Research Article


DOI :10.26650/eor.2022873271   IUP :10.26650/eor.2022873271    Full Text (PDF)

Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial

Özlem Sivas YılmazCangül KeskinDuygu H. AcarHikmet Aydemir

Purpose: Postoperative pain is a common complication in endodontics contributed by multiple etiological factors, which consist canal preparation instruments and kinematics. The aim of this randomized clinical trial compare the postoperative pain in terms of intensity and incidence after the use of different nickel titanium (NiTi) file systems. Patients and methods: In this randomized clinical trial (NCT03791762), a total of 150 patients were root canal treated by 2 experienced endodontists according to a standardised protocol. The subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups according to preparation instrument used: ProTaper Next (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Sirona). Following preparation the teeth underwent standardized root canal treatment procedures in a single visit. The patients were contacted to gather information about the incidence of pain and intensity at 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th, and 72nd hours postoperatively. The data were analysed using chi-square, one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests and logistic regression analysis with 5% significance threshold. Results: No significant difference was found among preparation groups in relation to the intensity of postoperative pain. The incidence of postoperative pain was significantly linked with the preoperative pain presence with odds ratio values ranging between 2.06 and 4.08 irrespective of the preparation technique (P<0.05). Conclusion: The effects of reciprocating and the continuous rotary systems on the intenstiy and incidence of postoperative pain were found to be similar.


PDF View

References

  • 1. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Asgary S. Impact of ultrasonic activation on the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite: A review. Iran Endod J 2015;10:216-20. google scholar
  • 2. Nixdorf D R, Moana-Filho E J, Law A S, McGuire L A, Hodges J S, John M T. Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36:224-30. google scholar
  • 3. Walton R, Fouad A. Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence and related factors. J Endod 1992;18:172-7. google scholar
  • 4. Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L. Comparison of post-obturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps:a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 2010;43:692-7. google scholar
  • 5. Ali A, Olivieri J G, Duran-Sindreu F, Abella F, Roig M, Garcia-Font M. Influence of preoperative pain intensity on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: A prospective clinical study. J Dent 2016;45:39-42. google scholar
  • 6. Siqueira J F, Barnett F. Interappointment pain: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Endod Topics 2004;7:93-109. google scholar
  • 7. De-Deus G, Belladonna F G, Souza E M, Vde O A, Silva E J, Rodrigues E, Versiani M A, Bueno C E. Scouting ability of 4 pathfinding instruments in moderately curved molar canals. J Endod 2016;42:1540-4. google scholar
  • 8. Blicher B, Lucier Pryles R. Endodontic pain management: preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative strategies. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020;41:242-3. google scholar
  • 9. Gambarini G. The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system. Endod Topics 2005;10:179-82. google scholar
  • 10. Peters O A. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67. google scholar
  • 11. Pereira E S J, Gomes R O, Leroy A M, Singh R, Peters O A, Bahia M G, Buono V T. Mechanical behavior of M-Wire and conventional NiTi wire used to manufacture rotary endodontic instruments. Dent Mater J 2013;29:318-24. google scholar
  • 12. Adıgüzel M, Capar I D. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne gold small, primary, and large instruments. J Endod 2017;43:623-7. google scholar
  • 13. Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1360-3. google scholar
  • 14. De-Deus G, Silva E J, Vieira V T, Belladonna F G, Elias C N, Plotino G, Grande N M. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017;43:462-6. google scholar
  • 15. Caviedes-Bucheli, J, Moreno J O, Carreño C P, Delgado R, Garcia D J, Solano J, Diaz E, Munoz H R. The effect of single-file reciprocating systems on Substance P and Calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in human periodontal ligament. Int Endod J 2013;46:419-26. google scholar
  • 16. Gambarini, G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande N M, Rubini A G, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2013;4:152-5. google scholar
  • 17. Arslan H, Khalilov R, Doğanay E, Karatas E. The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24:503-8. google scholar
  • 18. Hou X, Su Z, Hou B. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:86. google scholar
  • 19. Shokraneh A, Ajami M, Farhadi N, Hosseini M, Rohani B. Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2017;21:413-8. google scholar
  • 20. Neelakantan P, Sharma S. Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics—a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Invest 2015;19:2211-7. google scholar
  • 21. Kherlakian D, Ehrhardt I C, Zuolo M L, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno C E. Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using 2 reciprocating systems and a continuous rotary system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016;42:171-6. google scholar
  • 22. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38:850-2. google scholar
  • 23. Yared G. Reciproc blue: the new generation of reciprocation. G Ital Endod. 2017;31:96-101. google scholar
  • 24. Topçuoğlu H S, Zan R, Akpek F, Topçuoğlu G, Ulusan Ö, Aktı A, Düzgün S, Ağırnaslıgil M. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49:1183- 7. google scholar
  • 25. Arslan H, Doğanay E, Alsancak M, Çapar I D, Karataş E, Gündüz H A. Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc instruments with various kinematics. Int Endod J 2016;49:307-10. google scholar
  • 26. De-Deus G, Brandao M C, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel R A, Luna A S. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:39-4. google scholar
  • 27. Gambarini G, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Guerra F, Di Giorgio R, Di Giorgio G, Glassman G, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. The influence of a new clinical motion for endodontics instruments on the incidence of postoperative pain. Clin Ter 2017;168:e23-7. google scholar
  • 28. Kashefinejad M, Harandi A, Eram S, Bijani A. Comparison of single visit post endodontic pain using mtwo rotary and hand k-file ınstruments: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran, Iran) 2016;13:10-7. google scholar
  • 29. Mollashahi N F, Saberi E A, Havaei S R, Sabeti M. Comparison of postoperative pain after root canal preparation with two reciprocating and rotary single-file systems: A randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J 2017;12:15-9. google scholar
  • 30. Jain N, Pawar A M, Naganath M, Gupta A, Daryani H. Incidence and severity of postoperative pain after canal instrumentation with reciprocating system, continuous rotary single file system, versus SAF system. Endo Pract (Lond Engl) 2016;10:153-60. google scholar
  • 31. Keskin C, Sıvas Yılmaz O, İnan U, Özdemir Ö. Postoperative pain after glide path preparation using manual, reciprocating and continuous rotary instruments: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J 2019;52:579-82. google scholar
  • 32. Oliveira PS, da Costa KNB, Carvalho CN, Ferreira MC. Impact of root canal preparation performed by ProTaper Next or Reciproc on the quality of life of patients: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J 2019;52:139-48. google scholar
  • 33. Oguntebi B R, DeSchepper E J, Taylor T S, White C L, Pink F E. Postoperative pain incidence related to the type of emergency treatment of symptomatic pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:479-83. google scholar
  • 34. Karataş E, Ersoy İ, Gündüz H A, Uygun A D, Kol E, Çakıcı F. Influence of instruments used in root canal preparation on amount of apically extruded debris. Artif Organs 2016;40:774-7. google scholar
  • 35. Yaylali IE, Demirci GK, Kurnaz S, Celik G, Kaya BU, Tunca YM. Soes maintaining apical patency during instrumentation increase postoperative pain or flare-up rate after nonsurgical root canal treatment? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Endod 2018;44:1228-36. google scholar
  • 36. Abdulrab S, Rodrigues JC, Al-Maweri SA, Halboub E, Alqutaibi AY, Alhadainy H. Effect of apical patency on postoperative pain: A meta-analysis. J Endod 2018;44:1467-73. google scholar
  • 37. Nagendrababu V, Gutmann J L. Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: a systematic review. Quintessence Int 2017;48:193-208. google scholar
  • 38. Siqueira J F, Rôças I N, Favieri A, Machado A G, Gahyva S M, Oliveira J C, Abad E C. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457-60. google scholar
  • 39. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurse 2005;14:798-804. google scholar
  • 40. Price D D, Staud R, Robinson M E. How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales. J Rehabil Med 2012;4:800-1. google scholar
  • 41. Silva E J, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro M R, Coutinho-Filho de S. Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2013;39:173-6. google scholar
  • 42. Kara Tuncer A, Gerek M. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2014;40:38-41. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yılmaz, Ö.S., Keskin, C., Acar, D.H., & Aydemir, H. (2022). Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research, 56(2), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


