Research Article


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084    Full Text (PDF)

A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results)

Ercan Verim

Hadrianopolis is an important Southern Paphlagonian ancient city within the borders of Eskipazar district of Karabük. As a result of the excavations that have been going on since 2003, the ruins of seven buildings, date to the Early Byzantine period were discovered in the city. The one of them called as The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel, is also the subject of this article. Its location, architectural characteristics and findings indicate that it was an administrative or military building. Its construction has been completed in two stages, the first construction was in the Roman period, probably around the 2nd-3rd century AD. and it was destroyed at the beginning of the Early Byzantine period between the 4th and 5th centuries and rebuilt with the cross-in-square plan. The cross-in-square plan was common in Byzantine architecture mostly in religious buildings such as churches, martyrium and mausoleums. The cross-in square planned building adressed in this article had an administrative or military function. Besides the rarity of its type of plan in the Early Byzantine period, its military or administrative function makes it more particular as a cross-in-squared planned building of this era. In this study, the history, architectural characteristics and findings of the building were explained in detail, and suggestions about its function were presented and the importance of the building in Byzantine architecture is tried to be emphasized.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084    Full Text (PDF)

Paphlagonia’dan Yeni Bir Keşif: Hadrianopolis İç Kalesi’ndeki Kare İçinde Haç Planlı Yapı (İlk Tespitler)

Ercan Verim

Hadrianopolis, Karabük’ün Eskipazar ilçesi sınırlarındaki önemli bir Güney Paphlagonia kentidir. 2003 yılından beri süregelen kazı çalışmalarıyla, kentte hepsi Erken Bizans Dönemi’ne tarihlendirilen yedi yapı ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bunlardan biri de bu çalışmanın konusu olan ve Hadrianopolis İç Kalesi’ndeki Kare İçinde Haç Planlı Yapı olarak adlandırılan yapıdır. Epigrafik

kaynakların eksikliği ve kazı çalışmalarındaki buluntuların yetersizliği, yapının kim tarafından, hangi tarihte yaptırıldığı veya hangi işlevde kullanıldığı konusunda net bilgiler verilmesini engellemektedir. Bulunduğu konum, mimari özellikleri ve buluntular, idari veya askerî işlevli bir yapı olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Yapının iki farklı inşa evresi bulunmaktadır. İlk olarak

Roma Dönemi’nde, muhtemelen 2.-3. yüzyıl civarında inşa edilmiş, Erken Bizans Dönemi başlarında büyük ihtimalle 4.-5. yüzyıl arasında yıkılmış ve kare içinde haç planlı olarak yeniden yapılmıştır. Kare içinde haç plan, Bizans mimarlığında daha çok kilise, martyrium ve mausoleum gibi dinî işlevli yapılarda uygulanmıştır. Bu yayında tanıtılan kare içinde haç planlı yapı

ise idari veya askerî işlevlidir. Erken Bizans Dönemi’ne tarihlenen az sayıdaki kare içinde haç planlı yapılardan biri olmasının yanında, idari veya askerî işlevli yapıda bu plan tipinin uygulanması, yapıyı Bizans mimarlığı içerisinde önemli kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yapının tarihi, mimari özellikleri ve buluntuları detaylı şekilde açıklanarak işlevine dair öneriler sunulmuş ve yapının Bizans mimarlığındaki önemi vurgulanmaya çalışılmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Hadrianopolis is an important Paphlagonian city, located in Eskipazar district of Karabük, in the Western Black Sea region. Although archaeological data show that the settlement in Hadrianopolis dates back to the Chalcolithic Age, Hadrianopolis gained city status during the Roman period. Calamities such as wars or earthquakes that occured in the Late Antiquity, probably around the 3rd-4th centuries, caused massive damage in the city, and Hadrianopolis was rebuilt at the beginning of the Early Byzantine period. As an outcome of the excavations that have been going on since 2003, the ruins of seven buildings, date to the Early Byzantine period were discovered in the city borders. The one of them called as The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel, is also the subject of this article. It was discovered for the first time during archaeo-geophysical studies carried out in 2013. During the studies in 2013, it was concluded that the building was designed with cross-in-square plan, and it was suggested that it possibly functioned as a martyrium or mausoleum, based on that some tombs of Early Byzantine period such as the martyrium were constructed with the cross-in-square plan. Scientific excavations started in 2020, and the building was uncovered in 2022 completely. The lack of epigraphic resourches and insufficiency of the findings recovered in the excavations, prevent us to access exact information about when and by whom it was built, and for what was its function.

