Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968    Tam Metin (PDF)

İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz

Rahşan Tamsü Polat

Grekçede -eidolon, Latincede -idolum kelimesinden türetilmiş olan, imge, görüntü anlamına gelen idoller, Prehistorik döneme kadar geri giden, farklı dönemlerde farklı kültürlerde kendine yer bulmuş, tanrı ya da tanrıçayı temsil ettiği düşünülen, genellikle baş ile gövdelerin, bazen de boyun, kol, yüz ve diğer uzuvların da gösterildiği, şematize edilmiş soyut tasvirlerdir. Frigya Bölgesi sınırlarında, Frig Dönemi’ne tarihlenen tabakalarda tespit edilen yuvarlak bir baş ve dörtgen gövdeden oluşan bir grup tasvir de idol olarak adlandırılmaktadır. İdol betimlerinin, Frig kült anıtları ve Eski Frigçe yazıtlar ile Frig dininde ön plana çıkan Ana Tanrıça Matar’ın soyut betimleri olduğu, pek çok araştırmacı tarafından kabul edilmektedir. Fakat belirtilen coğrafyada tekli idollerin dışında, tek gövdeyi paylaşan yan yana yapılmış iki baş ya da ayrı olarak, yan yana baş ve gövdelerden oluşan idollerin de bulunması, bu başların hangi tanrı ya da tanrıçayı tasvir ettiğine dair bir soruyu beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu makalede Frig dininde etkin bir biçimde tapınım gören ana tanrıçanın soyut betimlerinden olduğu düşünülen idollerin arkeolojik ve epigrafik buluntular yardımıyla Frig kültürünün öncülü ve ardılı olan kültürlerdeki yansımalarına değinilmiş, çift ve çoklu idollerin kimliğine dair sorulara cevaplar aranmıştır.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Analysis of the Identity of Idols in Phrygian Culture

Rahşan Tamsü Polat

Derived from the Greek -eidolon and the Latin -idolum, idols, meaning image or visual, stretching back to the Prehistoric Period, are schematized abstract depictions that have found themselves a place within different cultures during different periods, are thought to depict a god or goddess, and generally show a head and body, sometimes with a neck, arms, face, and other organs. The group of portrayals with a round head and rectangular body found within the borders of Phrygia, in the strata dated to the Phrygian Period determined to be Phrygian, are known as idols. It has been accepted by many researchers that the idol depictions are abstract representations of the Mother Goddess, Matar, who takes center stage in the cultic monuments and Old Phrygian inscriptions of Phrygian religion. However, in addition to the single idols found in the aforementioned area, the presence of idols with two collateral heads on a single body or separate but collateral heads and bodies bring about the question of which god or goddess they represent. In this article, we will touch on the reflections of the idols thought to be abstract depictions of the actively worshipped Phrygian mother goddess in the cultures previous and after Phrygia with archeologic and epigraphic finds and attempt to determine the identity of double and multiple idols.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


The idols thought to usually represent a god or goddess, identified as schematic and abstract depictions, and seen since the Prehistoric Period are generally schematized representations of a head and body, sometimes with a neck, arms, face, and other organs. Idol-type depictions found their place in the important powerhouse of the Iron Age, Phrygia. Phrygian idols generally consist of a round head and rectangular body. This group of idols consists of those made of stone or bone in a semi-iconic shape, those that are found on rocky outcrops, rocky surfaces, and in relief on the bedrock behind the steps of some altars, and those carved into steles.

