Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294    Full Text (PDF)

The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance

Göknur ErsarıAtılhan Naktiyok

The main purpose of this study is to examine the role of cost leadership and differentiation strategies in the relationships among entrepreneurial leadership, entrepreneurial mindset, and business performance. The sample of the study consists of 443 managers working in 8 sectors affiliated to the Erzurum Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The data were collected with the help of a survey consisting of Entrepreneurial Leadership Scale developed by Renko et al. (2015), Entrepreneurial Mindset Scale developed by Mathisen and Arnulf (2014), Competitive Strategies Scale developed by Espino-Rodríguez and Lai (2014), and Business Performance Scale adapted to Turkish by Zehir (2016). The data were analyzed by structural equation modeling. According to the research findings, while entrepreneurial mindset has a positive effect on entrepreneurial leadership and business performance; it has been determined that it has no significant effect on cost leadership and differentiation strategies. However, entrepreneurial leadership has a positive effect on business performance, cost leadership, and differentiation strategies. Also, it was concluded that cost leadership and differentiation strategies should not be used together.


PDF View

References

  • Altuntas, G. (2014). Girişimcilik ve stratejik yönetim ilişkisi: Bir stratejik girişimcilik modeli ve testi. Istan-bul Universitesi Isletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 1(2), 103-129. google scholar
  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R D. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation. Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518-550. google scholar
  • Bagheri, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation work behavior and opportunity recognition in high-technology SMEs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(2), 159-166. google scholar
  • Bagheri, A., &Akbari, M. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on nurses’ innovation behavior. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 50(1), 28-35. google scholar
  • Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2012). Strategic Management And Competitive Advantage (Fourth Edition ed.). USA: Pearson. google scholar
  • Beal, R. M., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (2000). Performance implications of aligning CEO functional experienc-es with competitive strategies. Journal of Management, 26(4), 733-762. google scholar
  • Bordean, O. N., Borza, A. I., Nistor, R. L., & Mitra, C. S. (2010). The use of Michael Porter’s generic strategies in the Romanian hotel industry. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 173-178. google scholar
  • Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M. A., & Feng, M. (2017). Manufacturing capability and organizational perfor-mance: The role of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 33-46. google scholar
  • Chheda, K., & Banga, C. (2013). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on performance of small and medium enterprises in India. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 9(2), 34-69. google scholar
  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneur-ship: Critical perspectives on business and management, 3, 5-28. google scholar
  • Currie, G., Humphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D., & McManus, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility?. Public Administration, 86(4), 987-1008. google scholar
  • Çalık, M., Altunışık, R., & Sütütemiz, N. (2013). Bütünleşik pazarlama iletişimi, marka performansı ve pazar performansı ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 9(19), 137-161. google scholar
  • Daft, R. L. (2010). Management (9th ed.). United States: Thomson. google scholar
  • Darling, J. R., & Beebe, S. A. (2007). Effective entrepreneurial communication in organization development: Achiev-ing excellence based on leadership strategies and values. Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 76-93. google scholar
  • David, F., & David, F. R. (2016). Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases. USA: Pearson Educatıon Sa Ebooks. google scholar
  • Dinçer, Ö. (2013). Stratejik Yönetim ve İşletme Politikası (9 ed.). İstanbul: Alfa. google scholar
  • Espino-Rodriguez, T. F., & Lai, P C. (2014). Activity outsourcing and competitive strategy in the hotel industry. The moderator role of asset specificity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 9-19. google scholar
  • Fontana, A., Fontana, A., Musa, S., & Musa, S. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innova-tion management and its measurement validation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2-19. google scholar
  • Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C, & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241-260. google scholar
  • Hill, C. W. (1988). Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: a contingency framework. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 401-412. google scholar
  • Iqbal Sumaya, Mir Ajaz Akbar. (2018). Comparative analysis of business performance of insurance com-panies in Jammu and Kashmir on subjective performance measures. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(1), 1253-1259. google scholar
