Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0104   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0104    Full Text (PDF)

Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale

Salih DursunOğuz BaşolSerpil Aytaç

Exposure to workplace violence increases employees’ levels of stress, depression, anxiety and burnout and decreases the productivity of the organization. The violence prevention climate refers to the perceptions of employees about organizational policies, procedures and practices relevant to eliminating and controlling violence or aggression in the workplace. The violence prevention climate is an important concept both in the emergence of different types of violence in the workplace and its effects on employees. Therefore, it is important to measure the violence prevention climate. In this context, this research aims to adapt the Violence Prevention Climate Scale, developed by Kessler et. al., into the Turkish language. According to the results of the research conducted with the participation of 279 private-sector employees, the total explained variance was determined as 72.45%. According to the confirmatory factor analysis results, the scale consists of 18 items and 3 factors as in the original (Chi-square/df: 3.78; RMSEA: 0.073; NFI: 0.95; NNFI: 0.96; CFI: 0.96; GFI: 0.90 and AGFI: 0.85). The internal consistency of the scale was calculated as 0.924 and item-total correlations ranged between 0.375 and 0.752. As a result, it was concluded that the violence prevention climate scale is valid and reliable for Turkish society.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0104   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0104    Full Text (PDF)

Şiddet Önleme İklimi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Salih DursunOğuz BaşolSerpil Aytaç

İşyerinde şiddete maruz kalmak bir yandan çalışanların stres, depresyon, kaygı ve tükenmişlik düzeylerini arttırmakta diğer yandan ise örgütün verimini düşürmektedir. Şiddet önleme iklimi, işyerinde şiddet veya saldırganlığın ortadan kaldırılması ve kontrol edilmesine yönelik, örgütsel politika, prosedür ve uygulamalarla ilgili çalışanların algılarıdır. Şiddet önleme iklimi gerek işyerinde farklı şiddet türlerinin ortaya çıkmasında gerekse de çalışanlar üzerindeki etkileri nedeniyle önemli bir kavramdır. İş ortamında şiddet önleme ikliminin ölçülmesi bu açıdan oldukça önemlidir. Bu bağlamda mevcut araştırma Kessler ve diğerleri tarafından geliştirilen şiddet önleme iklimi ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışmasını gerçekleştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. 279 özel sektör çalışanının katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen araştırma sonuçlarına göre, ölçekte bulunan maddelerin faktör yükleri 0,671 ile 0,846 arasında değişmektedir ve açıklanan toplam varyans %72,45 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre, şiddet önleme iklimi ölçeği (Ki-kare/serbestlik değeri: 3,78; RMSEA: 0.073; NFI: 0.95; NNFI: 0.96; CFI: 0.96; GFI: 0.90 ve AGFI: 0.85) orijinal ölçekte olduğu gibi 18 madde ve 3 faktörden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin içsel tutarlığı 0,924 olarak hesaplanmıştır ve madde-toplam korelasyonlarının 0,375 ile 0,752 arasında değiştiği görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak analizler, şiddet önleme iklimi ölçeğinin bu alandaki araştırmalarda, araştırmacılar tarafından kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


One of the reflections of the concept of violence, which is as old as the history of humanity, is workplace violence. Workplace violence, defined as all kinds of actions or events aimed at physical or psychological harm (Wiskow, 2003, p. 7), affects employees negatively. Workplace violence affects not only those who are exposed to violence but also the ones who witness workplace violence. Workplace violence also causes significant problems for organizations. The main organizational consequences of violence are the increase of illness-related absences, job turnover rates, insurance costs and the reduction of productivity (Di Martino, Hoel and Cooper, 2003, p. 63). Moreover, workplace violence affects employees’ motivation and commitment, quality and timely production and competitiveness, corporate loyalty, creativity, working climate and causes indirect costs on organizations (Di Martino, 2002, p. 27). The main social cost of workplace violence is the increase in health/treatment costs, early retirement and loss of production (Hoel, Sparks and Cooper, 2001, p. 51).

As can be seen, workplace violence causes serious costs for employees, organizations and society. Therefore, it is important to identify organizational factors to reduce violence. One of the important organizational factors for reducing or preventing violence is the climate of preventing violence (Spector, Yang and Zhou, 2015, p. 325-326).