The small number of Old Phrygian cultic inscriptions regarding the culture and cultic practices of Phrygia that survived to today through Greek literary texts from a limited source of information. In this case, our primary source of evidence of their culture is the archeologic artefacts found in cultic centers. Interpretations of these finds show that the Phrygians, who probably believed in many gods both male and female, adopted a deeply rooted, millennia-old, Anatolian belief in the Mother Goddess in their new home-centered in Central Anatolia and that they worshipped the goddess that they named “Matar” by building cultic monuments consisting of altars, niches, and facades in the rocky areas of valleys. The fact that the goddess, her name found in the Old Phrygian inscriptions on a group of rock facades, was the focus of worship in the Phrygian religion is evidenced in the anthropomorphic reliefs found on the steles. In addition to the anthropomorphic depictions of the goddess, a group of figures known as idols with round heads and rectangular bodies found within the borders of the Phrygian Region is worthy of note. In addition to these generally single idols, double idols are seen in the rocky outcroppings of the region, behind the steps of a group of altars, and on steles, and newly discovered triple idols are found in Midas Fortress, on a rock in Köhnüş Valley, and within the borders of Nakoleia (Seyitgazi). While the single idols are accepted by a group of researchers as “abstract depictions” of the goddess Matar, whose name is mentioned in Old Phrygian inscriptions, if we also accept that one of the heads on the samples with more than one collateral head again represents the goddess Matar, we are left with the important question of who the other head or heads depict. Some researchers note that in the double idols, one of the heads represents the goddess, the other a now unknown one of Matar’s paredros. Many experts on the subject lean towards the idea that the figure next to the Mother Goddess is a “Father God”, based on the religious iconography of earlier and contemporary cultures, and have made some inferences and suggestions as to the identity of this Father God. It is known that in Greek mythology, Attis is the goddess’s lover. Using this information and the fact that the word -ata or -atas, seen on a few monuments, could be the basis of the -Attis found in sources from the Greek and Roman Periods, they interpret the figure as the goddess’s lover in Greek mythology, Attis. However, no epigraphic or archeologic proof of the connection between the Phrygian -ata and the God Attis has yet been found. 

One of the figures accompanying the goddess is thought to be the Phrygian King Midas, a part of the cult of Cybele. The foundation of this idea is the monumental-sized Midas Monument found in Yazılıkaya/Midas which features the name “Midai” together with the words lavagetas, -vanaks, thusly interpreted as an offering to Midas. The inclusion of the name “Midai” on the monument, is believed to allude to the fact that this person played a role like Attis in the goddess’s cult.

The epigraphic research carried out in the Phrygian Region shows that many local gods and cults came about after the Hellenization of Anatolia’s very old, local cults in addition to the fact that although the names of Greek gods are frequently used in inscriptions, the epithets seen alongside these names usually allude to local gods. In addition, epigraphic and iconographic materials in the region show many offerings with different epithets to Zeus during the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. The people in the rural areas of northwestern Phrygia in particular, presented many offerings to the god of weather and fertility, Zeus, but with different ancillary names. In Ancient Greek sources, we see that the epithet “Papas (Παπας), (Παπιας)” was used for Zeus in Bithynia and Papas or Zeus Papas was featured in the Greek inscriptions in Phrygian Highlands. Meaning “Father Zeus”, this epithet is known to have also been used for Attis. In addition, the word “Baba” appears in a few Old Phrygian inscriptions and the meaning of this word, just like the way “Matar” was used to mean “mother”, is noted as meaning ‘father’. Another word found on these inscriptions is -ata. While the word “ata” is an Anatolian or Hittite term and the word -atta denoted Father or Father God, Brixhe and Drew Bear suggest that it is related to the Papas referred to in epigraphic and literary sources and that it is the name of a god. Therefore, they indicate that the superior Phrygian male god -ata, is “Father”. After the Hellenization of the Phrygian Region, -ata generally became synchronized with Zeus, but in some regions, the Greek word “Papas (father)” was used. Such a large amount of documentation of Zeus can be explained by the presence of a belief in a strong, patriarchal father god of the land whose roots date back to very early periods in Phrygia. Lastly, based on epigraphic data and analyses of that data, it should not be incorrect to think that the double idols seen under the steps of altars or on steles represent the goddess and her paredros, or the Father God that accompanies her.  


