Research Article


DOI :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908   IUP :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908    Full Text (PDF)

According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith

Nour Alhila

Belief in destiny is counted among the conditions of belief in the creed books of Ahl Al-Sunnah. The basis of this belief is the phrase "believing in destiny" in the hadith, known as Jibril’s hadith in reply to the prophet Muhammad PBUH, stating that Iman/belief in destiny is out of Iman. Yet imam Bukhari did not relate to any hadith stating the phrase “belief in destiny” in his Sahih. In addition, the Bukhari related to the phrase “belief in destiny” in one of his works named "Halku Efali'l-Ibad", in which he dealt with the subject of destiny separately, made it necessary to examine his opinion on destiny. This research aims to examine the reasons that led Imam bukhari not to relate to the hadiths that stated “belief in destiny” phrases, beside highlighting his own belief in believing in destiny under the mentioned Jibril’s Hadith.

DOI :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908   IUP :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908    Full Text (PDF)

هل اإليمان بالقدر من مسائل اإليمان عند اإلمام البخاري؟ دراسة من خالل حديث جبريل

Nour Alhila

يعد اإليمان بالقدر من أركان أو شروط اإليمان في كتب العقائد عند أهل السنة، وحديث جبريل من أهم األحاديث التي استندوا عليها، في جواب النبي صلى هللا كبير َّ من المصادر التي خرجتها، إال أن اإلمام البخاري في صحيحه لم يخرج أي حديث ٍ ٍ عليه وسلم أن اإليمان بالقدر من اإليمان، وهذه اللفظة واردة في جمع يشتمل على لفظ اإليمان بالقدر. وإلى جانب ذلك فقد كان من الضروري تناول إخراج البخاري للفظة "اإليمان بالقدر" في مصنفه "خلق أفعال العباد"، والذي ٍ أفرده لمسألة القدر التي برزت في عصره، في محاولة للوقوف على رأيه في هذه المسألة. فيهدف هذا البحث إلى محاولة الكشف عن علة اإلمام البخاري في عدم تخريج األحاديث المشتملة على لفظ اإليمان بالقدر، إلى جانب بيان عقيدته في اإليمان بالقدر في ظل حديث جبريل. 

DOI :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908   IUP :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908    Full Text (PDF)

Buhârî’ye Göre “Kader” İmanın Şartlarından mıdır? “Cibril Hadisi” Bağlamında Bir İnceleme

Nour Alhila

Kadere iman Ehl-i sünnetin akaid kitaplarında imanın şartları arasında sayılır. Bu inancın dayanağı ise Cibril hadisi olarak bilinen iman ve İslam’ın şartlarının sayıldığı hadisteki “kadere inanmandır” ibaresidir. Hemen hemen bütün hadis kaynaklarında tahric edilen bu hadisin Buhari versiyonunda söz konusu ibare bulunmamaktadır. Buhari’nin kader konusunu müstakil olarak ele aldığı ‘Halku Efali’l-İbad’ adlı eserinde de bu anlama gelebilecek bir ifadenin geçmemesi onun kader konusundaki görüşünü incelemeyi gerekli kılmıştır. Bu araştırma hem Cibril hadisi’ni “kadere iman” ifadesi açasından incelemeyi hem de Buhari’nin kader anlayışını ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Jibril’s Hadith is a well-known hadith in teaching Islam, with faith at its head. However, Bukhari did not derive the hadith from the way in which the word of belief in predestination appeared in both places that he discussed in his Sahih. Rather, he derived from the hadith of Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, from the ways in which the phrase “belief in predestination” was not proven. He stated that the reason for Ibn Omar’s famous narration of the hadith was to respond to those who denied predestination in his time. His narration became the most famous interpretation and was widely adopted in commentaries. 

Predestination is an important theological point on which various classifications were established. Discussions revolved around the concept, while differences involving different sects were eventually woven around it. Muslim scholars responded to and affirmed these discussions, and belief in predestination became one of the pillars of faith in all sects of Islam, according to later scholars.

None of the scholars, however, explained why Bukhari did not include this narration in his Sahih by explaining the reasons calling for that, especially since the Qadariyah sect had a strong voice in favor of a doctrine of free will in the time of Imam Bukhari. Finally, Bukhari wrote a book in response to the free-will advocating Qadariyah sect and its beliefs, although some contemporaries considered Bukhari not to have disproved it. The scholars challenged his method as an ineffective way of questioning Jibril’s Hadith. Some scholars responded to this criticism by weakening the position of Bukhari’s work, describing it as an incomplete narration.

