References

• Books google scholar
• Andrews N, The Modern Civil Process, Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution in England (Mohr Siebeck 2008) google scholar
• Belohlavek A J, ‘Seat of Arbitration and Supporting and Supervising Function of Courts’ in Alexander Belohlavek, Nadezda Rozehnalova (eds), Interaction of Arbitration and Courts, Czech Yearbook of Arbitration, vol 5 (2015, Juris) google scholar
• Blackaby N, Partasides C, Redfern A, Hunter J M, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th edn, OUP 2015) google scholar
• Blake S, Browne J, Sime S, A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution (5th edn, OUP 2018) google scholar
• Born G B, International Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2014) google scholar
• Born G B, International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing, (3th edn, Wolters Kluwer International 2010) google scholar
• Greenberg S, Kee C, Weeramantry R, International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia-Pacific Perspective (CUP 2011) google scholar
• Heilbron H, A Practical Guide to International Arbitration in London (1st edn., Informa Law 2008) google scholar
• Karrer P A, Introduction to International Arbitration Practice (Kluwer Law International 2014) google scholar
• Lalive P, ‘On the Neutrality of the Arbitrator and of the Place of Arbitration’, Swiss Essays on International Arbitration (1984), 30, 31, https://www.lalive.law/data/publications/43_-_On_ the_Neutrality_of_the_Arbitrator_and_of_the_Place_of_Arbitration_Recueil_de_travaux_ suisses_sur_l’arbitrage_international.pdf google scholar
• Lew J, ‘London’ in Michael Ostrove, Cladia Salomon, Bette Shifman (eds), Choice of Venue in International Arbitration (OUP 2014) google scholar
• Petrochilos G, Procedural Law in International Arbitration (OUP 2004) google scholar
• Seriki H O, Judicial Involvement and Intervention in Arbitration Proceedings After the Arbitration Act 1996, PhD Thesis, (Wales Cardiff, 2002) google scholar
• Sutton D S J, Gill J, Russell on Arbitration (24th edn, Sweet and Maxwell 2015) google scholar
• Turner P, Mohtashami R, A Guide to the LCIA Arbitration Rules (OUP 2009) google scholar
• Waincymer J, Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2012) google scholar
• Wolfson D, Charlwood S, ‘Chapter 25: Challenges to Arbitration’ in Julian D M Lew, Harris Bor, et al (eds) Arbitration in England, with Chapters on Scotland and Ireland (Kluwer Law International 2013) google scholar
• Articles google scholar
• Abedian H, ‘Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration-A Case for an Efficient System of Judicial Review’ (2011) 28 (6) Journal of International Arbitration 533 google scholar
• Carter J, Macpherson C, ‘Arbitral Awards-Challenging to Challenge’ (2016) 19 (4) International Arbitration Law Review 89 google scholar
• Gelander J L, ‘Judicial Review of International Arbitral Awards: Preserving Independence in International Commercial Arbitrations’ (1997) 80 Marquette Law Review 625 google scholar
• Giovannini T, ‘The Making and Enforcement of Arbitral Award: What are the Grounds on Which Awards Are Most Often Set Aside?’ (2001) 1 Business Law International 115 google scholar
• Harris B, ‘Report on the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2007) 23(3) Arbitration International 437 google scholar
• Hill J, ‘Determining the Seat of an International Arbitration: Party Autonomy and the Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements’ (2014) 63 Int Comp Law Q 517 google scholar
• Holmes R, O’Reilly M, ‘Appeals from Arbitral Awards: Should Section 69 be Repealed?’ (2003) 69(1) Arbitration 1 google scholar
• Liu R, ‘A Balancing Act: Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2018) 21 (1) International Arbitration Law Review 18 google scholar
• Mcllwrath M, ‘An Unamicable Separation: Brexit Consequences for London as a Premier Seat of International Dispute Resolution in Europe’ (2016) 33 (7) Journal of International Arbitration 451 google scholar
• Needham M, ‘Appeal on a Point of Law Arising out of an Award’ (1999) 65(3) Arbitration 205 google scholar
• Noussia K, ‘The Arbitration Act 1996: Time for Reform’ (2019) 2 Journal of Business Law 140 google scholar
• Paulsson J, ‘Arbitration-Friendliness: Promises of Principle and Realities of Practice’, (2007) 23/3 Arbitration International 477 google scholar
• Saville L, ‘The Denning Lecture 1995: Arbitration and the courts’ (1995) 61 Arbitration 157 google scholar
• Seriki H, ‘Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Awards: Can the Unruly Horse Be Tamed?’ (2018) 8 Journal of Business Law 679 google scholar
• The UK Departmental Advisory Committee, ‘DAC Report’, The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part, (1999) 15(4) Arbitration International 413 google scholar
• Vial G, ‘Influence of the Arbitral Seat in the Outcome of an International Commercial Arbitration’ (2017) 50(2) International Lawyer 329 google scholar
• Vial G, Blavi F, ‘New Ideas for the Old Expectation of Becoming an Attractive Arbitral Seat’ (2016) 25 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 279 google scholar
