Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/anar.2022.1058673   IUP :10.26650/anar.2022.1058673    Tam Metin (PDF)

İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi

Harun DanışmazKemalettin Köroğlu

Solhan Kalesi, kaleye ismini veren Bingöl — Solhan Ovası’nın batı uç kısmında yer almaktadır. 2019 yılı yüzey araştırmalarında tespit ettiğimiz kaleden günümüze kuru duvar tekniğiyle inşa edilmiş, destek duvarlarıyla güçlendirilmiş surlar ve iç kısmında çeşitli mekanlara ait olabilecek temel seviyesinde kalıntılara ulaşılmıştır. Solhan Kalesi’nin çanak çömleklerinin bir kısmı ve cüruf parçaları bölgenin Demir Çağı’ndaki aşiret merkezlerinden biri olabileceğine işaret etmektedir. Fakat kalenin mimari özelliklerine bakıldığında özellikle bastiyonlarla desteklenmiş sur duvarlarının bölgedeki Demir Çağı yerleşmelerinden oldukça farklı olduğu görülmektedir. Kalede üzeri sırlı veya boyalı Ortaçağ çanak çömleği bulunmamaktadır. Mevcut veriler Solhan Kale’sini Orta Demir Çağı’ndan Ortaçağ öncesine kadar geniş bir zaman aralığı arasında inşa edildiğini desteklemektedir.

DOI :10.26650/anar.2022.1058673   IUP :10.26650/anar.2022.1058673    Tam Metin (PDF)

Iron Age and Later Periods in an Isolated Region: The Bingöl-Solhan Fortress

Harun DanışmazKemalettin Köroğlu

Solhan Kalesi [Solhan Fortress] lies at the western tip of the Solhan Plain from which it derives its name. The fortress site was discovered in 2019 during surveys. Drywall fortifications reinforced with bastions and foundations from various buildings inside the fortification walls have been documented at the site. Ceramics and slag found at Solhan Fortress indicate that the site may have been a tribal center in the Iron Age. However, the architectural features of the fortress, especially the fortifications with bastions, are notably different from other Iron Age sites in the region. Surface finds do not include painted or glazed ceramics from the Medieval Period. Current findings indicate Solhan Fortress to have been inhabited for a long period from the Middle Iron Age to the Medieval Period.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


This study presents the recently identified site of Solhan Kalesi [Solhan Fortress] in the Solhan Plain and evaluates the sites that have been documented in surveys around the Solhan district in relation to the Urartian Kingdom. Ongoing surveys since 2019 in this under-investigated region have covered the Solhan Plain, the mountainous region to the north, and Murat River Valley. In addition to Solhan Fortress, other Iron Age fortresses at Azat and Hazarşah in the northern Solhan Plain, İşaret Fortress in the mountainous region southeast, and Deriktepe and Sükyan in southern Murat River Valley have also been identified.

The Solhan District of Bingöl Province lies on a relatively small (950 ha) plateau in the mountainous landscape of Eastern Anatolia. Located 800 m northeast of the Yenibaşak village junction off the Bingöl-Muş highway around 6 km west of Solhan district center, Solhan Kalesi is situated on an oval-shaped hill 75 m above the plain at the southern tip of a northeast-southwest mountain range. In addition to the architectural remains of fortifications and building foundations, many ceramic sherds, slag, and obsidian fragments have been found inside the fortress and outside on the slopes.

The foundations of the fortification walls visible on the hilltop can be traced along the natural contours of the hill. Walls are three meters wide, built with the dry-stacked technique, and even preserved up to three-courses in certain sections. Fortifications are reinforced by bastions at regular intervals. South of the area where the natural bedrock is exposed nearby the fortified peak, the foundations of a rectangular (23x33 m) building consisting of at least five rooms accessed through a long hallway have been documented. Inside the fortress are three adjacent structures abutting the southeastern section of the fortification wall. The northernmost room has a rectangular plan (8.20x3.60 m), the adjacent room has a square layout (4.50x4.50 m), and the eastern wall of the southernmost room (3.20x2.50 m) abuts the fortification wall.

Two oval structures consisting of a single course of stones are found inside the fortress in an area close to the southeastern fortifications. Each one measures 2.10x1.50 m and was built with roughly dressed stones. These irregularly built, 60-cm wide walls are reminiscent of cistern entrances.

