Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jes.2024.1489520   IUP :10.26650/jes.2024.1489520    Full Text (PDF)

Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations

Fuat Aksu

Since 1923, 14 of Turkey's foreign policy crises have occurred directly or indirectly with Greece. Although the crises were prevented before turning into an allout war between the parties, reaching a permanent solution to the disputes was impossible. The disputes between Turkey and Greece are related but also have different characteristics. Many factors make it difficult to resolve these disputes through peaceful resolution methods. The uniqueness of geography, the emergence of technological innovations that require redefining the sovereign rights of states, and the disruption of the delicate balance established by statusestablishing agreements with actual violations are some of these. In addition to these, the negativities created by the historical legacy, negative perceptions regarding identity and intention, the instrumentalization of disputes in domestic and foreign policy and the influence of third actors should not be ignored. In addition, the positive and negative guiding effects of the leaders in the two countries and the actors who have the potential to influence public opinion can also be mentioned. This study will focus on the contractual law dimension of the disputes regarding maritime jurisdictions between the parties, how they interpret the concepts of sovereignty and sovereign rights, and their attempts to change the status quo with fait accompli. The sovereignty of the islands surrounding Anatolia, the problems encountered in determining their jurisdictions, and the differences of opinion that make the solution to these problems difficult will be discussed.

DOI :10.26650/jes.2024.1489520   IUP :10.26650/jes.2024.1489520    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye-Yunanistan İlişkilerinde Deniz Yetki Alanı Uyuşmazlıkları

Fuat Aksu

1923’ten günümüze Türkiye’nin dış politika krizlerinden 14’ü doğrudan-dolaylı olarak Yunanistan’la yaşanmıştır. Krizler taraflar arasında topyekûn bir savaşa dönüşmeden engellenmiş olsa da uyuşmazlıkları kalıcı bir çözüme ulaştırmak mümkün olmamıştır. Türkiye’yle Yunanistan arasındaki uyuşmazlıklar birbiriyle ilintili ama aynı zamanda farklı özelliklere sahiptir. Bu uyuşmazlıkların barışçıl çözüm yöntemleriyle çözülebilmesini güçleştiren pek çok etkenden söz edilebilir. Coğrafyanın kendine özgülüğü, devletlerin egemenlik haklarını yeniden tanımlamayı gerektiren teknolojik yeniliklerin ortaya çıkması, statü kuran antlaşmaların kurduğu hassas dengenin fiili ihlallerle bozulması bunlardan bazılarıdır. Bunların yanı sıra tarihsel mirasın yaratmış olduğu olumsuzluklar, kimlik ve niyete ilişkin olumsuz algılar, iç ve dış politikada uyuşmazlıkların araçsallaştırılması ve üçüncü aktörlerin etkisini de yadsımamak gerekir. Buna ek olarak iki ülkedeki liderlerin ve kamuoyunu etkileme potansiyeline sahip aktörlerin olumlu-olumsuz yönlendirici etkilerinden de söz edilebilir. Bu çalışmada taraflar arasındaki deniz yetki alanlarına ilişkin uyuşmazlıkların ahdi hukuk boyutu, egemenlik ve egemen haklar kavramlarını nasıl yorumladıkları, statükoyu oldubittilerle değiştirme girişimleri üzerinde durulacaktır. Anadolu’yu çevreleyen adaların egemenlikleri, yetki alanlarının belirlenmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve bu sorunların çözümünü güçleştiren görüş ayrılıklarının neler olduğu tartışılacaktır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In the process of disintegration of the Ottoman Empire, the emergence of independent nation-states brought along minorities and border problems. A significant part of the disputes between Turkey and Greece today are also related to the contractual arrangements signed by these states during their independence processes. In this study, in addition to the main debates concerning territorial sovereignty between Turkey and Greece, disputes regarding sovereign rights, especially arising from the Law of the Sea, are examined.

