Research Article

DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1096747   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1096747    Full Text (PDF)

Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks

Alper Yılmaz

This article attempts to examine the recent developments that have amplified the consequences of uncertainty regarding trade between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) countries under global economic turmoil such as occurred in the 2008 financial crisis and trade wars sparked by the USA and the COVID-19 pandemic. These events severely affected intraBRICS trade and investment. For this purpose, we employed the Westerlund and Edgerton cointegration approach to check for cointegration under structural breaks and the procedure for the asymmetric Granger non-causality test to assess the causal relationship between the custom tariff and export variables of BRICS countries with regard to the panel data methodology for the 2000-2020 period using annual data. The empirical results for cointegration indicate the presence of a long-term relationship; in other words, they are seen to move together under investigation. The estimated breakpoints correspond with 2008 and the ongoing financial turmoil and with the 2018-2020 period and the rising trade disputes between USA and China. In addition, the Granger non-causality test provides enough evidence to show opposite directions (signs) for the causal links between the variables that run from tariffs to exports for BRICS countries.

JEL Classification : F10 , F13 , F23
DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1096747   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1096747    Full Text (PDF)

BRICS Ülkelerinde Ticaret: Yapısal Kırılmalı Panel Veri Analizi

Alper Yılmaz

Bu çalışmada, 2008 küresel finansal krizi, ABD-Çin ticaret savaşları, Covid-19 pandemisi gibi belirsizlikleri artırıcı gelişmelerin, BRICS ülkeleride birlik içi ticarete etkileri irdelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Söz konusu gelişmeler, BRICS ülkeleri ticareti ve yatırımları üzerinde ciddi etkiler doğurmuştur. Bu amaçla 2000-2020 dönemi gümrük tarifeleri ve ihracat değişkenlerine ait yıllık veriler bağlamında, değişkenler arasındaki eş bütünleşme ilişkisi Westerlund ve Edgerton yaklaşımı ile yapısal kırılma altında ve yine seriler arasındaki Granger nedensellik ilişkisi ise asimetrik nedensellik testi ile panel veri modelleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Eş bütünleşme sonuçlarına göre ilk olarak seriler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğu yani serilerin birlikte hareket ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Eş bütünleşme ilişkisindeki yapısal kırılma tarihleri 2008 finansal krize, krizin etkili olduğu yıllara ve ABD-Çin ticari geriliminin yaşandığı 2018-2020 dönemine tekabül etmektedir. Diğer yandan Granger nedensellik testi değişkenler arasında gümrük tarifelerinden ihracata doğru zıt yönlü (işaretli) nedensellik ilişkisinin varlığı hakkında yeterli delil sunmaktadır.

