Research Article


DOI :10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009   IUP :10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009    Full Text (PDF)

The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?

Fulya Teomete Yalabık

There are various determinants that induce London to be the favourable seat. In this regard, the grounds for challenging an award have some severe implications on determining London as the arbitral seat.1 Arbitrations with a London seat are exercised under the ‘supervisory jurisdiction’2 of the English courts and the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996).3 That is to say, any challenge to an interim or final award made by the arbitrators may be fulfilled in the courts of the location chosen as the arbitral seat. The consensual nature of international arbitration depends on certain core principles such as party autonomy, judicial nonintervention and finality of the arbitral awards. Nonetheless, the binding aspect of the arbitral award and its enforceability akin to that of final judgements of national courts necessitate some “balanced” degree of judicial supervision.

DOI :10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009   IUP :10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009    Full Text (PDF)

“Tahkim Yerinin, Müdahale Etmeme İlkesi Üzerindeki Rolü: Hakem Kararlarına Karşı Kanun Yoluna İlişkin 1996 tarihli İngiliz Tahkim Kanunu 67, 68 ve 69. Bölümler Londra’nın Cazip Bir Tahkim Merkezi Olmasını Sağlıyor Mu?”

Fulya Teomete Yalabık

Londra’yı tercih edilen bir tahkim yeri haline getiren çeşitli belirleyiciler söz konusudur. Bu bağlamda, hakem kararlarına karşı kanun yoluna başvuru sebeplerinin, Londra’nın tahkim yeri olarak belirlenmesinde bazı önemli etkileri vardır. Tahkim yerinin Londra olarak belirlendiği tahkimler İngiliz mahkemelerinin ‘denetleyici yetkisi’ ve 1996 tarihli Tahkim Kanunu’nun kapsamında icra edilmektedir. Yani, hakemlerin ara veya nihai kararlarına yönelik kanun yolu başvurularında tahkim yeri olarak belirlenen yer mahkemeleri yetkili olmaktadır. Uluslararası tahkimin rızaya dayalı doğası, taraf özerkliği, yargıya müdahale etmeme ve hakem kararlarının kesinliği gibi bazı temel ilkelere bağlıdır. Bununla birlikte, hakem kararının bağlayıcı yönü ve ulusal mahkemelerin nihai kararlarına benzer şekilde icra edilmeleri, “dengeli” bir şekilde uygulanacak bir yargı denetiminin varlığını gerektirmektedir.