In the international community, the borders of sovereign states are necessarily determined by a treaty arrangement. In addition to limitations, special arrangements and obligations such as the demilitarisation of some regions can also be agreed upon between neighboring states. Such arrangements are also in question in determining the territorial borders between Turkey and Greece. For example, it is seen that the islands transferred to Greece by treaties were transferred with the obligation to be demilitarized. On the other hand, the determination of maritime borders as well as land borders may cause disputes between neighbouring states. As a result of technical studies on the determination of the land borders between Turkey and Greece, the land borders between the two countries could be made indisputable. However, since the entry into force of the Lausanne Peace Treaty, there has been no joint work on determining maritime borders between the two countries. Due to the developments in the Law of the Sea, the tendency of states to benefit more from the seas has brought Turkey and Greece, which are coastal countries in the Aegean Sea, against each other in terms of both sovereignty borders and limitation of sovereign rights. The fact that no study has been carried out to determine the boundaries of sovereignty of the maritime country makes it unclear what the limits of the sovereign rights of these countries are. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the limits of sovereign rights regarding maritime jurisdiction areas without determining the common and indisputable border of the maritime country.

In the study, it is discussed how the country transfers were carried out between the two states and how and with what constraints the borders of sovereignty were determined within the framework of the contractual arrangements that created the status. In essence, it can be said that the disputes between Turkey and Greece have three dimensions that are directly related to the contractual status. Accordingly, although there is a contractual arrangement that creates a status, one of the parties may violate this regulation with a fait accompli. Secondly, although it is a general contractual arrangement, either party may interpret the provisions of this regulation differently or the contractual arrangement does not contain a provision regarding the relevant dispute. Thirdly, no contractual arrangement specific to the dispute between the parties has ever been made, and one of the parties is trying to create a de facto situation by making a fait accompli. It is possible to observe these three features in the relations between Turkey and Greece. As a matter of fact, according to the study conducted by the Turkish Foreign Policy Crisis Studies Group, there were 14 foreign policy crises between Turkey and Greece between 1923 and 2016. The vast majority of these crises are directly related to the sovereignty and/ or sovereign rights of the parties.

Therefore, the handling of the existing disputes between the parties by using peaceful resolution methods and reaching a permanent and satisfactory solution is directly related to the parties' compliance with the contractual status, the realization of contractual arrangements that have not yet been realized, and the avoidance of fait accomplis that will escalate the tension between the parties. If the parties try to change the status quo for their benefit, it will not only trigger a new crisis but also increase the risk of a hot military conflict. The starting point for the negotiation is the Lausanne Peace Treaty (and other contractual arrangements) signed between the parties. It is not possible to establish an undisputed sovereignty order without completing the unfinished work of determining the borders of territorial sovereignty. The demarcation of an undisputed territorial border would also make it easier for the parties to agree on more flexible options for sovereign rights and technical responsibilities. In this context, the point that will challenge the parties in the negotiations is due to the originality of the political geography in the Aegean Sea. In particular, both the numerical multiplicity of the islands surrounding the Anatolian coasts and the fact that they belong to Greece, which is a country with a distant coast, restrict the policies of the parties in an equitable, just and optimum solution.

The emergence of independent nation-states during the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire brought with it minority and border problems. A significant part of the disputes between Türkiye and Greece today are related to the contractual arrangements signed by these states during their independence processes. In this study, in addition to the basic debates regarding territorial sovereignty between Turkey and Greece, the disputes regarding sovereign rights arising from the Law of the Sea are examined. 

In the international society, the borders of sovereign states are determined by a contractual regulation. In these contractual arrangements, in addition to limitations, special arrangements and obligations can also be agreed upon between neighbouring states, such as the demilitarisation of some regions. Such regulations also apply to determining the territorial borders between Turkey and Greece. For example, it seems that the islands transferred to Greece through treaties were transferred with the obligation of being demilitarized. On the other hand, determining maritime borders as well as territorial borders may cause disputes between neighbouring states. As a result of technical studies on determining the land borders between Türkiye and Greece, the land borders between the two countries have become indisputable. However, since the Lausanne Peace Treaty came into force, no joint work has been carried out between the two countries regarding determining maritime borders. Due to the developments in the Law of the Sea, states' tendency to benefit more from the seas has brought Turkey and Greece, which are coastal countries in the Aegean Sea, face to face in terms of both sovereignty boundaries and limitation of sovereign rights. The fact that no study has been carried out to determine the borders of sovereignty regarding the maritime country makes it unclear what the limits of the sovereign rights of these countries are. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the boundaries of sovereign rights regarding maritime jurisdiction areas without determining the common and undisputed border of the maritime country.

