Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390    Full Text (PDF)

Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics

Emine Elif Ayhan

Care is a multi-pronged concept that expresses support for people who cannot fulfill their daily living activities owing to old age, illness, disability, or other conditions; this includes maintaining the social order. Social responsibility for the provision of care is seen as an obligation that must be met within the household rather than in public spaces. Given the gendered nature of power relationships within the household, the provision of care ultimately becomes the responsibility of women. Caring duties imposed on women with a traditional understanding impoverish women in many ways. Despite some policies being implemented to combat this type of poverty, women clearly still spend more time performing unpaid care work compared to men. This “feminine nature” in the care business has brought forth an understanding of ethical care. The ethics of care implies a moral importance in the core elements of human relationships and needs in giving and receiving care. Such ethics, which focus on maintaining the relationships between caregivers and care recipients by harmonizing the welfare of caregivers within the social network, comprise an approach that provides a new reading of human relations. The present investigation examines studies on the concepts of social care and care ethics and contributes to the conceptual and moral discussions on the nature of care, arguing that global care ethics should be built by considering care services beyond private or personal relationships and sexist approaches.

DOI :10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390    Full Text (PDF)

Bakım Etiği Penceresinden Kadın Yoksulluğu

Emine Elif Ayhan

Bakım; yaşlılık, hastalık, engellilik veya diğer koşullar nedeniyle günlük yaşam aktivitelerini yerine getiremeyen kişilere yönelik desteği ifade eden ve toplumsal düzeni korumayı içeren çok yönlü bir kavramdır. Bakımın sağlanmasına yönelik sosyal sorumluluk, kamusal alanlardan ziyade hane içinde karşılanması gereken bir yükümlülük olarak görülmektedir. Hane içindeki güç ilişkilerinin cinsiyete dayalı doğası göz önüne alındığında, bakımın sağlanması nihai olarak kadınların mesuliyetindedir. Geleneksel bir anlayışla kadınlara yüklenen bakım görevleri, pek çok açıdan kadınları yoksullaştırmaktadır. Bu tür bir yoksulluk çeşidi ile mücadele etmek için bazı politikalar uygulanmasına rağmen kadınların ücretsiz bakım işinde hala erkeklerden daha fazla zaman harcadıkları ortadadır. Bakım işindeki bu ‘‘kadınsal doğa’’, etik bakım anlayışını doğurmuştur. Etik bakım, bakım hizmeti verme ve alma konusunda insan ilişkilerinin ve ihtiyaçlarının ana unsurlarında ahlaki bir önem olduğunu ima eder. Sosyal ilişkiler ağı içinde bakım verenler ile bakım alanların refahını uyumlaştırarak aralarındaki ilişkileri sürdürmeye odaklanan etik bakım, bir anlamda insan ilişkilerinin yeni bir okumasını sağlayan bir yaklaşım türüdür. Bu çalışma sosyal bakım ve bakım etiği kavramları ile ilgili çalışmaları içermekte, bakımın doğası hakkında kavramsal ve ahlaki tartışmalara katkıda bulunmakta ve bakım hizmetlerini özel veya kişisel ilişkilerin ve cinsiyetçi yaklaşımların ötesinde ele alarak küresel bir bakım etiğinin inşa edilmesi gerektiğini savunmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


When a person encounter difficulties in performing activities of daily living (ADLs) independently owing to a congenital or later decline in their skills or functional status, they have to receive care service. Performing ADLs is an indispensable necessity for an individual to continue their life. Thus, care services are of vital importance for people facing difficulties in carrying out their daily life activities. However, care work is not only limited to protecting and taking care of one’s body but also has a nature that nurtures social relations and protects the social order. Because people first experience care in the family environment, it is quite reasonable to perceive domestic and family-based care as the foundation of all care relationships. Nonetheless, this situation limits care work to the female members of the family, their private lives, and their close relationships. Therefore, this results in the exclusion and marginalization of women from the spheres of social existence and value. In addition, caretaking becomes an undesirable activity while caregiving is seen as a worthless occupation; the social status of the parties to the care and care work is consequently considered worthless. However, care work is not a gender-specific and private-life activity. Beyond these established borders for care, a concept of care ethics has emerged with which the unique nature of care can be understood.

