Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SP2021-873927   IUP :10.26650/SP2021-873927    Full Text (PDF)

The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture

Mehmet Can SevinçliYasemin Abayhan

Crysel (2014) argued that Schadenfreude can be evaluated as a trait in the face of various unfortunate events in social life. Accordingly, she developed a 12-item scale that consists of two dimensions: benign and malicious Schadenfreude. The present study aims to adapt the Schadenfreude Scale Crysel developed for American culture to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The study’s sample is comprised of 379 university students (183 male, 196 female, Mage = 20.6, SD = 2.48). The participants were given the Toronto Empathy Scale and Benign and Malicious Envy Scale to test the validity of the Schadenfreude Scale. Item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency were respectively performed on the data obtained from the sample. The item analysis demonstrated the item-total correlation values to be suitable (ranging from .27- .46). As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, five models were generated, and the obtained findings show the Turkish form of the scale to have adequate fit indexes and a factor structure similar to the original scale. As expected, a positive correlation was found between Schadenfreude and malicious envy, whereas a negative correlation was found between Schadenfreude and empathy. Also, the results revealed no relationship to be present between benign envy and Schadenfreude. As a result, the Turkish form of the Schadenfreude Scale consists of two factors and 11 items. According to the analysis, a variety of evidence was obtained showing the scale to be a valid and reliable measuring tool. Hence, this scale can easily be used to determine the level of Schadenfreude in future research investigating interpersonal processes, emotions, the self, and traits.

DOI :10.26650/SP2021-873927   IUP :10.26650/SP2021-873927    Full Text (PDF)

Başkasının Üzüntüsüne Sevinme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Mehmet Can SevinçliYasemin Abayhan

Crysel (2014), sosyal yaşamda çeşitli talihsiz olaylar karşısında başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme duygusunun bir kişilik özelliği olarak ele alınabileceğini ileri sürmüştür. Bu doğrultuda, iyicil ve kötücül başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme olmak üzere iki faktöre sahip ve toplam 12 maddeden oluşan bir ölçek geliştirmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Crysel (2014) tarafından Amerikan örnekleminde geliştirilen Başkasının Üzüntüsüne Sevinme Ölçeği’ni Türkçeye uyarlamak ve psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini 379 üniversite öğrencisi (183 erkek, 196 kadın, Ort.yaş = 20.6, SS = 2.48) oluşturmaktadır. Başkasının Üzüntüsüne Sevinme Ölçeği’ne ek olarak katılımcılara geçerlik sınamaları kapsamında Toronto Empati Ölçeği ve BeMaS- Haset ve Gıpta Ölçeği de verilmiştir. Psikometrik sınamalar kapsamında madde analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, diğer yapılarla ilişkiler ve güvenirlik için tutarlık analizi uygulanmıştır. Madde analizi, ölçek maddelerinin madde toplam korelasyon katsayılarının uygun değerlere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir (.27- .46). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri sonucunda toplam beş model sınanmış ve elde edilen bulgular ölçeğin Türkçe formunun yeterli uyum değerlerine sahip olduğunu ve orijinal ölçek ile benzer faktör yapısına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Beklenildiği şekilde, faktörlerin kendi aralarındaki ve ölçekle olan ilişkileri anlamlı olduğu gibi; başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme ile empati arasında negatif yönlü, haset arasında ise pozitif yönlü bir ilişki vardır. Ayrıca, sonuçlar gıpta ile başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme duygusu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, Başkasının Üzüntüsüne Sevinme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formu iki faktörden ve 11 maddeden oluşmuştur. Yapılan analizler doğrultusunda ilgili ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olabileceğine ilişkin çeşitli kanıtlar elde edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, bu ölçek kişiler arası süreçleri, duyguları, benliği ve kişilik özelliklerini inceleyecek gelecek araştırmalarda başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme duygusunun düzeyini belirlemek için kolayca kullanılabilir. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


According to Festinger (1954), people tend to compare themselves with others. In this regard, people either positively maintain their self-image or enhance their self-esteem (Buunk et al., 2007). Smith (2000) stated emotions to be found based on social comparisons such as admiration, pity, or sympathy. The way one perceives their social environment is closely related to what kind of emotions emerge through social comparisons. For instance, a misfortune that befalls someone causes people to feel not only pity, upset, and empathy but also happiness, joy, and amusement. People occasionally tend to take some pleasure from the misfortune that befalls another, which the literature refers to as schadenfreude. Schadenfreude is a compound word with Schaden meaning harm and Freude meaning joy. Despite discussions regarding to the origin of the word, van Dijk and Ouwerkerk (2014) asserted schadenfreude to be a loanword for English because it derives from German.

