Research Article


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437    Full Text (PDF)

Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum

Selda Uygun Yazıcı

The subject of the study is seventeen metal crosses registered in the inventory of Kırklareli Museum. All of the artifacts were brought to the museum through purchasing from Kırklareli and the surrounding districts. Eleven of these artifacts are pendant crosses, and the six of them are reliquary cross. Four of the reliquary crosses are one-sided. Metal crosses, which are unique in Byzantine art, are very rich with examples from different museums, digging areas and collections. The numerous examples obtained from different parts of the empire attest not only to the richness of Byzantine art, but also to the fact that Christianity has always preferred metal crosses as liturgical or personal religious objects. What makes this study different is that there are examples among the crosses of the Kırklareli Museum that are thought to be of Balkan design.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437    Full Text (PDF)

Kırklareli Müzesi Bizans Dönemi Madeni Haçları

Selda Uygun Yazıcı

Bizans sanatı içerisinde kendine has bir yeri olan madeni haçlar, farklı müze, kazı ve koleksiyon örnekleriyle oldukça zengindir. İmparatorluğun değişik coğrafyalarından ele geçirilen sayısız haç örneği, Bizans sanatının varsıllığını, dinî yaşam kültürünü ve bu kültürün çeşitliliğini kanıtlayan somut objelerdir. Madeni haç eserlerin sayısal fazlalığı, haçların hem

litürjik hem de kişisel kullanımda her dönem tercih edildiğini de göstermektedir. Kırklareli Müzesi envanterine kayıtlı olan on yedi madeni haç bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Eserlerin tamamı Kırklareli ve çevre ilçelerden satın alma yoluyla müzeye kazandırılmıştır. Kırklareli Müzesinden alınan izinle incelenen haçların on biri pandantif haç, altısı röliker haçtır. Röliker haçların dördü tek taraflıdır. Bronz ve bakırdan, döküm tekniğiyle üretilen eserlerin bezemelerinde kazıma ve kabartma tekniği kullanılmış, eserlerin bazıları değerli taş ya da cam malzemeyle süslenmiştir. Röliker haçlarda bir örnekdışında İsa, Meryem ve kutsal kişi tasvirlerine rastlanmıştır. Pandantif haçlar yassı kesitli, bitkisel ve geometrik desenlidir. Çalışmaya konu olan örnekler Yunan ve Latin Haçı formundadır. Üslup özelliklerine göre değerlendirilip benzer öneklerle karşılaştırılan Kırklareli Müzesi örneklerinin içerisinde Balkan üretimi olduğu düşünülen eserlerin bulunması bu çalışmayı farklı kılmaktadır. Yapılan değerlendirmeler ışığında madeni haçlar Orta Bizans Dönemi’ne tarihlendirilmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


With the most general expression, the cross can be defined as the shape that is identified with the moment of Jesus’ crucifixion as well as one of the most important symbols of Christianity. It is also known that the cross, an important element of belief, responds to different needs in life. The respect and trust for the cross, which people carried due to its protective features, and socially which was not only in religious buildings but also on city walls, in houses, on roads and passageways, and in common areas, is important in understanding its significance in the Byzantine world. The value and symbolic meaning of the cross has made its uses diverse and dynamic. The cross, which is chosen for military and imperial ceremonies in the administrative sense, can be used in different areas as well due to its savior, healer and protector attributes in the religious sense. This determines the reasons why the cross is used for different purposes and its formal characteristics accordingly. Pendant crosses has flat (Cat. No. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) and circular (Cat.

No. 4 and 5) sections. The arms of the cross end in a straight, circle, teardrop or halfround/ semi-circle. According to Pitarakis typology, the reliquary crosses is divided into Type I (Cat. No. 12), Type IV (Cat. No. 14, 15, 16 and 17) and Type VIII (Cat. No.13).

Considering the material and technical characteristics of the artifacts, two of the crosses are made of copper (Cat. No. 15 and 16), while the others are made of bronze. The decoration is made through engraving (Cat. No. 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14 and 17) and relief (Cat. No. 3, 7, 11, 13, 15 and 16) techniques. In one example, it was observed that (Cat. No. 17) slots were opened for colored stones or glass, but the stone or glass material that may have been inside has not survived.

