Erkan

Lecturer

Hazal

Personal grounds for exclusion of punishment refer to personal reasons that prevent an offender from being punished despite the presence of the elements of typicality, illegality, and culpability existing at the time the crime was committed. How to make a legal assessment in terms of an offender who has made a mistake is a very controversial issue regarding the objective conditions of these grounds.According to the objective theories put forward in this regard, the objective presence of personal grounds for exclusion of punishment is decisive, and the offender’s ignorance of the objective conditions of these reasons will not affect their criminal liability, because these are objective reasons that are completely beyond injustice and culpability.&nbsp;On the other hand, according to strict subjective theories, a mistake made in terms of the objective conditions of personal grounds for exclusion of punishment should be accepted as also affecting the offender’s criminal responsibility. However, different theoretical and normative justifications have been put forward by various authors regarding the legal reason for this effect.&nbsp;Other authors who accept that a result should be attached to the offender’s subjective situation do not reject the arguments of objective theories, nor have they made a general assessment on this subject. Instead, they support limited subjective theories and argue that a mistake made regarding the objective conditions of the personal grounds for exclusion of punishment as established for certain crimes will eliminate the offender’s criminal responsibility. However, these authors do not make categorical distinctions among the personal grounds for exclusion of punishment.Lastly, still other authors have used separative theory to argue that distinctions should be made among the personal grounds for exclusion of punishment. Accordingly, if a personal ground for exclusion of punishment exclusively or predominantly serves the state’s policies on punishment, then the completely objective situation will be taken into account in terms how to apply these grounds, and the error is insignificant regarding the circumstances of these grounds.Conversely, if these grounds primarily require consideration of the act’s motivation, similar to a state of necessity or decreased level of culpability of the crime, one must consider the what the offender envisaged.Making such distinctions appears to be quite correct. However, the conclusions to be drawn from this distinction should be compatible with the letter and systematics of the law.&nbsp;This study has reached the opinion that if a personal ground for exclusion of punishment exclusively or predominantly serves the state’s policies on crime and punishment, attributing a result to an error in the objective conditions is impossible, due to such a reason being unable to affect one’s culpability regarding an act. On the other hand, if the hypothetical formation of the offender’s motivation in committing an act was taken into account when the legislator established the personal grounds for exclusion of punishment, then the need exists to think differently. In such cases, the legislator accepts that the weight of the lack of judgment regarding normative social values in the face of the act has not reached a level worthy of punishment, which is reflected in law as a personal ground for exclusion of punishment regarding the crime in question.For example, in cases falling within the scope of the Turkish Penal Code (TPC) Art. 283/3, a legislator assumes that the conflict between compliance with the norm and protecting a relative from danger would shape the offender’s motivation to act. Because this assumption is based on the offender’s motivation to act, one should assumed that the mistake made regarding the objective conditions of such personal grounds for exclusion of punishment also shaped the motivation to act. Therefore, an offender who has made a mistake regarding the objective conditions of a personal ground for exclusion of punishment should also benefit from this mistake.When looking at the TPC, an error in the objective conditions of personal grounds for exclusion of punishment is not seen to be regulated under any clear norm. When looking at the TPC systematically, this is understood to be an unconscious gap in the law. However, a legislator has regulated errors regarding the objective conditions of the reasons that remove or reduce culpability in TPC Art. 30/3. In this context, this study has the opinion that TPC Art. 30/3 should be applied by analogy in favor of the offender in terms of an error regarding the objective conditions of personal impunity in the narrow sense, which also affects culpability in terms of nature. Accordingly, an offender who makes an inevitable error regarding the objective conditions of personal grounds for exclusion of punishment should benefit from this mistake in accordance with the provision in TPC Art. 30/3.&nbsp;

Şahsi Cezasızlık Sebeplerinin Maddi Şartlarında Hata

Derya

Assist. Prof.

