Research Article


DOI :10.26650/anar.2022.1108527   IUP :10.26650/anar.2022.1108527    Full Text (PDF)

A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük

Yalçın Kamış

Acemhöyük is located on the southern tip of Tuz Gölü in the Aksaray Plain and was one of the largest trading centers during the Assyrian Trade Colonies. Excavations that have been conducted along the southern slope of the mound have revealed several Early Bronze Age layers under the Hellenistic and Assyrian Trade Colonies period deposits. The Early Bronze Age layers of Acemhöyük have yielded a large number of archaeological finds that indicate cultural and commercial relations extending beyond Central Anatolia. The Syrian bottle recovered from Level XI is one of these finds. Syrian bottles are one of the well-known and widely distributed vessel forms of the ancient Near East. They have been attested to in several Early Bronze Age sites distributed over a wide geographical area and thus are considered one of the distinctive archaeological object groups that are useful for understanding cultural and commercial relations alongside the chronological issues of the related period. The following article presents a typological and technical discussion on the Syrian bottle that was recovered from Level XI at Acemhöyük. As a result, the Acemhöyük bottle appears to have been connected to bottles that were distributed in Northwestern Syria.

DOI :10.26650/anar.2022.1108527   IUP :10.26650/anar.2022.1108527    Full Text (PDF)

Acemhöyük’ten Bir “Suriye Şişesi”

Yalçın Kamış

Tuz Gölü’nün hemen güneyinde, Aksaray Ovası’nda yer alan Acemhöyük Asur Ticaret Kolonileri Çağı’nın büyük ticari merkezlerinden biridir. Höyüğün güney yamacında yürütülen kazılar Helenistik Dönem ve Asur Ticaret Kolonileri Çağı dolgularının altında bulunan İlk Tunç Çağı tabakalarının açığa çıkartılmasını sağlamıştır. İlk Tunç Çağı tabakalarında Acemhöyük’ün Orta Anadolu dışına uzanan kültürel ve ticari bağlarının anlaşılmasına katkı sunan çok sayıda buluntu ele geçmiştir. Söz konusu buluntular arasında XI. tabakada ele geçen bir “Suriye Şişesi” de yer almaktadır. Eski Önasya dünyasının en fazla bilinen kap formları arasında yer alan “Suriye Şişeleri” oldukça geniş bir coğrafyaya yayılan çok sayıda İlk Tunç Çağı yerleşiminde ele geçmiştir. Bu nedenle, dönemin kültürel ve ticari ilişkilerinin kavranmasının yanı sıra kronolojik sorunlarına da ışık tutan buluntu gruplarından biri olarak kabul edilirler. Bu çalışmada Acemhöyük XI. tabakada ele geçen “Suriye Şişesi” biçimsel ve teknik özellikleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bunun sonucunda, Acemhöyük şişesinin Kuzeybatı Suriye’de dar bir alanda yayılım gösteren şişelerin bir örneği olduğu anlaşılmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Acemhöyük is a large ancient city located on the alluvial fan of the Karasu River near the southern tip of Tuz Gölü. Long-term excavation projects have been carried out at the site for many decades and revealed wide spans of different periods. The site is located at the crossroads between Syro-Cilicia, Central Anatolia, and Western Anatolia, and its complex history reflects its changing relations associated with cultural and political developments. Archaeological investigations carried out at the site have indicated the presence of a citadel mound and a lower town. The lower town is mostly covered now by the modern village of Yeşilova. Archeological soundings carried out at different locations suggest that the lower town surrounded the citadel mound during the Assyrian Trade Colonies period (2000-1700 BC) and covered a much larger area than the mound itself. The citadel covers approximately 30 hectares and rises 20 m above the surrounding Aksaray Plain. The mound was extensively excavated by Nimet Özgüç and Aliye Öztan between 1962 and 2019.

The excavations shed new light not only on the Assyrian Trade Colonies period, but also provides evidence for earlier periods. The architectural sequence of the Early Bronze Age settlement was recovered at the southern slope of the mound. According to the current state of research, the mound has several Early Bronze Age layers (Levels XII-IV), corresponding to a period spanning from the Early Bronze Age II (2700-2450 BC) to the end of Early Bronze Age III (2450-2000 BC) during Anatolia’s 3rd millennium BC chronology.

