Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iutd.202208   IUP :10.26650/iutd.202208    Full Text (PDF)

“A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II

Özgür Oral

The Ottoman-Venetian war of 1570 began with the naval campaign against the Venetian-held island of Cyprus. Soon thereafter, the action evolved into a war between the Ottomans and the Holy League that ultimately included the battle of Lepanto, in which the Ottomans experienced a heavy defeat. Nevertheless, the Ottomans continued to fight the Holy League by rebuilding their navy the following year. The efforts of the 1572 campaigns, while not resulting in an overall victory, caused cracks in the alliance of the Holy League. Venice, for example, made a separate peace with the Ottomans, and Selim II issued an ahdname. This article will examine the aforementioned peace (ahdname) and discuss its various articles. Finally, the author will offer a general evaluation of the struggle between the Ottomans and Venice.

DOI :10.26650/iutd.202208   IUP :10.26650/iutd.202208    Full Text (PDF)

“Zaferin Ardından Gelen Onur Kırıcı Bir Antlaşma”: II. Selim’in Venedik’e Verdiği 1573 Ahidnamesi

Özgür Oral

1570 yılında Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kıbrıs seferi ile başlayan Osmanlı Venedik Savaşı, kısa zamanda bir Osmanlı-Kutsal Birlik savaşı haline dönüşmüş, bu mücadeleler esnasında İnebahtı’da Osmanlı donanması ağır bir mağlubiyet almıştır. Buna rağmen, donanmalarını yeniden inşa eden Osmanlılar, mücadelelerine devam etmişlerdir. 1572 yılındaki girişimlerden bir netice alınamaması, Kutsal Birlik’in zayıflamasına ve Venedik’in Osmanlılarla müstakilen barış yapmasına neden olmuştur. Bu makalede, 1573 yılında II. Selim’in Venedik’e verdiği ahidname maddeleri incelenecek, buradan hareketle İnebahtı Savaşı ile zirve yapan bu süreçteki Osmanlı Venedik mücadelelerinin genel bir değerlendirmesi yapılacaktır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The Ottoman conquest of Cyprus in 1571 caused great distress in the Catholic world. Due to the efforts of Pope Pius V, the conquest also led to the establishment of a Holy League against the Turks. Soon after the fall of Famagusta, the Ottoman navy was virtually destroyed in the battle of Lepanto by a fleet of the Holy League. This sea battle was a great victory for the Holy League, and historians have rightfully interpreted it as such. Conversely, further developments, such as the dissolution of the Holy League and the Venetian diplomatic attempts to make peace with the Ottomans, demonstrate that the effects of this victory were short-lived. In the end, Venice requested peace, and following negotiations, reached an agreement with the Ottomans. On March 7, 1573, Selim II issued an ahdname, and with that, the war between the two states was officially over.

The ahdname of 1573 has been briefly mentioned by several historians, and numerous transliterations of two existing copies have been published. However, there are some gaps and misinterpretations in the literature regarding its articles. Furthermore, this ahdname was a renewal of the ahdname of 1567, which itself was a renewal of the 1540 ahdname. In order to have a thorough understanding of the ahdname of 1573, one needs to be conversant with all these three texts. Mahmut Şakiroğlu tried to do just that and published a comparative study of the two texts but omitted the 1540 ahdname.

The ahdname of 1573 obliged Venice to pay 300,000 ducats to the Ottoman Empire. This requirement has been interpreted by several scholars as comprising reparations. Some scholars have even argued that the money had to be paid to the Ottoman Empire to cover the expenses of the Cyprus campaign. Although this payment can be seen as reparations at first glance, both the Ottomans and the Venetians preferred not to use this term and instead simply called it a “payment.” A similar payment existed in the ahdname of 1540, where again it appeared under this term. However, when ambassadors paid installments, and the Ottomans received them, different names started appearing in the letters, including “pişkeş” (gift) or “kesim” (tax). Other letters and chronicles show that the Ottomans had sought the amount as a precondition for issuing the ahdname. In this regard, I prefer to interpret and define this payment as the “price of friendship.”

When the decision to reach peace was made, the Ottoman castle of Sopoto was under Venetian control. Together with the 300,000 ducats, the Ottomans asked Venice to return the castle. This demand, I argue, was also a “precondition” for peace as well as the “price of friendship.” In the ahdname, it was made very clear that both Bosnia and Albania would return to their prewar borders. Based on this term of the ahdname, Sopoto Castle would have become Ottoman property in any case but because this transfer was to be a precondition of the ahdname and its other details were not yet set, the Ottomans asked for the castle to prove the Venetian desire for friendship. A similar demand had been made in 1540, when the Ottomans got the last Venetian castles in Morea, Nafplio, and Monemvasia, in precisely the same way.