Türkiye’s Penal Reform on Domestic Violence: From the Opuz Case to the 2020s

İbrahim

Many reforms were made in the Ottoman Empire after the Tanzimat Edict. One important aspect of these reforms occurred in the field of law. These changes in the field of law can be divided into two: changes made in the field of judicial organization and codification. In 1879, the Criminal Procedure Code (Usul-i Muhakemat-ı Cezaiye Kanunu) was made based on the French Criminal Procedure Code. The concept of the investigating judge had entered the Ottoman legal system for the first time in 1879 and formed an institution that was accepted in the 1929 Code of Criminal Procedure after the proclamation of the Republic. Even if a defendant was ultimately acquitted, the fact that a criminal case had been opened against a person had serious consequences. In order to minimize any unjustness in this situation, the investigation phase should be carried out very carefully. For this reason, investigating judges also served as prosecutors during the investigation phase following the changes made to Ottoman criminal law in 1879. This study discusses how investigating judges were assigned in the Ottoman criminal legal system, their powers and decisions, and how these decisions were appealed.&nbsp;According to the Criminal Procedure Code of 1879, an investigating judge was appointed by the sultan to serve for three years. The term of office could be extended for an investigating judge whose term of office had expired. Administratively, this judge is subordinate to the prosecutor, yet also acts independently as a judge. In case of flagrante delicto, the investigating judge may actsua sponte and conduct an investigation. In this context, the investigating judge collects the evidence, listens to the witnesses, and keeps the necessary minutes. At this stage, this judge asks for help from law enforcement if necessary. In this phase, the investigating judge should inform the prosecutor about the actions he has taken. Apart from cases of flagrante delicto, the investigating judge may conduct an investigation only if requested by the prosecutor in writing. The prosecutor cannot conduct an investigation, with some exceptions. According to this law, the investigating judge has the duty of carrying out the investigation. The investigating judge must collect evidence in favor of and against the accused. A judge who serves in the investigation stage cannot participate in the trial of the accused as a judge. In order to complete the investigation, the investigating judge is to perform many operations, such as conducting an inspection, investigating traces and signs, taking statements from both sides, listening to witnesses, conducting an expert examination, and receiving reports from forensic experts. After completing the investigation, the file must be sent to the prosecutor in order to prepare an indictment. The prosecutor examines the file, and if it contains any deficiencies, the prosecutor may ask the investigating judge to correct these. If the file is complete, the prosecutor prepares the indictment and sends the file back to the investigating judge. In this phase, the investigating judge will decide whether the accused needs to be prosecuted by considering the information in the file and the indictment. The investigating judge is not bound by the prosecutor’s indictment when making a decision. The investigating judge may make a different decision based on the characteristics of the crime. If the crime is a misdemeanor, the investigating judge will send the relevant documents to the civil court of peace. And if the accused is in custody in this case, the decision to release the accused will be made. If the committed act is considered criminal, the investigating judge will send the file to the court, and if the crime does not require a prison sentence, the judge will make the decision to release the accused. In this stage, the investigating judge will need to obtain a certificate of residence from the accused. A person who has been accused of a serious crime may eventually be acquitted. However, until the acquittal, this person will feel torment and anxiety throughout the trial and be exposed in front of the public. This situation will cause material and immaterial damage that cannot be easily compensated for, both for the accused and the family of the accused. This is why the investigation conducted against a person must be carried out very carefully. For this reason, having the investigating judge as well as the prosecutor take part in the investigation phase is important. One of the results this study has reached is that it has revealed to an extent the level the Ottoman judicial system had achieved in the Tanzimat Period. As a result of the transformation that started with the Tanzimat Period in the Ottoman Empire, a comprehensive judicial structure had been established that was able to meet the needs of the day. This structure was also bequeathed to the newly established Republic of Turkey.

Osmanlı Ceza Yargılamasında Müstantik (Sorgu Hâkimi)

Nuray

Sevil

Prof. Dr.

Violence by a Female Confidant in Turkiye in  the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Gender Shadow Pandemic

Şölen

Res. Assist.

Child pornography has become more widespread with the development of the Internet and virtual platforms and has created one of the biggest dangers on the Internet for children. When considering that child pornography also involves their being sexual abused, the importance of the issue becomes too great to ignore. For this reason, child pornography has been seen as a problem that should be solved not only by legal experts, but also by psychiatrists, sociologists, educators, and parents, with studies also having been carried out in every discipline to prevent the current problem. In line with this purpose, some regulations have been passed to prevent child pornography, with international regulations having called upon states to criminalize acts related to child pornography, as well as allowing children access to pornographic products. Despite states having regulated child pornography as a crime in their domestic laws, uniformity generally does not exist in its definitions. To say that the reason for these inconsistencies is due to how the concept is interpreted differently in terms of social understanding would not be wrong. For instance, even&nbsp;different interpretations within the legal sense of the concept of child exist, despite this concept being considered very basic. As an accordant example, different penalties in German criminal law are given regarding the use of children between 14-18 and those under 14 years of age in pornographic products. Should this type of grouping be made among children in this regard? Various interpretations of even simple-looking concepts, such as children have major practical significance. For this reason, consensus regarding the child pornography concept must first be reached so that standard regulations can be made regarding the prevention of child pornography within the framework of international requirements, as well as to regulate and adapt domestic law in light of international conventions. Although definitions of the subject are found in many international and domestic regulations, the concept still has problematic points.One of the points that should be mentioned in this regard is the concept of child pornography itself. When considering that a child’s best interests is a value that needs to be protected to a high degree, how accurate would is the use of the concept of pornography? Despite the familiarity of the usage of child pornography, the concept of pornography here is insufficient for protecting children from sexual abuse. As a matter of fact, when looking at general definitions, the concept of pornography is briefly described as materials in which people are made into sexual objects and shown with just aesthetic concern for the purpose of sexual arousal. In this case, if child pornography is interpreted as the use of children in pornographic products within the scope of its literal meaning, only very grave actions on children would be considered within the scope of child pornography. Although child pornography is more commonly used as a general concept, the Turkish Penal Code does not contain the concept of child pornography, with all acts related to child pornography being regulated under the crime of obscenity.Obscenities are defined as products that carry no artistic, scientific, or literary value; that offend the sense of social Decency; that aim at feelings of lust; and that are produced only to satisfy these feeling. When considering both concepts in the light of the definitions and explanations in the doctrine, the scope of the concept of obscenity can clearly be seen to be more comprehensive than the concept of pornographic products. Therefore, to say that the term “obscenity” as used in the Turkish Criminal Code rather than the term “child pornography” and the search for obscene products in terms of the occurrence of a crime provide more effective protection for children would not be wrong. This study discusses the distinctions between obscenity and pornography and compares them with other concepts in this context. In addition, the study emphasizes what criteria determine the distinction between these concepts.In conclusion, the study has first compiled within its scope the definitions in international regulations regarding the concept of child pornography. Rather than giving only definitions here, the study also compares the definitions found in these regulations with one another. Afterward, the study evaluates the regulations regarding child pornography in the Turkish Penal Code in light of all these definitions and discusses which of these definitions is able to provide more effective protection for children. When making these determinations, the study also takes into consideration Turkish and foreign judgments, as well as the criteria that have been brought in the context of these decisions. In addition, comparing concepts and criteria developed within the framework of court decisions will in fact be very useful in determining what content the concepts should contain.&nbsp;

