Research Article


DOI :10.26650/gaad.900115   IUP :10.26650/gaad.900115    Full Text (PDF)

A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618)

Fatma İnce

The Avars, who did not want to fall under the rule of the Gokturks, moved west and sent their envoys to the Byzantine State, informing them that they wanted to conclude an agreement with them. Meanwhile, the Byzantine State needed a force that they could use against their enemies, the Bulgarians and Slavs. For this reason, the Byzantine Emperor Iustinianos I (527-565) signed an agreement with the Avars. According to the agreement, the Byzantine State will pay annual taxes to the Avars, and in return the Avars will fight against the enemies of the Byzantine State. Byzantine-Avar relations, which began as friendly, will become different in the following years with the change of circumstances. As a matter of fact, the Avars did not hesitate to establish unity with the Slavs, who were the enemies of the Byzantines since the period of Iustianos II (565-578), according to their interests. One of the main goals of the Slavic-Avar alliance is over the Balkan territory. The Balkans is very important for both Slavs, Avars and the Byzantine State in terms of its geopolitical position. Although Slav-Avar troops captured a large part of this region with their raids between the years 565-616, it was not possible to capture Thessaloniki, one of the most important centers of the region. In this study, the attacks organized by the Slavic-Avar forces on Thessaloniki in 617/618, the events experienced during the siege, the weapons and equipment used, and the consequences of the attacks that occurred in terms of the Slavic-Avar alliance alongside Byzantium will be evaluated on the basis of the work named The Miracles of Saint Demetrios. 

DOI :10.26650/gaad.900115   IUP :10.26650/gaad.900115    Full Text (PDF)

Müşterek Bir Hücum: Slav ve Avarların Selânik Kentine Saldırıları (617/618)

Fatma İnce

Göktürklerin hükmü altına girmek istemeyen Avarlar, batıya doğru hareket etmişler ve Bizans Devleti’ne elçilerini göndererek, onlarla anlaşma yapmak istediklerini bildirmişlerdir. Bizans Devleti’nin ise bu sırada, düşmanları olan Bulgarlara ve Slavlara karşı kullanabilecekleri bir güce ihtiyaçları bulunmaktaydı. Bu sebeple Bizans İmparatoru I. Justinianos (527-565), Avarlar ile bir anlaşma imzalamıştır. Anlaşmaya göre, Bizans Devleti, Avarlara yıllık vergi ödeyecek, Avarlar da bunun karşılığında Bizans Devleti’nin düşmanlarına karşı mücadele edeceklerdir. Dostça başlayan Bizans-Avar münasebetleri, daha sonraki yıllarda, şartların da değişmesiyle farklı bir hâl alacaktır. Nitekim Avarlar, II. Justinos (565-578) döneminden itibaren zaman zaman Bizanslıların düşmanı olan Slavlar ile menfaatlerine göre birlik tesis etmekten çekinmemişlerdir. Vuku bulan Slav-Avar ittifakının en büyük hedeflerinden biri Balkan toprakları üzerinedir. Balkanlar hem Slavlar ve Avarlar hem de Bizans Devleti açısından jeopolitik konumu itibariyle oldukça önemlidir. 565-616 yılları arasında Slav-Avar birlikleri gerçekleştirdikleri akınlarla bu bölgenin büyük bir kısmını ele geçirmelerine rağmen bölgenin en önemli merkezlerinden biri olan Selânik’in ele geçirilmesi mümkün olmamıştır. Bu çalışmada 617/618’de Slav-Avar kuvvetlerinin Selânik üzerine düzenlemiş oldukları hücümlar, kuşatma esnasında yaşanılanlar, kullanılan silâh ve teçhîzatlar ve vuku bulan saldırıların Bizans yanında Slav-Avar ittifakı açısından neticeleri Aziz Demetrios’un Mucizeleri isimli eser esas alınarak, değerlendirilecektir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Thessaloniki is one of the most important cities of the Roman period. The city has a very important place in the history of Christianity both because it is an important trading port of the Balkan Peninsula and because the Apostle Paulus visited the city. The city walls built during the time of Theodosius (347-395) are another factor that increases the importance of this city. Thessaloniki is the second important city after Constantinople in terms of the Byzantine State. Slavic-Avar troops organized many expeditions in various periods, especially on Thessaloniki, which they considered a key to the Mediterranean coast, but did not achieve any success in this regard.

The Avars will begin to play an active role in Eastern Europe and the Balkans, moving along the path opened by the Migration of Tribes in 558. During the mentioned period, the Byzantine State, on the one hand, was struggling with the socities remaining from the Huns and Slavs in the West, and Sâsânî in the East. Along with the entry of the Avars into Eastern Europe and the Balkans, the Byzantine State had to take measures against the Avars this time. After all, the Byzantine Emperor Iustinianus I (527-565), who realized that he could not fight the Huns, Slavs, Avars and Persia at the same time agreed to pay taxes by making a deal with the Avars, and in response to this situation, the Avars would also side with the Byzantine State in possible struggles against the Bulgarians and Slavs

On the occasion of this agreement with the Avars, the Byzantine State kept the Bulgarians, Slavs and other enemy elements under control and also got rid of the economic burden and loss of people that could arise if the expedition was organized against different external threats. However, since the time of Iustinos II (565-578), the alliance between the two sides ended because Byzantium did not want to continue paying taxes to the Avars. In the later period, the Avars did not hesitate to be in unity with the Slavs, the enemy of Byzantium. As a result of the struggles, the Slav-Avar armies achieved their goal of holding in the Balkans to a large extent and seized many cities in the region. One city would remain independent from this situation: Thessaloniki. The attacks on the region by the Slav-Avar troops in 617/618 have a special place in Saint Demetrios’ narratives.

