Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628    Full Text (PDF)

An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors

Mehmet SağlamNecla Öykü İyigün

In this study, it is aimed to investigate mediator roles and the effect of a learning organization approach and intellectual capital on organizational ambidexterity and entrepreneurial orientation for the service and production sectors. Snowball and judgemental sampling was used and an online survey form was created as a data collection tool. The data collection process took place between April 5 2019 and June 7 2019. The sample included 378 service and 324 production sector participants. SPSS 21, AMOS 20 and PROCESS 3.1 programs were used for data analysis. In the results of the study, it is concluded that intellectual capital has a partial mediator role in the impact of a learning organization on organizational ambidexterity and the impact value is higher in the production sector. Organizational ambidexterity and intellectual capital have a partial mediator role in the impact of a learning organization on entrepreneurial orientation and the impact values are also higher in the production sector. Finally organizational ambidexterity has a partial mediator role in the impact of intellectual capital on entrepreneurial orientation and the impact values are higher in the service sector. When evaluated in terms of total effects, it was determined that the impact coefficients for the production sector were higher in all research models.


PDF View

References

  • Arıkboğa, Ş. (2003). Entelektüel Sermaye. İstanbul: Derin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Atak, M. ve Atik, İ. (2007). Örgütlerde Sürekli Eğitimin Önemi ve Öğrenen Örgüt Oluşturma Sürecine Etkisi, Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, 3(1), 63-70. google scholar
  • Attar, M. (2014). Üst Düzey Yöneticilerin Liderlik Özelliklerinin Örgütsel Ustalık Düzeyine Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi,Konya),http://acikerisi-marsiv.selcuk.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5909’den erişildi. google scholar
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity in new product innovation, Journal of Marke-ting, 69(4), 61-83. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30166552 google scholar
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psycholo-gical Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 google scholar
  • Bayam, B.Y. (2016). Örgütsel Öğrenme Sürecinde, Örgüt Kültürünün, Çalışanların Öğrenen Örgüt Algılarına Etkisi: Güreş Group, (Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Manisa), Retrieved from https:// tezarsivi.com/orgutsel-ogrenme-surecinde-orgut-kulturunun-calisanlarin-ogrenen-orgut-algilarina-etkisi -gures-group google scholar
  • Benner, M.J., and Tushman, M.L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the producti-vity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi/10.2307/30040711 google scholar
  • Bierly, P., Damanpour, F., and Santoro, M. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481-509. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x google scholar
  • Bodwell, W. and Chermark, T.J. (2012). Organizational Ambidexterity: Integrating Deliberate and Emergent Strategy with Scenario Planning, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193-202. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.004 google scholar
  • Cai, L., Zhu, X.M., and Liu, Y. (2011). Study on the impact of EO on resource acquisition, Studies in Science of Science, 29(4), 601-609. Retrieved from: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KXYJ201104016. htm google scholar
  • Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., and Shashi. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in the develop-ment of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 141,172-194. https://doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.014 google scholar
  • Chen, J., Zhu. Z. and Xie, H.Y. (2004). Measuring Intellectual Capital: A New Model And Empirical Study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410513003 google scholar
  • Covin, J., and Miles, M. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurial and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrep-reneurial: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47-63. google scholar
  • Çömlek, O., Kitapçı, H., Çelik, V., and Özşahin, M. (2012). The effects of organizational learning capacity on firm innovative performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 367-374. google scholar
  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303 google scholar
  • Dzinkovvski, R. (2000). The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction, Mana-gement Accounting. 78(2), 32-36. google scholar
  • Efe, M.N. (2015). Girişimsel Yönelim, Entelektüel Sermaye ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Yeteneklerinin Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkileri, (Beykent Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul), Retrieved from https://te-zarsivi.com/girisimsel-yonelim-entelektuel-sermaye-ve-orgutsel-ogrenme-yeteneklerinin-firma-perform ansi-uzerine-etkileri google scholar
  • Fettahlıoğlu, Ö.O., ve Afşar, A. (2015). Öğrenen Örgüt Boyutlarına Yönelik Algılamaların, Entelektüel Sermaye Algılaması Üzerindeki Yansımaları, International Journal of Social Science, 35(5), 287-300. google scholar
  • Fiske, D.W. (1982). Convergent-discriminant validation in measurements and Research strategies, D. Brin-berg ve L. Kidder (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Fiş, A.M., ve Wasti, S.A. (2009). Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütlerin Girişimcilik Yönelimi İlişkisi, ODTÜ Geliştirme Dergisi, 35(Özel Sayı), 127-164. google scholar
  • Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., and Shalley, C.E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159793 google scholar