Except for two examples, ceramics from the site are made of a reddish-brown fabric with fine sand inclusions, self-slipped, medium- or well-fired, and in general wheel-made. Rim sherds indicate the presence of bowls, plates, and jars with and without handles. Sherds have also been found that are decorated with linear incisions. For example, a jar sherd decorated with a 4-cm wide band bearing an incised fishbone pattern between two horizontal lines and a handle sherd decorated with incised vertical grooves were found inside the fortress. 

In addition to ceramic sherds, surface finds include obsidian fragments, terracotta spindle whorls, and iron slag. Various-sized spindle whorls and slag indicate the presence of workshops.

The floorplan of Solhan Kalesi does not resemble the royal cities and provincial centers of the Urartian Kingdom. The fortifications are built directly on roughly dressed bedrock without the use of rock-cut terraces, and they encircle an ovoid area abiding by the topography and reinforced by equidistant bastions. No architectural remains inside the fortress show the characteristic traits of buildings known from Urartian royal centers. In fact, a wide enough area that could accommodate such structures does not exist at the site, nor have indicators been found to suggest the presence of a lower town. Therefore, this article may explore the possibility that Solhan Fortress might have been an Urartian tribal center.

Urartian tribal centers had spread across a wider landscape beyond the territory dominated by the Urartian Kingdom. The characteristic traits of Urartian tribal centers involve works of rock-carving and masonry such as rock-cut tombs, roughly dressed cyclopic walls, and rock signs.

The geographical location of Solhan Fortress outside the political territory of the Urartian royal centers makes it a good candidate for having been a tribal center. However, the characteristic rock-carved features known from Urartian tribal centers are not present at the site, and the fortifications were built with roughly dressed medium- and small-sized stones rather than cyclopic stones. The most outstanding feature of the fortifications is the regularly placed bastions. Fortresses possessing bastions with a similar layout are known from the southern Lake Urmia Basin in Northwestern Iran. No glazed/painted ceramics from the Medieval Period have been found at Solhan Fortress. Incised ceramics from the site date to the Iron Age, A corroborated by the presence of iron slag. However, the architectural features noted above indicate that the fortress is distinct from Urartian settlements. The layout of the fortifications demonstrates that the site had been built as a pre-planned construction project and could not have been a temporary or seasonal settlement like the Urartian tribal centers. In the absence of clear chronological markers, the construction date of the fortress may date to any period between the Middle Iron Age and the Medieval Period. A more acute chronological assessment of Solhan Fortress will only be possible through on-site excavations and continued surveys in the region. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Burney, C. A. (1966). A First Season of Excavations on the Urartian Citadel of Kayalıdere. Anatolian Studies, 16, 55-111. google scholar
  • Çifçi, A., & Gökçe, B. (2020). “‘I Have Made A Highway of Biainili’: Transportation and Road Networks in the Territories of the Urartian Kingdom” Altorientalischen Forschungen, 48(2), 221-232. google scholar
  • Dan, R. (2017). Linking Lowlands Among the Mountains: The Urartian “Road Stations”. Studies in Caucasian Archaeology, 3, 84-112. google scholar
  • Danışmaz, H. (2020). Urartu Krallığı: Yönetim ve Organizasyon. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. google scholar
  • Danışmaz, H. (2021). Murat Tepe Orta Demir Çağı (Urartu Dönemi) Seramiği. In A. Özdemir & Z. Kılınç (Eds.), Murat Nehri Kıyısında Bir Urartu Yerleşimi Murat Tepe (s. 85-145): Ege Yayınları. google scholar
  • Erdem, A. Ü. (2009). Van Gölü Havzası’nda Bulunan Demir Çağ Yivli Çanak Çömleğinin Urartu Kalelerindeki Varlığı. In H. Sağlamtimur, E. Abay, Z. Derin, A. Ü. Erdem, A. Batmaz, F. Dedeoğlu, M. Erdalkıran, M. B. Baştürk, & E. Konakçı (Eds.), Altan Çilingiroğlu’na Armağan. Yukarı Denizin Kıyısında Urartu Krallığı’na Adanmış Bir Hayat/ Studies in Honour of Altan Çilingiroğlu. A Life Dedicated to Urartu on the Shores of the Upper Sea (s. 299-307). İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kleiss, W. (1976). Urartaische Plâtze im Iran (Stand der Forschung Herbst 1975). Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 9, 19-43. google scholar
  • Kleiss, W. (2015). Geschichte der Architektur Irans. Teheran: Deutsches Archaologisches Institut. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, K. (1996). Urartu Krallığı Döneminde Elazığ (Alzi) ve Çevresi. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, K. (2020). Urartu: Krallık ve Aşiretler. In K. Köroğlu & E. Konyar (Eds.), Urartu: Doğu’da Değişim (s. 1-35). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, K. (2021). The Western Expension of the Urartian Kingdom. In G. R. Tsetskhladze (Ed.), Archaeology and History of Urartu (Biainili), Colloquia Antiqua, 28 (s. 415-435). Leuven: Peeters. google scholar
  • Özdemir, A. (2020). Murat Höyük 2019 Excavation: A Preliminary Report. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 51, 272-287. google scholar
  • Özdemir, A. (2021). Murat Tepe Urartu Dönemi Yerleşimi. A. Özdemir & Z. Kılınç (Eds.), Murat Nehri Kıyısında Bir Urartu Yerleşimi Murat Tepe (s. 47-84): Ege Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özdemir, A., & Kılınç, Z. (2021). Murat Nehri Kıyısında Bir Urartu Yerleşimi Murat Tepe: Ege Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özdemir, A., Kılınç, Z., & Demir, E. (2021). Erken Tunç Çağı’nda Murat Höyük. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sağlamtimur, H. (1994). Van Dilkaya Kazılarından Çıkan Demir Çağ Çanak Çömleği. (Yüksek Lisans). Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir. google scholar
  • Sevin, V. (1988a). Elazığ-Bingöl İlleri Yüzey Araştırması, 1986. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, V/2, 1-44. google scholar
  • Sevin, V. (1988b). The oldest highway: between the regions of Van and Elazığ in Eastern Anatolia. Antiquity, 62(236), 547-551. google scholar
  • Tiryaki, S. (2018). Urartu Krallığının Batı Yayılımda Bingöl Güzergâhı. B. Gökce & P. Pınarcık (Eds.), Eski Yakındoğu’da Ulaşım Üzerine Yazılar/Articles on Transportation in Ancient Near East (s. 383-411). Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Danışmaz, H., & Köroğlu, K. (2022). İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi. Anadolu Araştırmaları, 0(26), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