PDF View

References

  • Books google scholar
  • Andrews N, The Modern Civil Process, Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution in England (Mohr Siebeck 2008) google scholar
  • Belohlavek A J, ‘Seat of Arbitration and Supporting and Supervising Function of Courts’ in Alexander Belohlavek, Nadezda Rozehnalova (eds), Interaction of Arbitration and Courts, Czech Yearbook of Arbitration, vol 5 (2015, Juris) google scholar
  • Blackaby N, Partasides C, Redfern A, Hunter J M, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th edn, OUP 2015) google scholar
  • Blake S, Browne J, Sime S, A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution (5th edn, OUP 2018) google scholar
  • Born G B, International Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2014) google scholar
  • Born G B, International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing, (3th edn, Wolters Kluwer International 2010) google scholar
  • Greenberg S, Kee C, Weeramantry R, International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia-Pacific Perspective (CUP 2011) google scholar
  • Heilbron H, A Practical Guide to International Arbitration in London (1st edn., Informa Law 2008) google scholar
  • Karrer P A, Introduction to International Arbitration Practice (Kluwer Law International 2014) google scholar
  • Lalive P, ‘On the Neutrality of the Arbitrator and of the Place of Arbitration’, Swiss Essays on International Arbitration (1984), 30, 31, https://www.lalive.law/data/publications/43_-_On_ the_Neutrality_of_the_Arbitrator_and_of_the_Place_of_Arbitration_Recueil_de_travaux_ suisses_sur_l’arbitrage_international.pdf google scholar
  • Lew J, ‘London’ in Michael Ostrove, Cladia Salomon, Bette Shifman (eds), Choice of Venue in International Arbitration (OUP 2014) google scholar
  • Petrochilos G, Procedural Law in International Arbitration (OUP 2004) google scholar
  • Seriki H O, Judicial Involvement and Intervention in Arbitration Proceedings After the Arbitration Act 1996, PhD Thesis, (Wales Cardiff, 2002) google scholar
  • Sutton D S J, Gill J, Russell on Arbitration (24th edn, Sweet and Maxwell 2015) google scholar
  • Turner P, Mohtashami R, A Guide to the LCIA Arbitration Rules (OUP 2009) google scholar
  • Waincymer J, Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2012) google scholar
  • Wolfson D, Charlwood S, ‘Chapter 25: Challenges to Arbitration’ in Julian D M Lew, Harris Bor, et al (eds) Arbitration in England, with Chapters on Scotland and Ireland (Kluwer Law International 2013) google scholar
  • Articles google scholar
  • Abedian H, ‘Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration-A Case for an Efficient System of Judicial Review’ (2011) 28 (6) Journal of International Arbitration 533 google scholar
  • Carter J, Macpherson C, ‘Arbitral Awards-Challenging to Challenge’ (2016) 19 (4) International Arbitration Law Review 89 google scholar
  • Gelander J L, ‘Judicial Review of International Arbitral Awards: Preserving Independence in International Commercial Arbitrations’ (1997) 80 Marquette Law Review 625 google scholar
  • Giovannini T, ‘The Making and Enforcement of Arbitral Award: What are the Grounds on Which Awards Are Most Often Set Aside?’ (2001) 1 Business Law International 115 google scholar
  • Harris B, ‘Report on the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2007) 23(3) Arbitration International 437 google scholar
  • Hill J, ‘Determining the Seat of an International Arbitration: Party Autonomy and the Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements’ (2014) 63 Int Comp Law Q 517 google scholar
  • Holmes R, O’Reilly M, ‘Appeals from Arbitral Awards: Should Section 69 be Repealed?’ (2003) 69(1) Arbitration 1 google scholar
  • Liu R, ‘A Balancing Act: Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2018) 21 (1) International Arbitration Law Review 18 google scholar
  • Mcllwrath M, ‘An Unamicable Separation: Brexit Consequences for London as a Premier Seat of International Dispute Resolution in Europe’ (2016) 33 (7) Journal of International Arbitration 451 google scholar
  • Needham M, ‘Appeal on a Point of Law Arising out of an Award’ (1999) 65(3) Arbitration 205 google scholar
  • Noussia K, ‘The Arbitration Act 1996: Time for Reform’ (2019) 2 Journal of Business Law 140 google scholar
  • Paulsson J, ‘Arbitration-Friendliness: Promises of Principle and Realities of Practice’, (2007) 23/3 Arbitration International 477 google scholar
  • Saville L, ‘The Denning Lecture 1995: Arbitration and the courts’ (1995) 61 Arbitration 157 google scholar
  • Seriki H, ‘Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Awards: Can the Unruly Horse Be Tamed?’ (2018) 8 Journal of Business Law 679 google scholar
  • The UK Departmental Advisory Committee, ‘DAC Report’, The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part, (1999) 15(4) Arbitration International 413 google scholar
  • Vial G, ‘Influence of the Arbitral Seat in the Outcome of an International Commercial Arbitration’ (2017) 50(2) International Lawyer 329 google scholar
  • Vial G, Blavi F, ‘New Ideas for the Old Expectation of Becoming an Attractive Arbitral Seat’ (2016) 25 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 279 google scholar
  • Walker J, ‘The London Principles and Their Impact on Law Reform’ (2018) 84 (2) Arbitration 174 google scholar
  • Zamir N, ‘Appeal in International Arbitration-An Efficient and Affordable Arbitral Appeal Mechanism’ (2019) 35(1) Arbitration International 79 google scholar
  • News, and Analysis google scholar
  • Capper P, Sabharwal D, Connellan C, ‘When is the ‘Venue’ of an Arbitration its ‘Seat’?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (November 25, 2009), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2009/11/25/ when-is-the-venue-of-an-arbitration-its-seat/ google scholar
  • Farouki Z, ‘Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act: London’s discrete edge in its quest to become the top arbitration seat’ Jus Mundi Blog, May 17 2021, <https://blog.jusmundi.com/ section-69-of-the-english-arbitration-act-londons-discrete-edge-in-its-quest-to-become-the-top-arbitration-seat/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=section-69-of-the-english-arbitration-act-londons-discrete-edge-in-its-quest-to-become-the-top-arbitration-seat> google scholar