JEL Classification : F10 , F13 , F23

PDF View


  • Aggrawal, A. (2004). Impact of tariff reduction on exports: A quantitative assessment of Indian exports to USA. Indian Council For International Economic Relations, Working Paper No. 120. google scholar
  • Agosin, M. R. (1999). Trade and growth in Chile. CEPAL Review, 1999(68), 79-100. doi:10.18356/18ba57ab-en google scholar
  • Amiti, M., Redding, S. J. & Weinstein, D. (2019). The impact of the 2018 trade war on USA prices and welfare. NBER Working Papers, 25672. doi:10.3386/w25672 google scholar
  • Bagwell, K. & Staiger, R. (2001). Reciprocity, non-discrimination and preferential agreements in the multilateral trading system. European Journal of Political Economy, 17 (2), 281-325. doi:10.1016/ s0176-2680(01)00029-5 google scholar
  • Bai, J., & Kao, C. (2006). Chapter 1 on the estimation and inference of a panel Cointegration model with cross-sectional dependence. Panel Data Econometrics - Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Applications, 3-30. doi:10.1016/s0573-8555(06)74001-9 google scholar
  • Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and co-integration. Econometrica, 72(4), 11271178. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x google scholar
  • Becker, R., Enders, W. & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x google scholar
  • Becker, T., & Mauro, P. (2006). Output drops and the shocks that matter. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.926227. google scholar
  • Berthou, A. & Stumpner, S. (2020). Quantifying the impact of the US-China trade war on exports. google scholar
  • Bleaney, M.F. (1999), Price and monetary dynamics under alternative exchange rate regimes. IMF Working Papers, 99(67),1. doi:10.5089/9781451848885.001 google scholar
  • Bowen, L. (2015). Rethinking the optimal tariff theory. Chicago Policy Review https:// optimal%20 tariff%20theory%20argues,buyer%20from%20many%20competing%20suppliers google scholar
  • Breusch, T.S. & Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. google scholar
  • Breitung, J. & Pesaran H. (2005). Unit roots and co-integration in panels. Economic Studies Discussion Paper, Series 1, No 42/2005, ISBN 3-86558-105-106. google scholar
  • Broda, C., Limao, N. & Weinstein, D. (2006). Optimal tariffs: The evidence. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 12033, google scholar
  • Chen, J. & Scott, G. (2021). Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS), https://www. google scholar
  • Clarke, R. and Kirkpatrick, C. (1992), ‘Trade Policy Reform and Economic Performance in Developing Countries: Assessing the Empirical Evidence’, in R. Adhikari, C. Kirkpatrick and J. Weiss (eds.), Industrial and Trade Policy Reform in Developing Countries, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 56-73. google scholar
  • Czech, K., Wielechowski, M., Kotyza,P., Benesova, I. & Laputkova, A. (2020). Shaking stability: COVID-19 impact on the visegrad group countries and financial markets. Sustainability, 12(15), 6282. doi:10.3390/su12156282 google scholar
  • google scholar
  • Day, M., Khan, M. & Oshikawa, M. (2001). Tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and economic development in Bangladesh. Journal of World Trade, 35(2), 253-273. doi:10.54648/337900 google scholar
  • Eberhardt, M. & Teal F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Economics Series Working Papers 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. google scholar
  • Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (2010). The slide to protectionism in the Great Depression: Who succumbed and why? The Journal of Economic History, 70(4), 871-897. doi:10.1017/ s0022050710000756 google scholar
  • Enders, W. & Lee, J. (2012a). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin Economics and Statistics, 74, 574-599. google scholar
  • Enders, W. & Lee, J. (2012b). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root tests. Econ. Letters. 117, 196-199. google scholar
  • Evenett, S. J. (2009). What can be learned from crisis-era protectionism? An initial assessment. Business and Politics, 11(3), 1-26. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1287 google scholar
  • Evenett, S. & Martin, W. (2010). A snapshot of contemporary protectionism: How important are the murkier forms of trade discrimination. Econ Stor, ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 83. google scholar
  • Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2019). The return to protectionism. NBER Working Papers, 25638. doi:10.3386/w25638 google scholar
  • Fouda, R. A. N. (2012). Protectionism and free trade: a country’s glory or doom? International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 3(5), 351-355. doi:10.7763/ijtef.2012.v3.226 google scholar
  • Funke, N, Granziera, E. & Imam, P. (2008). Terms of trade shocks and economic recovery. IMF Working Paper, African Department, WP/08/36. google scholar
  • Gallant, A. (1981). On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form. Journal of Econometrics, 15(2), 211-245. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90115-9 google scholar
  • Granger, C.W. & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden co-integration. Department of Economics Working Paper, University of California, San Diego, 2002 (02), 1-49. google scholar
  • Gutierrez Chacon, E., & Machuca, C. M. (2021). The effect of tariffs on Spanish goods exports. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3852904 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A., Ajmi, A. N., El Montasser, G., Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Gupta, R. (2015). Research output and economic growth in G7 countries: New evidence from asymmetric panel causality testing. Applied Economics, 48(24), 2301-2308. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1117052 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2011). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 447456. doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x google scholar
  • Hayakawa, K. & Mukunoki. H. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on global value chains. The Developing Economies, 59, 154-177. google scholar
  • Hill, E. W. & Wolman, H. (2012). Economic shocks and regional economic resilience, affiliation: Building resilient regions. Institute for Government Studies, University of California, Berkley, January 2012. google scholar
  • Hooijmaaijers, B. (2021). The BRICS countries’ bilateral economic relations, 2009 to 2019: Between rhetoric and reality. SAGE Open, 11(4), 215824402110541. doi:10.1177/21582440211054128 google scholar
  • IMF Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Statistics, Data Querry https://data. google scholar
  • Izotov, D. & Tochkov, K. (2020). Trade relations between the Russian Far East and Northeast Asia: Assessment of institutional factors. In book: Proceeding of the International Science and Technology Conference Far East Con 2019, 177-188. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2244-4_15. google scholar