The violence prevention climate is the perception of employees about organizational policies, procedures and practices for eliminating and controlling violence or aggression in the workplace (Spector, Coulter, Stockwell and Matz, 2007, p. 119-120). A positive violence climate is the establishment of policies and procedures to manage and prevent physical violence and verbal aggression in the workplace by the organization. In this respect, having a positive violence climate helps to eliminate and identify the main risk factors related to violence and aggression in the workplace as well as reducing existing violence and aggression (Kessler, Spector, Chang and Parr, 2008, p. 110)

In this context, this research aims to adapt the Violence Prevention Climate Scale developed by Kessler et. al. in 2008 into the Turkish language. The research was conducted voluntarily with a total of 279 people working in different companies operating in the service sector in Bursa, Turkey. There are 2 sections in the questionnaire form used in the research. The first part aims to determine the demographic characteristics of the participants (gender, marital status, educational age and work experience). In the second part, the Violence Prevention Climate Scale, which was developed by Kessler et. al. (2008), consisting of 18 items and 3 factors (policies and procedures, practices and response, pressure for unsafe practices) has been conducted. In the evaluation of the scale, a 6-point Likert-type assessment was used (1: strongly disagree; 6: strongly agree) and SPSS 22, LISREL 8.71 programs were used for data analysis.

According to the results, 53.8% of the participants were female, 55.2% were single and 45.5% had a high school education. The ages of the participants ranged between 17 and 54 and the mean age was 28±6.43. The duration of the work experience of the participants ranged from 1 to 35 years and the average experience duration was 5±5.33 years.

After the analysis, the data set was found to be suitable for explanatory factor analysis (KMO: 0.899; Barlett’s p: 0.00). According to the results of the exploratory factor analysis (the Extraction method was principal component analysis, the rotation method was Varimax with Kaiser Normalization), 18 items with factor loads ranging from 0.671 to 0.846 were collected in the 3 factors and these factors explained 72.45% of the total variance. In this case, the items on the scale exactly matched the factor structure in the original study.

According to confirmatory factor analysis, all paths between the item and the factor were significant (t>1.96) and the standardized factor loadings of all items were greater than 0.50. When the goodness of fit statistics are examined (Chi-square / freedom value: 3.78; RMSEA: 0.073; NFI: 0.95; NNFI: 0.96; CFI: 0.96; GFI: 0.90 and AGFI: 0.85), all of the values are above the acceptable goodness of fit statistics, so it is appropriate to say that the scale is validated with 3 sub-factors. In other words, it can be said that the scale for violence prevention scale is valid.

Cronbach’s Alpha was used for the reliability of the violence prevention climate scale. As a result of the analysis, the Cronbach’s Alpha value of the policy and procedures factor was 0.91; the applications and response factor was 0.93; the pressure factor for insecure practices was 0.91 and finally, the whole scale was 0.92. These values indicate that the scale is reliable.

According to the results of the analysis, the internal consistency coefficient does not decrease significantly if any of the items in the scale are deleted. Therefore, the 18-item scale was found to have a high level of reliability. Furthermore, item-total correlations were greater than 0.30 (item-total correlations ranged from 0.375 to 0.752).