• Walker J, ‘The London Principles and Their Impact on Law Reform’ (2018) 84 (2) Arbitration 174 google scholar
• Zamir N, ‘Appeal in International Arbitration-An Efficient and Affordable Arbitral Appeal Mechanism’ (2019) 35(1) Arbitration International 79 google scholar
• News, and Analysis google scholar
• Capper P, Sabharwal D, Connellan C, ‘When is the ‘Venue’ of an Arbitration its ‘Seat’?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (November 25, 2009), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2009/11/25/ when-is-the-venue-of-an-arbitration-its-seat/ google scholar
• Farouki Z, ‘Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act: London’s discrete edge in its quest to become the top arbitration seat’ Jus Mundi Blog, May 17 2021, <https://blog.jusmundi.com/ section-69-of-the-english-arbitration-act-londons-discrete-edge-in-its-quest-to-become-the-top-arbitration-seat/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=section-69-of-the-english-arbitration-act-londons-discrete-edge-in-its-quest-to-become-the-top-arbitration-seat> google scholar
• Hesse D, ‘The Seat of Arbitration is Important. It’s That Simple.’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, (June 10, 2018), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/06/10/seat-arbitration-important-simple/ google scholar
• Jain S, ‘UK: Why London Continues to be an Attractive Seat for International Arbitration Post-Brexit’ Mondaq, 23 June 2021, https://www.mondaq.com/uk/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1082072/ why-london-continues-to-be-an-attractive-seat-for-international-arbitration-post-brexit google scholar
• Kirtley W, The Importance of the Seat of Arbitration, International Arbitration Attorney Network (February 8, 2016), <https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/importance-seat-arbitration/> google scholar
• Speller D, Feldner M, ‘The International Arbitration Review: United Kingdom-England and Wales’, edition 12, (July 2021) <https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-international-arbitration-review/united-kingdom-england--wales > google scholar
• Lord Thomas, ‘Developing Commercial Law Through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship Between the Courts and Arbitration’ Courts and Tribunals Judiciary 2016, paragraph 21, https:// www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/lcj-speech-bailli-lecture-20160309.pdf google scholar
• Williams J, Lal H, Hornshaw R, ‘Arbitration procedures and practice in the UK (England and Wales): overview’ <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-502-1378?transitionType=D efault&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true> google scholar
• 2018 Queen Mary University of London, White & Case International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration, <http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/ docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2). PDF> google scholar
• 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting arbitration to a changing world, <http://www. arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/LON0320037-QMUL-International-Arbitration-Survey-2021_19_WEB.pdf> google scholar
• Cases google scholar
• The Achilleas [2008] UKHL 48, [2009] 1 AC 61 google scholar
• Allianz SpA and Others v West Tankers Inc [2009] EUECJ C-185/07 google scholar
• AMEC Civil Engineering Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2005] EWCA Civ 291 google scholar
• Bandwidth Shipping Corporation Intaari (the ‘Magdelena Oldendorff’) [2007] EWCA Civ 998, [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 1015, [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 google scholar
• Braes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Business Services Ltd [2008] 2 All ER (Comm) 493 google scholar
• C v D [2008] Bus LR 843 google scholar
• CMA CGM SA v Beteiligungs-Kommanditgesellschaft MS ‘Northern Pioneer’Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mBH & Co (The Northern Pioneer) [2002] EWCA Civ 1878 google scholar
• Essar Oilfields Services Ltd v Norscot Rig Management PVT Ltd [2016] EWHC 2361 (Comm) google scholar
• HC Trading Malta Ltd v Tradeland Commodities SL [2016] EWHC 1279 (Comm) google scholar
• Itochu Corporation v Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH & Co KG &Anr [2012] EWCA Civ 996 google scholar
• La Societepour la Recherche LaProduction Le TransportLa Transformation et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures SPA v Statoil Natural Gas LLC (Statoil) [2014] EWHC 875 google scholar
• Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd (The Nema) (No 2) [1982] AC 724 (HL) google scholar
• Shashoua and ors v Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) google scholar
• Gerald Metals SA v The Trustees of the Timis Trust and others [2016] EWHC 2327 google scholar
• Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm) google scholar
• Alegrow S.A. v Yayla Agro Gida San ve Nak AS [2020] EWHC 1845 (Comm) google scholar
• CVLC Three Carrier Corp v Arab Maritime Petroleum Transport Co [2021] EWHC 551 (Comm) google scholar

Citations