According to the narration in The Miracles of Saint Demetrios, the Avars first sent scouts who were waiting for everyone outside the walls. The kagan came later, with the majority of his forces, including heavy siege vehicles, rams, catapults, and siege towers. Emperor Heraclius (610-641) was stunned by the Slav-Avar attack as he fought intensely against the Persians and could not send any aid to the city, and as a matter of fact, Thessaloniki had to rely on his own forces. However, the stories of the people of Nis and Sardica, who had previously experienced Slav-Avar attacks and fled to Thessaloniki, created great fear and anxiety on the people. However, despite this, especially with the encouragement of Archbishop Ioannes, the people of Thessaloniki will start to protect the city. It should be noted that the siege was much better organized than in previous attempts. As a result of a number of events that are considered to be a miracle by the people of Thessaloniki but seen as unlucky by the Slav-Avar armies, the siege will result in negativity for the Slav-Avar troops. Eventually, the Avar Khan reached a negotiated agreement with the Thessalonians and left the city. The Slavs sold their captives to the Thessaloniki people. The 33-day siege of Thessaloniki was an siege that ended in failure in 617 or 618 by Slavic tribes and Avars who settled near the city of Thessaloniki, the largest Byzantine fortress in the region. The alliance established, the weapons used, the state of the people, the developments during the siege of the city and the departure of the Slavic-Arab troops from Thessaloniki will be evaluated on the basis of a contemporary source, The Miracles of Saint Demetrios. 