The ethics of care is a concept that has developed in last 40 years and questions the place of care in society and moral life. These ethics elevate care services to an important value in human life. The starting point of care ethics is any formal and informal care work practice that is important to individual well-being but is not given the value it deserves. People face moral, political, technical, and psychological questions when engaged in daily care activities. Therefore, care work requires knowledge and judgment capability. Such inquiries add a moral edge to care work. Accordingly, caring for someone in terms of care ethics is considered a vital activity for all kinds of living together. Carol Gilligan formulated her ethics of care while attempting to address the problems that she saw in Lawrence Kohlberg’s moral psychology. Gilligan often discusses the expression of women’s responsibilities in caregiving and highlights that social structure, rather than any natural feature of femininity, causes the prevalence of women in caregiving positions. However, because the ethics of care define care generally as meeting human needs in a moral order, it is argued that these ethics should be considered largely independent of gender. Nevertheless, women are frequently the subject of studies on care because of their disadvantageous position in the distribution of paid and unpaid care work. Given this context, the present study discusses the occurrence of female poverty based on care ethics.

It is expected that women alone will fill the gap left by the public and private sectors in unpaid care work. In fact, women are pushed toward multidimensional poverty as they miss economic and social opportunities owing to the unpaid care work that they traditionally undertake. Therefore, it can be argued that unpaid care work impoverishes women. This study draws attention to the importance of building a global care ethic with an ethical care approach by eliminating the gender inequality factor that characterizes care work as the responsibility of women. The ethics of care propose a consideration of care practices in a moral framework; as this challenges historically constructed gender norms, roles, and power relations, this framework can be considered a strategy to combat female poverty based on care work. To this end, care services should be integrated with global social policy by emphasizing the moral philosophy of care ethics. The ethics of care provide the world with a school of thought that sheds new light on care and offers possible solutions. 