Uluslararası Sözleşmeler Işığında Türk Hukukunda Çocuk Pornografisi Kavramı

Mert

Ses veya Görüntülerin Kayda Alınması Suçu (Türk Ceza Kanunu Madde 286)

Mustafa

The Measurement, Selection, and Placement Center [MSPC] regarding exams and candidate selection and placement conducts several national exams, including the university entrance exams and civil servant exams. Preparing the exam questions, determining which candidates are to take exams, ensuring exams are conducted securely, and announcing results require many essential administrative mechanisms.Although conducting and evaluating exams are considered administrative tasks, exam security and crimes regarding the exams constitute themes that fall under criminal law. Law No. 6114 on the Organization and Duties of MSPC was enacted on February 17, 2011 and states that exams are to be held within the equal opportunity framework. As this paper explains in detail, Law No. 6114 is applicable to the exams conducted by the MSPC as well as by the Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. The article evaluates how the penal provisions in this law are not applicable for exams run by any public institutions and organizations other than MSPC or MoNE. Some decisions by the Supreme Court of Appeal have incorrectly addressed this issue. Law No. 6114 mandates that exam questions and their drafters’ identities be kept confidential. Moreover, questions from the question pool cannot be shared with third parties under any circumstances, whether in whole or in part.Again, the very first sentence of Paragraph 2 in Article 10 of Law No. 6114 defines the unlawful obtainment or possession ofconfidential information as a crime, as well as the disclosure of said confidential information. This paper holds that the crimeof illegally obtaining or keeping confidential information and the crime of disclosing this information can be handled within the scope of criminal intent and under aggregated crimes.Paragraph 3 of Article 10Law No. 6114 defines the crime of cheating. People who cheat either individually or collectively, as well as those who enable cheating, are to be punished in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. The same regulation covers cheating with devices that transmit sounds /or images. The act of cheating using technological devices has not been regulated as a qualified form of cheating and remains open to discussion. The fact that this type of cheating does not qualify as cheating is not appropriate. In addition, the exam on behalf of another candidate or charging someone for the exam other than the one taking it have also been defined as crimes.Aiding the crime of cheating is defined as an independent crime. Lawmakers have differentiated this crime from the general provisions regarding the act of being an accomplice to cheating through Paragraph 3. Another crime defined in Paragraph 4 of Article 10 in Law No. 6114 is the crime of changing exam results. Anyone who changes the results of an exam in favor or against a candidate is to be punished according to this paragraph. The crime described here is related to altering exam results. However, this paragraph makes no specific definitions regarding how or by which methods changing an exam result becomes a crime. In addition, the paragraph makes no distinctions between candidates or public officials in terms of the identity of the perpetrator. Thus, defining public employees as also being able to perpetrate this crime could also have been easily regulated as one of the qualifying characteristics.This paper conceptualizes the crimes defined in Law No. 6114 as exam crimes, as most of the crimes regulated in this law take the form of secondary norms that are regulated on a conditional basis. If the act constitutes another crime that requires a steeper penalty, the specified secondary norm will then not be applied. This theme is taken into consideration within the framework of aggregation in criminal law. This study finds the absence of effective reparations to be open to criticism. The single qualified casewithin the scope of the law is, crime being committed as an criminal organizational activity.

6114 Sayılı Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi Kanununda Düzenlenen Sınav Suçları

Adem

Prof.

An Error in the Objective Conditions of Personal Grounds for Exclusion of Punishment

The Investigating Judge in Ottoman Criminal Proceedings

The Concept of Child Pornography in Turkish Law in Consideration of International Conventions

Crime of Recording Audio or Visual Media (Article 286 of the Turkish Criminal Code)

The Central Exam Crimes as Defined by Law No. 6114 Placement Center Presidency

@JOURNAL_BOX_CURRENT

@JOURNAL_BOX_EARLYVIEW

Ayşe Özge

If we placed all of our personal data in a circle, the information coming from a molecular genetic analysis of our DNA would be located at the center point. This centre point symbolizes our sensitive personal data. Compared with other branches of law, criminal procedural law is the branch of law which most needs personal data and therefore performs the most interventions in accordance with its proceedings. Moreover, data in the category of sensitive personal data has a great importance in terms of criminal procedure. Since DNA samples cannot be manipulated and provide results with close to 100 percent accuracy, they offer a valuable type of evidence in terms of revealing the material truth. Depending on the offense committed, the molecular genetic analysis method therefore constitutes an important approach in the investigation and prosecution phases of criminal procedure, as being a method of reading the markers expressed in DNA data. Making use of DNA samples is important for criminal procedural law, but it requires using sensitive personal data. For this reason, the need for protecting sensitive personal data should be taken into consideration from the very beginning of the criminal procedure through to the conclusion. In this study, the molecular genetic analysis method in criminal procedural law will be evaluated, especially with regard to the protection of personal data. To this end, firstly the definition of personal data and the classification of specific personal data will be given and subsequently the legal provisions in Turkish criminal procedural law will be examined in detail. As will be seen, in terms of molecular genetic analysis, there are important provisions in the Turkish legislation regarding the protection of personal data. The most important one of these provisions is allowing the application of this method only in cases of where a judge renders a decision based on essentiality. In addition to specifically regulating confidentiality, the objectivity of the expert who makes this analysis and the destruction of the samples used in the analysis have also been regulated. After the evaluation of Turkish legislation, views on the possibility of establishing a national DNA data bank in Turkey, will be discussed. In this regard, opinions in the doctrine shall be presented and the obsolete draft Act on a national DNA data bank in Turkey will be explained. After this comprehensive analysis of the Turkish law, the next topic will be the&nbsp;regulation of molecular genetic analysis in comparative law. In that context, since the related Articles of the Turkish Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) have been translated from the German Criminal Procedure Code (StGB), the first country to be compared will be Germany. In this way, to avoid repeating the same provisions, two different methods will be explained which are regulated in the StGB but which do not appear in the CPC. These are: mass DNA analysis and data storage used for future criminal procedures. In other words a DNA data bank. The second country to be examined after Germany is the United Kingdom. This is because until the ECtHR’s famous decision in the Case of S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom this country had implemented a highly controversial system. Until this decision, the United Kingdom kept DNA cell samples for an indefinite period. Since this kind of application constitutes a very serious interference to the right to privacy regulated in Article 8 of ECHR, the ECtHR ruled against the United Kingdom, and the country made some amendments to its domestic law. Following the United Kingdom, the United States of America will be examined due to it having the largest DNA data bank in the world. This DNA data bank, named CODIS, is used by the FBI. Subsequently, other countries such as France, Italy and Canada (where national DNA data banks have existed for a long time) will be examined, and the different features of the practices in these countries will be explained. In the conclusion, a general evaluation and some important suggestions will be made which should be taken into consideration in case of the establishment of a national DNA data bank in Turkey. In this context, countries that have the most positive practices regarding the protection of personal data will be given as examples. Thus, the recommendations will be given for reaching and even going beyond the levels of international standards.&nbsp;