Although many studies conventionally measure schadenfreude in response to social circumstances (Dvash & Shamay-Tsoory, 2011; Feather & McKee, 2014; Piskorz & Piskorz, 2009; Smith et. al., 1996), research examining schadenfreude as a trait has been scarce. In a study by Crysel (2014), schadenfreude was measured as a trait through a scale involving 12 items. The findings showed schadenfreude to be influenced by individual differences and to be conceptualizable as a trait instead of an emotional reaction to social cues. Hence, this study aims to adapt Crysel’s Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish and to assess its psychometric properties.

Method

The present study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Schadenfreude Scale developed by Crysel (2014). The translation of the scale was carried out in line with the literature. Firstly, all items were translated into Turkish by the current study’s researchers. Subsequently, these items were reexamined by an expert in the field, and the expert’s opinions were taken to provide clarity and linguistic equivalency to Turkish grammar and culture. Lastly, the Turkish form of the scale took its final form. The research sample consists of students selected using the convenience sampling method in order to remain consistent with the original study. The study recruited 379 psychology students (48.3% male, 51.7% female) from a public university. As data collection tools, participants were given the Benign and Malicious Envy Scale (Lange & Crusius, 2015) and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (Spreng et al., 2009) along with the Schadenfreude Scale. Finally, item, confirmatory factor, construct validity, and internal consistency analyses were conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Schadenfreude Scale.

Results

Firstly, the item analysis results show the item-total correlations of the scale items to vary between .27 and .46. Hence, the representativeness and distinctiveness of these items are sufficient. As a result, each item is consistent with the whole scale. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis was performed for the structural validity. According to the results, the final model was found to be statistically acceptable (χ2 = 61.095, df = 40, χ2 / df = 1.53, AGFI = .95, GFI = .97, CFI = .96, NFI = .90, RMSEA = .03). The results indicate the Turkish form of the scale to consist of 11 items and two factors, just as in Crysel’s (2014) study. The correlation analysis expectedly displayed a significantly positive correlation to exist between the Turkish form of the scale and the factor of malicious envy from the Benign and Malicious Envy Scale (r (377) = .29), whereas a significantly negative correlation was shown to exist between the Turkish form of the scale and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (r (377) = -.39). Also, the results show a significantly positive relationship to exist between malicious Schadenfreude and benign Schadenfreude (r (377) = .34). As expected, both malicious and benign Schadenfreude have a significant relationship with the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (respectively, r (377) = -.47, and r (377) = -.20). The findings regarding the relationship between the Turkish form of the overall scale and its two factors (malicious and benign Schadenfreude) demonstrate a significant relationship to exist between them (respectively, r (377) = .87 and r (377) = .76). Lastly, the analysis revealed no relationship to exist among benign envy, the adapted scale, or its two factors (respectively, r (377) = .00, r (377) = -.01, and r (377) = .02). Lastly, an internal consistency analysis revealed Cronbach’s alpha to be acceptable (.71). In addition, the coefficients for the two factors from the adapted scale were found to be acceptable (respectively, .62 and .71). As a result, the psychometric properties of the adapted scale were found to be sufficient.

Discussion

The current study has aimed to fill the gap in the Turkish literature regarding the measurement of schadenfreude as a trait. As a result, the Schadenfreude Scale developed by Crysel (2014) has been adapted into Turkish as a statistically valid and reliable measurement tool. The results show support for the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of the scale. The scale consists of 11 items and two factors (i.e., benign and malicious schadenfreude). Compared to the original scale, Turk culture is believed to be able to affect a differentiation regarding the number of items on the adapted scale because social events can be interpreted or perceived differently in different cultures. Consequently, this scale is found to be employable in future research on emotions, interpersonal and intrapersonal processes, the self, and personality traits on account of it having features that are easy to use and useful for assessing. 