AMA

Danışmaz H, Köroğlu K. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi. Anadolu Araştırmaları. 2022;0(26):65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


ABNT

Danışmaz, H.; Köroğlu, K. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi. Anadolu Araştırmaları, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 26, p. 65-80, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Danışmaz, Harun, and Kemalettin Köroğlu. 2022. “İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi.” Anadolu Araştırmaları 0, no. 26: 65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


Chicago: Humanities Style

Danışmaz, Harun, and Kemalettin Köroğlu. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi.” Anadolu Araştırmaları 0, no. 26 (Oct. 2022): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


Harvard: Australian Style

Danışmaz, H & Köroğlu, K 2022, 'İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi', Anadolu Araştırmaları, vol. 0, no. 26, pp. 65-80, viewed 2 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Danışmaz, H. and Köroğlu, K. (2022) ‘İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi’, Anadolu Araştırmaları, 0(26), pp. 65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673 (2 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Danışmaz, Harun, and Kemalettin Köroğlu. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi.” Anadolu Araştırmaları, vol. 0, no. 26, 2022, pp. 65-80. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


Vancouver

Danışmaz H, Köroğlu K. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi. Anadolu Araştırmaları [Internet]. 2 Oct. 2022 [cited 2 Oct. 2022];0(26):65-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673 doi: 10.26650/anar.2022.1058673


ISNAD

Danışmaz, Harun - Köroğlu, Kemalettin. İzole Bir Bölgede Demir Çağı ve Sonrası: Bingöl-Solhan Kalesi”. Anadolu Araştırmaları 0/26 (Oct. 2022): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2022.1058673



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim16.01.2022
Kabul09.04.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma29.07.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.