Research Article


DOI :10.26650/eor.20231076495   IUP :10.26650/eor.20231076495    Full Text (PDF)

Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites

Büşra Karabulut GençerEzgi AcarBilge Tarçın

Purpose To evaluate color differences in repair of indirect ceramic and resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM blocks with two universal shade composites after different surface preparations. Materials and Methods 120 samples were prepared from IPS Empress and GC Cerasmart270 CAD/ CAM blocks and thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5°C–55°C). Initial colors of sample surfaces were measured using a spectrophotometer. Rectangular prism-shaped cavities were prepared and repaired with Tokuyama Universal Bond/Omnichroma and G-Multiprimer/G-Premio/Essentia Universal following surface preparation with aluminum oxide, Cojet, and bioactive glass (Sylc). Repaired samples were thermocycled (5000 cycles) and color measurement was performed. Color coordinates L*a*b* were recorded, and color differences were calculated using the CIELab formula. Color differences between pre-and post-repair (∆E1) and between post-repair and post-aging (∆E2) were determined. Data were analyzed using Three-way ANOVA with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results ∆E1 values in all subgroups exceeded the threshold of 3.3. No significant difference was found between the surface preparation processes regarding ∆E1 values. There was no significant difference between the composites and bonding agents in ∆E1 values, except for Cerasmart/Sylc and Empress/Sylc groups. No statistically significant difference was detected in ∆E2 values between the surface preparation treatments in all groups. (p>0.05). Conclusion Color match of the universal shade composites, which are preferred to increase the esthetic satisfaction and to simplify repair procedures, were found above the acceptable threshold. Post-aging color stability of universal shade composites was below the acceptable threshold.


