Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iutd.2022165   IUP :10.26650/iutd.2022165    Full Text (PDF)

From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica

Diren Çakılcı

The non-Muslim merchants of the Ottoman State had requested protection from the consuls throughout the 18th century for their legal and economic freedom. In this sense, the institution of tercümanlık [dragoman] was open to abuse and exploited, and the issue of beratlı-fermanlı tüccarıs [certified merchants] arose. Selim III in particular fought against this issue in order to preserve the state's reputation and revenues. Salonica was one of the significant cities where the attempt was made to control this issue and the patronage of consuls. The practices of Selim III regarding the establishment of nizâm-ı raiyyet [statute regarding non-Muslim subjects] had significant success in Salonica. In 1806, the issue of beratlı [certified] merchants was resolved in Salonica, and the institution of Avrupa tüccarı [merchants of Europe], which was offered to the dhimmi [non-Muslim subjects] as an alternative, gained popularity. Compared to the Greeks, the Jewish merchants of the city gained an active position in socio-economic life thanks to this establishment.

DOI :10.26650/iutd.2022165   IUP :10.26650/iutd.2022165    Full Text (PDF)

Beratlı Tüccar’dan Avrupa Tüccarı’na Selanik’te “Nizâm-ı Raiyyet” Arayışı

Diren Çakılcı

Osmanlı Devleti’nin gayrimüslim tüccarı hukukî ve ekonomik serbestlik için 18. yüzyıl boyunca konsoloslardan himaye talep etmişti. Bu anlamda suistimal edilmeye müsait olan tercümanlık kurumundan istifade edilmiş, beratlıfermanlı tüccarlar meselesi ortaya çıkmıştı. Özellikle III. Selim, devletin itibarının ve gelirlerinin muhafazası için bu meseleyle mücadele etmişti. Selanik, beratlı tüccarın ve konsolos himayesinin kontrol altına alınmaya çalışıldığı önemli şehirlerdendi. III. Selim’in, devletin gayrimüslim tebaasıyla olan ilişkilerindeki düzen anlamına gelen “nizâm-ı raiyyet”i tesisine dair uygulamaları Selanik özelinde başarı göstermişti. 1806 yılında Selanik’te beratlı tüccar sorunu çözülmüş, alternatif olarak reayaya sunulan Avrupa tüccarı müessesesi rağbet görmüştü. Rumlara nazaran, şehrin Yahudi tüccarları bu müessese sayesinde sosyo-ekonomik hayatta etkin bir konum kazanmıştı.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The economic and legal capitulations the Ottoman State gave to foreign states resulted in negative impacts on socioeconomic life in the 18th century and the abuse of certain institutions. One of these was the institution of tercumanlık [dragoman], which was responsible for conducting the consuls’ work and communicating with the Ottoman state authorities in particular. Consul dragomans, regardless of whether they were actually Ottoman dhimmi [nonMuslim subjects] or not, were subject to the law of müstemen [foreign nationals permitted to reside on Ottoman lands]. In this way, dhimmi merchants, who had the opportunity to be exempt from the tax burden and other obligations of the dhimmi law, started racing to become dragoman. The fact that each dragoman was appointed two hizmetkar [servants] to his entourage who were also able to benefit from the same exemptions caused the problem to grow and deepen over a short time. This problem became famous over time as the beratlı-fermanlı tüccarıs [certified merchants].

The city of Salonica was a commercial center where the issue of beratlı-fermanlı tüccarıs was on the agenda throughout the 18th century due to the diversity of its demographic structure and the abundance of consulates there. At the beginning of the 18th century, France, and England first established consulates there, after which consulates from other European states increased in number. This situation made getting permission to work as a dragoman or servant easier for the dhimmi of Salonica, as it also increased the need for these types of workers.

According to the document from 1797 that is the subject of this study, the number of people who were allowed to work as dragoman and servants in Salonica until that date had been 70. The consuls from France, England, Spain, Sweden, Austria, the Netherlands, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, Venice, Denmark, Prussia, and Dubrovnik claimed patronage over the merchants in Salonica with this method. Until 1806, the numbers of dragomans and servants in Salonica had changed little. Except for the dragomans provided to the newly established Septinsular Republic and those under the protection of Russia, the number of other countries remained unchanged. This is because Selim III only gave a new certificate after the death of the old holder, in order to keep the number of licensed merchants under control. According to the new decisions made during the reign of Sultan Abdulhamid I, the charter holders had to strictly abide by the rules to which they were subject. Otherwise, they were in danger of losing their charters. In order to implement the decisions taken by his uncle Selim III, Abdulhamid I had inspections made in many cities. In 1802, however, he offered the dhimmi merchants an alternative to obtaining the same status as an Avrupa tüccarı without the patronage of a consul.