AMA

Yılmaz Ö S, Keskin C, Acar D H, Aydemir H. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research. 2022;56(2):102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


ABNT

Yılmaz, Ö.S.; Keskin, C.; Acar, D.H.; Aydemir, H. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 56, n. 2, p. 102-109, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, Özlem Sivas, and Cangül Keskin and Duygu H. Acar and Hikmet Aydemir. 2022. “Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial.” European Oral Research 56, no. 2: 102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yılmaz, Özlem Sivas, and Cangül Keskin and Duygu H. Acar and Hikmet Aydemir. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial.” European Oral Research 56, no. 2 (Oct. 2022): 102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


Harvard: Australian Style

Yılmaz, ÖS & Keskin, C & Acar, DH & Aydemir, H 2022, 'Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial', European Oral Research, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 102-109, viewed 5 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, Ö.S. and Keskin, C. and Acar, D.H. and Aydemir, H. (2022) ‘Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial’, European Oral Research, 56(2), pp. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271 (5 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Yılmaz, Özlem Sivas, and Cangül Keskin and Duygu H. Acar and Hikmet Aydemir. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial.” European Oral Research, vol. 56, no. 2, 2022, pp. 102-109. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271


Vancouver

Yılmaz ÖS, Keskin C, Acar DH, Aydemir H. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial. European Oral Research [Internet]. 5 Oct. 2022 [cited 5 Oct. 2022];56(2):102-109. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271 doi: 10.26650/eor.2022873271


ISNAD

Yılmaz, ÖzlemSivas - Keskin, Cangül - Acar, DuyguH. - Aydemir, Hikmet. Comparison of postoperative pain after the use of different nickel-titanium instrumentation systems: A randomized clinical trial”. European Oral Research 56/2 (Oct. 2022): 102-109. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022873271



TIMELINE


Submitted12.08.2021
Accepted16.01.2022
Published Online05.05.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.