This analysis leads us to certain questions that require answers, as follows:

Why did Bukhari prefer in his Sahih to extract the narration of Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, over the narration of Ibn Omar, which includes the word “faith in predestination” and mentions a supporting reason for this inclusion, thereby distancing the delusion from its narrator. Why did Bukhari prefer the methods of Abu Hurairah’s hadith that are free of the word “faith” as the basis on which it was to be proven? Was the word “faith in predestination” proven in the hadith of Abu Hurayrah? Is the narration adopted by Bukhari in his Sahih incomplete and weak as Bakr Tatali notes in his study?

Is faith in predestination mentioned in the other Sahih collections, such as the Book of Predestination, which Bukhari created for examining this issue, or the Book of Unity? Also, did Bukhari reveal in his independent work Creating the Actions of the People that the word “faith in predestination” was the underlying reason for his composition? Was this the reason the issue of predestination erupted in the era of Bukhari? Further, did Bukhari see fate as an independent issue of belief or as a pillar of faith in the event that faith was one of the chapters of belief? Note that the hadith of Omar states in it: “You  believe in predestination.” Was Bukhari not seeing it as an issue of faith? This difference is especially pertinent because the issue of fate during the period of the emergence of the Qadariyah sect occupied such a large area of theological discussion. That is, it did so until Bukhari wrote his works responding to it.

This research aims to reveal Imam Bukhari’s reason for not extracting the hadiths that contain the word “faith in predestination,” as well as explaining his belief in predestination in the light of Jibril’s Hadith, by answering the questions above.

The author’s research for this paper demonstrated that what is established from the narration of Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, is that Bukhari did not actually use the term belief in predestination. The chains of transmission of the narrations that Bukhari did not derive previously, such as the hadith of Omar as indicated by Ibn Hajar, were themselves not free from defects, problems, and criticism that distanced them from the condition of Bukhari in his Sahih. Bukhari’s action in not following the paths of the narration of Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, in which the phrase “belief in predestination” was not proven, is an indication that this wording is likely not to be proven from the hadith of Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him.

This study also showed that Bukhari maintained the established wording of the companion even when he narrated from his path and did not include any extraneous words, even if it was selected from the narrations of the other companions in the hadith.

This author concludes that Bukhari believed that predestination is an independent issue of belief because of his contention that belief in predestination is an issue of faith that cannot be confirmed. Bukhari did not refer in his Sahih to the word “belief in predestination” in the chapters or the suspensions, or even in the follow-ups, which is preferred when a word is proven by a path that is not ordinarily on its condition, and in the case of the presence of the hadith and its chain of transmission. He did cite the narration that includes the word “faith in predestination” from the narrations of Abu Hurairah and Abu Dhar outside of the Sahih, in his book Creating the Actions of the People, which is based on this issue, and as al-Lalka’i called it, is viewed as “the response to Qadariyah sect.” However, Bukhari’s consideration of this particular narration was in the context of proving the naming of Islam and faith as actions. The wording of Ibn Omar’s narration from Omar were not sufficiently derived to allow one to stand on them. Bukhari also created a complete book in his collection that he called the “Book of Predestination.” Although he did not narrate Jibril’s Hadith in this book, he nonetheless narrates other hadiths that do affirm predestination, not just a belief in predestination. 


