Research Article


DOI :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012   IUP :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012    Full Text (PDF)

Copyright Law Practice in Turkey

Nevhis Deren Yıldırım

The Turkish Copyright Act is from 1951. This Act distinguishes between several classes of works such as linguistic works, musical works, works of arts and cinematographic works. Under the amendment in 1995 the same Act is regulating the relatedrights: Theprotectionofthe rightsof exploitationandmoralrightsis a sensitive subjectforlegalpractice. Furthermore, the protection of copyrights is related with preliminary injunctions. The provisional legal protection of copyrights can be safeguarded by the new built Courts of appeal in Turkey.

DOI :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012   IUP :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012    Full Text (PDF)

Die urheberrechtliche Praxis in der Türkei

Nevhis Deren Yıldırım

Das Gesetz fuer geistige Schoepfungen und Kunstwerke trat im Jahre 1951 in Kraft. Es bestimmt den Schutzgegenstand des Urheberrechts und stellt verschiedene Kategorien,wie wissenschaftliche und literarische Werke,musikalische Werke, Kunstwerke und Filmwerke auf. Seit der Gesetzesaenderung im Jahre 1995 werden auch verwandte Schutzrechte des ausuebenden Kuenstlers,des Herstellers von Tontraegern und des Sendeunternehmens anerkannt. Der Schutz der Verwertungsrechte und der urheberlichen Persoenlichkeitsrechte bildet den Kernpunkt dieses Rechtsbereiches. Der einstweilige Rechtschutz spielt im Urheberrecht eine kritische Rolle. Die Einfuehrung der Berufungsinstanz ist aus diesem Grund zu begruessen, da die Gerichtspraxis in Vergangenheit zur Abweisung der Antraege tendierte.

DOI :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012   IUP :10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’de Fikri Haklar Uygulaması

Nevhis Deren Yıldırım

(Türk) Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu 1951 tarihlidir. Söz konusu kanun birçok eser kategorisine yer vermektedir; bunlar sırasıyla edebiyat eserleri, müzik eserleri, güzel sanat eserleri ve sinema eserleridir. 1995 değişikliği ile aynı kanun eser ile bağlantılı hakları da koruma altına almıştır. Uygulamada eser üzerindeki mali haklar ile manevi yetkilerin hukuki korunması hassas bir konudur. Bunun yanı sıra telif haklarının korunması ihtiyati tedbirler ile de bağlantılıdır. Fikri hakların geçici korunması yeni kurulan istinaf mahkemeleri ile de garanti altına alınmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works (the Turkish Copyright Act) regulates the author’s rights. According to Art. 8 the owner of a copyright is the creator of an intellectual or artistic work. Creators’ rights, such as exploitation rights and moral rights, are protected by the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works from 1951. Moral rights are the right of making the work public (Art. 14), the right of determining the indication of the author’s name (Art. 15), the right of integrity (to prevent distortion and other alterations of the work; Art. 16), and the right of the author against possessors and owners of the work (Art. 17). Exploitation rights are the right to adapt (Art. 21), the right of reproduction (Art. 22), the right of distribution, the right of exhibition (Art. 24), and the right of broadcasting (Art. 25). There are several types of works protected by the Copyright Act: 1) linguistic and scientific works, 2) works of art, 3) musical works, and 4) cinematographic works.

Since its amendment in 1995, the same act regulates related rights. Third persons have to be granted sub-licences in whole or in part for utilisation rights. In the case of infringement of a right of exploitation or a moral right, the creator can apply to the Court of Copyrights for legal protection, which was established as a specialised court of civil law in 1995. Authors and related rights holders can request compensation (Art. 70) and make claims for preventing infringement and for restitution, or just bring an action for a declaratory judgment. 

Copyright law practice in Turkey is still vibrant. The establishment of a specialised court for copyright law proposals might also be said to contribute to the development of authors’ rights. Court-granted preliminary injunctions are the core of the protection of authors and related rights holders. The amendment of the Civil Procedure Act and the newly established Appeal Court must be welcomed. Copyrights ensure that creators have control over the exploitation of their works. In order to gain an understanding of the origin of copyrights, we have to postulate a theory. Many authors have proposed theories of the origin of copyrights, including the theory of intellectual property, the theory of personality rights, the monistic theory, the theory of publishers’ property, and the principle of creativity. The principle of creativity has become dominant with the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works (Art. 8). One of the most frequently discussed topics among Turkish copyright lawyers is the definition of creativity as the subject of protection of a work.

The rights of ownership were not known in the early Middle Ages. The human being was accepted as a creation of God, so human creators did not have the right of determining the indication of their own names.The rights of ownership were not known in the early Middle Ages. The human being was accepted as a creation of God, so human creators did not have the right of determining the indication of their own names.