In the study, how territorial transfers took place between two states is discussed and it is discussed how and with what restrictions the borders of sovereignty are determined within the framework of the contractual regulations that create the status. In essence, it can be said that the disputes between Türkiye and Greece have three dimensions that directly concern the contractual status. Accordingly, although there is a contractual regulation that creates a status, one of the parties may violate this regulation. Secondly, although it is a general contractual regulation, any party may interpret the provisions of this regulation differently or the contractual regulation does not contain a provision regarding the relevant dispute. Thirdly, no contractual regulation has been made specifically for the dispute that has arisen between the parties, and one of the parties is trying to create a de facto situation by making it a fait accompli. It is possible to observe these three features in the relations between Turkey and Greece. As a matter of fact, according to the study conducted by the Turkish Foreign Policy Crisis Investigation Group, there were 14 foreign policy crises between Turkey and Greece between 1923 and 2016. The majority of these crises are directly related to the sovereignty and/or sovereign rights of the parties.

Therefore, addressing the existing disputes between the parties using peaceful resolution methods and reaching a permanent, satisfactory solution is directly related to the parties' compliance with the contractual status, realization of contractual arrangements that have not yet been realized, and avoiding fait accomplis that will escalate the tension between the parties. If the parties attempt to change the status quo to their advantage, it will not only trigger a new crisis but also increase the risk of a hot military conflict. The starting point for negotiations is the Lausanne Peace Treaty (and other contractual arrangements) signed between the parties. It is not possible to achieve an undisputed sovereignty order without completing the unfinished work of determining the borders of territorial sovereignty. Determining an undisputed territorial border will also make it easier for the parties to agree on more flexible options regarding sovereign rights and technical responsibilities. In this context, the point that will challenge the parties in the negotiations stems from the uniqueness of the political geography, especially in the Aegean Sea. In particular, both the numerical abundance of the islands surrounding the Anatolian coast and the fact that they belong to Greece, a distant coastal country, restrict the policies of the parties in an equitable, fair and optimum solution.