Evaluation of Molecular Genetic Analysis in Criminal Procedure Law in Terms of Protection of Sensitive Personal Data

Cüneyt

Our study examines the concept of “serious crime” that leads to withdrawal of donation. This may be due to the donee committing a serious crime against the donor or one of the donors’ relatives, which can be a reason for the withdrawal of donations, regulated by the Turkish Obligation Code (TOC) art. 295 I b 1. We refer to “severe crime,” as defined in the Turkish Civil Code art. 510, which regulates the grounds for debarment from inheritance. However, evaluations of severe crime that lead to debarment from inheritance may not be valid when considering the grounds for withdrawal of donation. In case of debarment from inheritance, the person whom the legator is debarring from his/her inheritance may be the heir according to the legator, yet there may be no such relationship between the donor and the donee. The proximity between the donor and the donee may not be as intense as in inheritance law. How can the concept of “serious crime” then be interpreted in terms of the withdrawal of donation? Is it possible, in this case, to deploy the assessments of criminal law? In the context of our study, we attempt to find answers to this question. To not exceed the scope of our study, we evaluate the concept of severe crime only with reference to withdrawal of donation. To gain an understanding of the concept of “serious crime” based on the TOC 295 I 1, a dual distinction must be in place to express the reason for a donee committing a serious crime against a donor or one of his/her relatives. The first distinction is “crime,” and the second distinction is “serious”. This distinction should not be regarded as purely theoretical because when withdrawing a donation, the offense committed by the donee is characterized as “crime” in terms of criminal law. When a donation is withdrawn, the offense committed by the donee is characterized as “crime” in terms of criminal law. To evaluate whether the offending act is a crime or not, referring to criminal law is sufficient. The fact that the offense is characterized as “crime” serves as an objective condition for the withdrawal of a donation when it is a serious crime. The second distinction required is to define the term “serious.” A crime is characterized as “serious” based on private law regulations in relation to the withdrawal of the donation. The criminal law issue will not be effective in this regard. The private law judge evaluates two types of issues when determining the concept of “serious crime”: objective and subjective. When determining subjective issues, the judge examines the following three elements: whether the crime justifies the existence of ingratitude, any damage caused to the donor because of the crime, and the objective justification for&nbsp;this damage. The judge should examine the nature of each specific case type, the extent of the donation, the motivation of the donor to donate, the motivation of the donee in relation to the offense, whether the donor is at fault or not, and whether these three elements exist together.