As I mentioned above, the ahdname of 1573 defined Ottoman–Venetian borders in accordance with the principle of status quo ante bellum. Although this principle sought only a return to the prewar borders, which sounded very simple, it took approximately three years to draw the final border due to constant disagreements and local uprisings. In the end, the two states settled their dispute, but the Ottomans never returned Ulcinj and Antivari.

The ahdname of 1573 regulated the following two different tribute issues as well: Cyprus and Zante. The Venetians had been paying tribute for Cyprus to the Ottomans since 1517, but during this war, as the Ottomans had captured the island, the Venetians no longer had to pay the tribute of 8,000 ducats. The ahdname does not mention Cyprus other than in this specific article and does not discuss its sovereignty. By accepting the abolishment of the Cyprus tribute, Venetians implicitly accepted the Ottoman jurisdiction over the island. In the second tribute regulation, the Ottomans increased the tax of Zante, an Ionian island held by the Venetians since 1485, from 500 ducats to 1,500 ducats.

At the beginning of the war, both sides arrested each other’s subjects and confiscated their merchandise and properties. With the 1573 ahdname, all the arrested subjects of the two parties were to be released and their properties returned. If the merchandise had been sold or disappeared, the states had to offer compensation.

Although the Ottomans suffered a great defeat in the battle of Lepanto, they managed to compensate for their loss at the diplomatic table. On the contrary, Venice not only lost territory but also had to accept burdensome terms, including the sizable payment and increases in its previous tribute. In this sense, following a great victory, the Venetian Republic suffered a humiliating peace. 


