181–188). Stockholm, SE: Svenska Forskningsinstitutet Istanbul. google scholar
  • Runciman, S. (1930). A history of the first Bulgarian Empire. London, UK: G. Bell & Sons Ltd. google scholar
  • Setton, K. M. (1950). The Bulgars in the Balkans and the occupation of Corinth in the seventh century. Speculum 25(4), 502–543. google scholar
  • Sinor, D. (2000). Hun dönemi (M. Tuncay, Çev.). D. Sinor (Ed.), Erken İç Asya tarihi içinde (s. 145–282). İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
  • Sinor, D. (Ed.). (2000). Erken İç Asya tarihi. İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
  • Stepanov, T. (2010). The Bulgars and the steppe empire in the early Middle Ages: The problem of others. Boston, MA: Brill. google scholar
  • Szadeczky-Kardos, S. (2000). Avarlar (R. Sezer, Çev.). D. Sinor (Ed.), Erken İç Asya tarihi içinde (s. 283–310). İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
  • Thompson, E. A. (2008). Hunlar (S. Dinçel, Çev.). Ankara: Phoenix. google scholar
  • Thrace. (2018, 31 Ağustos). In WikiVisually. Retrieved from https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Thrace_%28theme%29 google scholar
  • Treadgold, W. (2002). The struggle for survival (641–780). In C. Mango (Ed.), The Oxford history of Byzantium (pp. 129–152). Oxford, UK: University Press. google scholar
  • Üren, U. (2013). Büyük Bulgar Devleti. O. Karatay & S. Acar (Eds.), Doğu Avrupa Türk tarihi içinde (251–271). İstanbul: Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Vryonis, S. (1967). Byzantium and Europe. London, UK: Thames and Hudson. google scholar
  • Vryonis, S. (1981). The evolution of Slavic society and Slavic invasions in Greece. The first major Slavic attack on Thessaloniki, A.D. 597. Hesperia 50(4), 378–390. google scholar
  • Whittow, M. (1996). The making of Orthodox Byzantium, 600-1025. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Yükselen Peler, G. (2018). Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 58(2), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


AMA

Yükselen Peler G. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi. 2018;58(2):429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


ABNT

Yükselen Peler, G. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 58, n. 2, p. 429-448, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yükselen Peler, Gökçe,. 2018. “Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi.” Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi 58, no. 2: 429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yükselen Peler, Gökçe,. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi.” Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi 58, no. 2 (May. 2025): 429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


Harvard: Australian Style

Yükselen Peler, G 2018, 'Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi', Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 429-448, viewed 28 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yükselen Peler, G. (2018) ‘Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi’, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 58(2), pp. 429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004 (28 May. 2025).


MLA

Yükselen Peler, Gökçe,. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi.” Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, vol. 58, no. 2, 2018, pp. 429-448. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


Vancouver

Yükselen Peler G. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi [Internet]. 28 May. 2025 [cited 28 May. 2025];58(2):429-448. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004 doi: 10.26650/TUDED2018-0004


ISNAD

Yükselen Peler, Gökçe. Tarih İçinde Yunanistan’da Türk Dili: Hun-Avar-Bulgar Dönemi”. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi 58/2 (May. 2025): 429-448. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2018-0004



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Kabul11.10.2018

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ



İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.