“Serious Crime” in Terms of the Withdrawal of the Donation

@JOURNAL_BOX_FEATURED

Boran Ali

Restorative justice is an alternative practice of justice whereby offenders and victims voluntarily encounter, empathise and finally reconcile with each other in the presence of family and relatives, and other mediators. It has emerged as a substitute for the criminalising effects and humane-fiscal cost of the retributive justice system and initiated the active participation of community members in justice procedure. In this regard, community values and norms function as replacements for the written law of the state and criminal justice courts but with regard to more integrating and inclusionary means. The aim is, simply, to restore the broken rule of law by reintegrating perpetrators into the law-abiding community. The main condition for reconciliation between parties relies on a mutual positive emotional interaction and transference between parties, the aim of which is to make offenders reflect on their illicit behaviours and ultimately feel shame and remorse. Even though debates mostly focus on the judicial and socio-cultural viability of this alternative justice system, it is the possibility of a positive emotional interaction that plays a critical role in setting peace and reconciliation between victim and offenders. The idealised process is personified by the revealing of positive emotional expressions, mutual empathy and understanding between the parties in a conflict of interest. A psychosocial criminological approach to the evidence found in the literature on restorative justice has thus far shown that shame and remorse are the two key emotions anticipated for reconciliation in this setting. While not referenced explicitly, this emotional interaction process bears rather on a psychosocial character given that certain psychoanalytical processes are implicitly at work when victims and offenders are seeking to empathise with each other. Given the previous successful results of restorative justice conferences, emotional interaction between the parties has been observed to lead to the construction of mutual empathy and final closure, relying on identification and transference. In the course of the interaction, certain emotional turning points have been identified as taking place between the victim and the offenders, the latter of whom attempts to initiate a possible closure by symbolicemotional posture, facial expressions and gestures. These emotional turning points usually change the course of the conversation between the parties, resulting in the expression of a cordial apology by the offender and its acceptance by victim. However, studies on restorative justice reveal the problem of offenders’ sincerity and the genuineness of their remorse and guilt in such encounters. Some researchers&nbsp;argue that a genuine flow of shame and remorse, in an idealised form, is not displayed by offenders in contrast to the idealised expectations. To exemplify this, setting out the findings of the South Australia Juvenile Justice Research and Conferencing Project, Kathleen Daly draws attention to the fact that victims thought that only 30 per cent of offenders’ apologies were genuine, whereas offenders claimed that 60 per cent of apologies were truly sorry. This means that victims do not think offenders’ apologies are sincere and that offenders think that their apology does not truly reflect any genuine intent. Put it another way, the evidences suggest that there is a radical difference between offenders’ psychic-inner experiences and the presentation of themselves regarding the imperatives of restorative justice setting. This paper offers a conceptual distinction between emotion and affect as viewed from a psychoanalytically-inflected psychosocial criminological perspective. It further argues that emotion refers to symbolic bodily–linguistic signifiers being adaptable and consciously manipulable according to social contexts, whilst affect indicates an energy or intensities experienced unconsciously and not being symbolised. Setting out various case studies and pieces of evidence, the paper suggests that under the pressure of negative affects such as anxiety and fear of a possible failure of the restorative justice conference, offenders tend to display positive symbolic-emotional representations in a way that would convince victims and other mediators of their guilt and shame. The latter usually leads to the expected–idealised result of the victim-offender encounter. Thus, affective intensities in the emotional turning points need to be considered within the interaction process between victim and offender. A psychosocial criminological perspective should always be taken into consideration while restorative justice practices are claimed to be successful and implemented in a specific social and judicial setting.

Victim-Offender Encounters in Restorative Justice Practices: Emotional Representations versus Genuine Affects

Kerryn

Scott A.

Dale M.

Gender and Prison Recidivism: The Influence of Protective and Risk Factors

@JOURNAL_BOX_MOSTREAD

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) is an open access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal published biannually in June and December. It has been an official publication of Istanbul University Faculty of Law, Criminal Law and Criminology Research and Practice Center.

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) focuses primarily on penal law and criminology, and also welcomes the articles on subjects related with crime and criminality. The journal aims to offer an international platform for exchange of knowledge and contribute to the field in all aspects with high quality content. Besides articles in Turkish, articles in English, German, French, Spanish and Italian are included within the journal. The target group of the journal consists of academicians, researchers, professionals, students, related professional and academic bodies and institutions.

ERIH PLUS

DOAJ

TR Dizin

Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)

EBSCO

@METRIC_VOLUMES

@METRIC_ISSUES

@METRIC_ARTICLES

@METRIC_OPENACCESS

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology

@INFO_TAB_ABOUT

Editor in Chief

Co Editor in Chief

Managing Editor

Editorial Management Board Member

Section Editor

Language Editor

Statistics Editor

Editorial Assistant

Editorial Board Member

Advisory Board Member

@INFO_TAB_BOARDS

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) is an open access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal published biannually in June and December. It has been an official publication of Istanbul University Faculty of Law, Criminal Law and Criminology Research and Practice Center.Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) focuses primarily on penal law and criminology, and also welcomes the articles on subjects related with crime and criminality. The journal aims to offer an international platform for exchange of knowledge and contribute to the field in all aspects with high quality content. Besides articles in Turkish, articles in English, German, French, Spanish and Italian are welcome within the journal. The target group of the journal consists of academicians, researchers, professionals, students, related professional and academic bodies and institutions.

Aim and Scope

<ul type="disc"> <li>Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)</li> <li>TÜBİTAK - ULAKBİM TR Dizin    </li><li>DOAJ</li><li>ERIH PLUS</li><li>EBSCO Central &amp; Eastern European Academic Source </li> </ul>

Indexing and Abstracting

The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and pays regard to Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, <a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a>, and <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> on <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a> The subjects covered in the manuscripts submitted to the Journal for publication must be in accordance with the aim and scope of the Journal. Only those manuscripts approved by every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Changing the name of an author (omission, addition or order) in papers submitted to the Journal requires written permission of all declared authors.Plagiarism, duplication, fraud authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, salami slicing/salami publication, breaching of copyrights, prevailing conflict of interest are unethical behaviors. All manuscripts not in accordance with the accepted ethical standards will be removed from the publication. This also contains any possible malpractice discovered after the publication. Plagiarism Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. If plagiarism/self-plagiarism will be found authors will be informed. Editors may resubmit manuscript for similarity check at any peer-review or production stage if required. High similarity scores may lead to rejection of a manuscript before and even after acceptance. Depending on the type of article and the percentage of similarity score taken from each article, the overall similarity score is generally expected to be less than 15 or 20%. Double Blind Peer-Review After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by the editors-in-chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope. The editor provides a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles and hands over the papers matching the formal rules to at least two national/international referees for evaluation and gives green light for publication upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.

Policies

The journal is an open access journal and all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Except for commercial purposes, users are allowed to read, download, copy, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read" target="_blank">BOAI</a> definition of open access.The open access articles in the journal are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) license.

All expenses of the journal are covered by the Istanbul University. Processing and publication are free of charge with the journal. There is no article processing charges or submission fees for any submitted or accepted articles.