PDF View

References

  • Akça, N., Yılmaz, A. ve Işık, O. (2014). Sağlık çalışanlarına uygulanan şiddet: Özel bir tıp merkezi örneği. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 13(1), 1-11. google scholar
  • Ayrancı, Ü. (2005). Violence toward health care workers in emergency departments in west Turkey. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 28(3), 361-365. google scholar
  • Aytaç, S. ve Dursun, S. (2011). The effect of job satisfaction and stress of the perceptions of violence climate in the workplace. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 70-77. google scholar
  • Aytaç, S. ve Dursun, S. (2012). The effect on employees of violence climate in the workplace. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41, 3026-3031. google scholar
  • Aytaç, S., Bozkurt, V., Bayram, N., Yıldız, S., Aytaç, M., Akıncı F. S. ve Bilgel N. (2011). Workplace violence: a study of Turkish workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 17(4), 385-402. google scholar
  • Bagozzi, R.P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. google scholar
  • Bayer, E. ve Dal, A. (2018). Hemşirelerde psikolojik şiddet ve verilen tepkiler üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 459-481. google scholar
  • Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS ile veri analizi. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Biçkes, D. M., Çizmeci, B., Göver, H. ve Pomak, İ. (2017). Investigation of health care workers’ stress, depression and anxiety levels in terms of work-related violence. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2628-2642. google scholar
  • Björkdahl, A., Hansebo, G. & Palmstierna, T. (2013). The influence of staff training on the violence prevention and management climate in psychiatric inpatient units. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20, 396–404. google scholar
  • Chang, C.-H., Eatough, E. M., Spector, P. E., & Kessler, S. R. (2012). Violence-prevention climate, exposure to violence and aggression, and prevention behavior: A mediation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 657–677. google scholar
  • Chang, Y-P., Lee, D‐C., Chang, S‐C., Lee, Y‐H. & Wang, H‐H. (2019). Influence of work excitement and workplace violence on professional commitment and turnover intention among hospital nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 2171–2180. google scholar
  • Cole, L. L., Grubb, P. L., Sauter, S. L., Swanson, N. G., & Lawless P. (1997). Psychosocial correlates of harrassment, threats and fear of violence in the workplace. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 23, 450- 457. google scholar
  • Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. google scholar
  • Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Çöl, S. Ö. (2008). İşyerinde psikolojik şiddet: Hastane çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Çalışma ve Toplum, 4, 107- 134. google scholar
  • Çömlekçi, M. ve Başol, O. (2019). Sosyal medya haberlerine güven ve kullanıcı teyit alışkanlıkları üzerine bir inceleme. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, (30), 55-77. google scholar
  • De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in social research. Australia: Allen & Unwin. google scholar
  • Di Martino V. (2002). Workplace violence in the health sector: Country case studies. World Health Organization Publication. google scholar
  • Di Martino, V., Hoel, H. & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Preventing violence and harrassment in the workplace. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. google scholar
  • Duan, X., Ni, X., Shi, L., Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Mu, H., Li, Z., Liu, X., Fan, L. & Wang, Y. (2019). The impact of workplace violence on job satisfaction, job burnout, and turnover intention: The mediating role of social support. Health Qual Life Outcomes 17(1), 93. google scholar
  • Dursun, S. (2012). İşyeri şiddetinin çalışanların tükenmişlik düzeyi üzerine etkisi: Sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 3(1), 105-115. google scholar
  • Dursun, S. ve Aytaç, S. (2011). İşyerinde şiddet davranışlarının çalışanlar üzerine etkisi: Bir uygulama. TİSK Akademi, 6(11), 6-29. google scholar
  • Dülgeroğlu, İ. (2012). Marka kişiliği, hizmet kalitesi, hizmete duyulan güven ve sadakat ilişkisi üzerine yapısal eşitlik modellemesi analizi. (Doktora tezi). Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa. google scholar
  • Emmerik, H. V., Euwema, M. C., & Bakker, A. B. (2007). Threats of workplace violence and the buffering effect of social support. Group & Organization Management, 32(2), 152-175. google scholar
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. google scholar
  • Gazica, M. W., & Spector, P. E. (2015). A comparison of individuals with unanswered callings to those with no calling at all. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 1–10. google scholar
  • Gillespie, G. L., Gates, D. M., Margaret M., & Howard, K. P. (2010). Workplace violence in healthcare settings: Risk factors and protective strategies. Rehabilitation Nursing, 35(5), 177-184. google scholar
  • Gökçe, T. ve Dündar, C. (2008) Samsun ruh ve sinir hastalıkları hastanesinde çalışan hekim ve hemşirelerde şiddete maruziyet sıklığı ve kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 25-28. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E (2010). Multivariate data analysis a global perspective (7th Ed.). USA: Pearson. google scholar
  • Halletta, H., Huberc, J., Sixsmith, J. & Dickensa, G. L. (2018). Measuring the violence prevention climate: Development and evaluation of the VPC-14. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 88, 97–103. google scholar
  • Hegney, D., Tuckett, A., Parker, D. & Eley, R. (2010). Workplace violence: Differences in perceptions of nursing work between those exposed and those not exposed: A cross-sector analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16, 188–202. google scholar
  • Hershcovis, M. S. & Barling, J. (2009). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44. google scholar
  • Hintikka, N. & Saarela, K. L. (2010). Accidents at work related to violence-analysis of Finnish national accident statistics database. Safety Science, 48, 517–525. google scholar
  • Hoel, H. & Cooper, C. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. google scholar
  • Hoel, H., Sparks, K. & Cooper, C. (2001) The cost of violence/stress at work and the benefits of a violence/stressfree working environment. Report Commissioned by the International Labour Organization, University of Manchester, Manchester. google scholar
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Kaukiainen, A., Salmivalli, C., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Lahtinen, A., Kostamo, A. & Lagerspetz, K. (2001). Overt and covert aggression in work settings in relation to the subjective well-being of employees. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 360–371. google scholar
  • Kessler, S. R., Spector, P. E., Chang, C. H. & Parr, A. D. (2008). Organizational violence and aggression: Development of the three-factor violence climate survey. Work & Stress, 22(2), 108-124. google scholar
  • Kline, R. B. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Y. Petscher ve C. Schatsschneider, (Ed.), Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences (p. 171-207). New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • LeBlanc, M. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 444-453. google scholar
  • Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 2, 67-76. google scholar
  • Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 99-109. google scholar
  • Roldán, G. M., Salazar, I. C., Garrido, L. & Ramos, J. M. (2013), Violence at work and its relationship with burnout, depression and anxiety in healthcare professionals of the emergency services. Health, 5(2), 193-199. google scholar
  • Schat, C. H. A & Kelloway, E. K. (2003) Reducing the adverse consequences of workplace aggression and violence: The buffering effects of organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(2), 110-122. google scholar
  • Spector, P. E., Coulter, M. L., Stockwell, H. G., & Matz, M. W. (2007). Perceived violence climate: A new construct and its relationship to workplace physical violence and verbal aggression, and their potential consequences. Work & Stress, 21(2), 117-130. google scholar
  • Spector, P. E., Yang, L-Q., & Zhou, Z. E. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of the role of violence prevention climate in exposure to workplace physical violence and verbal abuse. Work & Stress, 29(4), 325-340. google scholar
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş. Ankara: Ekinoks. google scholar
  • Taşkın, Ç. (2008). Pazarlama stratejilerinin oluşturulmasında marka değerinin etkisi ve bir uygulama. (Doktora Tezi). Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa. google scholar
  • Whittington, L. E. & Wykes, T. (1989). Invisible injury. Nursing Times, 84(42), 30-32. google scholar
  • Williamson, A. M., Feyer, A. M., Cairns, D. & Biancotti, D. (1997). The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Safety Science, 25(3), 15-27. google scholar
  • Wiskow, C. (2003). Guidelines on workplace violence in the health sector: comparison of major known national guidelines and strategies: United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden, USA. World Health Organization Publication. google scholar
  • Yang, L. Q. & Caughlin, D. E. (2017). Aggression-preventive supervisor behavior: Implications for workplace climate and employee outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(1), 1-18. google scholar
  • Yıldız, A. N. ve Kaya, M. (2009). İşyerinde şiddet. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni, 28(3), 1-6. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Dursun, S., Başol, O., & Aytaç, S. (2020). Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