The crosses has geometric (Cat. No. 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 17) and floral (Cat. No.10) motifs. Figurative depictions include Crucified Jesus (Cat. No. 3, 12, 13, 16), Mary in orans position Bible writers or saints (Cat. No. 15 and 16). One example is undecorated (Cat. No. 6).

The stylistic features of the crosses are the most important element in identifying the artifacts and revealing the differences/similarities between them. Except for one example (Cat. No. 3 figural), both geometric and floral decorations are used on the pendant crosses. Figural decorations are seen on the reliquary crosses except for one example (Cat. No. 17 geometric). Geometric decoration is characterized by intertwined circular motifs or circles, while floral decoration is characterized by curling twigs.

Since the Byzantine cross of the Kırklareli Museum were included in the museum inventory through purchase, museum, collection and archaeological diggings have a great importance in the analysis of the material. The crosses obtained from Kırklareli and their surroundings were first compared with similar examples in the nearby geography. It is very important that the examples of Balkan origin are not only museum material but also diggings .

While most of the crosses date to the Middle Byzantine period (10th-12th century) (Cat. No. 1, 2, 3, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17), common examples from different parts of the empire date to the Early and Middle Byzantine periods (6th-13th century) (Cat. No. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 13).

As a result, the metal cross artifacts belonging to the Kırklareli Museum are important examples in terms of contributing to the existing inventory of Byzantium and examining its place in the Balkan geography when evaluated regionally. All seventeen metal artifacts were brought to the museum through purchasing. As it is a portable object the exact location of the find is unknown. These artifacts are nevertheless partof a whole as the inventory of the Kırklareli Museum and are concrete examples of Byzantine Christian culture. The abundance of portable crosses, which we know were used by believers during praying or in daily life to protect against all that is evil, suggests that Constantinople cannot be the only center of production. These artifacts may include locally made crosses.

The Balkan geography, with its miscellaneous ethnic structures and multiplist internal dynamics, is at a different level within the empire. The proximity of this geography, which is located on the borderline of the capital, to Constantinople brought along many factors. Spread of Christianity in the Balkans took place at different times. Occupation, migration, warfare, trade and cultural relations between Southeastern Europe and Anatolia through the ages must have influenced the Christian heritage of the region. It has been observed that some of the artifacts belonging to Kırklareli and its surroundings, which are located in the Thrace Region today, are not only of Constantinople or Anatolian origin but also of Balkan origin. Reliquary 11 is based on the Heraklia-Perinthos digging in Tekirdağ; Reliquary 14 is based on the Varna National Museum in Bulgaria, Reliquary 15 is based on the Athos/Vatopedi Monastery find, the Pernik Bulgarian Medieval Castle digging find, the Sofia National Museum, the Belgrade National Museum and the Budapest National Museum. Reliquary 16 is similar to the digging finds from Prosek Castle in Macedonia, the Benaki Museum in Athens and the Hungarian National Museum in Budapest and Reliquary 17 is similar to the Anatolian examples, as well as the Ukrainian and Athens-Canellopoulos Museum examples.

No. 10 pendant/encolpion is the only one among the metal crosses of the Kırklareli Museum with its four-leaf clover form. Encolpions are dated mainly to the late 10th and early 11th centuries, with examples appearing in the neighboring lands of the empire (Georgia, Bulgaria, Greece, Ukraine). They are thought to have been sent as gifts from the capital or made by local producers in lands outside the empire in response to popular demand. The pendant/encolpion in the Kırklareli Museum may have originated in Constantinople or it may be made in the Balkan region.