Authors publishing with the journal retain the copyright to their work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>) (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</a>  ) and grant the Publisher non-exclusive commercial right to publish the work. CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Editor should consider publishing correction if minor errors that do not effect the results, interpretations and conclusions of the published paper are detected. Editor should consider retraction if major errors and/or misconduction that invalidate results and conclusions are detected.Editor should consider issuing an expression of concern if there is evidence of research or publication misconduct by the authors; there is evidence that the findings are not reliable and institutions of the authors do not investigate the case or the possible investigation seems to be unfair or nonconclusive. The guidelines of <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/complete-set-english" target="_blank">COPE</a> and <a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/" target="_blank">ICJME</a> are taken into consideration regarding correction, retractions or expression of concern.

To guarantee that all papers published in the journal are maintained and permanently accessible, articles are stored in Dergipark which serves as a  national archival web site and at the same time permits LOCKSS to  collect, preserve, and serve the content.Additionally, authors are encouraged to self-archive the final PDF version of their articles in open electronic archives with  that conform to standards of Open Archives Initiative (<a href="https://www.openarchives.org/" target="_blank">https://www.openarchives.org/</a>). Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of IUPress journal website.

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and pays regard to Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing published by <a href="https://publicationethics.org/" target="_blank">the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)</a>, <a href="https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/#principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</a>, t<a href="https://oaspa.org/" target="_blank">he Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)</a>, and <a href="https://www.wame.org/" target="_blank">the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)</a> on <a href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing" target="_blank">https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing</a>All submissions must be original, unpublished (including as full text in conference proceedings), and not under the review of any other publication synchronously. Each manuscript is reviewed by one of the editors and at least two referees under double-blind peer review process. Plagiarism, duplication, fraud authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, salami slicing/salami publication, breaching of copyrights, prevailing conflict of interest are unnethical behaviors.All manuscripts not in accordance with the accepted ethical standards will be removed from the publication. This also contains any possible malpractice discovered after the publication. In accordance with the code of conduct we will report any cases of suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing.

Ethics

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology (Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi) adheres to the highest standards in research ethics and follows the principles of international research ethics as defined below. The authors are responsible for the compliance of the manuscripts with the ethical rules.- Principles of integrity, quality and ransparency should be sustained in designing the research, reviewing the design and conducting the research.- The research team and participants should be fully informed about the aim, methods, possible uses and requirements of the research and risks of participation in research.- The confidentiality of the information provided by the research participants and the confidentiality of the respondents should be ensured. The research should be designed to protect the autonomy and dignity of the participants.- Research participants should participate in the research voluntarily, not under any coercion.- Any possible harm to participants must be avoided. The research should be planned in such a way that the participants are not at risk.- The independence of research must be clear; and any conflict of interest or must be disclosed.- In experimental studies with human subjects, written informed consent of the participants who decide to participate in the research must be obtained. In the case of children and those under wardship or with confirmed insanity, legal custodian’s assent must be obtained.- If the study is to be carried out in any institution or organization, approval must be obtained from this institution or organization.- In studies with human subject, it must be noted in the method’s section of the manuscript that the informed consent of the participants and ethics committee approval from the institution where the study has been conducted have been obtained.

It is authors’ responsibility to ensure that the article is in accordance with scientific and ethical standards and rules. And authors must ensure that submitted work is original. They must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere or is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere, in any language. Applicable copyright laws and conventions must be followed. Copyright material (e.g. tables, figures or extensive quotations) must be reproduced only with appropriate permission and acknowledgement. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources must be appropriately credited and referenced.All the authors of a submitted manuscript must have direct scientific and academic contribution to the manuscript. The author(s) of the original research articles is defined as a person who is significantly involved in “conceptualization and design of the study”, “collecting the data”, “analyzing the data”, “writing the manuscript”, “reviewing the manuscript with a critical perspective” and “planning/conducting the study of the manuscript and/or revising it”. Fund raising, data collection or supervision of the research group are not sufficient roles to be accepted as an author. The author(s) must meet all these criteria described above. The order of names in the author list of an article must be a co-decision and it must be indicated in the <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/19F4A71C8F1746A989A75F46111763A6" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a>.The individuals who do not meet the authorship criteria but contributed to the study must take place in the acknowledgement section. Individuals providing technical support, assisting writing, providing a general support, providing material or financial support are examples to be indicated in acknowledgement section.All authors must disclose all issues concerning financial relationship, conflict of interest, and competing interest that may potentially influence the results of the research or scientific judgment. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published paper, it is the author’s obligation to promptly cooperate with the Editor-in-Chief to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

Editors evaluate manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, political or philosophy of the authors. They provide a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles for publication. They ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing.Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. They must publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.Editor does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers. Only he has the full authority to assign a reviewer and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the Journal.Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, political or philosophy of the authors. They must have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders. Their judgments must be objective.Reviewers should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. They must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the Editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process.The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The reviewers are not allowed to have copies of the manuscripts for personal use and they cannot share manuscripts with others. Unless the authors and editor permit, the reviews of referees cannot be published or disclosed. The anonymity of the referees is important. In particular situations, the editor may share the review of one reviewer with other reviewers to clarify a particular point.

Only those manuscripts approved by its every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by editor-in-chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope. The selected manuscripts are sent to at least two national/international referees for evaluation and publication decision is given by editor-in-chief  upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.Editor-in-Chief evaluates manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief or political philosophy of the authors. He/She provides a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles for publication and ensures that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing. Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. He/She must publish errata pages or make corrections when needed. Editor-in-Chief does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers. Only he has the full authority to assign a reviewer and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the Journal. Reviewers must have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders. Their judgments must be objective. Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The anonymity of the referees must be ensured. In particular situations, the editor may share the review of one reviewer with other reviewers to clarify a particular point.