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Akçay, Atakan. “Ovaören-Yassıhöyük’den Bir Yarı İkonik İdol.” Arkeoloji ve Sanat 149 (2015): 47-54. google scholar
  • Akurgal, Ekrem. Phrygische Kunst. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi, 1955. google scholar
  • Akurgal, Ekrem. Die Kunst Anatoliens von Homer bis Alexander. Berlin: Gruyter, 1961. google scholar
  • Akyürek Şahin, Nalan Eda. Yazıdere (Seyitgazi) Zeus Kutsal Alanı ve Adak Yazıtları. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  • Barnett, Richard David. “Phrygia and The Peoples of Anatolia in The Iron Age.” The Cambridge Ancient History II (1967): 1-32. google scholar
  • Berndt Ersöz, Susanne. “In Search of a Phrygian Male Superior God.” Offizielle Religion, Lokale Kulte und Individuelle Religiositat: Akten des Religionsgeschichtlichen Symposiums “Kleinasien und Angrenzende Gebiete vom Beginn des 2. bis zur Mitte des 1. Jahrtausends v. Chr.” (Bonn, 20- 22. Februar 2003, Alter Orient und Altes Testament 318). Ed. Manfred Hutter ve Sylvia Hutter Braunsar. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2004, 47-56. google scholar
  • Berndt Ersöz, Susanne. Phrygian Rock-Cut Shrines. Structure, Function, and Cult Practise. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006. google scholar
  • Bittel, Kurt. Kleinasiatische Studien, Istanbuler Mitteilungen, Heft 5, İstanbul: Deutsches Archaologisches Institut, 1942. google scholar
  • Bittel, Kurt. “Untersuchungen auf Büyükkale.” Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient Gesellschaft 91 (1958): 57-72. google scholar
  • Bittel, Kurt. “Phrygisches Kultbild aus Bogazköy.” Antike Plastik II (1963): 7-21. google scholar
  • Bittel, Kurt. Hattusha. The Captal of Hittites. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970. google scholar
  • Boehmer, Rainer Michael. Die Kleinfunde von Boğazköy: Aus den Grabungskampagnen, 19311939 und 1952-1969, Wissenscaftliche Veröffentlichung der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 87, Boğazköy-Hattusa 7. Berlin: Mann, 1972. google scholar
  • Bossert, Theodor Helmuth. Altanatolien: Kunst undHandwerk in Kleinasien von den Anfangen Bis Zum Völligen Aufgehen In Der Griechischen Kultur. Berlin: E. Wesmuth, 1942. google scholar
  • B0gh, Birgitte. “The Phrygian Background of Kybele.” Numen 54/3 (2007): 304-339. google scholar
  • Brixhe Claude ve Thomas Drew Bear. “Trois Nouvelles Inscriptions Paleo-phrygiennes de Cepni.” Kadmos 21 (1982): 64-87. google scholar
  • Brixhe, Claude ve Michel Lejeune. Corpus des Inscriptions Paleo-phrygiennes. 2 vols. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, 1984. google scholar
  • Brixhe Claude ve Taciser Sivas. “Dedicace Paleo-Phrygienne Inedite (Menekşekaya/Demirli),” Kadmos 41 (2003): 103-116. google scholar
  • Buluç, Sevim. “The Architectural Use of the Animal and Kybele Reliefs Found in Ankara and Its Vicinity.” Source: Notes in the History of Art vol.7, 3/4 (1988): 16-23. google scholar
  • DeVries, Keith. “The Gordion Excavation Seasons of 1969-1973 and Subsequent Research.” American Journal of Aarchaeology 94 (1990): 371-406. google scholar
  • Diakonoff Igor M. ve Neroznak, Vladimir Petrovich. Phrygian. New York: Caravan Books, 1985. google scholar
  • Drew Bear, Thomas ve Christian Naour. “Divinites de Phrygie.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 18/3 (1990): 1907-2044. google scholar
  • Drews, Robert. “Myths of Midas and the Phrygian Migration from Europe.” Klio 75 (1993): 9-26. google scholar
  • Erdan, Emre. Frig Kültürü ve Uygarlığı. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2018. google scholar
  • Erdan, Emre. “Frig Tipi Fibulalarda Tanrıça Sembolizmi Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler.” Art-Sanat 11 (Ocak 2019): 163-185. google scholar
  • Genz, Hermann. “Thoughts on the Origin of the Iron Age Pottery Traditions in Central Anatolia.” Ed. Altan Çilingiroğlu ve Gareth Darbyshire. Anatolian Iron Ages 5, Proceedings of the Fifth Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium Held at Van, 6-10 August 2001. Ankara: British Institute at Ankara, 2005, 75-84. google scholar
  • Gündoğan Aydıngün, Şengül. “Yerleşik Hayat Öncesi: Yaratan Beden.” Tunç Çağı’nın Gizemli Kadınları. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2005, 11-28. google scholar
  • Haspels, Caroline Henriette Emilie. Phrygie, Exploration Archeologique III, La Cite de Midas, Ceramique et Trouvailles Diverses. Paris: E. De Boccard, 1951. google scholar
  • Haspels, Caroline Henriette Emilie. The Highlands of Phrygia. Sites and Monuments. 2 vols. Princeton: The University Press, 1971. google scholar
  • Herodotos. Herodot Tarihi. Çev. Müntekim Ökmen. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1991. google scholar