PDF View

References

  • Acara Eser, Meryem. “Hristiyanlıkta Haç Kültü ve Ankara Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi Koleksiyonunda Bulunan Bir Grup Haç.” Bizans ve Çevre Kültürler Prof. Dr. Yıldız Ötüken’e Armağan. Ed. Sema Doğan ve Mine Kadiroğlu. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Kültür ve Sanat Yayıncılık, 2010, 27-43. google scholar
  • Acara Eser, Meryem. “Komana Kazısı Metal Buluntularından Bir Grup: Röliker Haçlar.” Komana Ortaçağ Yerleşimi. Ed. Deniz Burcu Erciyas ve Mustafa Nuri Tatbul. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2015, 167-180. google scholar
  • Acara Eser, Meryem. “Liturjide ve Günlük Kullanımda Maden Sanatı.” Kalanlar, 12. ve 13. Yüzyıllarda Türkiye’de Bizans. Ed. Ayla Ödekan. İstanbul: Vehbi Koç Vakfı Yayınları, 2007, 37-42. google scholar
  • Acara Eser, Meryem. “Objects from Daily Life at Komana: Jewelry.” Komana Small Finds. Haz. Burcu Erciyas ve Meryem Acara Eser. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2019, 77-103. google scholar
  • Acara, Meryem. “Bizans Ortodoks kilisesinde Liturji ve Liturjik Eserler.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (1) (1998): 183-201. google scholar
  • Albayrak, Kadir. “Dinsel Bir Sembol Olarak Haç’ın Tarihi.” Dini Araştırmalar 7(19) (2004): 105129. google scholar
  • Altun, Feride İmrana. “Bandırma Arkeoloji Müzesi’nde Yer Alan Bizans Dönemine Ait Bronz Haçlar.” DEÜ Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 7(1) (2020): 133-151. google scholar
  • Böhlendorf-Arslan, Beate. “Das Bewegliche Inventar eines Mittelbyzantinischen Dorfes: Kleinfunde aus Boğazköy.” Byzantine Small Finds in Archaeological Contexts BYZAS. Ed. Beate Böhlendorf-Arslan ve Alessandra Ricci. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2012, 351-368. google scholar
  • Buyruk, Hasan. “Silifke Müzesi’ndeki Haç Rölikerler.” Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7(33) (2014): 504-512. google scholar
  • Campbell D. Sheila ve Anthony Cutler. “Enkolpion.” Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Ed. Alexander Kazdan. 1. cilt. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 700. google scholar
  • Cleymans, Sam ve Peter Talloen. “Protection in Life and Death: Pendant Crosses from the Cemetery of Apollo Klarios at Sagalassos, Turkey.” European Journal of Archaeology 21(2) (2018): 280298. google scholar
  • Çakmakçı, Zeynep. “Şükrü Tül Eski Eser Koleksiyonu’ndaki Bizans Dönemi Madeni Eserleri.” Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Kültür Envanteri Dergisi TÜBA-KED 15 (2017): 45-61. google scholar
  • Elyiğit, Ufuk. “Bursa Arkeoloji Müzesi’ndeki Madeni Haç Örnekleri.” Art-Sanat 18 (2022): 173200. Doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2022.18.1090632 google scholar
  • Frazer, M. E. ve Anthony Cutler. “Reliquary.” Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Ed. Alexander Kazdan. 1.cilt. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 1782-1783. google scholar
  • Gül, Ahmet. Haçın Hristiyan Teolojisindeki Yeri ve Önemi. Mardin: Şırnak Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018. google scholar
  • Kalavrezou, Ioli. “Reliquary Enkolpion.” Byzantium 330-1453. Ed. Robin Cormack ve Maria Vassilaki. Londra: Royal Academy Publications, 2008. google scholar
  • Karpozilos, Apostolos ve Anthony Cutler. “The Cross in Everyday Life.” Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Ed. Alexander Kazdan. 1. cilt. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 551 google scholar
  • Koçyiğit, Oğuz. “Erimtan Arkeoloji ve Sanat Müzesi Bizans Dönemi Maden Haçları.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 35(2) (2018): 110-121. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, Gülgün ve Hüseyin Vural. “Sinop-Dikmen Nekropolü Kazılarında Ortaya Çıkarılan Geç Roma-Bizans Dönemi Takıları.” 20. Uluslararası Ortaçağ Türk Dönemi Kazıları ve Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları Sempozyumu. 1. Cilt. Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2017, 348-357. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, Gülgün. “Rezan Has Müzesindeki Örnekleri Işığında Geç Roma-Bizans Döneminde Tılsımlar.” Akdeniz Sanat 13 (2019): 399-424. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, Gülgün. “Yumuktepe Höyüğü Kazılarından Ortaçağ Takıları.” 13. Ortaçağ-Türk Dönemi Kazıları ve Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları Sempozyumu. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2010, 417-426. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, Gülgün. Anadolu Uygarlıklarında Takı. İstanbul: Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınları, 2004. google scholar