Peer Review

Editors evaluate manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, political or philosophy of the authors. They provide a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles for publication. They ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing.Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. They must publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.Editor does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers. Only he has the full authority to assign a reviewer and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the Journal.Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, political or philosophy of the authors. They must have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders. Their judgments must be objective.Reviewers should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. They must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the Editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process.The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The reviewers are not allowed to have copies of the manuscripts for personal use and they cannot share manuscripts with others. Unless the authors and editor permit, the reviews of referees cannot be published or disclosed. The anonymity of the referees is important. In particular situations, the editor may share the review of one reviewer with other reviewers to clarify a particular point.

Only those manuscripts approved by its every individual author and that were not published before in or sent to another journal, are accepted for evaluation.Submitted manuscripts that pass preliminary control are scanned for plagiarism using iThenticate software. After plagiarism check, the eligible ones are evaluated by editor-in-chief for their originality, methodology, the importance of the subject covered and compliance with the journal scope.  The selected manuscripts are sent to at least two national/international referees for evaluation and publication decision is given by editor-in-chief  upon modification by the authors in accordance with the referees’ claims.Editor-in-chief evaluates manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief or political philosophy of the authors and ensures a fair double-blind peer review of the selected manuscripts.Editor in chief does not allow any conflicts of interest between the authors, editors and reviewers and is responsible for final decision for publication of the manuscripts in the Journal.Reviewers’ judgments must be objective. Reviewers’ comments on the following aspects are expected while conducting the review.-    Does the manuscript contain new and significant information?-    Does the abstract clearly and accurately describe the content of the manuscript?-    Is the problem significant and concisely stated?-    Are the methods described comprehensively?-    Are the interpretations and consclusions justified by the results?-    Is adequate references made to other Works in the field?-    Is the language acceptable?Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the editor if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the topic of a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.The editor informs the reviewers that the manuscripts are confidential information and that this is a privileged interaction. The reviewers and editorial board cannot discuss the manuscripts with other persons. The anonymity of the referees is important.

<ol><li style="text-align: left;">Manuscripts should be submitted online via <a href="http://istanbul.edu.tr:8080/en/journal/jplc/home" target="_blank">http://istanbul.edu.tr:8080/en/journal/jplc/home</a></li><li style="text-align: left;">All the manuscripts submitted must be accompanied by a cover letter indicating that the manuscript is intended for publication, specifying the article category (i.e. research article etc.) and including information about the manuscript (see the Submission Checklist). In addition, a <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/19F4A71C8F1746A989A75F46111763A6" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a> that has to be signed by all authors must be submitted.</li><li style="text-align: left;">A <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3D0F829DFC9B4EBA9E2AA77D514E123B" target="_blank">title page</a> including author information must be submitted together with the manuscript. The title page is to include fully descriptive title of the manuscript and, affiliation, title, e-mail address, postal address, phone and fax number of the author(s) (see The Submission Checklist).</li><li style="text-align: left;">Apart from peer-reviewed manuscripts, reviews of judgements, book reviews, legislation assessments and informative notes are included within the Journal. The acceptance or the rejection of the above mentioned works is made by the Editorial Board.</li><li style="text-align: left;">All correspondence will be sent to the first-named author unless otherwise specified.</li><li style="text-align: left;">It is accepted that the submitted manuscripts are in line with the journal’s rules. In case that violation of scientific research and ethical rules and too many writing errors are detected the manuscript would be rejected by the Editorial Board.</li><li style="text-align: left;">The typeface of the submited manuscripts should be Times New Roman and font size should be 12-point, except for chapter headings which should be 14-point and footnotes which should be 10-point. Line spacing should be 1.5 pt. The footnotes must be placed at the bottom of the page.</li><li style="text-align: left;">The name(s) of author(s) should be given just beneath the title of the study aligned to the right. Also the affiliation, title, e-mail and phone of the author(s) must be indicated on the bottom of the page as a footnote marked with an asterisk (*).</li><li style="text-align: left;">The manuscripts should contain mainly these components: title, abstract and keywords; extended abstract, sections, footnotes and references.</li><li style="text-align: left;">Before the introduction part, there should be an abstract between 180 and 200 words in Turkish and English and an extended abstract only in English between 600-800 words, summarizing the scope, the purpose, the results of the study and the methodology used. Underneath the abstracts, three keywords that inform the reader about the content of the study should be specified in Turkish and in English.</li><li style="text-align: left;">Research article sections are ordered as follows: “Introduction”, “Aim and Methodology”, “Findings”, “Discussion and Conclusion”, “Endnotes” , “References” and “Tables and Figures”. For review and commentary articles, the article should start with the “Introduction” section where the purpose and the method is mentioned, go on with the other sections; and it should be finished with “Discussion and Conclusion” section followed by “Endnotes”, “References” and “Tables and Figures”.</li><li style="text-align: left;">A bibliography in alphabetical order according to the surname of the author/authors must be placed at the end of the manuscript. Besides, the sources used in the work should be placed within the footnotes or briefly in the text.</li><li style="text-align: left;">If the manuscript includes a table or graphic, raw data must be submitted as a separate Excel file togather with the manuscript Word file. Tables, graphs and figures can be given with a number and a defining title if it is necessary to follow the idea of the article.</li><li style="text-align: left;">Authors are responsible for all statements made in their work submitted to the Journal for publication.</li><li style="text-align: left;">The author(s) can be asked to make some changes in their articles due to peer reviews.</li><li style="text-align: left;">The manuscripts submitted to the journal will not be returned whether they are published or not.</li></ol>