The building, located in the north-east of Hadrianopolis Citadel, is largely in destroyed. It’s not possible to access detailed information about the first phase of the building. The ruins deducted as from the first phase are the blocks found between the north, east and west cross arms and in the northeast room. The blocks discovered on the floor of building are placed parallel to each other so as to form a channel. The recovered ruins prevent us to attain exact information about its function in the first phase. The fact that there is a channel with its blocks water flew through, suggests that the building was a latrina in the Roman period. Probably there were some wooden arrangements above the channel and so it was served as a latrina. Considering the stratigraphy of the excavation area, it can be said that the construction of the building was around the 2nd-3rd century AD.

The building, which was reconstructed in the Early Byzantine period, was designed as cross-in-square plan in this phase. However its impossible to determine the exact time of this transformation of the main plan, it can be argued, based on the findings discovered during the excavations and the stratigraphy of the area, that the building was rebuilt with cross-in-sqaure plan as a conclusion of the designation of a new purpose to it, around the 4th-5th century. The building has a square plan, measuring 16,75 x 16,55 meter from the outside, and has a cross-in-square plan inside, which measures 14,60 x 14,40 meter. The building contains four rectangular cross arms point to the north, south, east and west, and also quadrangular rooms in different sizes in its four corners. At the intersection of the cross arms, there is a rectangular center, measuring 5,60 x 5,30 meter, which seems to be most important part of the building, and reached through the arms of the cross. In order to emphasize the importance of the central part, arched transitions rising on rectangular shaped pillars were constructed in the places that provide the transition from the cross arms to the central part.

The cross-in-square plan was commonly applied in the religious buildings such as churches, baptisterium, mausoleum and martyrium in Byzantine architecture. Although it has cross-in-square plan, the building in question doesn’t have religious function. The findings discovered during the excavations don’t provide a definite information about the function, but give clues which indicate that it was a building with civil, military and administrative purpose. Firstly, the building is located in the citadel, indicates that it was a military building for the first time. The findings such as pieces of armor probably of a soldier or high-ranking official, perhaps an administrator, and an iron mask belonging to a cavalry, suggest a possible military purpose for the building. The facts that it was a sheltered building with a few doors, and contains many pithos and mortars, found in the northwest room, possibly for storing food, indicate

that the building might have been used as a horreum. Horreums of Late Antiquity, where grain and rations were stored, were usually located in the central areas of cities.

These buildings had a few doors and windows and protected by soldiers to ensure the safety of the materials and food stored inside. When its location, architectural characteristics

and findings recovered from the excavations were taken in consideration all together, it is reasonable to argue that it was a horreum. A lead weight found in the southern cross arm inside the building, also provides clues go along with the argument above. There is an inscription of a phrase on the front face of the weight, may be read as the name Theodoros, who was probably the official responsible for treasury affairs of the Byzantine empire. Although it is not clearly evident because of the conditions of the inscriptions, it can be presumed that Theodoros was the official with the title of “comes sacrarum largitionum”. It is arguable that Theodoros had sent this weight to an officer probably with title of horreiarios or kommerkiarios in charge of building, so that he could carry out his civic duty in Hadrianopolis properly. All this data are also go along with the argument that the building had been used an administrative or commercial building.

These study presents the architectural characteristics of the building in detail, and through the discussion emphasizing its plan, tries to explain and determine its importance in Byzantine architecture. It also takes the findings discovered during the excavations, the location of the building and its architectural characteristics into consideration and evaluated together, and finally offer some suggestions regarding its function, because it hasn’t been clearly detected yet.