  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989. google scholar
  • Josiah, N., & Nyagara, N. (2015). Assessment of the effect of Cost Leadership Strategy on the performance of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Companies in Eldoret town, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. International Jour-nal of Business and Management Invention, 4(4),1-7 google scholar
  • Kavale, S., Mugambi, F., & Namusonge, G. (2016). The effects of product differentiation strategy on cor-porate growth in selected microfinance institutions in Kenya. International Journal For Research In Business, Management And Accounting, 2(6), 13-28. google scholar
  • Keskin, H., Zehir, S., & Ayar, H. (2016). Pazar yönelimi ve firma performansı ilişkisi: Farklılaştırma stratejisinin aracı rolü. Doğuş Universitesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 111-127. google scholar
  • Kesidou, E., & Carter, S. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership and firm performance: Reconciling the objec-tive-subjective dichotomy. Rencontres St Gall, 9(1), 1-23. google scholar
  • Kimuli, S. N. L. (2011). Strategic Entrepreneurship and Performance of Selected Private Secondary Schools in Wakiso District. (Doctoral dissertation, Makerere University). google scholar
  • Kriewall, T. J., & Mekemson, K. (2010). Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergradu-ates. The journal of engineering entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5-19. google scholar
  • Kumar K., Subramanian, R., & Yauger C. (1997). Pure versus hybrid: Performance implications of Porter’s generic strategies. Health Care Management Review, 22(4), 47-61. google scholar
  • Kurtulus, K. (2006). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Literatür Yayıncılık, Istanbul. google scholar
  • Lassen, A. H. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical study of the importance of strategic consid-erations in the creation of radical innovation. Managing Global Transitions, 5(2), 109-131. google scholar
  • Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic management journal, 22(6-7), 615-640. google scholar
  • Leitch, C. M., & Volery, T. (2017). “Entrepreneurial leadership: Insights and directions”. International Small Business Journal, 35(2), 147-156. google scholar
  • Li, C. B., & Li, J. J. (2008). Achieving superior financial performance in China: differentiation, cost leader-ship, or both?. Journal of International Marketing, 16(3), 1-22. google scholar
  • Ling, Y-H, & Jaw, B-S. (2011). Entrepreneurial leadership, human capital management, and global compet-itiveness: An empirical study of Taiwanese MNCs. Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, 2(2), 117-135. google scholar
  • Linton, G., & Kask, J. (2017). Configurations of entrepreneurial orientation and competitive strategy for high performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 168-176. google scholar
  • Liu, W., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2018). Enhancing product innovation performance in a dysfunctional com-petitive environment: The roles of competitive strategies and market-based assets. Industrial Marketing Management, 73(1), 7-20. google scholar
  • Mathisen, J-E, & Arnulf, J. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial mindsets: Theoretical foundations and empirical prop-erties of a mindset scale. The International Journal of Management and Business, 5(1), 81-101. google scholar
  • Martinez-Simarro, D., Devece, C., & Llopis-Albert, C. (2015). How information systems strategy moderates the relationship between business strategy and performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 15921594. google scholar
  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creat-ing opportunity in an age of uncertainty (284. bs): Harvard Business Press. google scholar
  • Mgeni, T. O., & Nayak, P. (2015). Impacts of entrepreneurial leadership style on business performance of female owned SMEs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 4(2), 39-50. google scholar
  • Miles, G., Heppard, K. A., Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (2000). Entrepreneurial strategies. Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial edge, 101-114. google scholar
  • Murray, A. I. (1988). A contingency view of Porter’s “generic strategies. Academy of management review, 13(3), 390-400. google scholar
  • Naktiyok, A. (2016). Endüstri ve Rekabet Analizi Stratejik Yönetim. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi AÖF. google scholar
  • Neneh, N. B. (2012). An exploratory study on entrepreneurial mindset in the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector: A South African perspective on fostering small and medium enterprise (SME) success. African Journal of Business Management, 6(9), 3364-3372. google scholar
  • Newman, A., Neesham, C., Manville, G., & Tse, H. H. (2017). Examining the influence of servant and entre-preneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22. google scholar
  • Newman, E. B. L. (2013). A theory on becoming an entrepreneurial leader: A student’s developmental jour-ney to a creation-driven mindset: (Ph. D. Thesis). University of Pennsylvania. google scholar
  • Njeru, P. W., Bwisa, H. M., & Kihoro, J. M. (2012). Gender based entrepreneurial mind set and their influ-ence on performance of small and medium manufacturing firms. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(9), 182-198. google scholar