Author Guidelines

<div>Manuscript Submission GuideBefore beginning the online submission process please read the Information for Authors and make sure you have the followings available:Cover letter to the editor<ul type="disc"> <ul type="circle"> <li style="text-align: left;">The category of the manuscript</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Confirming that “the paper is not under consideration for publication in another journal”.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Including disclosure of any commercial or financial involvement.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Confirming that the statistical design of the research article is reviewed.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Confirming that last control for fluent English was done.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Confirming that journal policies detailed in Information for Authors have been reviewed.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Confirming that the references cited in the text and listed in the references section are in line with OSCOLA.</li> </ul> </ul><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/19F4A71C8F1746A989A75F46111763A6" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a>Permission of previous published material if used in the present manuscript<a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/63A8A40BD2D24BC1BE4A2149AD958F68" target="_blank">Title page</a><ul type="disc"> <ul type="circle"> <li style="text-align: left;">The category of the manuscript</li> <li style="text-align: left;">The title of the manuscript both in the languge of the manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">All authors’ names and affiliations (institution, faculty/department, city, country), e-mail addresses</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Corresponding author’s email address, full postal address, telephone and fax number</li> <li style="text-align: left;">ORCIDs of all authors.</li> </ul> </ul>Main Manuscript Document<ul type="disc"> <ul type="circle"> <li style="text-align: left;">The title of the manuscript both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Abstracts (180-200 words) both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Key words: 3 words both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Extended Abstract (600-800 words) in English (for the articles which are not in English)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Main article sections</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Grant support (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Conflict of interest (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Acknowledgement (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">References</li> <li style="text-align: left;">All tables, illustrations (figures) (including title, description, footnotes)</li> </ul> </ul>Manuscript Submission<ul type="disc"> <li style="text-align: left;">DergiPark manuscript submission site of the journal is: <a href="https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/49/submission/step/manuscript/new" target="_blank">https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/49/submission/step/manuscript/new</a></li> <li style="text-align: left;">The manuscript must be submitted through the account of the corresponding author. The account of authors other than the corresponding author or someone else who is not included as an author in the work must not be used for submission. All correspondence regarding the submission is made with the corresponding author through e-mail via the DergiPark system.</li> <li style="text-align: left;">While uploading Main Document, make sure that the main document has no information that clarify the author’s identity. Due to double blind peer review, Main Document must not include Title Page, the name of author or any other detail that can disclose the author identity. </li> </ul><ul type="disc"> </ul>Files to be uploaded separately<ul type="disc"> <li style="text-align: left;">Copyright Agreement Form</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Permissions obtained for previously published material if used in the present manuscript</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Title page</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Main Manuscript Document</li> </ul><ul type="disc"> <ul type="circle"> <li style="text-align: left;">The title of the manuscript both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Abstracts (180-200 words) both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Key words: 3 words both in the language of manuscript and in English</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Extended Abstract (600-800 words) in English (for the articles which are not in English)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Main article sections</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Grant support (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Conflict of interest (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">Acknowledgement (if exists)</li> <li style="text-align: left;">References</li> <li style="text-align: left;">All tables, illustrations (figures) (including title, description, footnotes)</li></ul></ul><ul type="disc"> </ul></div>

<a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/19F4A71C8F1746A989A75F46111763A6" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/A88EB8B9731B438891352413411FB708" target="_blank">Title page</a><a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7DF8D5C4E6AC44E2BE185FADD62BFE2E" target="_blank">Author Form</a>

<div>Ensure that the following items are present:●    Cover letter to the editor•    The category of the manuscript•    Confirming that “the paper is not under consideration for publication in another journal”.•    Including disclosure of any commercial or financial involvement.•    Confirming that last control for fluent English was done.•    Confirming that journal policies detailed in Information for Authors have been reviewed.•    Confirming that the references cited in the text and listed in the references section are in line with ORCOLA or APA6.●    <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/19F4A71C8F1746A989A75F46111763A6" target="_blank">Copyright Agreement Form</a>●    Permission of previous published material if used in the present manuscript●    <a href="https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/242CCBF87DC24DCC99A7F358A7628055" target="_blank">Title page</a>•    The category of the manuscript•    The title of the manuscript both in the language of article and in English•    All authors’ names and affiliations (institution, faculty/department, city, country),e-mail addresses•    Corresponding author’s email address, full postal address, telephone and fax number•    ORCIDs of all authors..●    Main manuscript document•    The title of the manuscript both in the language of article and in English•    Abstracts (180-200 words) both in the language of article and in English•    Key words: 3 words both in the language of article and in English•    Extended Abstract (600-800 words) in English for the articles which are not in English•    Body text•    Grant Support (if exists)•    Conflict of interest (if exists)•    Acknowledgement (if exists)•    References•    All tables, illustrations (figures) (including title, description, footnotes) </div>

Issue Type	Regular
Editor(s)	Adem Sözüer
Cover (PDF)
Front Pages (PDF)

Journal of Penal Law and Criminology

VOLUME 11, ISSUE 1, 2023

Şahsi Cezasızlık Sebeplerinin Maddi Şartlarında Hata

Türkiye’s Penal Reform on Domestic Violence: From the Opuz Case to the 2020s

Osmanlı Ceza Yargılamasında Müstantik (Sorgu Hâkimi)

Violence by a Female Confidant in Turkiye in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Gender Shadow Pandemic

Uluslararası Sözleşmeler Işığında Türk Hukukunda Çocuk Pornografisi Kavramı

Ses veya Görüntülerin Kayda Alınması Suçu (Türk Ceza Kanunu Madde 286)

6114 Sayılı Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi Kanununda Düzenlenen Sınav Suçları

INFORMATION

SHARE