PDF View

References

  • Ahrens HJ, Wettbewerbsverfahrensrecht (Köln\Bonn\München 1983) 257 ff. google scholar
  • Arkan A, Eser Sahibinin Haklarına Bağlantılı Haklar (Istanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Ayiter N, Hukukta Fikir ve Sanat Ürünleri (2. Bası Ankara 1981). google scholar
  • Arslanlı H, Fikri Hukuk Dersleri II (İstanbul 1954). google scholar
  • Baur F, Studien zum einstweiligen Rechtsschutz (Tübingen 1967). google scholar
  • Deren-Yildirim N, Haksız Rekabet Hukuku İle Fikri ve Sınai Mülkiyet Hukukunda İhtiyati Tedbirler (2. Baskı Istanbul 2002). google scholar
  • Erdmann W, Das Bearbeitungsrecht (FS W. Büscher, Köln 2018) 169 ff. google scholar
  • Erel ŞN, Türk Fikir ve Sanat Hukuku (3. Aufl., Ankara 2009). google scholar
  • Ernst R, Die vorsorglichen MaŞnahmen im Wettbewerbs- und Immaterielgüterrecht (Zürich 1992). google scholar
  • Fromm and Nordemann, Urheberrecht, Kommentar (9. Auflage, Stuttgart 1998). google scholar
  • Güneş G, Türk Hukukunda Entelektüel Sınai Haklar ve Vergilendirilmesi (Istanbul 1997). google scholar
  • Hirsch EE Das neue Urheberrechtsgesetz der Türkei’ (1954) 1 UFİTA 24 ff (UFİTA 1954) google scholar
  • Hirsch EE, Fikri Say (B II İstanbul 1943) (Fikri) google scholar
  • Hösly B, Der urheberrechtlich schützbare Rechtssubjekt (Bern 1987) 8 ff. google scholar
  • Hubmann H, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz (Patent-, Gebrauchsmuster-, Geschmacksmuster-, Warenzeichen-und Wettbewerbsrecht) (5. Auflage, München 1988). google scholar
  • Kaya A, ‘Sind Staedtplaene als Werke im Sinne von UrhG anzusehen?’ 2001 (33) 50 Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul 253 ff. (Annales 2001) google scholar
  • Kaya A, Marka Hukuku (Istanbul 2006) (Marka Hukuku) google scholar
  • Kaya A, Şehir Planları (Rehberleri) Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunun Kapsamında Eser midir? (Festschrift Tekinalp, B. II, 2003) 321-331 (Şehir Planları). google scholar
  • Kuru B, Arslan R and Yılmaz, E, Medeni Usul Hukuku (12. Bası, Ankara 2000). google scholar
  • Öztan F, Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Hukuku (Ankara 2008). google scholar
  • Rehbinder M, Urheberrecht (9. Auflage München 1996). google scholar
  • Rehbinder M and Peukert A, Urheberrecht (17. Auflage, München 2015). google scholar
  • Tekinalp Ü, Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku (3. Auflage, Istanbul 2004). google scholar
  • Tosun Y, Sinema Eserleri ve Eser Sahibinin Hakları (Istanbul 2009). google scholar
  • Troller A, Immaterialgüterrecht, B.I (3. Auflage, Basel/Frankfurt a.M. 1983). google scholar
  • Sosnitza O, ‘Das Persönlichkeitsrecht als allgemeines Element der geistigen Eigentumsrechte‘ (FS Ahrens, Köln 2016) 305 ff. google scholar
  • Suluk C and Orhan A, Uygulamalı Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, B.II (Istanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Ulmer, Urheber-und Verlagsrecht (3. Auflage, 1980). google scholar
  • von Büren R and David L, Schweizerisches Immaterialgüter-und Wettbewerbsrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, (Basel 1995). google scholar
  • Yarsuvat D, Türk Hukukunda Eser Sahibi ve Hakları (3. Auflage İstanbul 1984). google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Deren Yıldırım, N. (2020). Copyright Law Practice in Turkey. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(69), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


AMA

Deren Yıldırım N. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. 2020;0(69):119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


ABNT

Deren Yıldırım, N. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 69, p. 119-132, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Deren Yıldırım, Nevhis,. 2020. “Copyright Law Practice in Turkey.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 69: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


Chicago: Humanities Style

Deren Yıldırım, Nevhis,. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 69 (May. 2021): 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


Harvard: Australian Style

Deren Yıldırım, N 2020, 'Copyright Law Practice in Turkey', Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 69, pp. 119-132, viewed 15 May. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Deren Yıldırım, N. (2020) ‘Copyright Law Practice in Turkey’, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(69), pp. 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012 (15 May. 2021).


MLA

Deren Yıldırım, Nevhis,. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 69, 2020, pp. 119-132. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


Vancouver

Deren Yıldırım N. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul [Internet]. 15 May. 2021 [cited 15 May. 2021];0(69):119-132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012 doi: 10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012


ISNAD

Deren Yıldırım, Nevhis. Copyright Law Practice in Turkey”. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0/69 (May. 2021): 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0012



TIMELINE


Submitted04.06.2020
Accepted15.09.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.