  • Obeng, B. A., Robson, P., & Haugh, H. (2014). Strategic entrepreneurship and small firm growth in Ghana. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 501-524. google scholar
  • Ortega, M. J. R. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’ moderat-ing roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273-1281. google scholar
  • Phillips, L. W., Chang, D. R., & Buzzell, R. D. (1983). Product quality, cost position and business perfor-mance: A test of some key hypotheses. The Journal of Marketing, 26-43. google scholar
  • Panwar, R., Nybakk, E., Hansen, E., P& inkse, J. (2016). The effect of small firms’ competitive strategies on their community and environmental engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 578-585. google scholar
  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business per-formance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 761-787. google scholar
  • Renko, M, El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brannback, M. (2015). “Understanding and measuring entre-preneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74. google scholar
  • Roomi, M. A., & Harrison, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial leadership: What is it and how should it be taught?. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 1-44). google scholar
  • Spanos, Y. E., Zaralis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2004). Strategy and industry effects on profitability: Evidence from Greece. Strategic management journal, 25(2), 139-165. google scholar
  • Thornberry, N. (2006). Lead like an entrepreneur: Keeping the entrepreneurial spirit alive within the corpo-ration. Fairfield, PA: McGraw Hill. google scholar
  • Thornhill S., & White R.E. (2007). Strategic purity: A multi-industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 553-561. google scholar
  • Ward, P. T., & Duray, R. (2000). Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 123-138. google scholar
  • Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mavondo, F. T. (1999). Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Technovation, 19(8), 507-518. google scholar
  • Yaşar, F. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Case study on Gaziantep carpeting sector/ Rekabet stratejileri ve firma performansi: Gaziantep hali sektörü üzerinde bir durum çalışması. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 309-324. google scholar
  • Yücel, R., & Ahmetoğulları, K. (2017). Rekabet stratejilerinin ileri imalat teknolojileri ve firma performansı üzerine etkileri. AİBÜ-İİBF Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2), 113-129. google scholar
  • Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). “International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility”. Journal of business venturing, 15(5), 469492. google scholar
  • Zehir, S. (2016). Pazar yonelimi, ogrenme yönelimi, rekabet stratejileri ve firma performansı ilişkisi. Gebze teknik universitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. (Yayınlanmammış doktora tezi). google scholar
  • Zhang, Y. (2012). The impact of performance management system on employee performance-Analysis with google scholar
  • WERS 2004. (Master’s thesis), The University of Twente. google scholar
  • Zijlstra, P. (2014). When is entrepreneurial leadership most effective. (Master’s thesis), University of Twente. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ersarı, G., & Naktiyok, A. (2022). The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance. Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


AMA

Ersarı G, Naktiyok A. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance. Istanbul Business Research. 2022;51(1):47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


ABNT

Ersarı, G.; Naktiyok, A. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 51, n. 1, p. 47-68, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ersarı, Göknur, and Atılhan Naktiyok. 2022. “The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1: 47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ersarı, Göknur, and Atılhan Naktiyok. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1 (Dec. 2022): 47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


Harvard: Australian Style

Ersarı, G & Naktiyok, A 2022, 'The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 47-68, viewed 4 Dec. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ersarı, G. and Naktiyok, A. (2022) ‘The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance’, Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), pp. 47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294 (4 Dec. 2022).


MLA

Ersarı, Göknur, and Atılhan Naktiyok. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, 2022, pp. 47-68. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


Vancouver

Ersarı G, Naktiyok A. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 4 Dec. 2022 [cited 4 Dec. 2022];51(1):47-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294 doi: 10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294


ISNAD

Ersarı, Göknur - Naktiyok, Atılhan. The Role of Competitive Strategies in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset and the Entrepreneurial Leadership on Business Performance”. Istanbul Business Research 51/1 (Dec. 2022): 47-68. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.834294



TIMELINE


Submitted01.12.2020
Accepted04.10.2021
Published Online26.01.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.