  • Hair J. F. J., Black C.W., Babin J.B., Anderson, E.R., and Tatham, L. R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall Inc. google scholar
  • Hughes, M., and Morgan, R. (2007). Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emer-ging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 359-375. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00519.x google scholar
  • İpçioğlu, İ., ve Tunca, M.Z. (2002). Entelektüel Sermayenin Yönetilmesi, Ölçülmesi ve Firma Değerine Etkisi, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2(1), 175-198 google scholar
  • Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1984). Lisrel VI. Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods, Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software. google scholar
  • Kang, S.C., Snell, S.A., and Swart, J. (2012). Options-based HRM, intellectual capital, and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms’ practice group. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 461-486. https:// doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21484 google scholar
  • Khalili, H., Nejadhussein, S., and Fazel, A. (2013). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on innova-tive performance: Study of a petrochemical company in Iran. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 5(3), 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKIC-09-2013-0017 google scholar
  • Kıngır, S., ve Mesci, M. (2007). Öğrenen Organizasyonlar, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(19), 63-81. google scholar
  • Kitapçı. H., and Çelik, V. (2013). Ambidexterity and Firm Productivity Performance: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning Capacity, 9th International Strategic Management Conference, Procedia - So-cial and Behavioral Sciences 99, 1105-1113. google scholar
  • Kocapınar, E.B. (2010). Entelektüel Sermayenin Girişimsel Oryantasyona Etkisi ve Firma Performansıyla İlişkisi, (Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli), Retrieved from https://tezarsivi.com/ entelektuel-sermayenin-girisimsel-oryantasyona-etkisi-ve-firma-performansi-ile-iliskisi google scholar
  • Koç, H., ve Topaloğlu, M. (2010). Yönetim Bilimi, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 1. Baskı, Ankara. google scholar
  • Leana, C.R. and Van Buren, H.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices, Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/259141 google scholar
  • Li, Y.H., Huang, J.W., and Tsai, M.T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440-449. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.004 google scholar
  • Lin, H,E., and McDonough, E.F.(2011). Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity, Ieee Transactions On Engineering Management, 58(3), 497-509 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2092781 google scholar
  • Lubatkin, M.H., Şimşek, Z., Ling, Y., ve Viega, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Mana-gement, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712 google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G.T., and Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632 google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Cogliser, C.C., and Shneider, D.R. (2009). Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: an Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective, Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47-69. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x google scholar
  • Marsick, V.J., and Watkins K.E. (2003). Demonstrating the Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources Journal. 5(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002 google scholar
  • Meydan, C.H., ve Şeşen, H.(2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Mische, M.A. (2001). Strategic Renewal, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. google scholar
  • Nazari, J., Herremans, I.M., Isaac, R.G., Manassian, A., and Kline, T.J.B.(2011). Organizational Culture, Climate and IC: An Interaction Analaysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 224-248. https://doi. org/10.1108/14691931111123403 google scholar
  • Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method (Resources for the Future. Washington, DC). Retrieved from https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~rcarson/ papers/UsingSurveysToValuePublicGoods.pdf google scholar
  • Mooi. E., and Sarstedt, M. (2011). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. New York: Springer. google scholar
  • Na, F., Ma, Q. H., Janine, B., and Patrick, F. (2016). Intellectual capital and organizational ambidexterity in Chinese and Irish professional services firms. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Per-formance, 3(2), 94-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2016-0021 google scholar
  • Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373 google scholar
  • O’Reilly, C.A. and Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/fa-culty/Publication%20Files/07-088.pdf google scholar
  • Özkoç, Ö. (2018). Hastanelerde Marka Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Hastaların Marka Denkliği Algısı ve Hastane Tercihine Etkisi, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul), Retrieved from https://tezarsivi. com/hastanelerde-marka-yonetimi-uygulamalarinin-hastalarin-marka-denkligi-algisi-ve-hastane-tercihin e-etkisi google scholar
  • Özyılmaz, A., and Eser. S. (2013). Ortak Metod Varyansı Nedir? Nasıl Kontrol Edilebilir?, 21.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi. 1. Basım. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 500-508. google scholar
  • Panagopoulos, G. (2016). Aspects of Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Global Strategic Manage-ment, 10(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.20460 google scholar