PDF View

References

  • Arşiv Kaynakları google scholar
  • Archivio di Stato di Venezia (ASVe.) google scholar
  • Documenti Turchi, 26, 73, 167, 169, 188, 452, 469, 595, 820, 826, 869, 1086. google scholar
  • Lettere Turchesche, b. 3/27-28. google scholar
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) google scholar
  • Mühimme Defterleri (ADVNSMHM), d. 23, 24 google scholar
  • Düvel-i Ecnebiye Defterleri (ADVNSDVE), d. 16/4. google scholar
  • Kaynak Eserler ve Araştırma Eserleri google scholar
  • Bostan, İdris, Osmanlılar ve Deniz: Deniz Politikaları, Teşkilat, Gemiler, İstanbul 2007. google scholar
  • Brummet, Palmira, Mapping the Ottomans, Sovereignty, Territory and Identity in the Early Modern Mediterranen, New York 2015. google scholar
  • Callia, Anna, “Venedik Devlet Arşivi’nde Bulunan Liber Graecus (Yunan Kitabı) ve XV-XVI. YY. Osmanlı Venedik İlişkileri”, çev. Güner Doğan, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. XXII, Ankara 2015, s. 279-317. google scholar
  • Costantini, Vera, Il Sultano e l’Isola Contesa: Cipro tra Eredita Veneziana e Potere Ottomano, Turin 2011. google scholar
  • Çelik, Sıtkı, XXI. Numaralı Mühimme Defteri, Çeviriyazı-İnceleme, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 1997. google scholar
  • Doğan, Güner, “Girit Muharebesi Sonrası Osmanlı-Venedik Sınırı (1671)”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. X, 2019, s. 1-18. google scholar
  • Fisher, Sydney Nettleton, The Foreign Relations of Turkey, 1481-1512, Urbana 1948. google scholar
  • Gökbilgin, M. Tayyib, “Venedik Devlet Arşivindeki Türkçe Belgeler Kolleksiyonu ve Bizimle İlgili Diğer Belgeler”, Belgeler, V-VIII/9-12, Ankara 1971, s. 1-151. google scholar
  • ________, “Venedik Devlet Arşivindeki Vesikalar Külliyatında Kanunî Sultan Süleyman Devri Belgeleri”, Belgeler, I/2, Ankara 1964, s. 119-120. google scholar
  • Hammer, Joseph von, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches, v. III, Wien 1828. google scholar
  • Işıksel, Güneş, La Politique Etrangere Ottomane dans la Seconde Moitie du XVIe Siecle le cas du Regne de Selim (1566-1574), Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Doktora Tezi, 2012. google scholar
  • İnalcık, Halil, Hicri 835 Tarihli Sûret-i Defter-i Sancak-i Arvanid, Ankara 1987. google scholar
  • Jorga, Nicolae, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi, çev. Nilüfer Epçeli, kontr. Kemal Beydilli, İstanbul 2005. google scholar
  • Kaçan, Meryem, XVI. ve XVII. Yüzyıllarda Osmanlı Venedik Ahidnameleri, Marmara Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 1995. google scholar
  • Lane, Frederick C., Venice: A Maritime Republic, Baltimore and London 1973 google scholar
  • Lutfi Paşa, Tevârih-i Âl-i Osman, İstanbul 1341. google scholar
  • Mantran, Robert, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi, çev. Server Tanilli, İstanbul 2012. google scholar
  • Otman, Elvin, The Crescent, The Lion and the Eagle: Re-Analyzing the Ottoman Apulian Campaign and Attack on Corfu (1537) in the Context of Ottoman-Habsburg Rivalry, Doktora Tezi, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara 2018. google scholar
  • Panciera, Walter, “Building a Boundary: the First Venetian - Ottoman Border in Dalmatia, 1573-1576”, Radovi - Zavod za hrvatsku povijest, c. XLV, Zagreb 2013. google scholar
  • Paruta, Paolo, Storia della Guerra di Cipro, Siena 1827. google scholar
  • Romanin, Samuele, Storia Documentata di Venezia, c. V, Venezia 1855. google scholar
  • Rosaccio, Gioseppe, Viaggio da Venetia a Costantinopoli per Mare, e per Terra&İnsieme Quello di Terra Santa, Venedik 1598. google scholar
  • Setton, Kenneth M., Papacy and Levant, (1204-1571), c. IV, Philadelphia 1984. google scholar
  • Spremiç, Momcilo, “XV. Yüzyılda Venedik Cumhuriyeti’nin Şarkta Ödediği Haraçlar”, çev. Mahmut H. Şakiroğlu, Belleten, c. XLVII/185, Ankara 1983, s. 383-384. google scholar
  • Şakiroğlu, Mahmut H., “II. Selim’in Venedik Cumhuriyeti’ne Verdiği 1567 ve 1573 Tarihli Ahidnâmeler”, Erdem Dergisi, c. II/5, 1986, s. 527-553. google scholar
  • Theunissen, Hans, “Cairo Revisited (I): Four Documents Pertinent to the Ottoman-Venetian Treaty of 1517”, EJOS, II (1999), no: 7, s. 1-29. google scholar
  • ________, “Dostluğun Bedeli: 1612-1617 Yıllarında Hollanda ile Osmanlı Devleti Arasındaki Resmi İlişkilerin Oluşmasında Hediyenin Rolü”, Kebikeç, c. XXV, İstanbul 2008, s. 51-66. google scholar
  • ________, “Ottoman Venetian Diplomatics: The Ahdnames. The Historical Background and the Development of a Category of Political-Commercial Instruments together with an Annotated Edition of a Corpus of Relevant Documents”, EJOS, I (1998), s. 370-635. google scholar
  • Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı, Osmanlı Tarihi, c. III, Ankara 1988. google scholar
  • Wright Diana Gilliland - Pierre A. Mackay, “When the Serenissima and the Grand Turco Made Love: The Peace Treaty of 1478”, Studi Veneziani, c. LIII, Venedik 2007. google scholar
  • Zinkeisen, Johann Wilhelm, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi, çev. Nilüfer Epçeli, c. II, İstanbul 2011. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Oral, Ö. (2022). “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II. Turkish Journal of History, 0(76), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


AMA

Oral Ö. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II. Turkish Journal of History. 2022;0(76):145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


ABNT

Oral, Ö. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II. Turkish Journal of History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 76, p. 145-160, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Oral, Özgür,. 2022. ““A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 76: 145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


Chicago: Humanities Style

Oral, Özgür,. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 76 (Feb. 2023): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


Harvard: Australian Style

Oral, Ö 2022, '“A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II', Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 76, pp. 145-160, viewed 4 Feb. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Oral, Ö. (2022) ‘“A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II’, Turkish Journal of History, 0(76), pp. 145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208 (4 Feb. 2023).


MLA

Oral, Özgür,. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II.” Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 76, 2022, pp. 145-160. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208


Vancouver

Oral Ö. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II. Turkish Journal of History [Internet]. 4 Feb. 2023 [cited 4 Feb. 2023];0(76):145-160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208 doi: 10.26650/iutd.202208


ISNAD

Oral, Özgür. “A Humiliating Treaty Followed the Great Victory”: The Ahdname of 1573 Issued by Selim II”. Turkish Journal of History 0/76 (Feb. 2023): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.202208



TIMELINE


Submitted16.02.2022
Accepted02.03.2022
Published Online16.03.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.