PDF View

References

  • Bauer, J. M., ve Sousa-Poza, A. (2015). Impacts of Informal Caregiving on Caregiver Employment, Health, and Family. Journal of Population Ageing, 8(3), 113-145. google scholar
  • Burton, B. K., ve Dunn, C. P. (2013, October 1). Ethics of Care. Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-of-care google scholar
  • Dugarova, E. (2020). Unpaid Care Work in Times of the COVID-19 Crisis: Gendered Impacts, Emerging Evidence and Promising Policy Responses. Families in Development: Assessing Progress, Challenges and Emerging Issues. Focus on Modalities for IYF+30. UN Expert Group Meeting. google scholar
  • Fisher, B., ve Tronto, J. (1990). Towards a Feminist Theory of Care. E. E. Abel, & M. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of Care. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. google scholar
  • Fraser, Nancy. (2016) Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review, 100(99), 99-117. google scholar
  • Gallagher, E., ve Delworth, U. (1993). The Third Shift: Juggling Employment, Family, and the Farm. Journal ofRural Community Psychology, 12(2), 21-36. google scholar
  • Gerstel, N. (2000). The Third Shift: Gender and Care Work Outside the Home. Qualitative Sociology, 23(4), 467-483. google scholar
  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Hankivsky, O. (2014). Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis. American Political Science Review, 108, 252-264. google scholar
  • Haskin, J. (2015). Third Shift Appearance Work: Experiences Of Career-Oriented Mothers. Wayne State University Dissertations. google scholar
  • Held, V. (2015). Care and Justice, Still. D. Engster, & M. Hamington (Eds.), Care Ethics and Political Theory (pp. 19-36). Great Clarendon Street, Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books. google scholar
  • Hochschild, A. (1997). The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work . New York: Henry Hold & Company, LLC. google scholar
  • Hochschild, A. (2000). Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value. A. Giddens, ve W. Hutton (Eds.), Living with Global Capitalism (pp. 130-146). London: Jonathan Cape. google scholar
  • Holstein, M. (2010). Ethics and Old Age: The Second Generation. D. Dannefer, ve C. Phillipson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology (pp. 630-640). SAGE. google scholar
  • Hugman, R. (1991). Power in Caring Professions. London: The Macmillan Press. google scholar
  • International Labour Office. (2019a, September 26). Advancing Social Justice, Promoting google scholar
  • Decent Work. International Labour Office: https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/ multimedia/maps-and-charts/enhanced/WCMS_721348/lang--en/index.htm google scholar
  • International Labour Office. (2019b). A Quantum Leap For Gender Equality : For A Better Future of Work for All. Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • Kittay, E. F. (2011). The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability. Ratio Juris, 24(1), 49-58. google scholar
  • Kohlberg, L. (1968). Early Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View. Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39(4), 1013-1062. google scholar
  • Kranak, J. (2019). Kantian Deontology. G. Matthews (Eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics (pp. 52-63). Rebus Community. google scholar
  • Lalor, K., & Share, P. (2009). Understanding Social Care. K. Lalor, ve P. Share (Eds.), Applied Social Care: An Introduction for Students in Ireland (pp. 3-28). Gill & Macmillan . google scholar
  • Moreira da Silva, J. (2019). Why You Should Care About Unpaid Care Work. OECD Development Matters. google scholar
  • Nguyen, M. T., Zavoretti, R., & Tronto, J. (2017). Beyond the Global Care Chain: Boundaries, Institutions and Ethics of Care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 11(3), 199-212. google scholar
  • Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. google scholar
  • Ogando, A. C., Rogan, M., & Moussie, R. (2021). Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Unpaid Care Work on Informal Workers’ Livelihoods. International Labour Review. google scholar
  • Orloff, A. S. (2002). Women’s Employment and Welfare Regimes: Globalization, Export-Orientation and Social Policy in Europe and North America. Geneva: Programme on Social Policy and Development, Paper No. 12. UNRISD . google scholar
  • Orozco, A. P. (2009). Global Care Chains. United Nations, İnstraw. google scholar
  • Parks, J. A. (2003). No Place Like Home? Feminist Ethics and Home Health Care. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. google scholar
  • Parrenas, R. S. (2012). The Reproductive Labour of Migrant Workers. Global Networks, 12(2), 269-275. google scholar
  • Parrott, L. (2001). Social Work and Social Care (2. bs.). London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Pettersen, T. (2011). The Ethics of Care: Normative Structures and Empirical Implications. Health Care Analysis, 19, 51-64. google scholar
  • Razavi, S. (2007). The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context: Conceptual İssues, Research Questions and Policy Options. Geneva: Gender and Development Programme Paper No. 3 (UNRISD). google scholar
  • Robinson, F. (2011). The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press. google scholar
  • Samman, E., Presler-Marshall, E., Jones, N., Bhatkal, T., Melamed, C., Stavropoulou, M., & Wallace, J. (2016). Women’s Work: Mothers, Children and the Global Childcare Crisis. London: Overseas Development Institute. google scholar
  • Sevenhuijsen, S. (2004). Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London & New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (1987). Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care. Signs, 12(4), 644663. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: a Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (1998). An Ethic of Care. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 22(3), 15-20. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (2010). Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose. Ethicsand Social Welfare, 4(2), 158-171. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice. New York, NY: NYU Press. google scholar
  • Tronto, J. C. (2017). There is an Alternative: Homines Curans and the Limits of Neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 27-43. google scholar
  • United Nations. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on women. New York: United Nations. google scholar
  • Vosman, F. (2020). The Disenchantment of Care Ethics A Critical Cartography. E. F. google scholar
  • Vosman, A. Baart, ve J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Ethics of Care: the State of the Art (pp. 17-63). Leuven - Paris - Bristol, CT: Peeters Publishers. google scholar
  • Williams, F. (2018). Care: Intersections of Scales, Inequalities and Crises. Current Sociology, 66, 547-561. google scholar
  • Wolf, N. (2002). The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. New York: Harper Perennial. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ayhan, E.E. (2022). Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(82), 383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


AMA

Ayhan E E. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2022;0(82):383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


ABNT

Ayhan, E.E. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 82, p. 383-405, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ayhan, Emine Elif,. 2022. “Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 82: 383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ayhan, Emine Elif,. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 82 (Jul. 2024): 383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


Harvard: Australian Style

Ayhan, EE 2022, 'Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 82, pp. 383-405, viewed 24 Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ayhan, E.E. (2022) ‘Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(82), pp. 383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390 (24 Jul. 2024).


MLA

Ayhan, Emine Elif,. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 82, 2022, pp. 383-405. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


Vancouver

Ayhan EE. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 24 Jul. 2024 [cited 24 Jul. 2024];0(82):383-405. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390


ISNAD

Ayhan, EmineElif. Female Poverty in the Context of Care Ethics”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/82 (Jul. 2024): 383-405. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.1007390



TIMELINE


Submitted08.10.2021
Accepted23.12.2021
Published Online02.03.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.