PDF View

References

  • 1. Ahmed b. Hanbel: el-‘İlel ve Ma‘rifetü’r-Ricâl, Thk. Vasiyullah Abbâs, 2. Baskı, Riyad, Dârü’l-Hanî,1422/2001. google scholar
  • 2. Aydın, Ömer, KUR’AN IŞIĞINDA KADER VE ÖZGÜRLÜK, Beyan Yayınları, İstanbul, 1998. google scholar
  • 3. Beyhakî, Ahmed b. el-Hüseyn: el-Kadâ ve’l-kader, thk. Selahaddin b. Abbâs Şükr. 1. Baskı, Riyad: MektebetüR-Rüşd. google scholar
  • 4. Beyhakî, Ahmed b. el-Hüseyn: es-Sünenü’l-Kebir, Thk. Abdullah b. Abdulmuhsin et-Türkî, 1. Baskı, Kahire, Merkezu Hecr li’l-Buhus ve’d-Dirasati’l-Arabiyye ve’l-İslamiyye,1432/2011. google scholar
  • 5. Beyhakî, Ahmed b. el-Hüseyn: Şu‘abü’l-Îmân, Thk. Muhtâr Ahmed en-Nedvî, 1. Baskı, Bombay, ed-Dârü’s-Selefiyye, 1423/2003. google scholar
  • 6. Bezzâr, Ahmed b. Amr: el-Bahru’z-Zehhâr )Müsnedü’l-Bezzâr(, Thk. Âdil b. Sa‘d, 1. Baskı, Medine, Mektebetü’l-Ulum ve’l-Hikem, 1427/2006. google scholar
  • 7. Buhârî, Muhammed b. İsmâîl: et-Târîhu’l-Evsat, Thk. Muhammed b. İbrâhîm el-Lahîdân, 1. Baskı, Riyad, Dârü’s-Sumay’î, 1418/1998. google scholar
  • 8. Buhârî, Muhammed b. İsmâîl: Halku Ef‘âli’l-‘İbâd ve’r-Red ‘ale’l-Vehmiyye ve Ashâbi’t-Ta‘tîl, Thk. Fehd b. Süleyman el-Füheyd, 1. Baskı, Riyad, Dımaşk, Dârü Atlasi’l-Hadrâ,1425/2005. google scholar
  • 9. Buhârî, Muhammed b. İsmâîl: Sahîhu’l-Buhârî, terkim ve tebvib Muhammed Nizâr Tamîm, Heysem Nizâr Tamîm, Dârü’l-Erkam b. Ebi’l-Erkam, Beyrut, t.y. google scholar
  • 10. Cevherî, Ebû Nasr İsmâîl b. Hammâd: es-Sıhâh: Tâcü’l-Lüga ve Sıhâhu’l-‘Arabiyye, 4. Baskı, Beyrut, Dârü’l-İlm li’l-Melayin, 1990. google scholar
  • 11. Dârekutnî, Ali b. Ömer: el-‘İlelü’l-Vâride fi’l-Ehâdîsi’n-Nebeviyye, Thk. Mahfûzurrahman Zeynüddîn es-Selefî, 1. Baskı, Riyad, Daru Taybe, 1405/1985. google scholar
  • 12. Dârekutnî, Ali b. Ömer: Suâlâtu’s- Sülemî li’d-Dârekutnî, Thk. Komisyon, byy 1427. google scholar
  • 13. Ebû Avâne, Ya‘kûb b. İshâk el-İsferâînî: Müsnedü Ebî Avâne, Thk. Eymen Arif ed-Dımaşkî, 1. Baskı, Beyrut, Dârü’l-Ma’rife, 1419/1998. google scholar
  • 14. Ebû Dâvûd, Süleyman b. Eş‘as es-Sicistânî: Sünenü Ebî Dâvûd, Thk. Nâsıruddîn el-Elbânî, 1. Baskı, Riyad, t.y. google scholar
  • 15. Ebû Nu‘aym el-Isfahânî, Ahmed b. Abdullah: el-Müsnedü’l-Müstahrec ‘alâ Sahîhi’l-İmâm Müslim, Thk. Muhammed Hasan Muhammed Hasan İsmâîl eş-Şâfiî, 1. Baskı, Beyrut, Dârü’l-Kütübi’l-‘İlmiyye, 1417/1996. google scholar
  • 16. el-Mahmud, Abdurrahman b. Salih: el-Kadâ ve’l-kader fî dav’i’lkitap ve esSünne, 2. Baskı, Riyad, Darü’l-Vatan, 1418/1997. google scholar
  • 17. Firyâbî, Ca’fer b. Muhammed b. el-Hasen, Kitabül Kader, Thk. Abdullah b. Hamed el-Mansûr, 1. Baskı, Riyad, Edvâu’s-Selef, 1418/1997. google scholar
  • 18. Hatîb el-Bağdâdî, Ahmed b. Ali: Târîhu Medîneti’s-Selâm ve Ahbâru Muhaddisîhâ ve Zikrü Kuttânihâ’l-‘Ulemâ min Gayri Ehlihâ ve Vâridîhâ )Târîhu Bağdâd(, Thk. Beşşâr ‘Avvâd Ma‘rûf, Beyrut, Dârü’l-Garbi’l-İslâmî, 1422/2001. google scholar
  • 19. Heysemî, Ali b. Ebî Bekr: Buğyetü’l-Bâhis ‘an Zevâidi Müsnedi’l-Hâris, Thk. Hüseyin Ahmed Sâlih el-Bâkirî, Medine, Merkezü hidmeti’s-sünneti ve’s-sîreti bi’l-Câmiati’l-İslâmiyye, 1413/1992. google scholar
  • 20. İbn Batta, Muhibbüddin Abdullah b. Hüseyin b. Abdullah Ukberi: el-İbane an şeriati’l-firkati’n-naciye ve mücanebeti’l-fıraki’l-mezmume, y.y., t.y. google scholar
  • 21. İbn Ebî Hâtim er-Râzî, Abdurrahman b. Muhammed: el-Cerh ve’t-ta’dil, Haydarabad, Dâiretü’l-Maârifi’l-Osmaniyye, Beyrut, Mektebetü Dâri İhyâi’t-Türâs, y.y., t.y. google scholar
  • 22. İbn Ebî Şeybe, Abdullah b. Muhammed el-‘Absî: el-Musannef, Thk. Muhammed Avvâme, 1. Baskı, Cüdde, Suriye, Dârü’l-Kıble & Müessesetü Ulûmi’l-Kur’an, 1427/2006. google scholar
  • 23. İbn Fâris, Ebu’l-Huseyn Ahmed b. Fâris b. Zekeriyyâ: Mu’cemu Mekayisi’l-Luga, Thk, abdusselam Muhammed lbn Harun, Beyrut, Dârü’l-Fikir, 1979/1399. google scholar