PDF View

References

  • Aristoteles. (1954). The rhetoric and the poetics of Aristotle. (W. R. Roberts, Çev.). Modern Library. (Orijinal eserin basım tarihi MÖ 350). google scholar
  • Berndsen, M. ve Feather, N. T. (2016). Reflecting on schadenfreude: Serious consequences of a misfortune for which one is not responsible diminish previously expressed schadenfreude; the role of immorality appraisals and moral emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 40(6), 895-913. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11031-016-9580-8 google scholar
  • Berndsen, M., Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M. ve Hendres, D. M. (2017). Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2-3), 166-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573 google scholar
  • Berndsen, M., Tiggemann, M. ve Chapman, S. (2017). “It wasn’t your fault, but......”: Schadenfreude about an undeserved misfortune. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11031-017-9639-1 google scholar
  • Bers, S. A. ve Rodin, J. (1984). Social-comparison jealousy: A developmental and motivational study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.766 google scholar
  • Brambilla, M. ve Riva, P. (2017). Predicting pleasure at others’ misfortune: Morality trumps sociability and competence in driving deservingness and schadenfreude. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 243253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9594-2 google scholar
  • Brigham, N. L., Kelso, K. A., Jackson, M. A. ve Smith, R. H. (1997). The roles of invidious comparisons and deservingness in sympathy and schadenfreude. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1903_6 google scholar
  • Buunk, A. P., Cohen-Schotanus, J. ve van Nek, R. H. (2007). Why and how people engage in social comparison while learning social skills in groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 140. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.140 google scholar
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem A Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Cikara, M. (2015). Intergroup Schadenfreude: Motivating participation in collective violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.007 google scholar
  • Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M. ve Fiske, S. T. (2011a). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science, 22(3), 306-313. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797610397667 google scholar
  • Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J. ve Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007 google scholar
  • Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G. ve Saxe, R. R. (2011b). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408713 google scholar
  • Cikara, M. ve Fiske, S. T. (2014). Stereotypes and schadenfreude. W. W. Dijk ve J. W. Ouwerkerk (Ed.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (s. 151-169) içinde. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Clanton, G. (2006). Jealousy and envy. J. E. Sets ve J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (s. 410-442) içinde. Springer. google scholar
  • Combs, D. J. Y., Powell, C. A. J., Schurtz, D. R. ve Smith, R. H. (2009). Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: The sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.009 google scholar
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 google scholar
  • Crusius, J. ve Lange, J. (2014). What catches the envious eye? Attentional biases within malicious and benign envy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jesp.2014.05.007 google scholar
  • Crysel, L. (2014). Schadenfreude and the spread of a politician’s misfortune (Doktora tezi). University of Florida. google scholar
  • Çırpan, Y. ve Özdoğru, A. A. (2017). Turkish adaptation of BeMaS Benign and Malicious Envy Scale: Transliteral equivalence, reliability and validity study. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 18(6), 577585. google scholar
  • Dalakas, V. ve Melancon, J. P. (2012). Fan identification, Schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of Importance of Winning Index (IWIN). Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211199724 google scholar
  • Demir, E. ve Rigoni, U. (2017). You lose, I feel better: Rivalry between soccer teams and the impact of schadenfreude on stock market. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(1), 58-76. https://doi. org/10.1177/1527002514551801 google scholar
  • Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., Van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P. ve van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828-879. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654308321210 google scholar
  • Dvash, J. ve Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). Envy and schadenfreude: The neural correlates of competitive emotions. R. Ebstein, S. G. Shamay-Tsoory ve S. H. Chew (Ed.), From DNA to social cognition (s. 139-155) içinde. Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  • Erzi, S. (2019). Yardım davranışlarının schadenfreude, benlik saygısı ve benlik tehdit algısı bakımından incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(3), 1015-1021. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2369 google scholar
  • Erzi, S. (2020). Dark Triad and schadenfreude: Mediating role of moral disengagement and relational aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2020.109827 google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. (2008). Effects of observer’s own status on reactions to a high achiever’s failure: Deservingness, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701458068 google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. (2012). Tall poppies, deservingness and schadenfreude. Psychologist, 25(6), 434-437. google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. (2014). Deservingness and schadenfreude. W. W. Dijk ve J. W. Ouwerkerk (Ed.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (s. 29-57) içinde. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. ve McKee, I. R. (2014). Deservingness, liking relations, schadenfreude, and other discrete emotions in the context of the outcomes of plagiarism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12030 google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. ve Nairn, K. (2005). Resentment, envy, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Effects of own and other’s deserved or undeserved status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 87-102. https://doi. org/10.1080/00049530500048672 google scholar
  • Feather, N. T. ve Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 953-961. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720202800708 google scholar
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. https:// doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202 google scholar
  • Greitemeyer, T., Osswald, S. ve Brauer, M. (2010). Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude. Emotion, 10(6), 796-802. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020194 google scholar
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley. google scholar
  • James, S., Kavanagh, P. S., Jonason, P. K., Chonody, J. M. ve Scrutton, H. E. (2014). The Dark Triad, schadenfreude, and sensational interests: Dark personalities, dark emotions, and dark behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.020 google scholar
  • Jung, K. (2017). Happiness as an additional antecedent of schadenfreude. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1173224 google scholar
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996). The autonomous-relationalself: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180 google scholar
  • Kim, J. J. ve Kim, J. (2018). Effects of social identity and schadenfreude on attitude toward brand sponsoring an instant replay review: The moderating role of rivalry and suspense. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(6), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1738 google scholar
  • Krizan, Z. ve Johar, O. (2012). Envy divides the two faces of narcissism. Journal Of Personality, 80(5), 1415-1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00767.x google scholar