  • Maremveliotaki, Efi. “Copper-alloy Pectoral Cross.” Everyday Life in Byzantium, Byzantine Hours. Works and Days in Byzantium. Haz. Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi. Athens, 2002, 499. google scholar
  • Metin, Hüseyin. “Burdur Müzesi’nden Bir Röliker Haç.” Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 24 (2019), 414-415. google scholar
  • Okuyucu, Demet. “Erzurum Arkeoloji Müzesinde Bulunan Bizans Dönemine Ait Bir Grup Madeni Haç.” Art-Sanat 19 (2023): 365-392. Doi:10.26650/artsanat.2023.19.1155760 google scholar
  • Özdemir, Hatice ve Gökçen Kurtuluş Öztaşkın. “Denizli Arkeoloji Müzesi’nde Yer Alan Bizans Dönemi Maden Haçlarından Bir Grup.” XIII. Ortaçağ ve Türk Dönemi Kazıları ve Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2009, 489-499. google scholar
  • Paisidou, Melina. “Copper-alloy Pectoral Cross.” Everyday Life in Byzantium, Byzantine Hours. Works and Days in Byzantium. Ed. Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi. Athens, 2002, 500. google scholar
  • Pitarakis, Brigitte. Les Croix-Reliquaries Pectorales Byzantines En Bronze. Paris: Picard, 2006. google scholar
  • Podskalsky, Gerhard. “Cross.” Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. 1. cilt. Ed. Alexander Kazdan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991. google scholar
  • Rice, Tamara Talbot. Bizans’ta Günlük Yaşam. Bizans’ın Mücevheri Konstantinopolis. Çev. Bilgi Altınok. İstanbul: Özne Yayınları, 1998). google scholar
  • Ünal, Ceren. “Balıkesir, Kuva-yi Milliye Müzesi’nden II. Nikephoros Phokas (963-969) Dönemine Ait Nadir Gümüş Sikke Miliaresion.” Ege Üniversitesi Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 24/1 (2016): 114-115. google scholar
  • Ünal, Ceren ve Zeynep Çakmakçı. “Haluk Perk Müzesi’nden Örnekler Eşliğinde Bizans İmparatorluğu Döneminde İnanç, Münzevi Yaşam, Hac ve Hacılık Kavramları.” Art-Sanat 14 (2020): 495-531. Doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0019 google scholar
  • Ünlüler, Yakup. “Kapadokya Bölgesi Müzelerindeki Bizans Dönemine Ait Maden Haçlar.” Yüksek lisans tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, 2019. google scholar
  • Westphalen, Stephan. “Kleinfunde aus der Basilikagrabung am Kalekapı in Marmara Ereğlisi (Herakleia Perinthos).” Byzantine Small Finds in Archaeological Contexts BYZAS. Ed. Beate Böhlendorf-Arslan ve Alessandra Ricci. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2012, 127-137. google scholar
  • Yaşar, Fatma ve Selim Yavuz. “Malatya Arkeoloji Müzesi’ndeki Metal Haçların Değerlendirilmesi.” Inonu University Journal of Art and Design 12 (2022): 62-85. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, Şahin. Makedonya Kulesi Kurtarma Kazıları 2004. 14. Müze çalışmaları ve Kurtarma Kazıları Sempozyumu. 30 Nisan-2 Mayıs 2004 Ürgüp/Nevşehir. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 2005, 243-250. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Uygun Yazıcı, S. (2023). Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum. Art-Sanat, 0(20), 615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


AMA

Uygun Yazıcı S. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum. Art-Sanat. 2023;0(20):615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


ABNT

Uygun Yazıcı, S. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 20, p. 615-642, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Uygun Yazıcı, Selda,. 2023. “Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 20: 615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


Chicago: Humanities Style

Uygun Yazıcı, Selda,. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 20 (Dec. 2023): 615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


Harvard: Australian Style

Uygun Yazıcı, S 2023, 'Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 20, pp. 615-642, viewed 3 Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Uygun Yazıcı, S. (2023) ‘Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum’, Art-Sanat, 0(20), pp. 615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437 (3 Dec. 2023).


MLA

Uygun Yazıcı, Selda,. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 20, 2023, pp. 615-642. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


Vancouver

Uygun Yazıcı S. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 3 Dec. 2023 [cited 3 Dec. 2023];0(20):615-642. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437


ISNAD

Uygun Yazıcı, Selda. Byzantine Metal Crosses in Kırklareli Museum”. Art-Sanat 0/20 (Dec. 2023): 615-642. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1290437



TIMELINE


Submitted02.05.2023
Accepted14.07.2023
Published Online01.08.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.