PDF View

References

  • Acer, Yücel. Ege’de ve Doğu Akdeniz’de Sınırlandırma Sorunları. İstanbul: SETA Yay., 2021. google scholar
  • Acer, Yücel. “Uluslararası Yargı Kararları Işığında Doğu Akdeniz’de Sınırlandırma Sorunları ve Adaların Etkisi”. Doğu Akdeniz Sempozyumu: Doğu Akdeniz Sorunlarına Hukuki ve Siyasi Yaklaşım ile Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisinin Çözümdeki Muhtemel Rolü. Ankara: TBMM Yay., 2021, 87-112. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/yayinlar/2021/Dogu_Akdeniz_Sempozyumu.pdf [E. Tarihi. 3 Eylül 2022] google scholar
  • Aksu, Fuat. Türk Dış Politikasında Karar Alma ve Kriz Yönetimi Süreç Analizi. İstanbul: Dış Politika ve Kriz İncelemeleri Yay., 2017. google scholar
  • Aksu, Fuat. “Protracted Conflicts and Foreign Policy Crises in Turkish Foreign Policy”. R. Kutay Karaca and Fatma Zeynep Özkurt (Eds.). New Concepts and New Conflicts in Global Security Issues. İstanbul: İstanbul Gelişim University Press, 2017, 65-98. google scholar
  • Başeren S. Hami. (1998). “Ege’de Ada, Adacık ve Kayalıkların Uluslararası Andlaşmalarla Tayin Edilen Hukuki Statüsü”. Ali Kurumahmut (Y. Haz.). Ege’de Temel Sorun: Egemenliği Tartışmalı Adalar. (ss. ss.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay. 1998, 82-115. google scholar
  • Başeren, Sertaç Hami. Ege Sorunları. İstanbul: TÜDAV Yay. 2006. google scholar
  • Başeren, Sertaç Hami. “Doğu Akdeniz: Deniz Yetki Alanları Sorunları”. 73. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı. 24-28 Mayıs 2021 (Çevrimiçi). Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLLkPWQ5Hws [E. Tarihi. 3 Eylül 2022] google scholar
  • Başeren, Sertaç H. ve Kurumahmut, Ali. (Y. Haz.). Ege’de Egemenliği Devredilmemiş Adalar. Ankara: SAEMK Yay., 2003. google scholar
  • Bostan, İdris ve Kurumahmut, Ali. Trablusgarb ve Balkan Harplerinde İşgal Edilen Ege Adaları ve İşgal Telgrafları. Ankara: SAEMK Yay., 2003. google scholar
  • Bölükbaşı, Deniz. Turkey and Greece : The Aegean Disputes. Cavendish Pub. 2004. google scholar
  • Engin, Vahdettin. “Ege Adaları’nda Tanzimat Dönemi ve Sonrası Mali Uygulamalar (1839-1923)”. İdris Bostan (ed.). Ege Adaları’nın İdari, Mali ve Sosyal Yapısı. Ankara: SAEMK Yay. 2003, 91-114. google scholar
  • Erciyes, Çağatay. “Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Yetki Alanlarının Sınırlandırılması Türkiye’nin Siyasi ve Hukuki Tezleri Sahadaki Uygulamaları”. MFA, Erişim 3 Eylül 2022. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/dogu-akdeniz-deniz-yetki-alanlarinin-sinirlandirilmasi.pdf google scholar
  • Erim, Nihat. Devletlerarası Hukuku ve Siyasi Tarih Metinleri. Cilt 1, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Antlaşmaları. A.Ü. H.F. Yay. 1953. google scholar
  • Kılınç, Salih Uygar. Avrupa Birliği- Eurocontrol Sivil Havacılık Düzenlemeleri ve Türkiye. İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2011. google scholar
  • Kurumahmut, Ali. “Uluslararası Andlaşmalara Göre Ege Adaları’nın Egemenlik Devirleri”. Sertaç Hami Başeren ve Ali Kurumahmut (Y. Haz.). Ege’de Egemenliği Devredilmemiş Adalar. Ankara: SAEMK Yay., 2003, 11-69. google scholar
  • Örenç, A. Fuat. “Ege Adaları’nda İdari Yapı (1830-1923)”. İdris Bostan (ed.). Ege Adaları’nın İdari, Mali ve Sosyal Yapısı. Ankara: SAEMK Yay. 2003, 32-56. google scholar
  • Özman, Aydoğan. (1984). Birleşmiş Milletler III. Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi. (İstanbul: DTO Yayınları, 1984). google scholar
  • Pazarcı, Hüseyin. “Hukuki Açıdan: Ege’deki Deniz Sorunlarında Türk-Yunan Görüşleri”. Ege’de Deniz Sorunları Semineri. A. Ü. SBF Yay., 1986, 79-93. google scholar
  • Pazarcı, Hüseyin. Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, Cilt II. Ankara Turhan Kitapevi, 1999. google scholar
  • Soysal, İsmail. Türkiye’nin Siyasal Andlaşmaları. 1. Cilt (1920- 1945). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., 2000. google scholar
  • Syrigos, Angelos and Dokos, Thanos. Atlas of Greek- Turkish Relations. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www. syrigos.gr/books/Atlas_syrigos_dokos.pdf google scholar
  • Toluner, Sevin. Milletlerarası Hukuk Dersleri: Devletin Yetkisi. Filiz Kitapevi, 1984. google scholar
  • Turan, Şerafettin. “Rodos ve 12 Ada’nın Türk Hakimiyetinden Çıkışı”. Belleten. XXIX, (1965), 113-116. google scholar
  • “2321/23.6.1995 Sayılı Kanun”. Resmi Gazete [Yunanistan], 23 Haziran 1995. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https:// www.et.gr/api/Download_Small/?fek_pdf=19950100136 google scholar
  • “Archipelagic States Practice”. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ila_ study_-_uipdate_on_article_47_in_committee_s_final_first_report_roach_clean_draft_20_june_2015_2_.pdf google scholar
  • “Balkan İtilâfı Devletlerile Bulgaristan Arasında 31 Temmuz 1938 Tarihinde Selânikte İmza Edilen Anlaşmanın Tasdiki Hakkında Kanun”. Resmi Gazete. 12 Ocak 1939, [Sayı 4109]. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. http://www. resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/4109.pdf google scholar
  • “Bern Agreement Between Turkey and Greece”. Turkishgreek.org. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. http://www. turkishgreek.org/index.php/kuetuephane/item/50-bern-agreement-between-turkey-and-greece-11-november-1976 google scholar
  • “Ege Denizi ve Akdeniz’de Petrol Arama Ruhsat Sahaları”. Resmi Gazete. 18 Temmuz 1974, Sayı: 14949. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/14949.pdf google scholar
  • “Law No. 2321/1995”, [Greek] Government Gazette. 1995, 23 June. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.et.gr/ api/DownloadFeksApi/?fek_pdf=19950100136 google scholar
  • “Law of the Sea Bulletin, No.29, 1995”. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.un.org/depts/los/doalos_publications/ LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/bulletinE29.pdf google scholar
  • “Şikago’da 7 Aralık 1944 Tarihinde Akit ve İmza Edilmiş Olan Milletlerarası Sivil Havacılık Anlaşması ile Sivil Havacılık Geçici Sözleşmesi ve Bunların Eklerinin Onanması Hakkında Kanun”. Resmi Gazete, (12 Haziran 1945). Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/6029.pdf google scholar
  • “TBMM’de Temsil Edilen Siyasî Partilerin, Yunanistan’in Ege Denizindeki Karasularının 12 Mile Çıkarılmasına Yönelik Tutumunun Doğuracağı Sonuçların Yunan ve Dünya Kamuoyuna Dostane Duygularla Duyurulmasına İlişkin Önergesi”. TBMM, 8 Haziran 1995. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/ TUTANAK/TBMM/d19/c088/tbmm19088121.pdf google scholar
  • “The Law of the Sea Practice of Archipelagic States”. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www.un.org/depts/los/ LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/publications/E.92.V.3.pdf google scholar
  • “The Treaties of Peace of 1947”. International Law Studies-ILS. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://digital-commons. usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2181&context=ils google scholar
  • “Türk - Yunan Trakya Hududunun Mühim Kısmını Tâyin Eden Meriç Nehri Mecrasının Islahı Dolayısiyle 19 Ocak 1963 Tarihinde İmzalan Protokolün Onaylanmasının Uygun Bulunduğu Hakkında Kanun”. TBMM. 9 Ocak 1967. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/KANUNLAR_KARARLAR/ kanuntbmmc050/kanuntbmmc050/kanuntbmmc05000813.pdf [E. Tarihi. 3 Eylül 2022] google scholar
  • “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümeti ile Yunanistan Krallık Hükümeti Arasında Trakya Hududunun İşaretlenmesi Hakkında Anaprotokol ile Eklerinin Onaylanmasının Uygun Bulunduğuna İlişkin Kanun”. TBMM. 29 Mart 1979. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/KANUNLAR_KARARLAR/ kanuntbmmc062/kanuntbmmc062/kanuntbmmc06202220.pdf google scholar
  • “Türkiye-Yunanistan Meriç Nehri Sınır Düzenlemeleri”, Turkishgreek.org. Erişim 19 Mayıs 2024. http:// www.turkishgreek.org/index.php/kuetuephane/indirilebilir-kaynaklar/summary/19-1926-turkey-greece-boundary-agreement/138-turki-ye-yunani-stan-meri-c-nehri-sinir-duzenlemeleri google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Aksu, F. (2024). Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations. Journal of Eurasian Inquiries, 13(2), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