The archaeological work conducted at the southern slope of Acemhöyük yielded a large number of objects deeply connected to the regional and interregional developments characterizing the Anatolian cultures of the 3rd millennium BC. The appearance of Trojan plates, tankards, wheel-made vessels, and Syrian bottles in Level XI should be considered a strong indication of the interregional relations of the settlement.

Syrian bottle as a term usually refers to a specific type of small bottles that were widespread throughout Syria, Anatolia, and Mesopotamia during the second half of the 3rd millennium BC. Accordingly, these were considered one of the distinctive archaeological objects reflecting cultural and commercial relations alongside the chronological issues of this period. Their typology, chronology, and distribution have been discussed by many researchers. Syrian bottles appear mainly in funerary contexts. They have also been found less frequently in domestic and public contexts. Their shapes can be roughly divided into two forms: one is a long alabastron shape and the other is a globular shape. Syrian bottles are suggested as having been used as containers for aromatic fluids or oils.

Some of the Early Bronze Age sites located in Central and Western Anatolia have yielded Syrian bottles. Although the number of sites is very limited, the bottles revealed at these sites display significant diversity in terms of typology, chronology, and production materials. The Syrian bottles recovered at Central and Western Anatolian sites include local derivatives and actual imports. Their chronologies coincide roughly with the Syrian and Mesopotamian counterparts. Silver and gold bottles recovered at Eskiyapar and Troy indicate that these bottles were also considered to be items of prestige.

In some of the recent contributions, the bottles were divided into two classes according to their base shapes. While the bottles with pointed or rounded bases are defined as proper Syrian bottles, contemporary flasks with a flat or ring base are not included in this phenomenon. Proper Syrian bottles are defined as transregional types spread over a wide area. Contrarily, flat- or ring-based flasks are interpreted as local bottle types with limited geographical distribution. 

The Acemhöyük bottle discussed in this article was recovered from Level XI. The morphological, technical, and typological characteristics of the bottle are inconsistent with the local pottery repertoire. Therefore, this vessel could be considered to have been imported. Based on the morphological characteristics, it might be related to the flat- and ring-based flasks found in Northwestern Syria and its immediate vicinity. If one were to follow the methodology from the above-mentioned studies, the Acemhöyük bottle would not be able to be classified as a proper Syrian bottle. The bottle found at Acemhöyük has been dated to the beginning of the Early Bronze Age III (2450-2300 BC) according to stratigraphical observations, typological comparisons, and radiocarbon dates and is a significant archaeological object that defines the cultural and commercial relations of the site. 