PDF View

References

  • Alp, Ahmet Oğuz. “The Newly Discovered Middle Byzantine Churches from Phyrgia.” Architecture of Byzantium and Kievan Rus from the 9th to the 12th Centuries. Ed. Hans Buchwald. St. Petersburg: The State Hermitage Puplishers, 2010, 9-20. google scholar
  • Altripp, Michael. “Beobachtungen zu Synthronoi und Kathedren in Byzantinischen Kirchen Griechenland.” Bulletin de Correspondence Hellenique 124/1 (2000): 377-412. google scholar
  • Aydın, Ayşe. “Dağlık Kilikia Bölgesi Geç Antik Dönem Kırsal Yerleşimlerindeki Hıristiyan Dini Yapıları ve İşlevleri.” Antik Dönemde Akdeniz’de Kırsal ve Kent. Ed. Ümit Aydınoğlu ve Ahmet Mörel. Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2017, 78-94. google scholar
  • Brandes, Wolfram. Die Stadte Kleinasiens im 7. Und 8. Jahrundert. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben Verlag, 1989. google scholar
  • Buchwald, Hans. “Imitation in Byzantine Architecture-An Outline.” Studien zur Byzantinischen Kunst un Geschichte Festschrift für Marcell Restle. Ed. Birgitt Barkopp ve Thomas Steppan. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 2000, 39-55. google scholar
  • Cheynet, Jean-Claude. “İmparatorluk Yönetimi.” Bizans Dünyası: Bizans İmparatorluğu (6411204). Çev. Aslı Bilge. Ed. Jean-Claude Cheynet. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları: 2018, 132-154. google scholar
  • Curcic, Slobodan. “Architectural Significance of Subsidiary Chapels in Middle Byzantine Churches.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 36/2 (1977): 94-110. google scholar
  • Çelikbaş, Ersin ve Ercan Verim. “Hadrianoupolis Kuzeybatı Nekropol Kilisesi’nin Bema ve Apsisi Mozaikleri.” JMR 14 (2021): 79-99. Erişim 20 Nisan 2023, https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.930827. google scholar
  • Davies, Nikolas ve Erkki Jokiniemi. Dictionary of Architecture and Building Construction. Oxford: Elsevier Architectural Press, 2008. google scholar
  • Diehl, Charles. Maneul d’art Byzantine. Paris: Libraire Alphonse Picard et Fills, 1925. google scholar
  • Eliüşük, Mevlüt ve Gülçin Karakaş. “Paphlagonia Hadrianopolisi’nde Kare Planlı Yapı’da Bulunan Pontic Sigillata Grubu Seramikleri.” TÜBA-AR 30 (2022): 203-220. google scholar
  • Er, Yasemin. Klasik Arkeoloji Sözlüğü. Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi, 2017. google scholar
  • Eyice, Semavi. “Akkale in der Nahe von Elaiussa-Sebaste (Ayaş).” Studien Zur Spatantiken und Byzantinischen Kunst: Friedrich Wilhelm Deichman Gewidmet, Teil 1. Ed. Otto Feld ve Urs Peschlow. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GMBH, 1986, 63-76. google scholar
  • Eyice, Semavi. “Amasra Büyükada’sında Bir Bizans Kilisesi.” Belleten 15/60 (1951): 469-496. google scholar
  • Grabar, Andre. Martyrium, Recherces sur le Culte des Relique et l’art Chretien Antique, Volume I: Architecture. Paris: College de France, 1946. google scholar
  • Hoddinott, F. Ralp. Early Byzantine Churches in Macedonia and Southern Serbia: A Study of the Origins and the Initial Development of East Christian Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press INC., 1963. google scholar
  • Kalkan, Emrullah ve Ersin Çelikbaş. “New Findings from Prehistoric Period in Western Black Sea Region: Hadrianopolis (Karabük-Eskipazar) Prehistoric Potterys.” KAREN 8/16 (2022): 417-431. Erişim 19 Nisan 2023, https://doi.org/10.31765/karen.1163578. google scholar
  • Kazdhan, P. Alexander ve Anthony Kutler. “Comes Sacrarum Largitionum.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. 1. cilt. Ed. Alexander P. Kazhdan, Alice-Mary Talbot, Anthony Cutler, Timothy E. Gregory ve Nancy P. Sevcenko. New York-Oxford: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 486. google scholar
  • Kazdhan, P. Alexander ve Nicolas Oikonomides. “Kommerkiarios.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. 2. cilt. Ed. Alexander P. Kazhdan, Alice-Mary Talbot, Anthony Cutler, Timothy E. Gregory ve Nancy P. Sevcenko. New York-Oxford: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 1141. google scholar
  • Keleş, Vedat, Ersin Çelikbaş ve Alper Yılmaz. “Paphlagonia Hadrianopolis’i.” Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü 40. Kuruluş Yılı Armağanı: Anadolu’nun Zirvesinde Türk Arkeolojisinin 40 Yılı. Haz. Hasan Kasapoğlu ve Mehmet Ali Yılmaz. Ankara: Bilgin Kültür Sanat Yayınları, 2014, 271-290. google scholar
  • Krautheimer, Richard. Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd., 1965. google scholar
  • Laiou, E. Angeliki ve Cecile Morrisson. The Byzantine Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Lefort, Jacques. “The Rural Economy, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries.” The Economic History of Byzantium: From the Seventh through the Fifteenth Century. 1. cilt. Ed. Angeliki E. Laiou. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks, 2002, 225-310. google scholar
  • Mango, Cyril. Bizans Mimarisi. Çev. Mine Kadiroğlu. Ankara: Rekmay Ltd. Şt., 2006. google scholar
  • Mango, Cyril. Byzantine Architecture. Milan: Electa Editrice, 1978. google scholar
  • McGeer, Eric, John Nesbitt ve Nicolas Oikonomides. Catalogue of the Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art: The East. 4.cilt. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2001. google scholar