  • Hesse D, ‘The Seat of Arbitration is Important. It’s That Simple.’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, (June 10, 2018), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/06/10/seat-arbitration-important-simple/ google scholar
  • Jain S, ‘UK: Why London Continues to be an Attractive Seat for International Arbitration Post-Brexit’ Mondaq, 23 June 2021, https://www.mondaq.com/uk/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1082072/ why-london-continues-to-be-an-attractive-seat-for-international-arbitration-post-brexit google scholar
  • Kirtley W, The Importance of the Seat of Arbitration, International Arbitration Attorney Network (February 8, 2016), <https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/importance-seat-arbitration/> google scholar
  • Speller D, Feldner M, ‘The International Arbitration Review: United Kingdom-England and Wales’, edition 12, (July 2021) <https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-international-arbitration-review/united-kingdom-england--wales > google scholar
  • Lord Thomas, ‘Developing Commercial Law Through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship Between the Courts and Arbitration’ Courts and Tribunals Judiciary 2016, paragraph 21, https:// www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/lcj-speech-bailli-lecture-20160309.pdf google scholar
  • Williams J, Lal H, Hornshaw R, ‘Arbitration procedures and practice in the UK (England and Wales): overview’ <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-502-1378?transitionType=D efault&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true> google scholar
  • 2018 Queen Mary University of London, White & Case International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration, <http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/ docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2). PDF> google scholar
  • 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting arbitration to a changing world, <http://www. arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/LON0320037-QMUL-International-Arbitration-Survey-2021_19_WEB.pdf> google scholar
  • Cases google scholar
  • The Achilleas [2008] UKHL 48, [2009] 1 AC 61 google scholar
  • Allianz SpA and Others v West Tankers Inc [2009] EUECJ C-185/07 google scholar
  • AMEC Civil Engineering Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2005] EWCA Civ 291 google scholar
  • Bandwidth Shipping Corporation Intaari (the ‘Magdelena Oldendorff’) [2007] EWCA Civ 998, [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 1015, [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 google scholar
  • Braes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Business Services Ltd [2008] 2 All ER (Comm) 493 google scholar
  • C v D [2008] Bus LR 843 google scholar
  • CMA CGM SA v Beteiligungs-Kommanditgesellschaft MS ‘Northern Pioneer’Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mBH & Co (The Northern Pioneer) [2002] EWCA Civ 1878 google scholar
  • Essar Oilfields Services Ltd v Norscot Rig Management PVT Ltd [2016] EWHC 2361 (Comm) google scholar
  • HC Trading Malta Ltd v Tradeland Commodities SL [2016] EWHC 1279 (Comm) google scholar
  • Itochu Corporation v Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH & Co KG &Anr [2012] EWCA Civ 996 google scholar
  • La Societepour la Recherche LaProduction Le TransportLa Transformation et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures SPA v Statoil Natural Gas LLC (Statoil) [2014] EWHC 875 google scholar
  • Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd (The Nema) (No 2) [1982] AC 724 (HL) google scholar
  • Shashoua and ors v Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) google scholar
  • Gerald Metals SA v The Trustees of the Timis Trust and others [2016] EWHC 2327 google scholar
  • Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm) google scholar
  • Alegrow S.A. v Yayla Agro Gida San ve Nak AS [2020] EWHC 1845 (Comm) google scholar
  • CVLC Three Carrier Corp v Arab Maritime Petroleum Transport Co [2021] EWHC 551 (Comm) google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Teomete Yalabık, F. (2021). The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(70), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


AMA

Teomete Yalabık F. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. 2021;0(70):253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


ABNT

Teomete Yalabık, F. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 70, p. 253-272, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Teomete Yalabık, Fulya,. 2021. “The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 70: 253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


Chicago: Humanities Style

Teomete Yalabık, Fulya,. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 70 (Jun. 2022): 253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


Harvard: Australian Style

Teomete Yalabık, F 2021, 'The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?', Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 70, pp. 253-272, viewed 30 Jun. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Teomete Yalabık, F. (2021) ‘The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?’, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, 0(70), pp. 253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009 (30 Jun. 2022).


MLA

Teomete Yalabık, Fulya,. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?.” Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, vol. 0, no. 70, 2021, pp. 253-272. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


Vancouver

Teomete Yalabık F. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul [Internet]. 30 Jun. 2022 [cited 30 Jun. 2022];0(70):253-272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009 doi: 10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009


ISNAD

Teomete Yalabık, Fulya. The Impact of the Seat of Arbitration on Judicial-Interference: Do Sections 67, 68 and 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 regarding Challenges of Awards Make London An Attractive Hub?”. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0/70 (Jun. 2022): 253-272. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0009



TIMELINE


Submitted20.01.2021
Accepted09.08.2021
Published Online01.09.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.