AMA

Aksu F. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations. Journal of Eurasian Inquiries. 2024;13(2):89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


ABNT

Aksu, F. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations. Journal of Eurasian Inquiries, [Publisher Location], v. 13, n. 2, p. 89-122, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aksu, Fuat,. 2024. “Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations.” Journal of Eurasian Inquiries 13, no. 2: 89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aksu, Fuat,. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations.” Journal of Eurasian Inquiries 13, no. 2 (Oct. 2024): 89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


Harvard: Australian Style

Aksu, F 2024, 'Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations', Journal of Eurasian Inquiries, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 89-122, viewed 11 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aksu, F. (2024) ‘Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations’, Journal of Eurasian Inquiries, 13(2), pp. 89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520 (11 Oct. 2024).


MLA

Aksu, Fuat,. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations.” Journal of Eurasian Inquiries, vol. 13, no. 2, 2024, pp. 89-122. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


Vancouver

Aksu F. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations. Journal of Eurasian Inquiries [Internet]. 11 Oct. 2024 [cited 11 Oct. 2024];13(2):89-122. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520 doi: 10.26650/jes.2024.1489520


ISNAD

Aksu, Fuat. Maritime Jurisdiction Disputes in Turkey-Greece Relations”. Journal of Eurasian Inquiries 13/2 (Oct. 2024): 89-122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jes.2024.1489520



TIMELINE


Submitted24.05.2024
Accepted06.06.2024
Published Online30.09.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.