  • Javier, B., Lucio, J.J. & Crespo E. R. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 on trade flows: Measuring their impact through government policy responses. Plos One, 16(10): e0258356. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258356 google scholar
  • Jenkins, R. (1996). Trade liberalization and export performance in Bolivia. Development and Change, 27 (4), 693-716. google scholar
  • Joshi, V. & Little, I. M. (1996). India’s economic reforms 1991-2001. Oxford University Press, Print ISBN-13: 9780198290780, doi:10.1093/0198290780.001.0001. google scholar
  • Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359-379. doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(02)00202-6 google scholar
  • Kapustina, L. Lipkova, L. Silin, Y. & Drevalev, A. (2020). US-China trade war: causes and outcomes. SHS Web of Conferences, 73, 01012 (2020), IES-2019. google scholar
  • Kiyota, K. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and the world trade network. Journal of Asian Economics, 78, 101419. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101419 google scholar
  • Lau, L. (2020). The impacts of the trade war and the covid-19 epidemic on China-USA economic relations. The China Review, 20(4), 1-37. google scholar
  • Lee, J. & Strazicich, M. (2003). Minimum LM unit root tests with two structural breaks. Rev. Econ. Stat. 85, 1082-1089. google scholar
  • Lee, C., Wu, J. L. & Yang, L. (2015). A Simple panel unit-root test with smooth breaks in the presence of a multifactor error structure. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 78(3), 365-393. doi:10.1111/obes.12109 google scholar
  • Luintel, K. B., & Khan, M. (2009). Heterogeneous ideas production and endogenous growth: an empirical investigation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(3), 1 176-1205. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01543.x google scholar
  • Mankiv, G. (2018). Principles of economics. 8 th. Edition, Cengage Learning, SBN 13: 978-1-30558512-6, Print Number: 01, Print Year: 2016. google scholar
  • MacGregor P. & Hâla, M. (2021). CSR Unconscious Consumption by Generation Z in the COVID-19 era, responsible hereticsnot paying CSR Bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(18), 390. doi:10.3390/jrfm14080390 google scholar
  • Orloff, J. & Bloom J. (2014). Covariance and correlation, introduction to probability and statistics. MIT Open Course Ware, google scholar
  • Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CWPE 0435, google scholar
  • Pesaran, M.H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogenous panels with multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x google scholar
  • Pesaran, M.H., Ullah A. & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted lm test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. google scholar
  • Santos, P.U. (2002). Trade liberalisation and the balance of payments in selected developing countries. UK: The International Economic Study Group (IESG) Easter Conference, University of Birmingham. google scholar
  • Santos-Paulino, A., Thirlwall, A.P. (2004). The impact of trade liberalisation on exports, imports and the balance of payments of developing countries. The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 114(493), 50-72, F50-F72. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00187.x google scholar
  • Schumacher, R. (2012). Free trade and absolute and comparative advantage. ISSN (print) 1866-0738 Universitat Potsdam, Welt Trends Thesis 16. google scholar
  • Sofjan, M. (2017). The effect of liberalization on export-import in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2017, 7(2), 672-676. google scholar
  • Thorstensen, V., Tiago, I. & Oliviera, M. (2014). BRICS in the World Trade Organization: comparative trade policies. Ipea, CCGI (FGV) and SAIIA, March 2014. google scholar
  • Uprasen, U. (2014). The impact of non-tariff barriers in the European Union on China’s exports. Economic Integration in Asia, 141-164. doi:10.1057/9781137432933_8 google scholar
  • Vinogradov, A.O., Salitsky, A.I. & Semenova, N.K. (2019). US-China Economic confrontation: Ideology, chronology, meaning. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(1), 35-46. doi:10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-35-46 google scholar
  • Wang, W., Phillips, P. C. B. & Su, L. (2016). Homogeneity pursuit in panel data models: theory and applications. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics Yale University, November 2016. google scholar
  • Westerlund, J. (2006). On the estimation of co-integrated panel regressions with common factors. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 5(3). google scholar
  • Westerlund, J. & Edgerton, D. L. (2008). A simple test for co-integration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics Statistics, 70(5), 665-704. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x google scholar
  • Zestos, K., Jiang, Y. & Painter, C. (2021). Determinants of German and Japanese exports. Journal of Economic Integration, September 2021, 36(3), 339-371. doi:10.11130/jei.2021.36.3.339 google scholar
  • Zhang, Y., Hajiyev, N. & Smirnov, V. (2021). Tariff and non-tariff instruments of OPEC+ trade wars. Energy Strategy Reviews 38(2021), 100771. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100771 google scholar
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, D.W.K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270. doi:10.2307/1391541 google scholar


Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format



Yılmaz, A. (2022). Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 72(2), 653-687.


Yılmaz A. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2022;72(2):653-687.


Yılmaz, A. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks. Istanbul Journal of Economics, [Publisher Location], v. 72, n. 2, p. 653-687, 2022.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, Alper,. 2022. “Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 72, no. 2: 653-687.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Yılmaz, Alper,. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 72, no. 2 (Dec. 2023): 653-687.

Harvard: Australian Style

Yılmaz, A 2022, 'Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks', Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 653-687, viewed 11 Dec. 2023,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, A. (2022) ‘Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks’, Istanbul Journal of Economics, 72(2), pp. 653-687. (11 Dec. 2023).


Yılmaz, Alper,. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks.” Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 72, no. 2, 2022, pp. 653-687. [Database Container],


Yılmaz A. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks. Istanbul Journal of Economics [Internet]. 11 Dec. 2023 [cited 11 Dec. 2023];72(2):653-687. Available from: doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1096747


Yılmaz, Alper. Intra-BRICS Trade: A Panel Data Analysis with Structural Breaks”. Istanbul Journal of Economics 72/2 (Dec. 2023): 653-687.


Published Online15.08.2022


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.