AMA

Dursun S, Başol O, Aytaç S. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society. 2020;0(62):209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


ABNT

Dursun, S.; Başol, O.; Aytaç, S. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 62, p. 209-225, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Dursun, Salih, and Oğuz Başol and Serpil Aytaç. 2020. “Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62: 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


Chicago: Humanities Style

Dursun, Salih, and Oğuz Başol and Serpil Aytaç. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62 (Jun. 2021): 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


Harvard: Australian Style

Dursun, S & Başol, O & Aytaç, S 2020, 'Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale', Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, pp. 209-225, viewed 25 Jun. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Dursun, S. and Başol, O. and Aytaç, S. (2020) ‘Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale’, Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), pp. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104 (25 Jun. 2021).


MLA

Dursun, Salih, and Oğuz Başol and Serpil Aytaç. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, 2020, pp. 209-225. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104


Vancouver

Dursun S, Başol O, Aytaç S. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society [Internet]. 25 Jun. 2021 [cited 25 Jun. 2021];0(62):209-225. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104 doi: 10.26650/JECS2019-0104


ISNAD

Dursun, Salih - Başol, Oğuz - Aytaç, Serpil. Validity and Reliability Study of the Violence Prevention Climate Scale”. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0/62 (Jun. 2021): 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0104



TIMELINE


Submitted05.12.2019
Accepted12.04.2020
Published Online30.04.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.