The beratlı controls in Salonica in 1806 had important results. During the inspection, a total of 75 people consisting of 27 dragomans and 48 servants were evaluated as being assigned to 11 different country consulates in Salonica. As a result, 35 people were understood to have left Salonica due to death or abandonment and their status was revoked. A total of 22 people who were on duty in Salonica accepted becoming Ottoman dhimmi again and to being subject to the statue on non-Muslims. Because some did not volunteer, the administrators resorted to a little coercion. At the end of the audit, the total number of 75 people (i.e., 27 dragomans and 48 servants) from Salonica had decreased to 18. In this framework, only a few people remained under the auspices of the consulates of France, England, Sweden, Prussia, and the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. During the checks in Salonica, a total of 45 people who had obtained documents to become dragomans or servants in another city were understood to lived in Salonica. Due to them having to reside in the city where their consuls were located, their statuses were revoked, their charters were confiscated, and they were allowed to live in Salonica as dhimmi. In light of all this, Selim III’s checks are understood to have started in Salonica in 1806 and to have had significant success in the city.

In 1806, Yakomi of the Paico family was among those who had given up on being an dragoman and returned to being a dhimmi. His great-grandfather had been Constantin Paico, an dragoman in Salonica at the beginning of the 18th century. Costantin’s son, Andronic Paico, and his grandchildren were registered as dragomans and servants on the 1797 list. The family’s chartered status continued until the merchant Yakomi gave his up voluntarily in 1806. In fact, the merchant Yakomi received a charter as an Avrupa tüccarı from the state during this time. According to the archival document dated 1815, only one Avrupa tüccarı was residing in Salonica at that time, and that was Yakomi, son of Paico. The success of Selim III’s policy also resulted in success in the Paico family.

After 1815, the number of Avrupa tüccarıs began to increase. However, the Greek Revolt of 1821 and the subsequent independence of Greece caused the Greeks of Salonica to stop seeking Avrupa tüccarı status they had initially sought. As in the example of the merchant Plato who was executed in 1821, properties were confiscated from some of the Avrupa tüccarı who’d been involved in the revolt. The risk of losing their lives and property had caused Greek merchants to prefer being müstemen rather than an Avrupa tüccarı. As a matter of fact, only two Greeks were registered as Avrupa tüccarı in the census records from 1830. However, the Jews in the city became more interested in being Avrupa tüccarı over time, and by 1830 their number had reached at least 11. Isak, son of Santo Odini was among them and one of the first Avrupa tüccarı to be granted a charter as of 1816. The Jewish Karasu family, who gave up becoming dragoman in 1806 and accepted being dhimmi, also became interested in becoming Avrupa tüccarı over time. Avram Karasu, the son of Isak Karasu, gave up his duty as a dragoman for the Spanish consul in 1806 and accepted the law for non-Muslim subjects with his brothers; he also became an Avrupa tüccarı. The importance of the family in Salonica business life lasted until the 20th century. Just like the Karasu family, Salamo Amar, a member of the Jewish Amar family, had the charter for being an Avrupa tüccarı. His children and grandchildren took their place among the important bankers of Salonica at the end of the 19th century.

According to the records in the Sicill archives of Salonica from 1839 just before the Tanzimat [Reforms], Salonica had 18 Avrupa tüccarıs 6 of them were Greek and 12 were Ottoman Jews. Behor Francis is included in this list and was one of the best examples in terms of the wealth and social status that being called an Avrupa tüccarı in Salonica could gain. Behor Francis was the representative of the Jewish community in the Salonica Assembly, which had been established after the proclamation of the Tanzimat. In this sense, he was a significant name in Salonica and was also respected by the state. When he died in 1861, the amount of wealth he left behind was more than one and a half million gurush [Ottoman currency].

Selim III's successful policy in Salonica removed the issue of beratlı from the city’s agenda after 1825. A significant number of the Greeks from Salonica, who’d avoided being subject to the law on dhimmis had opted for illegal means such as obtaining a patent. The Jews also made such attempts. However, the opportunities the Avrupa tüccarı institution offered to the Jews who’d remained subjects of the state led them to become stronger in their socioeconomic lives in the second half of the 19th century. 