PDF View

References

  • 1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD-CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 44-56. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 2. Abu-Obaid A, AlMawash A, Alyabis N, Alzaaqi N. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of polishing on the stainability of different CAD-CAM ceramic materials. Saudi Dent J 2019; 32: 135-41. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 3. Lee JH, Kim SH, Yoon HI, Yeo IL, Han JS. Colour stability and surface properties of high-translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing. Eur J Oral Sci 2020; 128: 170-180. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 4. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD-CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1232-4. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 5. Fasbinder DJ. A review of chairside CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Cosmetic Dent 2018; 34: 64-74. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 6. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 382-93. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 7. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529-34. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 8. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspects of CAD/CAM composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 273-5. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 9. Blum IR, Özcan M. Reparative Dentistry: Possibilities and Limitations. Curr Oral Health Rep 2018; 5: 264-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 10. Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A. Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 1205-13. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 11. Bello YD, Di Domenico MB, Magro LD, Lise MW, Corazza PH. Bond strength between composite repair and polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material: Effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 275-79. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 12. Fernandez E, Martin J, Vildosola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordon V, Major I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trials. J Dent 2015; 43: 279-86. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 13. de Carvalho Martins BM, da Silva E, Tavares Pereira Ferreira DM, Rodrigues Reis K, da Silva Fidalgo TK. Longevity of defective direct restorations treated by minimally invasive techniques or complete replacement in permanent teeth: a systematic review. J Dent 2018; 78: 22-30. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 14. FDI World Dental Federation, Repair of restorations: Adopted by the General Assembly: September 2019, San Francisco, United States of America; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ idj.12552 [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 15. Moura DMD,Verissimo AH, Leite Vila-Nova TE, Calderon PS, Özcan M, Assunçâo Souza RO. Which surface treatment promotes higher bond strength for the repair of resin nanoceramics and polymer-infiltrated ceramics? A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021; [Epub ahead of print] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33573835/ [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 16. Eltahlah D, Lynch CD, Chadwick BL, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent 2018; 72: 1-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 17. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10): 1214-24. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 18. Gordan VV, Riley JL, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Dilbone DA, Brotman SG, Gilbert GH; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146(12): 895-903. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 19. Iyer RS, Babani VR, Yaman P, Dennison J. Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multishade composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 394-400. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 20. Vichi A, Fraioli A, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. Influence of thickness on color in multi-layering technique. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 15849. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 21. 0stervemb N, J0rgensen JN, H0rsted-Bindslev P. A New Approach to Compare the Esthetic Properties of Different Composite Materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23: 238-49. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 22. de Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Benalcâzar Jalkh EB, Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33(2): 269276. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 23. Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental and visual valuation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 465-70. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 24. Lowe RA. Omnichroma: one composite that covers all shades for an anterior tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2019; 40: 8-10. google scholar
  • 25. Tokuyama Dental, Omnichroma technical report; Available from: https://www.tokuyama-us.com/omnichroma-dental-composite google scholar
  • 26. Sampaio CS, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Jorquera G. Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 333-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 27. ISO/CIE 11664-4:2019, Colorimetry - Part 4: CIE 1976 L*A*B* Colour Space; Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ ui/#iso:std:iso-cie:11664:-6:ed-1:v1:en google scholar
  • 28. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermalcycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 29. Dozic A, Kleverlaan C, El- Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth colormeasuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 93-100. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 30. Klotz AL, Habibi Y, Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ, Zenthöfer A. Laboratory and clinical reliability of two spectrophotometers. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34(2): 369-373. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 31. Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Shroyer KM, Johnston WM. Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 101-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 32. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 819-22. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 33. Cengiz E, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Karakaya I, Aktore H. Color difference of composite resins after cementation with different shades of resin luting cement. Odontology 2018; 106(2): 181186. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 34. Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 222-31. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 35. Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 178-85. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 36. Suh YR, Ahn JS, Ju SW, Kim KM. Influences of filler content and size on the color adjustment potential of nonlayered resin composites. Dent Mater J 2017; 36: 35-40. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 37. Paravina RD, Westland S, Kimura M, Powers JM, Imai FH. Color interaction of dental materials: blending effect of layered composites. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 903-8. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 38. Lucena C, Ruiz-López J, Pulgar R, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Optical behavior of one-shaded resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2021; 37(5): 840-848. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 39. Arimoto A, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Nishimura K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Translucency, opalescence and light transmission characteristics of light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater 2010; 26(11): 1090-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 40. Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS, Hilton TJ. Microstructural features of current resin composite materials. Curr Oral Health Rep 2014; 1: 205-12. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 41. Fonseca AS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PP, de Menezes LR, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LF. Effect of monomer type on the CC degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 394-401. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 42. Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012; 23: 508-14. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 43. Furuse AY, Mondelli J, Watts DC. Network structures of Bis-GMA/ TEGDMA resins differ in DC, shrinkage-strain, hardness and optical properties as a function of reducing agent. Dent Mater google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Karabulut Gençer, B., Acar, E., & Tarçın, B. (2023). Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites. European Oral Research, 57(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


AMA

Karabulut Gençer B, Acar E, Tarçın B. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites. European Oral Research. 2023;57(1):41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


ABNT

Karabulut Gençer, B.; Acar, E.; Tarçın, B. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 57, n. 1, p. 41-48, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Karabulut Gençer, Büşra, and Ezgi Acar and Bilge Tarçın. 2023. “Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites.” European Oral Research 57, no. 1: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


Chicago: Humanities Style

Karabulut Gençer, Büşra, and Ezgi Acar and Bilge Tarçın. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites.” European Oral Research 57, no. 1 (Dec. 2024): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


Harvard: Australian Style

Karabulut Gençer, B & Acar, E & Tarçın, B 2023, 'Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites', European Oral Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 41-48, viewed 13 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Karabulut Gençer, B. and Acar, E. and Tarçın, B. (2023) ‘Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites’, European Oral Research, 57(1), pp. 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495 (13 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Karabulut Gençer, Büşra, and Ezgi Acar and Bilge Tarçın. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites.” European Oral Research, vol. 57, no. 1, 2023, pp. 41-48. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495


Vancouver

Karabulut Gençer B, Acar E, Tarçın B. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites. European Oral Research [Internet]. 13 Dec. 2024 [cited 13 Dec. 2024];57(1):41-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495 doi: 10.26650/eor.20231076495


ISNAD

Karabulut Gençer, Büşra - Acar, Ezgi - Tarçın, Bilge. Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites”. European Oral Research 57/1 (Dec. 2024): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231076495



TIMELINE


Submitted21.02.2022
Accepted09.08.2022
Published Online31.01.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.