  • Işık, Fahri. Doğa Ana Kubaba: Tanrıçaların Ege’de Buluşması. İstanbul: Suna-İnan Kıraç Akdeniz Medeniyetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü, 1999. google scholar
  • Işık, Fahri. Uygarlık Anadolu’da Doğdu. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2012. google scholar
  • “Idolon”. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Ed. G. M. Lee. Oxford: the Clarendon Press, 1968, 820. google scholar
  • Liddell, Henry George ve Robert Scott. “Eidolon”. A Greek-English Lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996, 483. google scholar
  • Mellink, Machteld J. “Temples and High Places in Phrygia.” Tempels and High places in Biblical Times. Proceedings of the Colloquium in Honor of the Centennial of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Jerusalem, 14-16 March, 1977. Ed. Avraham Brian. Jerusalem: Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, 1981, 96-104. google scholar
  • Mellink, Machteld J. “Midas-Stadt.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 8 (1993): 153-156. google scholar
  • Metin, Mustafa ve Mehmet Akalın. “Frigya’da Bulunan İkiz İdol.” Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi 2000 Yıllığı 15. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi, 2001, 183-193. google scholar
  • Mitchell, Stephen. Anatolia: Land, Men and Gods in Asia Minor. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. google scholar
  • Naumann, Friederike. Die Ikonographie der Kybele in der Phrygischen und der Griechischen Kunst. Istanbuler Mitteilungen, Suppl. 28. Tübingen: Ernst Wasmuth 1983. google scholar
  • Neve, Peter. “Bericht Über Die Ausgrabungen Der Deutschen Boğazköy Expedition Im Jahre 1969.” Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 18/2 (1970): 151-167. google scholar
  • Olshausen, Eckart. “Phryges, Phrygia.” Der Neue Pauly. Enzyklopadie der Antike, Band IX. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler, 1996, 965-967. google scholar
  • Plinius. Naturalis Historia, Vol. 5. Çev. H. Rackham. (The Loeb Classical Library) London: New York, 1947. google scholar
  • Polat, Yusuf. “Yazılıkaya/Midas Vadisi Araştırmalarında Bulunan Bir Kaya İdolü.” Colloquium Anatolicum 18 (2019): 139-154. google scholar
  • Prayon, Friedhelm. Phrygische Plastik: die Früheisenzeitlische Bildkunst Zentral-Anatoliens und ihre Beizehungen zu Griechenland und zum Alten Orient. Tübingen: E. Wesmut, 1987. google scholar
  • Ramsay, William Mitchell. “A Study of Phrygian Art II.” Journal of Hellenistic Studies X (1889): 147-189. google scholar
  • Renfrew, Collin ve Paul Bahn. Arkeoloji; Kuramlar, Yöntemler ve Uygulama. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi, 2017. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. “The Legend of Midas.” Californian Studies in Classical Antiquity 14/1 (1983): 299-313. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. “Attis on Greek Votive Monuments: Greek God or Phrygian?” Hesperia 63/2 (1994): 245-262. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. In Search of God the Mother. The Cult of Anatolian Cybele. London: Berkeley Los Angeles, 1999. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. The Incised Drawings from Early Phrygian Gordion, Gordion Special Studies 4, Museum Monograph 130. Philedelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2009. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. “Frig Dini ve Kült Uygulamaları”, Frigler, Midas’ın Ülkesinde, Anıtların Gölgesinde. Ed. Taciser Tüfekçi Sivas ve Hakan Sivas. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2012, 202-231. google scholar
  • Roller, Lynn E. “Frig Dini ve Kült Uygulamaları”, Friglerin Gizemli Uygarlığı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2007, 141-147. google scholar
  • Simpson, Elizabeth ve Spirydowicz Krysia. Gordion Wooden Furniture (Gordion Ahşap Eserler): The Study, Conservation and Restruction of the Furniture and Wooden Objects from Gordion, 1981-1998. Ankara: Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesini Koruma ve Yaşatma Derneği: 1999. google scholar
  • Simpson, Elizabeth. “Gordion Mobilya ve Ahşap Eserleri”. Frigler, Midas’ın Ülkesinde, Anıtların Gölgesinde. Ed. Taciser Tüfekçi Sivas ve Hakan Sivas. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2012: 334-356. google scholar
  • Sivas, Taciser. “Eskişehir-Kütahya-Afyonkarahisar İlleri 2001 Yılı Yüzey Araştırması.” Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 20/2 (2003): 285-298. google scholar
  • Soykal Alanyalı, Feriştah. “Ana Tanrıça Kültünde Çobanlar ve Çoban Tanrılar.” Çoban Kitabı. Ed. Emine Gürsoy Naskali. İstanbul: Kitabevi Yayınları, 2011, 145-158. google scholar
  • Strabon. Coğrafya Anadolu: Kitap: XII-XIII-XIV. Çev. Adnan Pekman. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1987. google scholar
