Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2021-984480   IUP :10.26650/JECS2021-984480    Full Text (PDF)

A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups

Esat Daşdemir

This study examines the calculation of consumer price index (CPI) according to income groups. One of the principal determinants of consumption habits is income level; therefore, individuals’ consumer goods baskets change according to income level. In this context, the inflation rates faced differ according to income levels. Using Turkish Statistical Institute data, this study demonstrates that individuals with low-income levels faced higher inflation rates between the years 2006– 2021 in the Republic of Turkey than those in the high-income group; therefore, even if income level remains constant, the difference in living standards between low- and high-income groups has widened due to this inflation difference. Accurate determination of income distribution and income inequality is essential for social policy planning. Consequently, including changes in purchasing power is recommended in income distribution analysis. This study proposes an alternative method for the calculation of income distribution using the Gini coefficient. For the utilization of this method, separate CPI calculations are conducted for each income group using consumer goods baskets representing various income groups. The study contributes to the literature with a novel critique of current methods of CPI and income distribution, proposing an approach to address this criticism. In this respect, the findings and proposed approach could serve as a reference for policymakers’ development and implementation of social policies.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2021-984480   IUP :10.26650/JECS2021-984480    Full Text (PDF)

Gelir Gruplarına Göre Tüketici Fiyat Endeksi (TÜFE) Hesapları ve Gelir Dağılımı Ölçümü İçin Yeni Bir Öneri

Esat Daşdemir

Bu çalışma gelir gruplarına göre tüketici fiyat endeksi (TÜFE) hesaplanması konusunu incelemektedir. Tüketim alışkanlıklarının en büyük belirleyicilerinden biri gelir düzeyidir. Dolayısıyla gelir düzeyine göre bireylerin tüketici mal sepetleri de değişmektedir. Bu bağlamda gelir düzeylerine göre bireylerin karşılaştığı enflasyon oranları farklılık gösterir. Çalışma kapsamında Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ölçeğinde 2006-2021 yılları arasında gelir düzeyi düşük bireylerin daha yüksek enflasyon oranlarıyla karşılaştığı gözlemlenmiştir. Düşük gelir grubunda bulunan bireyler, yüksek gelir grubunda bulunan bireylere göre daha yüksek enflasyon oranları ile karşılaşmaktadır. Bu nedenle gelir düzeyi aynı kalsa dahi, gruplar arası enflasyon farklılığı nedeniyle düşük gelirli gruplar ile yüksek gelirli gruplar arasındaki yaşam standardı farklılığı açılmıştır. Sosyal politikaların planlanması aşamasında gelir dağılımının tespiti ve gelir eşitsizliği önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışma kapsamında gelir dağılımı analizlerine alım gücündeki değişmelerin dâhil edilmesi önerilmiştir. Bu çalışma Gini katsayısına atıf yapılarak gelir dağılımı hesabında alternatif bir yöntem geliştirilmiştir. Bu yöntemin kullanılması için gelir gruplarını temsil eden tüketici mal sepetleri kullanılarak her gelir grubu için farklı TÜFE hesabı yapılmıştır. Çalışma TÜFE ve gelir dağılımı hesabına getirdiği yenilikçi eleştiriler ile literatüre katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yönüyle çalışma sosyal politikaların belirlenmesi ve uygulanması aşamalarında politika yapıcılara referans olacaktır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Accurate calculation of macroeconomic indicators is an essential element for appropriate interpretation of economic circumstances and for the assessment and diagnosis of economic challenges. Since most macroeconomic data depend on other data at the stage of calculation, the calculation accuracy of basic data is essential. The consumer price index (CPI) is one such indicator. The GDP deflator, or CPI, is used to calculate nominal value macroeconomic data; therefore, if the CPI value is inaccurate, all data calculated incorporating CPI and many indicators, even income distribution, will also be inaccurate. Policymakers determine economic goals, develop and implement economic instruments according to these macroeconomic data; therefore, the deviation or miscalculation of these data will hinder policymakers’ objectives.