PDF View

References

  • Arşiv Belgeleri google scholar
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) google scholar
  • Bab-ı Asafi google scholar
  • Düvel-i Ecnebiyye Defterleri (A.DVNSDVE.d), 60. google scholar
  • Düvel-i Ecnebiyye Kalemi, Defterler (A.DVN.DVE.d), 916. google scholar
  • Bab-ı Defteri, Ceride Odası Defterleri (D.CRD.d), 39924. google scholar
  • Cevdet Tasnifi google scholar
  • Hariciye (C.HR), 30/1472. google scholar
  • İktisat (C.İKT), 11/518. google scholar
  • Maliye (C.ML), 77/3530; 103/4564. google scholar
  • Hatt-ı Hümayun (HAT), 196/9779-B, C, D, E, F, G, H, İ, J, K. google scholar
  • Kamil Kepeci, Defterler (KK.d), 3838. google scholar
  • Maliye Nezareti google scholar
  • Defterleri (ML.d), 320. google scholar
  • Varidat Defterleri (ML.VRD.d), 139; 4969. google scholar
  • Maliyeden Müdevver, Defterler (MAD.d), 21192; 21197. google scholar
  • Meclis-i Vala (MVL), 181/71. google scholar
  • Müzehheb Ferman ve Beratlar (MFB), 493; 494. google scholar
  • Nüfus Defterleri (NFS.d), 4960. google scholar
  • Sadaret, Divan Kalemi Evrakı (A.DVN), 179/39. google scholar
  • Selanik Makedonya Tarih Arşivi (Istoriko Archefo Makedomas, IAM) google scholar
  • Selanik Şeriyye Sicilleri, nr. 172, 184, 192, 236, 270. google scholar
  • Araştırma Eserleri google scholar
  • Anastassiadou, Meropi, Tanzimat Çağında Bir Osmanlı Şehri Selanik (1830-1912), Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yay.,İstanbul 2010. google scholar
  • Artunç, Cihan, “The Price of Legal Institutions: The Beratlı Merchants in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Empire”, The Journal of Economic History, 75/3, 2015, s. 720-748. google scholar
  • Bağış, Ali İhsan, “Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e Türk-Müslüman Burjuvazisi Oluşturma Çabaları”, Osmanlı, 3, Ankara 1999, s. 544-547. google scholar
  • ________, Osmanlı Ticaretinde Gayrimüslimler, Kapitülasyonlar-Avrupa Tüccarları-Beratlı Tüccarlar-Hayriye Tüccarları (1750-1839), Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara 1998. google scholar
  • Beaujour, Felix, Tableau du Commerce de la Grece, II, Paris 1800. google scholar
  • Berkes, Niyazi, Türkiye İktisat Tarihi, Yapı Kredi Yay., İstanbul 2013. google scholar
  • Boogert, Maurits H. van den, “Consular Jurisdiction in the Ottoman Legal System in the Eighteenth Century”, Oriente Moderno, 22/83, 2003, s. 613-634. google scholar
  • ________, “Ottoman Greeks in the Dutch Levant Trade: Collective Strategy and Individual Practice (C. 1750-1821)”, Oriente Moderno, 25/86, 2006, s. 129-147. google scholar
  • Çadırcı, Musa, “II. Mahmut Döneminde (1808-1839) Avrupa ve Hayriye Tüccarları”, Türkiye’nin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Tarihi (1071-1920) Birinci Uluslararası Türkiye’nin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Tarihi Kongresi Tebliğleri, ed. Osman Okyar-Halil İnalcık, Ankara 1980, s. 237-241. google scholar
  • ________, Tanzimat Döneminde Anadolu Kentlerinin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Yapısı, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., Ankara 2013. google scholar
  • Çakılcı, Diren, 19. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Selanik Şehri, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Antalya 2021. google scholar
  • Genç, Mehmet, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Devlet ve Ekonomi, Ötüken Yay., İstanbul 2000. google scholar
  • İnalcık, Halil, “İmtiyâzât”, DİA, XXII, s. 245-252. google scholar
  • İpek, Nurdan, Selanik ve İstanbul’da Seçkin Yahudi Bankerler (1850-1908), İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul 2011. google scholar
  • İpşirli, Mehmet, “Eman (Osmanlı Dönemi)”, DİA, XI, s. 77-79. google scholar
  • Kaymakcı, Said Salih, The Sultan’s Entrepreneurs, The Entrepreneurs’ Sultan: Beratlı Avrupa Tüccarı and Institutional Change in the Nineteenth Century Ottoman Empire (1835-1868), Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 2013. google scholar
  • Keleş, Erdoğan, “Avrupa Tüccarı’nın Hukukî ve Ticarî Durumlarına Dair Bazı Tespitler (1835-1868)”, Belleten, 79/284, 2015, s. 199-292. google scholar
  • Kütükoğlu, Mübahat S., “Ahidnâme”, DİA, I, s. 536-540. google scholar
  • ________, “Avrupa Tüccarı”, DİA, IV, s. 159-160. google scholar
  • ________, “Hayriye Tüccarı”, DİA, XVII, s. 64-65. google scholar
  • ________, Balta Limanına Giden Yol, Osmanlı-İngiliz İktisâdî Münâsebetleri (1580-1850), Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., Ankara 2013. google scholar