  • Kuipers, G. (2014). Schadenfreude and social life: A comparative perspective on the expression and regulation of mirth at the expense of others. W. W. Dijk ve J. W. Ouwerkerk (Ed.), Schadenfreude. Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (s. 259-294) içinde. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Lange, J. ve Crusius, J. (2015). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 284-294. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167214564959 google scholar
  • Leach, C. W. ve Spears, R. (2009). Dejection at in-group defeat and schadenfreude toward second- and third-party out-groups. Emotion, 9(5), 659-665. google scholar
  • Lehr, S. A., Ferreira, M. L. ve Banaji, M. R. (2019). When outgroup negativity trumps ingroup positivity: Fans of the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees place greater value on rival losses than own-team gains. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 26-42. https://doi. org/10.1177/1368430217712834 google scholar
  • Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303 google scholar
  • Nietzsche, F. (2012). Ahlakın soykütüğü: Bir polemik. (Z. Alangoya, Çev.). Kabalcı Yayınları. (Orijinal Basım Yılı 1887). google scholar
  • O’Meara, A., Davies, J. ve Hammond, S. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 523. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0022400 google scholar
  • Ouwerkerk, J. W. ve Van Dijk, W. W. (2014). Intergroup rivalry and schadenfreude. W. W. Dijk ve J. W. Ouwerkerk (Ed.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (s. 186-199) içinde. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Ouwerkerk, J. W., van Dijk, W. W., Vonkeman, C. C. ve Spears, R. (2018). When we enjoy bad news about other groups: A social identity approach to out-group schadenfreude. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663018 google scholar
  • Pancer, E., McShane, L. ve Poole, M. (2017). Schadenfreude and product failures: The role of product deservingness and product status. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15-16), 1236-1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1381639 google scholar
  • Parkinson, B. (1996). Emotions are social. British Journal of Psychology, 87(4), 663-683. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02615.x google scholar
  • Paulhus, D. L. ve Jones, D.N. (2015). Measures of dark personalities. G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske ve G. Matthews (Ed.), Measures of personality and socialpsychological constructs (s. 562-594) içinde. Academic Press. google scholar
  • Paulus, F. M., Müller-Pinzler, L., Stolz, D. S., Mayer, A. V., Rademacher, L. ve Krach, S. (2018). Laugh or cringe? Common and distinct processes of reward-based schadenfreude and empathy-based fremdscham. Neuropsychologia, 116, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2017.05.030 google scholar
  • Phillips-Melancon, J. ve Dalakas, V. (2014). Brand rivalry and consumers’ Schadenfreude: The case of Apple. Services Marketing Quarterly, 35(2), 173-186. google scholar
  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. NY: Norton. google scholar
  • Piskorz, J. E. ve Piskorz, Z. (2009). Situational determinants of envy and schadenfreude. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/s10059-009-0030-2 google scholar
  • Plouffe, R. A., Saklofske, D. H. ve Smith, M. M. (2017). The assessment of sadistic personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.paid.2016.07.043 google scholar
  • Porter, S., Bhanwer, A., Woodworth, M. ve Black, P. J. (2014). Soldiers of misfortune: An examination of the Dark Triad and the experience of schadenfreude. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.014 google scholar
  • Rogers, C. R. (1983). Empatik olmak değeri anlaşılmamış bir varoluş şeklidir [Empathic: An unappreciated way of being]. (F. Akkoyun, Çev.). Ankara Üniversitesitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 103-124. google scholar
  • Salovey, P. ve Rodin, J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.780 google scholar
  • Schaubroeck, J. ve Lam, S. S. K. (2004). Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees’ invidious reactions to promotees. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.01.001 google scholar
  • Schopenhauer, A. (2007). Parerga ile Paralipomena: Ya da kısa felsefe denemeleri. (L. Özşar, Çev.). Biblos Kitabevi. (Orijinal Basım Yılı 1851). google scholar
  • Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. J. Suls ve L. Wheeler (Ed.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (s. 173-200) içinde. Kluwer Academic Publishers. google scholar
  • Smith, R. H., Turner, T. J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C. W., Urch-Druskat, V. ve Weston, C. M. (1996). Envy and schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 158-168. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167296222005 google scholar
  • Spears, R. (2013). Evidence for group-based schadenfreude from the gender domain: From intragroup to intergroup rivalry. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20(4), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.4.1 google scholar
  • Spears, R. ve Leach, C. W. (2009). Why neighbors don’t stop the killing: The role of group-based schadenfreude. V. M. Esses ve R. A. Vernon (Ed.), Explaining the breakdown of ethnic relations: Why neighbors kill (s. 93-120) içinde. Blackwell Pub. google scholar
  • Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A. ve Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62-71. https://doi. org/10.1080/00223890802484381 google scholar
  • Stein, R. (1992). Schadenfreude: A reply to Ben-Ze’ev. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 41, 83-92. google scholar
  • Sung, H., Mills, B. M. ve Tainsky, S. (2017). From schadenfreude to mitfreude? Estimating viewership loss and rivalrous relationships in otherwise neutral markets. Sport Management Review, 20(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.08.006 google scholar
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11165-016-9602-2 google scholar
  • Tesser, A. ve Campbell, J. (1980). Self-definition: The impact of the relative performance and similarity of others. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(3), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033737 google scholar
  • Torun, G. (2012). Sosyal kimliğin kıskançlık ve başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme üzerindeki etkileri. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Totan, T., Doğan, T. ve Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among turkish university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 179-198. google scholar
  • Van de Ven, N. (2014). Malicious envy and schadenfreude. W. W. Dijk ve J. W. Ouwerkerk (Ed.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (s. 110-117) içinde. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • van Dijk, W. W. ve Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2014). Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W. ve Goslinga, S. (2009). The impact of deservingness on schadenfreude and sympathy: Further evidence. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(3), 390-392. https://doi. org/10.3200/SOCP.149.3.390-392 google scholar
  • van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S. ve Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000066 google scholar
  • van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Smith, R. H. ve Cikara, M. (2015). The role of self-evaluation and envy in schadenfreude. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 247-282. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10463283.2015.1111600 google scholar
  • Watanabe, H. (2018). Sharing schadenfreude and late adolescents’ self-esteem: Does sharing schadenfreude of a deserved misfortune enhance self-esteem? International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(4), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2018.1554500 google scholar
  • Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 google scholar
  • Yeniay, Y. (2012). Sosyal kimlik ile algılayan ve algılananın cinsiyetinin başkasının üzüntüsüne sevinme eğilimi üzerindeki etkileri [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Sevinçli, M.C., & Abayhan, Y. (2022). The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture. Studies in Psychology, 42(2), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