CPI calculations, which contain important numerical operations, are a highly controversial issue. The first part of the study includes the criticisms developed regarding CPI calculation. As a contribution to these criticisms, this study critiques the determination and calculation of the consumer goods basket, which is the most significant variable in CPI calculation. According to this study, consumer goods baskets vary according to factors such as individuals’ income level, total wealth, culture and beliefs, profession, psychological and sociological conditions, and demographic characteristics. As the population of the group represented by the consumer goods basket increases, individuals’ representative power decreases; therefore, this study advocates the determination of separate consumer goods baskets for various income groups, calculating separate CPIs.

The effects of inflation—referred to as the most brutal tax—on income distribution is a highly debated issue in the literature. Previous studies focus on the causality relationship between inflation and income distribution. In contrast, this study contributes to the literature by including inflation in the determination of income distribution. The indicators used to determine income distribution are calculated using income level; however, the purchasing power of individuals whose income level remains constant will decrease due to inflation. Therefore, while income levels remain constant, the purchasing power of groups that encounter different inflation rates will decrease at different rates. In other words, individuals whose incomes remain constant and who encounter different inflation rates will become poorer at different rates. For this reason, income distribution methods that only accept income level as an explanatory variable in income distribution and poverty determination will be inaccurate. This study proposes an income distribution calculation method that includes the CPIs of income groups and the groups’ income levels. According to this method, the change in the purchasing power of various groups is also included in the income distribution calculation. 

The findings indicate an inverse relationship between income level and CPI in the Turkish economy. As individuals’ income level increases, the inflation rate that they encounter decreases. Low-income individuals endure higher inflation rates in the long run than high-income individuals; therefore, to maintain equality of income distribution, low-income individuals need to earn higher incomes relative to high-income individuals. In the opposite case, income distribution will be distorted even if income levels remain constant.

Constructive criticisms are presented regarding CPI and Gini coefficient calculations published by Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). In addition, the proposal to create the CPI according to the income groups proposed in this study is calculated using TURKSTAT data. The calculated data are shared in the Appendix of the study for the use of researchers. This study suggests that consumer goods basket and CPI should be calculated specifically for restricted groups. For example, it can easily be asserted that consumer goods baskets will differ according to gender; therefore, it could be advantageous to calculate separate CPI and inflation rates based on gender as well as income groups. Households’ inflation rates could be calculated according to marital status and number of children. Calculation of CPIs specific to restricted groups in the determination and implementation of social policies will serve as a good reference for policymakers to identify groups whose purchasing power has decreased in the face of inflation so that measures to support the living conditions of these groups can be expediently developed and implemented. This study proposes approaches that will make an important contribution to the accuracy, relevance, and effectiveness of social policies. 