  • Summers, Geoffrey ve Françoise Summers. “Kerkenes Dağı Projesi 2003.” Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 26/1 (2005): 97-110. google scholar
  • Summers, Geoffrey D. ve Françoise Summers. “Kerkenes 2009.” Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 32/1 (2011): 381-402. google scholar
  • Summers, Geoffrey D. ve Françoise Summers. “Kerkenes Dağ.” Frigler, Midas’ın Ülkesinde, Anıtların Gölgesinde. Ed. Taciser Tüfekçi Sivas ve Hakan Sivas. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2012, 162-183. google scholar
  • Summers, Geoffrey D. “Phrygians East of the Red River: Phrygianisation, Migration and Desertion.” Anatolian Studies 68, (2018): 99-118. google scholar
  • Şahin, Nuran. Zeus’un Anadolu Kültleri. İstanbul: Pera Müzesi Yayınları, 2001. google scholar
  • Tamsü, Rahşan. “Observations On The Phrygian Rock-Cut Altars.” SOMA 2005 Proceedings of the IX Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Chieti (Italy), 24-26 February 2005, Bar International Series, Vol. 1739 (2008): 439-445. google scholar
  • Tamsü Polat, Rahşan. “Yeni Buluntular Işığında Phryg Kaya Altarları ve Bir Tipoloji Önerisi.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 10/1 (2010): 203-222. google scholar
  • Tamsü Polat, Rahşan, Yusuf Polat ve Alexander Lubotsky. “An Idol-shaped Stele with an Old Phrygian Inscription in the Territory of Nakoleia.” Gephyra 19 (2020): 45-67. google scholar
  • Tüfekçi Sivas, Taciser. Eskişehir-Afyonkarahisar-Kütahya İl Sınırları İçindeki Phryg Kaya Anıtları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Tüfekçi Sivas, Taciser ve Hakan Sivas, “Eskişehir-Kütahya-Afyon İlleri Yüzey Araştırması Arkeolojik Envanter Raporu.” Tüba-Kültür Envanteri Dergisi 1 (2003): 2-32. google scholar
  • Umurtak, Gülsün. “İdol.” Eczacıbaşı Sanat Ansiklopedisi 2. İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, 1997, 834. google scholar
  • Vassileva, Maya. “PAREDROI or Once Again on the Phrygian Rock Thrones.” Thracia 11, (1995): 265-276. google scholar
  • Vassileva, Maya. “Phrygian Rock-Cut Thrones, Idols And Phrygian Royal Symbolism.” Thracia 18 (2009): 111-124. google scholar
  • Vikela, Evgenia. “Bemerkungen zu Ikonographie und Bildtypologie der Meter-Kybelereliefs.” Mitteilungen des Deutschen ArchaologischenInstituts. AthenischeAbteilung 116 (2001): 67-123. google scholar
  • Von der Osten, Hans Henning. Explorations in Central Anatolia, Season of 1926. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1929. google scholar
  • Young, Rodney S. “Gordion-1950.” University Museum Bulletin 16/1 (1951): 2-19. google scholar
  • Young, Rodney S. “Doodling at Gordion.” Archeology 22 (1968): 270-275. google scholar
  • Young, Rodney S. The Gordion Excavations, Final Reports. Vol. I, Three Great Early Tumuli. Philedelphia: Penn Press, 1981. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Tamsü Polat, R. (2022). İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz. Art-Sanat, 0(17), 451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


AMA

Tamsü Polat R. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz. Art-Sanat. 2022;0(17):451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


ABNT

Tamsü Polat, R. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 17, p. 451-473, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Tamsü Polat, Rahşan,. 2022. “İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 17: 451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


Chicago: Humanities Style

Tamsü Polat, Rahşan,. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 17 (Sep. 2024): 451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


Harvard: Australian Style

Tamsü Polat, R 2022, 'İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 17, pp. 451-473, viewed 11 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Tamsü Polat, R. (2022) ‘İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz’, Art-Sanat, 0(17), pp. 451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968 (11 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Tamsü Polat, Rahşan,. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 17, 2022, pp. 451-473. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


Vancouver

Tamsü Polat R. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 11 Sep. 2024 [cited 11 Sep. 2024];0(17):451-473. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968


ISNAD

Tamsü Polat, Rahşan. İdollerin Frig Kültüründeki Kimliğine Dair Bir Analiz”. Art-Sanat 0/17 (Sep. 2024): 451-473. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2022.17.930968



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim01.05.2021
Kabul24.01.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma27.01.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.