AMA

Sevinçli M C, Abayhan Y. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture. Studies in Psychology. 2022;42(2):291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


ABNT

Sevinçli, M.C.; Abayhan, Y. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture. Studies in Psychology, [Publisher Location], v. 42, n. 2, p. 291-317, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sevinçli, Mehmet Can, and Yasemin Abayhan. 2022. “The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture.” Studies in Psychology 42, no. 2: 291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sevinçli, Mehmet Can, and Yasemin Abayhan. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture.” Studies in Psychology 42, no. 2 (Oct. 2022): 291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


Harvard: Australian Style

Sevinçli, MC & Abayhan, Y 2022, 'The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture', Studies in Psychology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 291-317, viewed 5 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sevinçli, M.C. and Abayhan, Y. (2022) ‘The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture’, Studies in Psychology, 42(2), pp. 291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927 (5 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Sevinçli, Mehmet Can, and Yasemin Abayhan. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture.” Studies in Psychology, vol. 42, no. 2, 2022, pp. 291-317. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927


Vancouver

Sevinçli MC, Abayhan Y. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture. Studies in Psychology [Internet]. 5 Oct. 2022 [cited 5 Oct. 2022];42(2):291-317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927 doi: 10.26650/SP2021-873927


ISNAD

Sevinçli, MehmetCan - Abayhan, Yasemin. The Adaptation of the Schadenfreude Scale into Turkish Culture”. Studies in Psychology 42/2 (Oct. 2022): 291-317. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-873927



TIMELINE


Submitted03.02.2021
Accepted06.01.2022
Published Online05.08.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.