Research Article

DOI :10.26650/imj.2022.92.004   IUP :10.26650/imj.2022.92.004    Full Text (PDF)

Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract

Fatma Çam KahramanVala Lale Tüzüner

In this study, the mediator role of the psychological contract on the effect of workplace flexibility on organizational commitment was examined. The sample of the research consists of 112 participants working in different sectors and positions in Istanbul. To test the research hypotheses, Simple Regression Analysis and Hierarchical Regression Analysis were performed. As a result of the analyses, the full mediator role of the relational psychological contract and the partial mediator role of the transactional psychological contract on the relationship between workplace flexibility and affective commitment and normative commitment were determined. With the inclusion of continuance commitment in the analysis as a dependent variable, the mediating role of both types of psychological contracts did not occur. Organizations can influence their employees’ psychological contracts and increase their commitment to the organization by providing flexibility in the work environment. There is a limited number of national studies in which employees’ perceptions of flexible practices in the workplace are considered. Also, it is predicted that examining flexibility within the scope of different models will contribute to the field.

PDF View


  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. google scholar
  • Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 637-647. google scholar
  • Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice, 10. Edition, London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page. google scholar
  • Arthur, M. M., & Cook, A. (2003). The relationship between work-family human resource practices and firm profitability: A multi-theoretical perspective. Research In Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 219-252. google scholar
  • Avcı, M., & Yavuz, E. (2020).Çalışanlarm esnek çalışma düzenlemelerine yönelik tutumlarının işe devamsızlık algıları üzerindeki etkileri: kamu kuramlarında bir alan araştırması. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18 (35), 37-55. google scholar
  • Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 545-572. google scholar
  • Camlı, L. G. (2010). Esnek çalışma saatleri ve çalışanların esnek çalışma saatleri düzenlemelerine yönelik tutumlarının örgüte bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi (Master thesis). Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul. google scholar
  • Cohen, A. (2011).Values and psychological contracts in their relationship to commitment in the workplace. Career Development International, 16 (7), 646-667. google scholar
  • Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903-930. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-6486.00210 google scholar
  • Dalton, D. R., & Mesch, D. J. (1990). The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 370-387. google scholar
  • Dex, S., & Smith, C. (2002). The nature and pattern of family-friendly employment policies in Britain. UK: Policy Press. google scholar
  • Dogan, A., Bozkurt, S., & Demir, R. (2015). Çalışanların esnek çalışmaya ilişkin tutumlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. International Journal of Economic & Administrative Studies, 7(14), 375398. google scholar
  • Dogan, S., & Demiral, O. (2009). Örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasında personel güçlendirme ve psikolojik sözleşmenin etkisine ilişkin bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 47-80. google scholar
  • Donmez, N. (2015). Ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin psikolojik sözleşme düzeyleri ile örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki. (Master thesis). Uşak University Social Sciences Institute, Uşak. google scholar
  • Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 145-167. google scholar
  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42 google scholar
  • Etzioni, A. (1975). A Evaluation of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement and their Correlates. Free Press, New York. google scholar
  • Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why work-life balance now?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 387-400. google scholar
  • Fonner, K. L.,& Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4),336-361. google scholar
  • French, R., Rayner, C., Rees, G., & Rumbles, S. (2011). Organizational behaviour. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Friedman, D.E. (2012). Workplace flexibility: A guide for companies, Retrieved October. google scholar
  • Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. google scholar
  • Galinsky, E., Sakai, K., &Wigton, T. (2011). Workplace flexibility: From research to action. The Future of Children, 21(2), 141-161. google scholar
  • Glynn, C., Steinberg, I., & McCartney, C. (2002). Work-life balance: the role of the manager. UK: Roffey Park Institute. google scholar
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88. google scholar
  • Grenier, J. N., Giles, A., & Belanger, J. (1997). Internal versus external labour flexibility: a two-plant comparison in Canadian manufacturing. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 52(4), 683-711. google scholar
  • Grimmer, M., & Oddy, M. (2007). Violation of the psychological contract: The mediating effect of relational versus transactional beliefs. Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), 153-174. https:// google scholar
  • Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Shulkin, S. (2008). Schedule flexibility and stress: Linking formal flexible arrangements and perceived flexibility to employee health. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 199-214. google scholar
  • Guest, D.E., & Conway, N. (2003). The psychological contract, health and well-being. In M.J., Schabracq, J.A.M., Winnubst, & C.L., Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 143-158). Second Edition, England: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Guest, D. E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649-664.<649::AID-JOB970>3.0.CO;2-T google scholar
  • Guest, D. (2004). Flexible employment contracts, the psychological contract and employee outcomes: an analysis and review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(1), 1-19. google scholar
  • Halpern, D.F., & Murphy, S.E. (2005). From work-family balance to work-family interaction: Changing the metaphor. New Jersey: Lawrence. google scholar
  • Hayman, J. (2010). Flexible work schedules and employee well-being. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 35(2), 76-87. google scholar
  • Jeffrey Hill, E., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 149-163. google scholar
  • Jones, F., Burke, R.J., & Westman, M. (2006). Work-life balance: A psychological perspective. New York: Psychology Press. google scholar
  • Keman, G. (2012). Psikolojik sözleşmenin örgütsel bağlılığa olan etkisi: Tekstil sektöründe bir uygulama. (Master Thesis), Trakya University Social Sciences Institute. google scholar
  • Kodz, J., Harper, H., & Dench, S. (2002). Work-life balance: Beyond the rhetoric. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies. google scholar
  • Kordeve, M. K., & Aydıntan, B. (2016). Correlation between flexible working and organizational commitment: an application on health professionals. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 8(2), 277-292. google scholar
  • Kossek, E.E., & Lautsch, B.A. (2007). CEO of me: Creating a life that works in the flexible job age. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing. google scholar
  • Kossek, E.E., & Michel, J.S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S., Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.535-572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. google scholar
  • Kotter, J. P. (1973). The psychological contract: Managing the joining-upprocess. California Management Review, 15(3), 91-99. google scholar
  • Lee, G. J., & Faller, N. (2005). Transactional and relational aspects of the psychological contracts of temporary workers. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(4),831-847. https://doi. org/10.1177/008124630503500412 google scholar
  • Macneil, I. R. (1985). Relational contract: What we do and do not know. Wis. L. Rev., 483-525. google scholar
  • Mccarraher, L., & Daniels, L. (2002), Dengeli Yaşam (Ü. Şensoy, Trans.), Optimist, İstanbul. google scholar
  • McDonald, D. J., & Makin, P. J. (2000). The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(2), 84-91. google scholar
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. google scholar
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the” side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372-378. https:// google scholar
  • Meyer J. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. google scholar
  • Meyer, J.P., Stanley, L.J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: a meta analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. google scholar
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L.J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1),1-16. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.002 google scholar
  • Millward, L. J., & Hopkins, L. J. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(16), 1530-1556. tb01689.x google scholar
  • Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: the case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486-500. google scholar
  • Ng, T. W., Butts, M. M., Vandenberg, R. J., DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2006). Effects of management communication, opportunity for learning, and work schedule flexibility on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 474-489. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.004 google scholar
  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499. google scholar
  • Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Matz-Costa, C. (2008). The multi-generational workforce: Workplace flexibility and engagement. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 215-229. https://doi. org/10.1080/13668800802021906 google scholar
  • Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Smyer, M. A. (2006). One size doesn’t fit all: Workplace flexibility. Center on Aging & Work/Workplace Flexibility, Boston College. google scholar
  • Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350-367. google scholar
  • Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R. T. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work-life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 183-197. google scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M., Hansen, S. D., & Tomprou, M. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081-1098. job.2284 google scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511- 541. https://doi. org/10.1348/096317901167505 google scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2011). The individual-organization relationship: The psychological contract. In S. Zedeck (Ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 3). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. google scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2003). Extending the psychology of the psychological contract: A reply to “putting psychology back into psychological contracts”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 229-238. google scholar
  • Sabuncuoglu, Z., & Vergiliel Tuz, M. (2013). Örgütsel davranış [Organizational behaviour]. Bursa: Aktüel. google scholar
  • Scandura, T. A., & Lankau, M. J. (1997). Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(4), 377-391.<377::AID-JOB807>3.0.CO;2-1 google scholar
  • Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework. In C.L., Cooper, & D.M., Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 91-109). USA: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Sutton, K.L., & Noe, R.A. (2005). Family-friendly programs and work-life integration: more myth than magic?. In E.E., Kossek & S.J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life interaction: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 151-169). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar


Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format



Çam Kahraman, F., & Tüzüner, V.L. (2022). Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal, 0(92), 61-81.


Çam Kahraman F, Tüzüner V L. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal. 2022;0(92):61-81.


Çam Kahraman, F.; Tüzüner, V.L. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 92, p. 61-81, 2022.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çam Kahraman, Fatma, and Vala Lale Tüzüner. 2022. “Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 92: 61-81.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Çam Kahraman, Fatma, and Vala Lale Tüzüner. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 92 (Mar. 2024): 61-81.

Harvard: Australian Style

Çam Kahraman, F & Tüzüner, VL 2022, 'Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract', Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 92, pp. 61-81, viewed 4 Mar. 2024,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çam Kahraman, F. and Tüzüner, V.L. (2022) ‘Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract’, Istanbul Management Journal, 0(92), pp. 61-81. (4 Mar. 2024).


Çam Kahraman, Fatma, and Vala Lale Tüzüner. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract.” Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 92, 2022, pp. 61-81. [Database Container],


Çam Kahraman F, Tüzüner VL. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal [Internet]. 4 Mar. 2024 [cited 4 Mar. 2024];0(92):61-81. Available from: doi: 10.26650/imj.2022.92.004


Çam Kahraman, Fatma - Tüzüner, ValaLale. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract”. Istanbul Management Journal 0/92 (Mar. 2024): 61-81.


Published Online24.08.2022


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.