  • 24. İbn Hacer, Ahmed b. Ali b. Muhammed el-Askalânî: en-Nüket ‘alâ Sahîhi’l-Buhârî )et-Tecrîd ‘ale’t-Tenkîh ile birlikte(, Thk. Ebu’l-Velîd Hişâm b. Ali es-Sa‘dînî, Ebû Temîm Nâdir Mustafa Mahmûd, 1. Baskı, Kahire, el-Mektebetü’l-İslâmiyye, 1426/2005. google scholar
  • 25. İbn Hacer, Ahmed b. Ali b. Muhammed el-Askalânî: Fethü’l-Bârî bi-Şerhi Sahîhi’l-Buhârî, Thk. Âdil Mürşid, Ahmed Berhûm, 1. Baskı, Dımaşk, Darü’r-Risaleti’l-Alemiyye, 1434/2013. google scholar
  • 26. İbn Hacer, Ahmed b. Ali b. Muhammed el-Askalânî: Takrîbü’t-Tehzîb, Thk. Muhammed Avvâme, 3. Baskı, Halap, Dârü’r-Reşid,1411/1991. google scholar
  • 27. İbn Hibbân, Muhammed b. Hibbân el-Bustî: el-Mecrûhîn mine’l-Muhaddisîn, Thk. Muhammed b. İnsân Ferhât, Beyrut, Dârü’l-Lü’lüe, 2016. google scholar
  • 28. İbn Hibbân, Muhammed b. Hibbân el-Bustî: Meşâhîru ‘Ulemâi’l-Emsâr, Dammam, Mektebetü’l-Cevzî, t.y. google scholar
  • 29. İbn Kayyim el-Cevziyye, Muhammed b. Ebî Bekr: Şifaü’l-alil fî mesaili’l-kaza ve’l-kader ve’l-hikme ve’t-ta’lil. tsh. Muhammed Bedreddin Ebû Firas en-Na’sani, -Riyad, Mektebetü’r-Riyad-el-Hadise. google scholar
  • 30. İbn Ma‘în, Ebû Zekeriyyâ Yahyâ: Târîhu İbn Ma‘în )Rivâyetu’t-Devrî(, Thk. Ahmed Muhammed Nûr Seyf, 1. Baskı, Mekke, Merkezü’l-Bahsi’l-İlmi ve İhyai’t-Türasi’l-İslami, 1399/1979. google scholar
  • 31. İbn Mâce, Muhammed b. Yezîd el-Kazvînî: Sünenü İbn Mâce, Thk. Nâsıruddîn el-Elbânî, 1. Baskı, Riyad, t.y. google scholar
  • 32. İbn Manzûr, Muhammed b. Kerem: Lisânü’l-‘Arab, Dârü’l-Me‘ârif, Kahire, t.y. google scholar
  • 33. İbn Mende, Muhammed b. İshâk: Kitâbü’l-Îmân, thk. Ali b. Muhammed b. Nâsır el-Fukayhî, 2. Baskı, Beyrut: Müessesetü’r-Risâle, 1986/1406. google scholar
  • 34. İbn Râhûye, Ebû Yakub İshak b. Râhûye: el-Müsned, thk. Abdulhak el-Belûşî. Medine: Mektebetü’l-Îmân, 1991. google scholar
  • 35. İbn Receb, Abdurrahman b. Ahmed el-Hanbelî: Câmiu‘l-ulûm ve’l-hikem, Thk. Şuayb Arnaût & İbrahim Hâbis, Beyrut, Müessesetü’r-Risâle, 7. Baskı, 2001/ 1422. google scholar
  • 36. İbn Sa‘d, Muhammed ez-Zührî: et-Tabakâtü’l-Kebîr, Thk. Ali Muhammed Ömer, Kahire, Mektebetü’l-Hancî, 1421/2001. google scholar
  • 37. İbnü’l-Cüneyd, İbrâhîm b. Abdullah el-Hatelî: Suâlâtu Yahyâ b. Ma‘în, Thk. Ahmed Muhammed Nûr Seyf, 1. Baskı, Medine, Mektebetü’d-dâr, 1408/1988. google scholar
  • 38. Lâlekâî, Ebu’l-Kâsım Hibetullah b. el-Hasan b. Mansûr: Şerhu Usûli İ‘tikâdi Ehli’s-Sünne ve’l-Cemâ‘a, Thk. Neş’et Kemâl el-Mısrî, sanaa, İskenderiyye, Dârü’l-Basîra & Dârü’l-Âsâr, 2001. google scholar
  • 39. Mervezî, Tâzîmu Kadri’s-Salât,Thk. Abdurrahman Abdulcebbâr el-Feriyvâî. Medine: Dâru’l-Medinetu’lMunevvera, 1406/1986. google scholar
  • 40. Mizzî, Yusuf b. Abdurrahman: Tehzîbü’l-Kemâl, Thk. Beşşâr ‘Avâd Ma‘rûf, 1. Baskı, Beyrut, Müessesetü’r-Risâle, 1403/1983. google scholar
  • 41. Müslim İbnü’l-Haccâc: Sahîhu Müslim, Thk. Muhammed Fuâd Abdulbâkî, 1. Baskı, y.y., 1374/1991. google scholar
  • 42. Nesâî, Ahmed b. Şuayb: Sünen-i Nesâî, tahriç Muhammed Nâsırüddîn el-Elbânî, İ‘tenâ bihi Meşhûr b. Hasan Âl Selmân, Riyad, Mektebetü’l-Meârif, 1. Baskı, y.y., t.y. google scholar
  • 43. Tatlı, Bekir, Hadis Tekniği Açısından Cibrîl Hadisi ve İslâm Düşüncesi’ne Yansımaları )Doktora Tezi(, Dnş. Doç. Dr. Bünyamin Erul, Ankara Üni. SBE., Ankara 2005. google scholar
  • 44. Tîbî, Şerefüddîn el-Hüseyn b. Abdullah: Futûhu’l-. Ğayb fî’l-Keşf ‘an Kmâ'i’r-Rayb, Thk. Komisyon, 1. Baskı, Dübey: Caizetu Dübey ed-Devliyye li’l-Kur’âni’l-Kerim, 2013/1434. google scholar
  • 45. Ukaylî, Muhammed b. Amr: ed-Du‘afâu’l-Kebîr, Thk. Hamdî es-Selefî, 1. Baskı, Riyad, Dârus-Sami’i, 1420/2000. google scholar
  • 46. Ukaylî, Muhammed b. Amr: ed-Du‘afâu’l-Kebîr, Thk. Mazin b. Muhammed es-Sersavi, 1. Baskı, Kahire, Mektebetu Dâru İbn Abbâs, 2008/1429. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Alhila, N. (2021). According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith. darulfunun ilahiyat, 32(2), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