PDF View

References

  • “Miracula St. Demetrii II”, VizantijskiIzvorizaNaroda Jugoslavije, Sırpça trc. Franjo Barisic, I, Belgrad 1955. google scholar
  • Ahmetbeyoğlu, Ali, “Hun Akınları Çağında Balkanlar”, Balkanlar El Kitabı, I, ed. Prof. Dr. Bilgehan Atsız Gökdağ, Prof. Dr. Osman Karatay, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara 2017, s. 75-90. google scholar
  • Anagnostis, Johannis, Selânik’in (Thessaloniki) Son Zaptı Hakkında Bir Tarih, Sultan II. Murad Dönemine Ait Bir Bizans Kaynağı, trc. ve nşr. Melek Delilbaşı, Ankara: TTK, 1989. google scholar
  • Basık, Celaleddin, Hiç Bizans Olmadı Romulus’tan Fatih’e Roma Devleti, I, İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi, 2013. google scholar
  • Baxevanis, Johan, The Port of Thessaloniki, Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki 1963. google scholar
  • Cameron, Averil, Bizanslılar, çev. Özkan Akpınar, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Curta, Florin, The Making of the Slavs History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region c. 500-700, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001. google scholar
  • Çapan, Fatma, Balkanlarda Bizans-Türk İlişkileri, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Elazığ 2013. google scholar
  • Delilbaşı, Melek, “16. Yüzyılda Via Egnatia (1380-1699)”, Sol Kol Osmanlı Egemenliğinde Via Egnatia (1380-1699), ed. Elizabeth A. Zachariadou, çev. Özden Arıkan, Ela Güntekin, Tülin Altınova, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1999, s. 73-91. google scholar
  • Demircioğlu, Halil, Roma Tarihi Cumhuriyet Birinci Kısım Menşelerinden Akdeniz Havzasında Hâkimiyet Kurulmasına Kadar, Ankara: TTK, 1987. google scholar
  • Dikici, Radi, Bizans İmparatorluğu Tarihi (Şu Bizim Bizans-Byzantium 330-1453), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2013. google scholar
  • Kardaras, Georgios, Byzantium and the Avars, 6th-9th Century AD Political, Diplomatic and Cultural Relations, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2018. google scholar
  • Gökbilgin, Tayyip, “Selânik”, İ.A., X, MEB Yayınevi, İstanbul 1996, s. 337-349. google scholar
  • Graauw, Arthur de, Ancient Coastal Settlements Port and Harbours, Vol. III / Ancient Port Structures, Grenoble 2020. google scholar
  • Gregory, T.E., Bizans Tarihi, çev. E. Ermet, İstanbul: YKY, 2016. google scholar
  • Günay, Umay Türkeş, Türklerin Tarihi, Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Hamzaoğlu, Yusuf, “Slovenya’da Avar İzleri”, Türkler, II, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002, s. 687-692. google scholar
  • Hersak, Emil, “Avarlar: Etnik Yaratılış Tarihlerine Bir Bakış”, Türkler, II, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002, s. 641-657. google scholar
  • Jorga, Nicolae, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi, İstanbul: Yeditepe Yayınları, İstanbul 2005. google scholar
  • Kafesoğlu, İbrahim, Türk Milli Kültürü, İstanbul: Boğaziçi Yayınları, 1994. google scholar
  • Karatay, Osman, “Avar Hâkimiyeti ve Balkanların Slavlaşması”, Balkanlar El Kitabı, I, ed. Prof. Dr. Bilgehan Atsız Gökdağ, Prof. Dr. Osman Karatay, Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları, 2017, s. 91-98. google scholar
  • Kiel, Machiel, “Selânik”, DİA, C. XXXVI, İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2009, s. 352-357. google scholar
  • Kurat, Akdes Nimet, IV.-XVIII. Yüzyıllarda Karadeniz Kuzeyindeki Türk Kavimleri ve Devletleri, Ankara: Murat Kitabevi Yayınları, 2002. google scholar
  • Kurat, Akdes Nimet, Rusya Tarihi Başlangıçtan 1917’e Kadar, Ankara: TTK, 1987. google scholar
  • Lemerle, Paul, Les Plus Anciens Recueils Des Miracles De Saint Demetrius Et La Penetration Des Slaves Dans Les Balkans, I, Du Centre De La Recherche Scientifique, Paris 1979. google scholar
  • Maclagan, Michael, The City of Constantinople, London 1968. google scholar
  • Magdalino, P., “Saint Demetrios and Leo VI”, Byzantinoslavica LI (2), 1990, s. 198-201. google scholar
  • Miller, William, “Selonika”, The English Historical Review, Vol. 32, No. 126, 1917, s. 161-174. google scholar
  • Norwich, J. Julius, Bizans (Erken Dönem M.S. 323-802), I, çev. Hamide Koyukan, İstanbul: Kavalcı Yayınları, 2013. google scholar
  • Ostrogorsky, Georg, Bizans Devleti Tarihi, çev. Fikret Işıltan, Ankara: TTK, 2011. google scholar
  • Pala, Ayhan, XV. ve XVI. Yüzyıllarda Selânik Şehri, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara 1991. google scholar
  • Rance, Philip, “The Fulcum the Late Roman and Byzantine Testudo: the Germanization of Roman Infantry Tactics?”, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 44 (2004), s. 265-326. google scholar
  • Süleymanova, Sevda A., “Kafkasya ve Avarlar”, Türkler, II, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, Ankara 2002, s. 674-686. google scholar
  • Theologou, Kostas-Panayotis G. Michaelides, “The Role of Jews in the Late Ottoman and Early Greek Salonica”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 12, No: 3, 2010, s. 307-320. google scholar
  • Ünal, Neslihan, İki Osmanlı Liman Kenti İzmir ve Selânik, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 2015. google scholar
  • Vickers, M., “Sirmium or Thessaloniki? A Critical Examination of the St. Demetrius Legend”, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 67 (2), 1974, s. 337-350. google scholar
  • Whitby, Michael, Essential Histories Rome at War AD 293-696, Osprey Publishing, 2002. google scholar
  • Woods, D., “Thessalonica’s Patron: Saint Demetrius or Demeterius?”, The Harvard Theological Review 93/3, 2000, s. 221-234. google scholar
  • Zenbilli, İlkgül Kaya, “Aziz Demetrios: Selânik’in Koruyucu Azizi, Yaşam Öyküsü ve Mucizeleriyle İlişkili Belgeler, Kültü ve Tasvirleri”, Ortaçağ Araştırmaları Dergisi, Bizans Dosyası, C. 3, S. 2, 2020, s. 361-382. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

İnce, F. (2021). A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618). The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, 0(37), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


AMA

İnce F. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618). The Journal of Southeastern European Studies. 2021;0(37):1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


ABNT

İnce, F. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618). The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 37, p. 1-16, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

İnce, Fatma,. 2021. “A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618).” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0, no. 37: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


Chicago: Humanities Style

İnce, Fatma,. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618).” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0, no. 37 (Jan. 2022): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


Harvard: Australian Style

İnce, F 2021, 'A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618)', The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, pp. 1-16, viewed 17 Jan. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


Harvard: Author-Date Style

İnce, F. (2021) ‘A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618)’, The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, 0(37), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115 (17 Jan. 2022).


MLA

İnce, Fatma,. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618).” The Journal of Southeastern European Studies, vol. 0, no. 37, 2021, pp. 1-16. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115


Vancouver

İnce F. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618). The Journal of Southeastern European Studies [Internet]. 17 Jan. 2022 [cited 17 Jan. 2022];0(37):1-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115 doi: 10.26650/gaad.900115


ISNAD

İnce, Fatma. A Joint Attack: the Attacks of the Slav and Avars on the City of Thessaloniki (617/618)”. The Journal of Southeastern European Studies 0/37 (Jan. 2022): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26650/gaad.900115



TIMELINE


Submitted19.03.2021
Accepted30.03.2021
Published Online31.12.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.