  • Morrisson, Cecile. “Başkent.” Bizans Dünyası: Doğu Roma İmparatorluğu 330-641. Çev. Aslı Bilge. Ed. Cecile Morrisson. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2014, 201-210. google scholar
  • Mörel, Ahmet. “Doğu Dağlık Kilikia Bölgesi’nde (Isauria) Bir Liman Yerleşimi: Akkale.” Antik Dönemde Akdeniz’de Kırsal ve Kent. Ed. Ümit Aydınoğlu ve Ahmet Mörel. Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2017, 95-121. google scholar
  • Nesbitt, John ve Nicolas Oikonomides. Catalogue of Byzantines seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art: West, Northwest and Central Asia Minor and the Orient. 3. cilt. Washington DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1996. google scholar
  • Orlandos, Anastasios. “H OTaupiKn BaoıXiKq thÇ ©aooy (He staurike basilike tes Thasu).” Apxeıov Tav BuZavTivav Mvn^nıav TnçE^aâoç To/ıoç Z' (Archeion ton byzantinon mnemeion tes Hellados). Aönvaıç (Atina): TvnoYa^sıov Eotıa (Hestia Yayınevi), 1951, 3-61. google scholar
  • Pekak, Mustafa Sacit. “Kappadokia’da Bizans Dönemine Ait Haç Planlı İki Kilise.” Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 17/2 (2008): 85-113. google scholar
  • Pekak, Mustafa Sacit. Trilye (Zeytinbağı) Fatih Camisi (Bizans Kapalı Yunan Haçı Planı). İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2009. google scholar
  • Ramsay, William Mitchell ve Gertrude Lowthian Bell. The Thousand and One Churches. Londra: Hodder and Stoughton, 1909. google scholar
  • Schmitz, Leonhard. “Horrea’rii/Horreum.” Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Ed. William Smith. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1859, 618. google scholar
  • Soykan, A. Nazlı. “Kappadokia Bölgesindeki Kapalı Yunan Haçı Planlı Kagir Kiliselerin Mimari Özellikleri Açısından İrdelenmesi.” Akademik Sanat; Sanat, Tasarım ve Bilim Dergisi 4/7 (2019): 44-64. google scholar
  • Verim, Ercan ve Oğulcan Avcı. “Çeltikdere’de Kapalı Yunan Haçı Planlı Bir Kilise.” History Studies 9/2 (2017): 235-256. Erişim 15 Nisan 2023. https://doi.org/10.9737/hist.2017.533. google scholar
  • Verim, Ercan. “Batı Karadeniz Bizans Dönemi Mimarisi (Bartın-Bolu-Düzce ve Zonguldak).” Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, 2022. google scholar
  • Verim, Ercan. “Hadrianopolis Antik Kenti’nden Bir Grup Erken Bizans Dönemi Sütun Başlığı.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 55 (2022): 183200. google scholar
  • Verim, Ercan. “Paphlagonia’da Bir Piskoposluk Merkezi: Hadrianoupolis Antik Kenti.” Uluslararası Geçmişten Günümüze Karabük ve Çevresinde Dini, İlmi ve Kültürel Hayat Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı. Ed. Ayhan Işık, Tuğba Aydeniz ve İbrahim Hakkı İmamoğlu. Karabük: Karabük Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2019, 276-289. google scholar
  • Wullf, Oscar. Altchristliche und Byzantinische Kunst, Volume II: Die Byzantinische Kunst von der ersten Blüte bis zu ihrem Ausgang. Berlin-Potsdam: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion M. B. H, 1914. google scholar
  • Zacos, George ve Alexander Veglery. Byzantine Lead Seals. 2. cilt. Basel: J. J. Augustin, Glückstadt, Est.-Ger., 1972. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Verim, E. (2023). A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results). Art-Sanat, 0(20), 703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


AMA

Verim E. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results). Art-Sanat. 2023;0(20):703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


ABNT

Verim, E. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results). Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 20, p. 703-731, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Verim, Ercan,. 2023. “A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results).” Art-Sanat 0, no. 20: 703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


Chicago: Humanities Style

Verim, Ercan,. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results).” Art-Sanat 0, no. 20 (Sep. 2024): 703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


Harvard: Australian Style

Verim, E 2023, 'A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results)', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 20, pp. 703-731, viewed 8 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Verim, E. (2023) ‘A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results)’, Art-Sanat, 0(20), pp. 703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084 (8 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Verim, Ercan,. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results).” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 20, 2023, pp. 703-731. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


Vancouver

Verim E. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results). Art-Sanat [Internet]. 8 Sep. 2024 [cited 8 Sep. 2024];0(20):703-731. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084


ISNAD

Verim, Ercan. A New Discovery from Paphlagonia: The Cross-in-Square Planned Building in Hadrianopolis Citadel (First Results)”. Art-Sanat 0/20 (Sep. 2024): 703-731. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1293084



TIMELINE


Submitted05.05.2023
Accepted14.07.2023
Published Online01.08.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.