PDF View

References

  • Alp, E. (2018). Bottle Shaped Vessels in Anatolia and the Syrian Bottle. Anadolu Araştırmaları 21, 56-75. google scholar
  • Aydıngün, Ş. ve Aydıngün, H. Selimpaşa Höyük Suriye Şişesi: Mezopotamya Balkanlar Arasındaki Ticari Kanıtlara Yeni Bir Katkı. Arkaeoloji Dergisi, 27, 21-32. google scholar
  • Bachhuber, C. (2015). Citadel and Cemetery in Early Bronze Age Anatolia. Sheffield: Equinox. google scholar
  • D’Andrea, M. (2017). Early Bronze Age IVB at Ebla-Stratigraphy, Chronology and Material Culture of the Late Early Syrian Town and Their Meaning in the Regional Context. Annales Archeologiques Arabes Syriennes, LVII-LVIII, 131-164. google scholar
  • Duru, R. (2010). Gedikli Karahöyük II. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. google scholar
  • Efe, T. (2007). The Theories of ‘Great Caravan Route’ between Cilicia and Troy: The Early Bronze Age III Period in Inland western Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 57, 47-64. google scholar
  • Falb, C., Porter, A. & PruB, A. (2014). North Mesopotamian Metallic Ware: Jezirah Stone Ware, North-Mesopotamian Grey Ware and Euphrates Banded Ware. In ARCANE International I Ceramics (pp. 171200). Turnhout: Brepols. google scholar
  • Felli, C. (2012). Funerary Practices from the End of the Early to the Middle Bronze Age in North-western Syria: the Middle Euphrates Valley. In P. Pfalzner, H. Niehr, E. Pernicka & A. Wissing (Eds.), (Re-) Constructing Funerary Rituals in the Ancient Near East (pp. 79-110). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. google scholar
  • Goldmann, H. (1956). Excavations at Gözlükule, Tarsus, from the Neolithic through the Bronze Age, Volume II. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Kamış, Y. (2017). Erken Tunç Çağı’nda Acemhöyük ve Konya Ovası. S. Özkan, H. Hüryılmaz ve A. Türker (Eds.), Samsat’tan Acemhöyük’e Eski Uygarlıkların İzinde: Aliye Öztan’a Armağan Kitabı içinde (s. 165176). İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. google scholar
  • Kamış, Y. (2018). Acemhöyük Buluntuları Işığında Erken Tunç Çağı’nda Orta Anadolu’nun Güneyinde Çark Yapımı Seramiğin Ortaya Çıkışı. ADALYA, 21, 63-84. google scholar
  • Kamış, Y. (2020). Acemhöyük’ten Bir Grup Erken Tunç Çağı Seramiği. B. Gür ve S. Dalkılıç (Eds.), Anadolu Prehistoryasına Adanmış Bir Yaşam: Jak Yakar’a Armağan Kitabı içinde (s. 285-310). Ankara: Bilgin Kültür Sanat. google scholar
  • Kühne, H. (1976). Die Keramik von Tell Chuera und ihre Beziehungen zu Funden aus Syrien-Palastina, der Türkei und dem Iraq, Syrien-Palastina, Berlin: Gebr Mann. google scholar
  • Leschtakov, L. & Zimmermann, T. (2021). The Casting Mould for a “Syrian Bottle” from Lipnik, Bulgaria. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 96 (1), 89-100. google scholar
  • Massa, M. & Palmisano, A. (2018). Change and Continuity in the Long-Distance Exchange Networks between Western/Central Anatolia, Northern Levant and Northern Mesopotamia, c.3200-1600 BCE. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 49, 65-87. google scholar
  • Mazzoni, S. (1985). Elements of the Ceramic Culture of Early Syrian Ebla in Comparison with Syro-Palestenian EB IV. BASOR, 257, 1-18. google scholar
  • Mellink, M. J. (1967). Archaeology in Asia Minor, American Journal of Archaeology, 71(2), 155-174. google scholar
  • Mellink, M.J. (1989). Anatolian and Foreign Relations of Tarsus in the Early Bronze Age. In K. Emre, B. Hrouda (pp. 319-332), M. Mellink & N. Özgüç (eds.), Anatolia and Ancient Near East, Studies in Honor of Tahsin Özgüç. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Ökse, T. (2004). Suriye Şişelerinin Taşınma Biçimlerine İlişkin Yeni Bir Bulgu. Belleten LXVIII/253, 599-612. google scholar
  • Özgüç, N. (1982). Acemhöyük Kazıları 1981 Yılı Çalışmaları. Belleten XLVI, 988-990. google scholar
  • Özgüç, N. (1990). An Early Bronze Age Jar from Acemhöyük. Eretz-Israel XXI, 70-73. google scholar
  • Özgüç, N. (2015). Acemhöyük-Buruşhaddum I, Silindir Mühürler ve Mühür Baskılı Bullalar, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özgüç, T. (1986). New Observations on the Relationship of Kültepe with Southeast Anatolia and the North Syria during the Third Millennium BC. In J. V. Canby, E. Porada, B. S. Ridgway & T. Stech (Eds.), Ancient Anatolia, Aspects of Change and Cultural Development, Essays in Honor of Machteld J. Mellink (pp. 31-47). Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press. google scholar
  • Özgüç, T. & Temizer, R. (1993). The Eskiyapar Treasure. In M. J. Mellink, E. Porada & T. Özgüç (Eds.), Aspects of Art and Iconography: Anatolia and its Neighbours, Studies in Honor of Nimet Özgüç (pp. 613628). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Öztan, A. (1989). A Group of Early Bronze Age Pottery from the Konya and Niğde Region. In K. Emre, B. Hrouda (pp. 407-418), M. Mellink & N. Özgüç (eds.), Anatolia and Ancient Near East Studies in Honor of Tahsin Özgüç. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Öztan, A. (1995). 1993 Acemhöyük Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı XVI (1), 189-192. google scholar
  • Öztan, A. (2012). Acemhöyük 1962-1988, 1989-. O. Bingöl, A. Öztan, H. Taşkıran (Eds.), Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi 75. Yıl Armağanı, Arkeoloji Bölümü Tarihçesi ve Kazıları kitabı içinde (s. 59-66). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Öztan, A. (2013). 2012 Yılı Acemhöyük Kazıları ve Sonuçları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı XXXV (3), 136-150. google scholar
  • Rahmstorf, L. (2006). Zur Ausbreitung vorderasiatischer Innovationen in die frühbronzezeitliche Âgâis, Prahistorische Zeitschrift, 81/1, 58-62. google scholar
  • Rova, E. (1991). Die Keramik aus dem Graberfeld. In W. Orthmann & E. Rova (Eds.), Ausgrabungen in Wreide, Graber des 3. Jahrtausends V. Chr. im Syrischen Euphrattal 2 (pp. 71-179). Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei. google scholar
  • Sazcı, G. (2007). The Treasures of Troia. İstanbul: Aygaz. google scholar
  • Schliemann, H. (1881). Ilios Stadt und Land der Trojaner. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus. google scholar
  • Schachner, Ş. & Schachner, A. (1995). Eine “syrische” Flasche aus Fara. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient Gesellschaft 127, 83-96. google scholar
  • Sconzo, P. (2014). Syrian Bottles. In M. Lebeau (Ed.), ARCANE International I Ceramics (pp. 215-236). Turnhout: Brepols. google scholar
  • Seeher, J. (2000). Die Bronzezeitliche Nekropole von Demircihöyük-Sarıket: Ausgrabungen des Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts in Zıısammenarbeit mit dem Museum Bursa 1990-1991. Tübingen. google scholar
  • Şahoğlu, V. (2005). The Anatolian Trade Network and the İzmir Region During the Early Bronze Age. Oxford Journal ofArchaeology, 24, 339-361. google scholar
  • Şenyurt, S. Y., Akçay, A. ve Kamış, Y. (2014). Ovaören 2013 Yılı Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı XXXVI (2), (101-119). Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Türkteki, M. (2012). Batı ve Orta Anadolu’da Çark Yapımı Çanak Çömleğin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Yayılımı. MASROP, 7, 45-111. google scholar
  • Vacca, A. (2014). Chronology and Distribution of 3rd Millennium BC Flasks. In S. Pizzimenti & L. Romano (Eds), Studi in onore di Paolo Matthiae, Sime ummianka (= CMAO 16) Contributi e materiali di archeologia orientale XVI (pp. 252-285). Roma: „Sapienza“ Universitâ di Roma- Dipartimento di Archeologia. google scholar
  • Von der Osten, H. H. (1937). The Alishar Hüyük Seasons of 1930-32 Part I. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Yener, K. A. (1995). Göltepe 1993 Kazı Sonuçları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı XVI, (177-188). Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Yener, A. (2000). The Domestication ofMetals. The Rise of Complex Metal Industries in Anatolia. Leiden: Brill google scholar
  • Yılmaz, D. (2019). The Geography of the Kings: Cultural Interactions Between Anatolia and Mesopotamia during the Akkadian Period. In V. Şahoğlu, M. Şevketoğlu & Y. H. Erbil (Eds.), Connecting Cultures: Trade and Interconnections in the Ancient Near East from the Beginning until the End of the Roman Period (pp. 165-186). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Zimmermann, T. (2005). Perfumes and Policies- A “Syrian Bottle” from Kinet Höyük and Anatolian Trade Patterns in the Advanced Third Millennium BC. Anatolica XXXI, 161-169. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kamış, Y. (2022). A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük. Anatolian Research, 0(26), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