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., and Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it, AnnualReview of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 google scholar
  • Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., and Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance, Organizational Research Methods, 12, 762-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834 google scholar
  • Sayan, E. (2006). Otomotiv Sektöründe Öğrenen Örgütler, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kocaeli), Retrieved from https://www.ulusaltezmerkezi.net/otomotiv-sektorunde-ogrenen-organizasyonlar/ google scholar
  • Senge, P.M. (2002). Beşinci Disiplin. [Fifth Discipline], (Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahmet Doğukan, Trans.), İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Stam, W., and Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The modera-ting role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy Management Journal, 51, 97-111. https://doi. org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.30744031 google scholar
  • Stevenson, H.H., and Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurial: entrepreneurial management. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 11(5), 17-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486667 google scholar
  • Stewart, T.A. (1997). Entelektüel sermaye: Kuruluşların yeni zenginliği. [Intellectual Capital: The new we-alth of organization], (N. El Hüseyni, Trans.), İstanbul: Mess Yayınları. google scholar
  • Subramaniam, M. and Youndt, M.A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities, The Academy ofManagement Journal, 48(3), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159670 google scholar
  • Şahin, F. (2012). Örgüt Kültürü ve Entelektüel Sermaye İlişkisi: Marmara Bölgesindeki Otel İşletmeleri Örneği, (Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bilecik), Retrieved from http://acikkaynak. bilecik.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11552/112 google scholar
  • Şimşek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 46, 597-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x google scholar
  • Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., and Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods, Journal ofManagement Sciences, 4(2), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.20547/ jms.2014.1704202 google scholar
  • Tran, Q.H. (2013). Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, Organizational Ambidexterity, And Small Firms’ Performance: The Moderating Effect Of Entrepreneurial Orientation, (Doctoral Dissertation). Ava-ilable from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3598513). google scholar
  • Turner, N., Swart, J., and Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and re-search agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x google scholar
  • Tushman, M.L., and O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852 google scholar
  • Yu, R., Jiefang, H.E., and Liu, Z. (2014). The Co-evolution of Organizational Culture Transformation and Ambidextrous Capability: A Strategic Orientation Perspective, Journal of Advanced Management Scien-ce, 2(2), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.2.2.102-105 google scholar
  • Wang, C.L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurial Theory andPractice, 32(4), 635-657. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x google scholar
  • Wang, K.Y., Hermens, A., Huang, K.P., and Chelliah, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizatio-nal Learning On Smes’ Innovation, The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 7(4), 71-81. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8c74/eeb59a4694e2fb67f3716203f31d4249d7ea.pdf google scholar
  • Wasko, M.M.. and Faraj, S.(2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribu-tion in electronic networks of practice, Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Sağlam, M., & İyigün, N.Ö. (2022). An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors. Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


AMA

Sağlam M, İyigün N Ö. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors. Istanbul Business Research. 2022;51(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


ABNT

Sağlam, M.; İyigün, N.Ö. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 51, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sağlam, Mehmet, and Necla Öykü İyigün. 2022. “An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sağlam, Mehmet, and Necla Öykü İyigün. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1 (May. 2022): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


Harvard: Australian Style

Sağlam, M & İyigün, NÖ 2022, 'An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-23, viewed 24 May. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sağlam, M. and İyigün, N.Ö. (2022) ‘An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors’, Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628 (24 May. 2022).


MLA

Sağlam, Mehmet, and Necla Öykü İyigün. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1-23. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


Vancouver

Sağlam M, İyigün NÖ. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 24 May. 2022 [cited 24 May. 2022];51(1):1-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628 doi: 10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628


ISNAD

Sağlam, Mehmet - İyigün, NeclaÖykü. An Investigation of Mediator Roles and the Effects of Learning Organization Approach and Intellectual Capital on Organizational Ambidexterity and Organizations’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Comparison of the Service and Production Sectors”. Istanbul Business Research 51/1 (May. 2022): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.804628



TIMELINE


Submitted03.10.2020
Accepted25.08.2021
Published Online27.01.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.