  • Masters, Bruce, “The Sultan’s Entrepreneurs: The Avrupa Tuccaris and The Hayriye Tuccaris in Syria”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 24/4, 1992, s. 579-597. google scholar
  • Mazower, Mark, Selanik Hayaletler Şehri, Hristiyanlar, Müslümanlar ve Yahudiler, 1430-1950, çev. Gül Çağalı Güven, Alfa Yay., İstanbul 2013. google scholar
  • Nehama, Joseph, Histoire des Israelites de Salonique, Tomes VI et VII, Thessalonique 1978. google scholar
  • Okyar, Osman, “Tanzimat Ekonomisi Hakkındaki Karamsarlık Üzerine”, Tanzimat’ın 150. Yıldönümü Uluslararası Sempozyumu, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., Ankara 1994, s. 243-254. google scholar
  • Orhonlu, Cengiz, “Tercüman”, İA, XII/1, İstanbul 1973, s. 175-181. google scholar
  • Örenç, Ali Fuat, “Yedi Ada Cumhuriyeti”, DİA, XLIII, s. 384-387. google scholar
  • Öz, Mehmet, “Reâyâ”, DİA, XXXIV, s. 490-493. google scholar
  • Özel, Ahmet, “Müste’men”, DİA, XXXII, s. 140-143. google scholar
  • Pamuk, Şevket, Osmanlı Ekonomisi ve Kurumları, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yay., İstanbul 2010. google scholar
  • ________, Osmanlı Ekonomisinde Bağımlılık ve Büyüme (1820-1913), Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yay., İstanbul 2020. google scholar
  • ________, Osmanlı-Türkiye İktisadî Tarihi, 1500-1914, İletişim Yay., İstanbul 2014. google scholar
  • Quataert, Donald, “Tanzimat Döneminde Ekonominin Temel Problemleri”, Tanzimat, Değişim Sürecinde Osmanlı İmparatorluğu, ed. Halil İnalcık-Mehmet Seyitdanlıoğlu, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yay., İstanbul 2014, s. 731-740. google scholar
  • Serdaroğlu, Üzeyir Serdar, The Evolution of Commercial Institutions and Business Networks in the Ottoman Empire: British Merchant Families and Individual Merchants in the Levant Trade in the 18th Century, Birmingham Üniversitesi Doktora Tezi, 2018. google scholar
  • Svoronos, N. G., Le Commerce de Salonique au XIIIe Siecle, Paris 1956. google scholar
  • Şenel, Şennur, “Osmanlılarda Ticaret Anlayışı ve Ticaret Teşkilatında Yeni Bir Yapılanma: Hayriye Tüccarı”, Türkler, 10, ed. Hasan Celal Güzel vd., Yeni Türkiye Yay., Ankara 2002, s. 736-743. google scholar
  • Thomas, “Reform and the Conduct of Ottoman Diplomacy in the Reign of Selim III, 1798-1807”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 83/3, 1963, s. 295-315. google scholar
  • Wood, Alfred C., Levant Kumpanyası Tarihi, çev. Çiğdem Erkal İpek, Doğubatı Yay., Ankara 2013. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çakılcı, D. (2022). From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica. Turkish Journal of History, 0(77), 165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


AMA

Çakılcı D. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica. Turkish Journal of History. 2022;0(77):165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


ABNT

Çakılcı, D. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica. Turkish Journal of History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 77, p. 165-212, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çakılcı, Diren,. 2022. “From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 77: 165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çakılcı, Diren,. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 77 (Aug. 2022): 165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


Harvard: Australian Style

Çakılcı, D 2022, 'From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica', Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 77, pp. 165-212, viewed 8 Aug. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çakılcı, D. (2022) ‘From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica’, Turkish Journal of History, 0(77), pp. 165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165 (8 Aug. 2022).


MLA

Çakılcı, Diren,. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica.” Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 77, 2022, pp. 165-212. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165


Vancouver

Çakılcı D. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica. Turkish Journal of History [Internet]. 8 Aug. 2022 [cited 8 Aug. 2022];0(77):165-212. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165 doi: 10.26650/iutd.2022165


ISNAD

Çakılcı, Diren. From Beratlı Tüccar to Avrupa Tüccarı: The Pursuit of "Nizâm-ı Raiyyet" in Salonica”. Turkish Journal of History 0/77 (Aug. 2022): 165-212. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.2022165



TIMELINE


Submitted26.04.2022
Accepted22.06.2022
Published Online20.07.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.