AMA

Alhila N. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith. darulfunun ilahiyat. 2021;32(2):483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


ABNT

Alhila, N. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith. darulfunun ilahiyat, [Publisher Location], v. 32, n. 2, p. 483-502, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Alhila, Nour,. 2021. “According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith.” darulfunun ilahiyat 32, no. 2: 483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


Chicago: Humanities Style

Alhila, Nour,. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith.” darulfunun ilahiyat 32, no. 2 (Sep. 2022): 483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


Harvard: Australian Style

Alhila, N 2021, 'According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith', darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 483-502, viewed 28 Sep. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Alhila, N. (2021) ‘According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith’, darulfunun ilahiyat, 32(2), pp. 483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908 (28 Sep. 2022).


MLA

Alhila, Nour,. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith.” darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 32, no. 2, 2021, pp. 483-502. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


Vancouver

Alhila N. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith. darulfunun ilahiyat [Internet]. 28 Sep. 2022 [cited 28 Sep. 2022];32(2):483-502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908 doi: 10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908


ISNAD

Alhila, Nour. According to Bukhari Is "Destiny"Condition of faith? An Analysis in the Context of "Jibril’s Hadith”. darulfunun ilahiyat 32/2 (Sep. 2022): 483-502. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.884908



TIMELINE


Submitted22.02.2021
Accepted28.05.2021
Published Online18.10.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.