PDF View

References

  • Agnello, L., & Sousa, R. M. (2014). How Does Fiscal Consolidation Impact on Income Inequality? Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 702-726. google scholar
  • Alam, Md. S., & Paramati, S. R. (2016). The impact of tourism on income inequality in developing economies: Does Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? Annals of Tourism Research, 61(C), 111-126. google scholar
  • Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, Inequality and the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27-49. google scholar
  • Blinder, A. S., Triplett, J. E., Denison, E., & Pechman, J. (1980). The Consumer Price Index and the Measurement of Recent Inflation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1980(2), 539-573. google scholar
  • Daşdemir, E. (2021). Relationship Between Income Distribution and Global Competitiveness Index. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 10-13. google scholar
  • Daşdemir, E. N. (2018). Bölüşüm Üzerine: Ülkelerarası Rekabet Gücü ile Yurtiçi Bölüşüm İlişkisi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 456-469. google scholar
  • Diewert, W. E., & Fox, K. J. (2020). Measuring Real Consumption and CPI Bias under Lockdown Conditions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 27144. google scholar
  • Emek, Ö. F., & Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2020). Gelir Eşitsizliği ile Enflasyon İlişkisinin Gelişmişlik Düzeyine Göre Heterojen Panel Veri Modelleri ile Analizi. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 10(2), 301-312. google scholar
  • Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of Inequality of Incomes. The Economic Journal, 31(121), 124-126. google scholar
  • Hausman, J. (2002). Sources of Bias and Solutions to Bias in the CPI. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 9298. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9298 google scholar
  • Hermes, N. (2014). Does microfinance affect income inequality? Applied Economics, 46(9), 1021-1034. google scholar
  • Hurwitz, A. (1962). Constants and Compromise in the Consumer Price Index. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(300), 813-825. google scholar
  • Iyengar, N. S., & Bhattacharya, N. (1965). On the Effect of Differentials in Consumer Price Index on Measures of Inequality. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B (1960-2002), 27(1/2), 47-56. google scholar
  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. google scholar
  • Law, C.-H., & Soon, S.-V. (2020). The impact of inflation on income inequality: the role of institutional quality. Applied Economics Letters, 27(21), 1735-1738. google scholar
  • Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209-219. google scholar
  • McCarthy, P. J. (1961). Sampling Considerations in the Construction of Price Indexes with Particular Reference to the United States Consumer Price Index. In The Price Statistics of the Federal Goverment (pp. 197-232). Report of the Price Statistics Review Committee, NBER. google scholar
  • Özdemir, O. (2020). The Handicap for Enhanced Solidarity Across Advanced Economies: The Greater the Economic Openness Higher the Unequal Distribution of Income. Annals ofPublic and Cooperative Economics, 91(4), 585-632. google scholar
  • Park, C.-Y., & Mercado, R. (2017). Financial Inclusion, Poverty, and Income Inequality. The Singapore Economic Review, 63(01), 185-206. google scholar
  • Schmidt, M. L. (1993). Effects of updating the CPI market basket. Monthly Labor Review, 116(12), 59-62. google scholar
  • Topuz, S. G., & Dağdemir, Ö. (2016). Ekonomik Büyüme ve Gelir Eşitsizliği İlişkisi: Kuznets Ters-U Hipotezi’nin Geçerliliği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 115-115. google scholar
  • Tunalı, H., & Özkan, İ. (2016). Türkiye’de Tüketici Güven Endeksi ve Tüketici Fiyat Endeksi Arasındaki İlişkinin Ampirik Analizi. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 3(2), 54-67. google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2021a). Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması, 2020. Erişim Adresi: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Income-and-Living-Conditions-Survey-2020-37404 google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2021b). Tüketici Fiyat Endeksi, Temmuz 2021. Erişim Adresi: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Tuketici-Fiyat-Endeksi-Temmuz-2021-37385 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Daşdemir, E. (2022). A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(65), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


AMA

Daşdemir E. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2022;0(65):395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


ABNT

Daşdemir, E. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 65, p. 395-414, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Daşdemir, Esat,. 2022. “A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 65: 395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


Chicago: Humanities Style

Daşdemir, Esat,. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 65 (Oct. 2022): 395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


Harvard: Australian Style

Daşdemir, E 2022, 'A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 65, pp. 395-414, viewed 5 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Daşdemir, E. (2022) ‘A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(65), pp. 395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480 (5 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Daşdemir, Esat,. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 65, 2022, pp. 395-414. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480


Vancouver

Daşdemir E. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 5 Oct. 2022 [cited 5 Oct. 2022];0(65):395-414. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480 doi: 10.26650/JECS2021-984480


ISNAD

Daşdemir, Esat. A New Proposal for Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculation and Income Distribution Measurement by Income Groups”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/65 (Oct. 2022): 395-414. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-984480



TIMELINE


Submitted18.08.2021
Accepted18.02.2022
Published Online15.04.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.