AMA

Kamış Y. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük. Anatolian Research. 2022;0(26):41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


ABNT

Kamış, Y. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük. Anatolian Research, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 26, p. 41-63, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kamış, Yalçın,. 2022. “A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük.” Anatolian Research 0, no. 26: 41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kamış, Yalçın,. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük.” Anatolian Research 0, no. 26 (Aug. 2022): 41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


Harvard: Australian Style

Kamış, Y 2022, 'A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük', Anatolian Research, vol. 0, no. 26, pp. 41-63, viewed 8 Aug. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kamış, Y. (2022) ‘A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük’, Anatolian Research, 0(26), pp. 41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527 (8 Aug. 2022).


MLA

Kamış, Yalçın,. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük.” Anatolian Research, vol. 0, no. 26, 2022, pp. 41-63. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


Vancouver

Kamış Y. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük. Anatolian Research [Internet]. 8 Aug. 2022 [cited 8 Aug. 2022];0(26):41-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527 doi: 10.26650/anar.2022.1108527


ISNAD

Kamış, Yalçın. A Syrian Bottle from Acemhöyük”. Anatolian Research 0/26 (Aug. 2022): 41-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1108527



TIMELINE


Submitted25.04.2022
Accepted11.06.2022
Published Online29.07.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.